Controversial head of judges' disciplinary council retires

By: Colin Perkel, The Canadian Press


Jan  28, 2021


TORONTO - The controversial head of the council responsible for handling complaints against federal judges has retired.

In a statement Thursday, the Canadian Judicial Council said Norman Sabourin, executive director and senior general counsel, was leaving after 16 years.


The statement credited Sabourin with preparing for the "council’s renewal."

"The council wishes to thank Mr. Sabourin for his contribution and wishes him the very best in his next endeavours," it said.

Last May, a Federal Court judge rapped the council for acting extremely unfairly when it publicly rebuked a respected Ontario Superior Court justice without a prior complaint.

It was Sabourin who had initiated the action against Justice Patrick Smith for accepting — with permission of his superiors — an unpaid, temporary post as dean of a law school in Thunder Bay, Ont., in 2018.

The proceedings against Smith, who quit the post in response, sparked widespread outrage among other judges as well as lawyers.

The council tried to argue that the 41-member council, comprising the country's chief justice as well as the chief justices and associate chief justices of the provincial and federal Superior Courts, was beyond second-guessing by a single judge.

The Federal Court ruling exonerated Smith and condemned the council's actions against him, prompting Smith's lawyer to demand an apology.

The council under Sabourin had previously drawn Federal Court criticism for attempting to argue the courts had no authority to review its disciplinary proceedings.

The issues prompted Chief Justice Richard Wagner in 2019 to launch a sweeping review, saying the council was in need of both internal and legislative reforms. Areas in need of scrutiny, Wagner said, included the crucial role of the executive director, who wields significant power as complaints gatekeeper.

Sabourin was also on extended leave for more than a year. There was no word on his replacement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 28, 2021.



Commentary by the Ottawa Mens Centre

The Judicial Council is a corrupt organization that spends 99.9% of its time "white washing" judicial complaints  against judges

who have total immunity and impunity for  criminal offences against the administration of justice.

The most common offence by judges is "fabricating evidence" to deny, minimize or otherwise

justify a politically correct decision or personally desired decision rather than a legal decision.


This only serves to encourage further abuses of power by the judiciary and has effective

removed legal rights for fathers in Canada.