Tuesday, March 30, 2010 1:39 PM
Liberals are pouncing on media reports detailing the latest public rebuke of the Harper government’s seemingly ham-fisted handling of foreign affairs. Expect this to be part of the Liberal line-up on Question Period today.
Adding to the pile-on was the weekend speech by former star diplomat Robert Fowler at the Liberal thinkers’ conference. In his speech Mr. Fowler took on the government for pandering to various ethnic groups to win votes. (He was also harsh on the Liberals, however.)
The opposition focus today is on the slap down by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over the Conservative government’s failure to invite other Nordic nations to yesterday’s Arctic summit.
The harsh criticism by Mrs. Clinton garnered headlines not only in Canada but in foreign newspapers.
In fact, the Liberals dug up an Associated Press report about the incident appeared in the Stockholm media: “Two Nordic nations have criticized Canada for not inviting them to a meeting of Arctic countries, saying the gathering could undermine the work of the broader Arctic Council,” the report says.
Says a senior Ignatieff official: “So the Conservatives have managed to be slapped publicly by the Chinese and Americans.”
The Chinese incident occurred when Mr. Harper traveled to Beijing last December and was publicly admonished by the Premier Wen Jiabao for taking so long to visit. A Canadian leader had not been to China for five years.
“Who will be next?” the Liberal official scoffed. “Who can they upset at the G8? Or will it be the G20, where there are more people to ignore or insult?”
In his weekend speech, Mr. Fowler, who was kidnapped by an al-Qaeda offshoot in 2008, cautioned the crowd that he was not going to mince his words. He lived up to the claim, criticizing the Harper government for removing the focus from Africa to the relatively more prosperous Latin America.
Not surprisingly, the Harper government took issue with Mr. Fowler’s criticism of its aid priorities and his characterization of them as merely courting of ethnic votes.
Immigration Minster Jason Kenney, who has spent much of his political career successfully wooing new Canadians, said he “respectfully disagrees” with Mr. Fowler’s view.
“I would say he's asked us to take a ‘balanced' approach in the Middle East but a principled approach in Africa,” Mr. Kenney told reporters on Monday. “I think we should have a principled approach everywhere. And a principled approach means supporting democracy and opposing terrorism.”
(Editorial cartoon by Anthony Jenkins/The Globe and Mail)
Commentary by the Ottawa Mens Centre
Mr. Harper does a hell of job "slapping himself down" and
"shooting himself in the foot"
He is also one of the world's foremost control freaks who is extremely determined to stay in power by doing indirectly what is improper or even illegal directly.
That means, flagrantly failing to comply with the spirit and intent of court orders or judgments.
Harper is also an utter Ace when it comes to controlling the media, and has enough power and influence to get favourable press when he presses that magic red button.
I'm not a fan Michael Ignatieff either. He appears to be the Reserve Puppet Prime Minister, the second American "Our man in Canada" to replace the republican's "Our man in Canada" should Mr. Harper just follow Republican doctrine a little too closely.
Right now, its "not extending Canadian troops in Afghanistan" but we all know, that at the very last minute, Mr. Harper will pull a rabbit out of the hat and attempt to get the best possible deal for the United States short of him getting booted out of parliament.
Mr. Harper has obviously recognized the writing on the wall regarding Afghanistan and knows that a Vietnam type backlash in winding up the spring.
Right now, we have an "Information Blackout" coming from Parliament Hill. Its so very strictly controlled that it shows just how much Mr. Harper is starting to live in his own delusional world.
Mr. Harper has not shown one iota of interest in dealing with Canada's primary problems, such as a declining birth rate and the fact that Canadian children do not have a legal right to equal parenting by both parents after separation.
Perhaps he should stroll over to 161 Elin Street and watch the underbelly of Ottawa's family court judiciary flagrantly abuse their power , striking pleadings, vexatious litigant orders, restraining orders, orders for support based on income for which there was no evidence etc.