Prosecutor in Duke lacrosse rape case disbarred

Associated Press

RALEIGH, N.C. — District Attorney Mike Nifong will be disbarred for his disastrous prosecution of three Duke University lacrosse players falsely accused of rape, a disciplinary committee decided Saturday. Even the veteran prosecutor said the punishment was appropriate.

“This matter has been a fiasco. There's no doubt about it,” said committee chairman F. Lane Williamson.

Mr. Nifong sat motionless, one hand resting over his mouth, as Mr. Williamson recounted how he engaged in dishonest and deceitful conduct. He said Mr. Nifong's early comments about the case — which included a confident proclamation that he wouldn't allow Durham to become known for “a bunch of lacrosse players from Duke raping a black girl” — were purposefully designed to boost his campaign for district attorney.

“At the time he was facing a primary, and yes, he was politically naive,” Mr. Williamson said. “But we can draw no other conclusion that those initial statements he made were to further his political ambitions.”

Mr. Nifong will not appeal the punishment, his lawyer said.

“He hopes this helps restore some of the confidence in the criminal justice system of North Carolina,” said attorney David Freedman.

“On one hand, it's very devastating. On the other hand, he's been going through this process for a long time, so you always have some semblance of relief when the process is over with regardless of the outcome.”

The North Carolina State Bar charged mr. Nifong with breaking several rules of professional conduct, including lying to both the court and bar investigators and withholding critical DNA test results from the players' defence attorneys.

The committee, after deliberating for a little more than an hour on Saturday, unanimously agreed with the bar on almost every charge — including the most serious allegations — that Mr. Nifong's actions involved “dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation.”

State Bar prosecutor Douglas Brocker told the committee that as Mr. Nifong investigated the allegations that a stripper was raped and beaten at a March 2006 party thrown by Duke's lacrosse team, he charged “forward toward condemnation and injustice,” weaving a “web of deception that has continued up through this hearing.”

“Mr. Nifong did not act as a minister of justice, but as a minister of injustice,” Mr. Brocker said.

The verdicts and the punishment did not appear to surprise Mr. Nifong, who acknowledged during sometimes tearful testimony Friday that he would likely be punished for getting “carried away a little bit” when talking about the case.

During Saturday's closing arguments, Mr. Williamson repeatedly interrupted Mr. Nifong's attorney, Dudley Witt, as he discussed the DNA testing.

Mr. Williamson questioned why it took several months for the defence to get DNA test results that found genetic material from several men in the accuser's underwear and body, but none from any lacrosse player.

“It wasn't just one little oversight,” Mr. Williamson said later. “This was conduct over an extended period in a very high-profile case.”

Aware of those test results, Mr. Nifong pressed ahead with the case anyway and won indictments against Dave Evans, Reade Seligmann and Collin Finnerty. Seligmann is from Essex Fells, N.J.

North Carolina prosecutors later concluded the three players were “innocent” victims of a rogue prosecutor's “tragic rush to accuse.”

Mr. Nifong made “multiple, egregious mistakes” as he pursued the charges, but not intentionally, his attorney said in closing statements.

“It didn't click,” Mr. Witt said as he tried to explain one of his client's errors. “His mind is just his mind. That's the way it works. It just didn't click.”

Mr. Nifong told the panel hearing the case Friday that he would resign from his post as Durham County district attorney over his handling of the rape charges.

The players' attorneys have pledged to seek criminal contempt charges next week in Durham.


Letter to the Globe and Mail

Male Apartheid is plaguing Canada as well as most western countries. Prosecutors salivate over any prosecution that bows to feminist doctrines. Take for example the Crown Attorneys in Timmins Ontario. Back in 1998 they repeatedly arrested one father in a custody battle simple because he had a letter published in two local papers describing how two local agencies obstructed justice who put the one father through 8 criminal charges, basically the same charge redressed. When he described the judge involved as “an insult to justice” they had him again arrested, thrown in jail on a 5 charges of criminal defamation, 2 of those charges were for supposedly defaming the Children’s Aid Society and the Canadian Mental Health Association. Another of those charges was for defaming the mother’s solicitor for stating that the solicitor made false statements in written submissions alleging that the father admitted making a false statement under oath. A fact that never occurred. The Timmins Crown Attorneys ignored multiple obvious documented offences against the father and each time, has the father arrested and thrown in jail where the prisoners were told that the father was a pedophile. Every day across Canada, prosecutors vilify the administration of Canadian justice by acting as feminist foot soldiers doing indirectly what they know is illegal directly all to earn feminist brownie points that will help their career. It makes you wonder why kind of personality disorder these creeps have they lets them sleep at night while committing heinous crimes obstruction of justice often with the obvious goal of intimidation and destruction to prevent a law suit for malicious prosecution. Often the damage comes later. Prosecutors often wink to the local police to have ongoing never ending harassment designed for keep such victims from developing the ability or the necessary financial stability needed to file claims for malicious prosecutions.


More comments