Across Canada, in fact, holding children back has become 
				increasingly rare. Instead, children who do not meet minimum 
				grade standards usually move ahead with their peers — a practice 
				known as social promotion — while also receiving remedial help.
				"Failing students really sends some very damning and negative 
				messages, which impacts on their entire lives," said Lori Tighe, 
				director of assessment and instructional support services at the 
				Winnipeg School Division.
				Indeed, studies suggest that flunking youngsters carries 
				long-term consequences: It damages their self-esteem, doesn't 
				improve their marks and increases drop-out rates. A 2001 study 
				of U.S. sixth graders found they viewed failing a grade as the 
				most stressful life event, ahead of losing a parent or going 
				blind.
				"This is, for some people, a counterintuitive body of 
				evidence," said Ken Leithwood, a professor at the Ontario 
				Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto. 
				"But for the most part holding kids back, especially in the 
				elementary grades, seems to have only negative effects on their 
				subsequent learning."
				As a result, social promotion has largely become the norm for 
				struggling elementary and middle-school pupils. Children who are 
				moved ahead a grade without adequately grasping the curriculum 
				are often given a range of extra support, including tailored 
				instruction from their teachers.
				However, few boards track retention levels among younger 
				pupils. At the Toronto District School Board, "very, very few" 
				pupils repeat grades, said Tracy Hayhurst, central co-ordinating 
				principal for elementary curriculum.
				In Edmonton, Ms. Mulgrew estimated that less than 60 out of 
				6,000 Grade 1 pupils — under 1 per cent — were retained in 
				2005-06. "And often that is at the insistence of parents because 
				when push comes to shove, a parent can actually insist that a 
				child repeat."
				Just this week, Mary Michailides, the principal of Glenora 
				School in Edmonton, met with the parents of a Grade 2 pupil, who 
				were adamant that she be held back because of her difficulties 
				with language arts and math. But after Ms. Michailides told them 
				about the current thinking on grade retention, they agreed the 
				girl should move ahead.
				"Keeping them back won't make a huge difference academically, 
				but it will make a negative difference socially, emotionally," 
				she said.
				In Halifax, the number of grade repeaters is even lower. Just 
				71 out of 39,583 children enrolled in primary to Grade 9 were 
				retained in the last school year. Many of those missed big 
				chunks of time due to illness or travel or, in the later grades, 
				truancy.
				"If the students are struggling, they're probably going to 
				struggle whether they're repeating or whether they're moving 
				ahead and the key is making sure that those interventions are in 
				place," said Geoff Cainen, director of program for the Halifax 
				Regional School Board.
				(Because high-school students are required to obtain a set 
				number of credits, failing a course usually means repeating the 
				class or picking up another credit elsewhere.)
				But among teachers, there is dissent about the merits of 
				social promotion, with some seeing the practice as ineffective 
				in addressing gaps in learning.
				"I've always felt that you're not really doing a child a 
				service if you're putting him through," said Patrick Mascoe, a 
				Grade 6 teacher in Ottawa who himself failed Grade 1 after 
				frequent absences due to asthma.
				"If our goal as teachers is to make sure that kids develop 
				self-discipline and are always trying to achieve to do their 
				best, I think it just has an adverse effect on them because it 
				teaches them that, 'You know what? I can get by without doing my 
				best.'"
				About this time last year, Mr. Mascoe recommended retention 
				for two of his pupils, one of whom missed about half the year in 
				addition to regular absenteeism in the previous grade. Instead, 
				both children were placed in Grade 7.
				In the end, however, neither social promotion nor retention 
				is the whole solution, said Penny Milton, CEO of the non-profit 
				Canadian Education Association.
				Instead, she said, the best strategy is early, intensive 
				intervention for struggling children and greater emphasis on 
				literacy.
				In Ontario, she noted just 84 per cent of Grade 10 students 
				passed a recent province wide literacy test.
				"On its own, [social promotion is] not much of an answer, 
				although it's probably less damaging to kids than grade 
				retention," she said. "Both approaches aren't helpful, or at 
				least they're not solutions to the problem."