Robyn Urback: No, the ‘gay-activist’ Premier is not trying to corrupt your children




On Monday, the Ontario government released the details of its new sex ed curriculum, catapulting the province’s fretful moralists into the soft velour of their fainting chaises. “MpffffSEXphhhKIDS,” they wail into crimson pillows, with the curriculum ripped in tatters and spewed across the bearskin rug. “[Unintelligible] ANAL IN KINDERGARDEN [unintelligible] WHY, KATHLEEN?”

Organizations have mobilized. The Campaign Life Coalition, which previously identified Kathleen Wynne as a “gay-activist” turned Premier — one who wants to get tweens “thinking about anal intercourse” — has launched a rally at Queen’s Park for Tuesday to protest the new curriculum. The Institute for Canadian Values was ahead of the game, releasing a statement last month abhorring Wynne’s supposed plan to “start teaching grade one children how to give sexual consent.” The REAL Women of Canada also got out early with a release, and they were aghast at a program that “conveys the message that promiscuous sex is expected of children.”


What’s next, Ms. Premier? Hmm? Drinking? Instructions on how to roll marijuana cigarettes? Talks about couples pooping on each other during intercourse? Is that want you want to talk about Ms. Wynne? Pooping?

It’s enough to make anyone reach for the smelling salts, but let’s do some filtering, shall we? Yes, the Premier is a lesbian. No, the Premier is not trying to create a province of little minion gays and lesbians. Awareness of a phenomenon does not necessarily endear one to a phenomenon; children will not decide to adopt a “homosexual lifestyle” for the duration of their adult lives because they learned in Grade 3 that some families have two daddies.

Yes, the new curriculum will include references to anal and oral sex. No, that will not happen in Grade One, and no, the Premier is not trying to create a province of little minion gays and lesbians (see above). The curriculum also does not encourage students to engage in anal or oral sex. It merely acknowledges the fact that some kids do, or will, and offers guidelines for teaching them how to do it safely. These lessons will begin in Grade 7, by which time, I guarantee, most kids are at least aware of anal or oral sex. And for the few that aren’t, I reiterate: Just because they hear about it doesn’t mean they’ll want to do it. Most students will giggle, draw a sketch of their teacher holding a balloon condom, and move on.


Ontario has been in desperate need of a new curriculum for more than a decade. Last updated in 1998, the existing program predates Facebook, the iPhone, Tinder, Instagram — basically, all modern forms of communication through which kids sometimes find themselves in trouble. It also predates the HPV vaccination program for Grade 8 girls in Ontario, as well as the ubiquity of relatively new forms of birth control such as the contraceptive ring, which prevents against pregnancy but not sexually transmitted infections.


While an update was clearly needed, there were some people who were going to be opposed to the government’s new curriculum regardless of the specific details unveiled on Monday. Those people usually contend that sex education should be the responsibility of the parents exclusively, and that the school should basically butt out when it comes to sex.

There are two major problems with this position. One: parents, generally speaking, have no idea what their kids are up to. They might skip the anal sex lesson, for example, believing that those sorts of deviant activities are only done by other children. The other issue is one of scope; parents can cover the birds and bees just fine, but do they know — and can they convey — the legal issues that might come into play when kids make and share intimate images? What do they know of child pornography charges? What about consent? Legally speaking, an individual cannot consent to sex if he or she is intoxicated. How many parents know that? And will they tell their kids? After all their kids don’t really drink alcohol, anyway.

The Liberals have said they are not backing down from their curriculum, as they did in 2010. That leaves hesitant parents with two options: they can either shrink into a dystopian reality — plush with velour and sober, abstinent children — where the lesbian premier is trying to encourage their six-year-olds to stick things in each other’s bums, or they can recognize the reality of modern sexual interactions among youth and temper lessons learned at school with conversations in the home. I can already hear the response: “MfffpmmSEXNO.”

National Post

Robyn Urback •





Commentary by the Ottawa Mens Centre


Premier Kathleen Wynne projects an image of fear and intimidation. She is unapproachable unless you are part of her cult, a culture that treats anyone who is NOT gay or lesbian as sub human.

Ontario Now places children with Mothers, 99% of the time. The extreme feminists of Ontario obtain those incredible statistics by appointing judges who they know or believe will, promote "their values" and send them to "reeducation camps" to ensure that Judges "think correctly" with respect to gender.

Over the last 30 years, its has resulted in Most Judges in Family Law or Child Protection being "former" CAS lawyers. It is this particular breed of Superior Court Judge who personally fabricates evidence, and how gives CAS what ever they ask for, even exparte, even without notice the most draconian and improper orders.

Ontario has the distinction of having around a handful of men each year, who get some spousal support from a woman. While hundreds of thousands of women who should be paying spousal support to me, in fact get spousal support from those men in the form of what is called "Child Support" that is primarily a weapon the Liberals use to treat men like indentured slaves not entitled to be parents.

Ontario is a dangerous place for fathers to reside and Ottawa in particular is the wrong place to be  a male victim of domestic violence.



This is the kind of "Liberalism" that undeservedly gives true "Liberals" a bad name. The Ontario Liberals are unfortunately, a cess tank of corrupt ideas breeding with each other while using Tax dollars to fund fas.cist programs that promote a "cult" of hatred towards those who don't happen to be gay or lesbian or work for the self-serving unaccountable unsustainable Government private corporations.

It's that "private" word that needs understanding. In Ontario, the Corrupt Liberals have their "own language" and if you don't understand it , it means you are not part of it and if you are not part of it then you can't be with them but against them etc.

Ontario Funds Fas.cist ideas of Gender Superiority though Billions of dollars in funding for the 54 unaccountable Children's Aid Societies, and Billions of dollars on policing forces "Gender Police", the Domestic Violence units whose role is to promote violence by women towards men.

It's reached epidemic proportions of clogged criminal and family courts where court time means big bucks for Liberal Supporters, such as, Child Protection workers, Police officers making $50 for every hour sitting waiting for court.

It gives the CAS golden opportunities to "scoop" the kids or engage in out right "baby snatching" rewarding their liberal supporters with babies and young good looking children for foster care and adoption.

Liberals promote Child Abuse, Crime, and offences against the administration of their Justice system that only apply to the politically correct word of extreme feminists.

It's time for change, and if only the conservatives could act like a real government in waiting.