Ottawa — From Wednesday's Globe and Mail Published on Tuesday, Apr. 06, 2010 10:32PM EDT Last updated on Wednesday, Apr. 07, 2010 9:08AM EDT
Acting on a request from federal government lawyers, the Military Police Complaints Commission barred the public from hearings until Thursday and hung a curtain, or veil, across the doors so that nobody could even glimpse the proceedings inside.
Late Tuesday, the commission promised it would release uncensored transcripts of the hearings as soon as they become available. But the move by the federal Department of Justice to limit public access to the inquiry is part of a pattern of behaviour by Ottawa, which has repeatedly tried to constrain this probe.
The arms-length Military Police Complaints Commission is investigating why Canada continued transferring suspects rounded up by its soldiers to torture-prone Afghan jails even after Ottawa received multiple complaints of abuse.
Over the past two years it has run into a string of roadblocks that Harper government lawyers have set up to delay and severely limit the scope of the probe. Tuesday was the first day of hearings to feature witnesses who have served in the war in Afghanistan.
Two hours before Sergeant Carol Utton, a military police officer, was due to testify Tuesday , Department of Justice lawyers requested the public be cleared from the hearing room. The government then cited the National Defence Act in asking that the hearings be conducted in private for two days: April 6 and April 7.
Elizabeth Richards, a government lawyer, would say only there was something worth keeping secret.
“The justification is it’s sensitive. I can tell you there’s a security concern that’s been raised,” Ms. Richards told The Globe and Mail.
Ron Lunau, lead lawyer for the commission, refused to say exactly why he and commissioners agreed to exclude the public. He said the reasons are confidential and that the commission would issue a written rationale for its decision.
“We’re not blind to the fact this is a public hearing.”
Sgt. Utton, the first witness to testify Tuesday, has previously told commission investigators about the suffering one detainee experienced at Canada’s holding facility in Kandahar. The man was stuck there after Ottawa halted holdovers to the Afghans in early 2007 after a legal bid by human-rights groups to end the practice of transfers.
“It was the most terrible experience to watch this man,” Sgt. Utton told investigators in 2008.
The detainee, who had health problems, was forced to remain in the facility – not built for stays of more than 96 hours – even as temperatures in confinement soared to intolerable levels. “The facility just was not made to hold somebody that long,” Sgt. Utton said in 2008.
The detainee’s screaming and crying – “Who’s feeding my kids? Who’s looking after my wife?” – prompted nearby soldiers to ask the Canadians if they were keeping a dog in there.
“He would scream and yell and climb the cage,” Sgt. Utton recounted at the time. “At one point we had to go in and take the plastic knife from him.”
Paul Champ, a lawyer acting for Amnesty International and the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, said he didn’t formally oppose the move to exclude the public in part because he didn’t want to push back hearings by another one to two days to fight it.
Mr. Champ said the fact the Justice Department agreed to release uncensored transcripts of the testimony was critical to his decision not to oppose the exclusive hearings.
“It was highly unusual but these are not key witnesses.”
However, Mr. Champ said he is concerned Ottawa may try again to seek similar exclusions on future hearing dates and vowed to oppose efforts to bar the public from hearing the testimony of major witnesses.
NDP foreign affairs critic Paul Dewar called the closed-door hearings “farcical” and questioned why Ottawa waited until the last minute to argue there was a security threat.
Liberal defence critic Ujjal Dosanjh said the Harper government’s record of interference in this inquiry suggests it’s trying to hide details from Canadians.
Commentary by the Ottawa Mens Centre
Mr. Harper and other recent Canadian Governments, have played upon the fact
that the average Canadian will not notice the corrosion of fundamental
principles of justice and the Rule of Law.
Our "Public Courts" are anything but public.
The underbelly of the judiciary regularly remove anyone from the court room they don't like.
In Ontario, back in 1989, Justice Howland ruled that self reps and journalists did not require the courts permission to make tape-recordings.
Ontario Judges later threw that out and DEMAND PRIOR permission, which of course NO ONE is prepared to ask for because its an unwritten fact, most judges don't want anyone having an audio recording.
Judges routinely say things in court that is later ignored in their decisions, One ruling can be made orally and the decision, its reasons, have an entirely different story and effect.
That's a matter of judicial discretion, they can do that, so what, but, the only reason the Judiciary have to prevent recordings is to maintain a cloak of secrecy.
Transcripts, are expensive, they are riddled with errors, transcribers know what a judges views are and they regularly change transcripts to cause extreme prejudice to one party.
It only takes an omission of a no, a change in a comma, a mispronunciation, a la deliberate spelling error can all suddenly change the a transcript.
Then there are the omitted pauses, an entire line of transcript may have had a significant pause that a recording would show and raise red flags but the transcripts may show nothing.
Placing a curtain across the doors is just adding insults to the already very insulting approach Mr. Harper has taken to remove all legal rights and to engage in typical Court Room tactics of "failure to disclose".
When it comes to the Legal Rights of Canadians, and the rights and abuses of prisoners, in Canada and Afghanistan, Mr. Harper behaves like a dictator and tells Canadians what we can see and hear.