Superior Court Penalties

Regions and Judges of Ontario

Peter Karl Roscoe

Nov 2008

Contents

Page

Introduction 1

Summary of Penalties For All Regions 3

Eastern Region

Eastern Region Judicial Summary 6

Eastern Region Financial Data 7

Eastern Region Cases 8

Toronto Region

Toronto Region Judicial Summary 23

Toronto Region Financial Data 24

Toronto Region Cases 25

Central East Region

Central East Region Judicial Summary 42

Central East Region Financial Data 43

Central East Region Cases 44

Central South Region

Central South Region Judicial Summary 61

Central South Region Financial Data 62

Central South Region Cases 63

Central West Region

Central West Region Judicial Summary 78

Central West Region Financial Data 79

Central West Region Cases 80

page

Southwest Region

Southwest Region Region Judicial Summary 93

Southwest Region Region Financial Data 94

Southwest Region Region Cases 95

Northwest Region Region

Northwest Region Region Judicial Summary 104

Northwest Region Region Financial Data 105

Northwest Region Region Cases 106

Northeast Region

Northeast Region Judicial Summary 114

Northeast Region Financial Data 115

Northeast Region Cases 116

Conclusions

Regional Discrimination Indexes 122

Judicial Discrimination Indexes 124

Financial Data 126

Penalties Against Self Represented Litigants 129

Introduction

This study examines 13 potentially punitive measures which may be ordered by Ontario Superior Court judges in family divorce actions. All categories except cost penalties, comes from data collected between Jan 2000 to Oct 2006, on the Canlii legal network. Cost penalties data has been taken from a separate study which extended from Jan 2000 to Aug 2007. All cases which fit category criteria in the timespan have been included. The penalty categories evaluated in this study span most major aspects of divorce. Contempt and default primarily relate to the violation of court orders. They often lead to the imposition of other penalties. Imputed income, prejudgment interest, and lump sums, are representative of financial measures. Imputed income is generally connected with support determinations, and prejudgment interest with equalization. Supervised access reflects concerns regarding children. Added emphasis has been given by using the interim impact on children to assess major and minor penalization with regards to restraining orders and exclusive possession of the family home. Summary judgment and striking pleadings could be described as procedural issues. Cost determinations are made at most hearings. Usually the benefits of cost penalties are given to the party the judge determines to be the overall winner. Not all measures examined could be properly termed as penalties, but they all have the potential of leaving that impression on those whom they are imposed. Extreme applications could most certainly have a punitive quality. To facilitate analysis, penalties have been classified as major or minor. Although a small amount of interpretation must be used in classification, a list of criteria for eah penalty type is reproduced below. In general, it can be said that major penalties are those which most clearly have severe impact on an individual. Or those with the most negative potential on the outcome of the divorce. Total penalties show who received the most penalties and major penalties who received the worst. The one thing all penalties have in common is that they are imposed on divorcing litigants against their will. Consent agreements are not included unless the issue initially consented subsequently becomes contested.

Major and Minor Penalty Classification

Penalty		Minor Penalty	Major Penalty
Contempt	C	Purged, overturned on appeal, minor less than 5 K penalty	Greater than 5 K penalty, imprisonment, or other penalty that would affect divorce outcome
Costs ( before appeal )	Cts
Interim Motion Costs		Less than 6.5 K	Greater than 6.5 K
Divorce Action Costs		Less than 15 K	Greater than 15 K
Post Divorce Action Costs		Less than 10 K	Greater than 10 K
Default	D	Set aside, overturned on appeal, minor less than 5 K penalty	Greater than 5 K penalty, imprisonment, or other penalty that would affect divorce outcome, vesting or charging order
Exclusive Possession of the Family Home	Ep	Overturned, occupancy rent or equivalent payments, non custodial spouse gets the home, minor timespan until sale	Opposing spouse gets interim custody and interim possession of the home
Freezing	F	Removed, overturned on appeal, only against a minor asset, mutual orders	Major or all assets
Imputed Income	Ip	Overturned on appeal, less than 15 % of declared income, support recipient	Over 15 % of declared income
Lump Sum	L	Overturned on appeal, less than 5 K	Greater than 5 K
Prejudment Interest	Pr	Overturned on appeal, Less than 5 K	Greater than 5 K
Restraining Order ( excluding restrained from moving or changing childrens names )	Ro	Overturned on appeal, rescinded, mutual, restrained from moving	Includes children, issued or upheld by the family court, issued by other agency if it results in interim custody, or possession of the family home
Security ( excluding equalization held in trust for both parties )	Sc	Overturned on appeal, insurance policy less than 500 K, passports for access to children	Insurance policy greater than 500 K
Striking Pleadings	St	Overturned on appeal, minor issue or pleading only	All others
Summary Judgment	Js	Overturned on appeal, minor issue only	All others
Supervised Access	Sa	Overturned on appeal, varied before trial, supervised party gets joint or sole custody of children	All others

Penalties may be imposed at interim hearings, divorce trials, and in post divorce actions. Not all cases are reported on legal networks. Interim hearings especially are often underrepresented. . Rulings may sometimes be obtained from other appearances such as trials, variations, appeals, or defaults. The endorsement where the penalty is discussed is the reference given in the case summaries. Penalties were divided into regions by the assignment of the judge who made the rulings. It would appear there is some interregional mobility of judges. A few judges may have been reassigned from other districts, and others may of just been given temporary assignments. Judges who have retired but were active during the time period are included. The nature of legal networks is such that they try to include a full range of examples. This means that most unusual or extreme cases are recorded. The result is that minor penalties may be under reported, but most major penalties should be represented. Since penalties against females are less common it is likely that they are mostly reported. Case summaries for all the data used in this study may be found after the judicial and financial data for each region. Conclusions follow on page .

Data Summary

MJ = Male Judge FJ = Female Judge

	Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
Region	# Male Judges	# M J Rulings	# Female Judges	# F J Rulings	# Male Judges	# M J Rulings	# Female Judges	# F J Rulings
Eastern
Total Penalties	20	86	10	154	7	12	5	18
Major Penalties	15	46	10	102	1	1	2	4
Toronto
Total Penalties	16	73	24	203	5	6	11	29
Major Penalties	15	55	23	155	1	2	3	9
Central East
Total Penalties	17	122	9	104	9	23	7	14
Major Penalties	14	82	9	85	8	13	4	6
Central South
Total Penalties	25	192	5	19	12	44	2	3
Major Penalties	23	122	5	13	9	15	1	1
Central West
Total Penalties	13	117	6	65	12	30	5	22
Major Penalties	13	75	6	46	4	4	2	8
South West
Total Penalties	15	95	6	31	8	22	4	10
Major Penalties	14	59	6	17	3	4	2	2
North West
Total Penalties	9	77	1	23	9	25	1	8
Major Penalties	9	39	1	14	6	9	1	3
North East
Total Penalties	8	44	3	22	7	11	4	5
Major Penalties	7	30	2	13	1	5	1	2
Total Penalties	123	806	64	621	69	173	39	109
Major Penalties	110	509	63	445	33	53	16	35

Penalties Against Men

	Type of Penalty
Region	C	Cts	D	Ep	F	Ip	Js	L	Pr	Ro	Sa	Sc	St
Eastern
Total Penalties	6	76	12	9	9	32	2	18	9	25	12	20	10
Major Penalties	2	33	8	6	7	27	2	16	4	16	11	7	8
Toronto
Total Penalties	8	70	14	12	13	56	5	23	10	16	4	36	7
Major Penalties	7	41	10	8	11	53	5	22	5	10	3	23	7
Central East
Total Penalties	3	55	12	8	8	36	5	17	6	23	14	25	15
Major Penalties	2	28	9	7	7	34	4	13	1	17	12	20	14
Central South
Total Penalties	1	90	5	13	4	25	3	14	9	15	15	13	1
Major Penalties	0	43	4	8	5	23	2	14	4	12	12	5	1
Central West
Total Penalties	2	43	7	6	15	41	4	19	7	14	7	17	1
Major Penalties	2	24	4	4	6	38	3	14	2	6	6	12	1
South West
Total Penalties	3	28	4	3	3	19	2	26	3	10	4	19	3
Major Penalties	3	10	3	1	2	17	2	21	1	4	3	6	2
North West
Total Penalties	2	26	3	8	8	9	2	8	3	12	2	17	1
Major Penalties	1	7	3	6	6	6	2	5	3	8	2	5	1
North East
Total Penalties	0	15	7	4	2	15	1	7	2	5	1	7	0
Major Penalties	0	6	7	4	0	12	1	6	1	3	1	3	0
Total Penalties	27	402	64	63	62	233	24	132	49	120	59	154	38
Major Penalties	17	192	48	44	44	210	21	111	26	76	50	81	34

Penalties Against Women

	Type of Penalty
Region	C	Cts	D	Ep	F	Ip	Js	L	Pr	Ro	Sa	Sc	St
Eastern
Total Penalties	2	14	2	1	2	3	0	0	0	3	1	1	1
Major Penalties	0	3	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0
Toronto
Total Penalties	1	13	4	1	6	2	0	0	0	4	1	1	2
Major Penalties	0	4	0	0	3	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	2
Central East
Total Penalties	2	17	0	1	3	8	0	1	0	3	2	0	0
Major Penalties	2	8	0	1	2	2	0	1	0	2	2	0	0
Central South
Total Penalties	2	27	0	3	1	6	0	0	0	7	0	0	1
Major Penalties	1	11	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	1
Central West
Total Penalties	5	16	0	3	13	4	1	0	0	8	3	0	0
Major Penalties	3	4	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	0
South West
Total Penalties	3	11	0	0	0	7	4	0	0	2	1	0	0
Major Penalties	1	2	0	0	0	1	2	0	0	0	0	0	0
North West
Total Penalties	0	14	1	1	1	2	2	1	2	5	2	1	1
Major Penalties	0	3	0	0	0	1	2	1	0	2	1	0	1
North East
Total Penalties	1	5	0	0	2	5	0	0	1	0	0	1	1
Major Penalties	1	2	0	0	0	2	0	0	1	0	0	0	0
Total Penalties	16	117	7	10	28	37	7	2	3	32	10	4	6
Major Penalties	8	37	0	3	5	8	4	2	1	9	7	0	4

Eastern Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

Contents

1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female

2 Region E - Eastern Region

# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

			Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
			Total		Major		Total		Major
Judge	1	2	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr

Aiken	F	E	33	13	20	9	2	1	0	0
Blishen	F	E	25	12	20	10	2	0	0	0
De Sousa	F	E	33	16	26	14	6	0	2	0
LaFrance-Cardinal	F	E	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Mackinnon J	F	E	38	9	20	3	7	0	2	0
Metivier	F	E	10	5	3	1	0	0	0	0
Polowin	F	E	6	2	2	0	1	1	0	0
Robertson	F	E	2	1	1	0	0	0	0	0
Toscano Roccano	F	E	2	1	1	0	0	0	0	0
Trousdale	F	E	5	5	5	5	0	0	0	0
Belch	M	E	9	4	6	2	1	0	0	0
Chadwick	M	E	2	1	1	0	0	0	0	0
Charboneau	M	E	3	1	3	1	1	0	0	0
Cosgrove	M	E	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Cusson	M	E	2	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
Hackland	M	E	5	0	3	0	2	0	0	0
Kealy	M	E	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Lalonde	M	E	9	6	7	5	4	3	1	0
Mackinnon C	M	E	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Macleod	M	E	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Manton	M	E	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Maranger	M	E	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
Panet	M	E	6	3	2	2	1	0	0	0
Pedlar	M	E	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Power	M	E	16	10	9	5	0	0	0	0
Roy	M	E	4	4	2	2	0	0	0	0
Rutherford	M	E	9	4	4	3	2	0	0	0
Sedgwick	M	E	5	2	4	2	0	0	0	0
Sheffield	M	E	3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
Smith R	M	E	6	2	1	0	1	1	1	1

Female Judges	10	154	62	102	44	18	2	4	0
Male judges	20	86	40	46	24	12	4	1	1
Total	30	240	103	146	68	30	6	5	1

Eastern Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )

Male Lump Sums missing 2

N = 16 Mean = 47.4 Total = 758.4

3.300 4.100 5.400 6.000 8.000 8.000 10.00 23.00 36.00 40.00 42.00 45.00 52.00 54.00 57.00 365.0

Male Imputed Income missing 2

N = 28 Mean = 43.8 Total = 1226.2

2.000 5.600 8.000 11.00 13.00 13.00 15.00 18.00 25.00 25.00 27.00 28.00 28.00 31.00 33.00 40.00 40.00 45.00 47.00 50.00 61.60 68.00 69.00 85.00 94.00 97.00 115.0 132.0

Male Cost Penalties

N = 78 Mean = 12.3 Total = 978.9

0.5000 0.8000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.600 1.800 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.800 3.800 3.800 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.100 4.300 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.500 5.700 5.800 6.500 6.500 7.500 7.500 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.500 9.000 9.000 9.600 9.700 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 12.10 15.00 15.00 17.00 18.00 18.50 20.00 22.50 25.00 25.00 34.00 35.00 36.00 36.90 40.00 40.00 49.00 50.70 60.90 95.00

Female Cost Penalties

N = 14 Mean = 13.4 Total = 187.6

1.000 1.300 1.500 3.000 4.500 4.800 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 10.00 20.00 46.00 70.00

Eastern Region Case Summary

1) Penalties Against Men

Contents

1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female

2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east

E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west

Sw – south west T - Toronto

3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor

6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default

Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets

Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum

Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access

Sc – security St – striking pleadings

7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )

Judge

1

2

3

4

Case

5

6

7

Description

Aitken	F	E	M	M	Abaza v. Abaza, 2001 CanLII 28192 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	25.0	Man claims 125 K income and is imputed to 171 by Mackinnon J and 150 K by Aitken J, 4.8 K per month total support
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Abaza v. Abaza, 2001 CanLII 28192 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest, she is denied exclusive possession but family home is vested to her
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Bhoi v. Bhoi, 2001 CanLII 28172 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Contempt $ 500 fine
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Bhoi v. Bhoi, 2001 CanLII 28172 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K costs of motion
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Bhoi v. Bhoi, 2001 CanLII 28172 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	13.0	Man declared 2 K income imputed to 15 K, man claims to be disabled but court finds he has a cash business
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Woman owes man equalization but his income imputed and his equalization held as security for child support payments, unemployed, denied spousal support
Aitken	F	E	M	F	Buttrum v. Buttrum, 2001 CanLII 28187 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	36.0	36 K lump sum for spousal support
Aitken	F	E	M	F	Buttrum v. Buttrum, 2001 CanLII 28187 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Prejudgment interest on equalization
Aitken	F	E	M	F	Buttrum v. Buttrum, 2001 CanLII 28187 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must maintain a 100 K life insurance policy, also freezing order by Brennan J
Aitken	F	E	F	M	Cameron v. MacGillivray, 2005 CanLII 47696 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife awarded prejudgment interest on 12 K equalization
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Doherty v. Wilcox, 2007 CanLII 5527 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Support variation, divided success, wife asks 8.3 K and gets 4 K
Aitken	F	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	5 K cost award for divorce trial, 5 K for 2 interim cost awards also
Aitken	F	E	sr	F	J.R. v. J.G., 2005 CanLII 14983 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order for threatening, police assistance in retrieving items refused, mans contempt motion dismissed as he violated court orders, aceess to son suspended until he has counselling
Aitken	F	E	F	M	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		40 K lump sum support, security on home and possessions and new wifes assets, pleadings struck, 21 K ordered paid to court, man and new wife sentenced to jail, costs, garnishment of wages 70 %
Aitken	F	E	F	M	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	40.0	40 K lump sum support, security on home and possessions and new wifes assets, pleadings struck, 21K ordered paid to court, man and new wife sentenced to jail, costs, garnishment of wages 70 %
Aitken	F	E	F	M	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		40 K lump sum support, security on home and possessions and new wifes assets, pleadings struck, 215 ordered paid to court, man and new wife sentenced to jail, costs, garnishment of wages 70 %
Aitken	F	E	sr	F	Jonas v. Jonas, 2003 CanLII 1967 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	22.5	Divorce action 2 day trial, husbands pleadings struck, 22.5 K costs
Aitken	F	E	M	F	N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		No more motions until payments are made
Aitken	F	E	M	F	N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	8.0	Lump sums of 4.5 K and 3.5 K for costs and arrears of support, didn’t make equalization payment of 15 K, support 2 K per month total, no more motions until support is paid, wife allowed to move to Nova Scotia with children
Aitken	F	E	M	F	N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man gets 18 month restraining order for assault, says wife assaulted him too, wife gets custody, allowed to move to Nova Scotia
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Scherr v. Scherr, 2004 CanLII 16252 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets interim possession of the family home, man must pay $ 1325 child support and $ 500 spousal support retroactive
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Scherr v. Scherr, 2004 CanLII 16252 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy
Aitken	F	E	M	M	Seguin v. Masterson, 2004 CanLII 196 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.8	Interim motion, wife asks 5.9 K and gets 3.8 K
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1982 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	42.0	Lump sum 42 K for child support, pleadings struck, 15 K equalization and 15 K constructive trust
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1982 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man given supervised access with conditions for unsupervised, conditions never met, no more contact, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, custody to wife no access order made, lump sum and imputation
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1983 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.1	Wife asks 95.1 K for divorce action And gets 12 K for post appeal motion
Aitken	F	E	sr	M	Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1983 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	13.0	Man claims 27 K and is imputed to 40 K
Aitken	F	E	sr	F	Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 13820 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	33.0	Man retrains and is intentionally unemployed and imputed at former level of 33 K, arrears
Aitken	F	E	sr	F	Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 25768 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Motion to vary support, wife asks for 8.7 K and gets 5 K costs
Aitken	F	E	M	sr	Testa v. Basi, 2005 CanLII 25186 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	4.0	Man bankrupted and living in trailer is imputed from 21 K to 25 K per year
Aitken	F	E	sr	sr	TPS	mn	Sc		Both husband and wife must establish insurance policies as security
Aitken	F	E	M	F	Vukovic v. Vukovic, 2003 CanLII 1987 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	69.0	2K per month spousal support, 40 K arrears, man claims 101 K income and is imputed to 170 K
Blishen	F	E	ex	F	Ahern v. Ahern, 2007 CanLII 37672 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	$ 1762 per month child support, $ 270 per month spousal support, s.7 expenses and retroactive support of 35.9 K, 5 K costs
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Biddle v. Biddle, 2004 CanLII 52809 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Man given non depletion order, 9 K per month total support, interim disbursement of 20 K to wife
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Biddle v. Biddle, 2004 CanLII 52809 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	94.0	Man declared 228 K imputed to 322 K, 9 K per month retroactive
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Biddle v. Biddle, 2005 CanLII 7660 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.0	Wife claims 19.5 K for interim support motion and gets 12 K
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	Cutillas v. Proulx, 2001 CanLII 28218 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession and has had house for 3 years
Blishen	F	E	M	F	Hackett v. Leung, 2005 CanLII 27603 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, 3.1 K per month child support and 1.7 K per month spousal support
Blishen	F	E	F	M	Hackett v. Leung, 2005 CanLII 42254 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Motion, Wife claims 8.4 K and gets 4 K
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Kerr v. Kerr, 2005 CanLII 16613 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Woman has called mans work, and influenced children, and called police, man has yelled and been angry , wife gets custody, 2.2 K per month total support,
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502	mj	Ro		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, vesting order, security, arrears
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502	mj	Sa		Man charged with assault given supervised access at interim motion and trial
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502	mj	Sc		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, vesting order, security, arrears
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502kim	mj	Ep		Man charged with assault, wife gets exclusive possession and interim custody, house transferred to wife at uncontested trial
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	N.L. v. B.P., 2000 CanLII 22516 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	28.0	Man claims 12 K income and is imputed to 40 K
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	N.L. v. B.P., 2000 CanLII 22516 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Charging order to secure child support arrears not rescinded
Blishen	F	E	M	M	N.L. v. J.C., 2005 CanLII 4838 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.5	Interim motion to strike pleadings, 2.5 K costs, previous interim motion for custody, 5.5 K costs
Blishen	F	E	M	M	N.L. v. J.C., 2005 CanLII 4838 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Pleadings not struck but made to sign disclosure release
Blishen	F	E	sr	M	Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck and his defense is disallowed including a constitutional challenge
Blishen	F	E	M	F	Piskor v. Piskor, 2004 CanLII 5023 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	18.0	Support variation, 18 K costs
Blishen	F	E	M	F	Roberts v. Roberts, 2004 CanLII 18250 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	27.0	Man declares 36 K and court imputes 63 K
Blishen	F	E	M	F	Stratton v. Kangas, 2001 CanLII 26440 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	28.0	Man on welfare is imputed to 28 K
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Stratton v. Kangas, 2002 CanLII 46690 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	Wife sucessful on 2 out of 3 issues, 3.5 K partial indemnity asked and gets 2 K
Blishen	F	E	sr	F	V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	15.0	Mans 26 K income imputed to 41 K, sexual assault on child allegations unproven, supervised access
Blishen	F	E	sr	F	V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order, wife gets custody and asks access terminated, first unsupervised, then by parents, then supervised access center ordered, wife makes sexual assault allegation
Blishen	F	E	sr	F	V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Mans supervised access is continued, mother asks it be terminated, criminal record, ron stewart, child support increased
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Zlater v. Hartwick, 2007 CanLII 30664 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.6	Motion for university expense, 9.6 K costs, ruling better than offer to settle
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	Biraben v. Pelland, 2006 CanLII 25614 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man accused of assault allowed supervised access with grandparent, wife gets custody
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	Brophy v. Brophy, 2004 CanLII 25419 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	18.5	Default on 8 K per month support, 25 K arrears, 18.5 K costs, 12 K costs of appeal
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	Brophy v. Brophy, 2004 CanLII 25419 (ON C.A.)	mj	D		Default on 8 K per month support, 25 K arrears
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	Brophy v. Brophy, 2004 CanLII 25419 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man claims 200 K income and is imputed to 240 K, 8 K per month support
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 1920 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Interim motion for possession of home and leave to appeal, 3.5 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	Davis v Morris 2006 CanLII 8196 (ON C.A.)	mn	D		Motion to overturn ex parte default order striking pleadings dismissed, overturned on appeal
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	Hinke v. Lake, 2007 CanLII 8635 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	Man achieves substancial success on motion to vary but wife gven 10 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Pleadings struck, freezing order
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Pleadings struck, freezing order
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	M.I. v. J.R., 2004 CanLII 52812 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, wife allowed to move to japan
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	M.I. v. J.R., 2004 CanLII 52812 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Domestic assault, Childrens Aid orders no access, court then orders supervised access, wife given custody and allowed to move to Japan
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	M.I. v. J.R., 2005 CanLII 7663 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	15.0	Divorce action, wife allowed to move to Japan, 15 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	M.M.F.1 v. G.R., 2004 CanLII 52811 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of assault, then threats, hasn’t seen son in 2 years, acess denied
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	M.M.F.1 v. G.R., 2004 CanLII 52811 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Charged with assault, plead guilty, harassment charges, wife denies access, supervised access at wifes discretion ordered, wife requests access terminated
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	M.R.P. v. M.A.P., 2006 CanLII 19444 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody
De Sousa	F	E	Sr	F	Martin v. Martin, 2007 CanLII 8638 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	40.0	Support variation,40 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	P.(M.L.) v. P.(G.W.), 2000 CanLII 22462 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	365.0	Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 365 K lump sum
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	P.(M.L.) v. P.(G.W.), 2000 CanLII 22462 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 365 K lump sum
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	P.(M.L.) v. P.(G.W.), 2000 CanLII 22462 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 365 K lump sum
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2003 CanLII 1918 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	36.9	Divorce action, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 36.9 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	sr	M	P.S. v. J.S., 2005 CanLII 16590 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Restraining order for assault, false sexual assault allegations, joint custody changed to sole custody to man
De Sousa	F	E	sr	M	Piskor v. Piskor, 2003 CanLII 53692 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 3.5 K per month spousal support, variation stayed until arrears paid
De Sousa	F	E	F	F	R.M. v. R.L.Z., 2004 CanLII 5024 (ON S.C	mj	L	10.0	10 K lumps sum compensatory support
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mans pleadings struck, non dissipation order, 36 K in cost arrears, child support default with FRO, refused variation
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	45.0	Man with no income and heavy stock losses imputed to 45 K and support set at 54 K
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wife gets restraining order from false assault allegations, man acquitted, court gives wife permanent restraining roorder, strikes pleadings, wife gets custody, imputed income, intentionally unemployed
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck at interim ex parte motion, 1.5 K costs, denied leave to appeal, uncontested trial,
De Sousa	F	E	sr	F	Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Mans pleadings struck at interim ex parte motion, 1.5 K costs, denied leave to appeal, uncontested trial
De Sousa	F	E	sr	M	Scott v. McKinley, 2002 CanLII 13273 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sa		Man gets only one supervised visit per year with his child, access increased to 3 times on appeal
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	Surrette v. Johnson, 2003 CanLII 2282 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	Support variation, divided success, 1 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	sr	M	Szivi v. Schwilgin, 2003 CanLII 2036 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.0	Motion for leave to appeal, 9 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	sr	M	Szivi v. Schwilgin, 2003 CanLII 2036 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Husband did not include imputed income on notice of appeal
De Sousa	F	E	sr	M	Szivi v. Schwilgin, 2003 CanLII 2036 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Supervised access continued
LaFrance-Cardinal	F	E	M	F	Fleming v. Lamb, 2004 CanLII 5001 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order, wife gets interim custody
LaFrance-Cardinal	F	E	M	F	Wylie v. Leclair, 2003 CanLII 49737 (ON C.A.)	mn	Cts	1.0	1K trial costs changed to 11 K but man gets 3 K costs of appeal, 150 K unjust enrichment award reduced to 70 K
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 27600 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	17.0	Uncontested trial judgement against wife set aside, 17 K costs against husband and his lawyer
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Cass v. Dyke, 2004 CanLII 5095 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	132.0	Mans declared income of 43 K imputed to 175 K, 2.85 K per month total support, security deposit
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Cass v. Dyke, 2004 CanLII 5095 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must maintain 100 K life insurance as security.
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 2041 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession of family home, mans motion for summary judgment denied, 2 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	F	Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 2041 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	Interim motions, 2 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Dalton v. Craig, 2001 CanLII 28168 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	5.6	Man claims 6.9 K income and is imputed to 12.5 K
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Dalton v. Craig, 2001 CanLII 28168 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	4.1	Wife gets 4.1 K retroactive lump sum for support and prejudgment interest
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Dalton v. Craig, 2001 CanLII 28168 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets 4.1 K retroactive lump sum for support and prejudgment interest
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	F. v. V., 2002 CanLII 2767 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	95.0	Divorce action, wife asks for 158 K and gets 95 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Gomez v. Bartusch, 2003 CanLII 37828 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Summary judgment denied, 3.5 K costs of motion
Mackinnon j	F	E	M	M	Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 11695 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	47.0	Man claims 55 K imputed to 102 K.
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 11695 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc	47.0	Man must maintain 100 K life insurance as security.
Mackinnon j	F	E	M	M	Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 15397 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	25.0	Divorce action, wife asks 35 K and gets 25 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Man found in contempt for disclosure, 2.5 K cost penalty by Roy J, income imputed to 100 K reset at trial
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	20.0	Man found in contempt for disclosure, 2.5 K cost penalty by Roy J, income imputed from 80 K to 100 K reset at trial
Mackinnon J	F	E	Sr	M	Irace v. Irace, 2004 CanLII 5020 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Properties transferred to wife for sale
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	M	Irace v. Irace, 2004 CanLII 5020 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Contempt motion, 3.5 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	Sr	M	J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Husbands pleadings struck, uncontested trial, imputed income, retroactive support, 40 K costs by Trousdale J
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	Likins v. MacKenzie, 2004 CanLII 15767 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	Divorce action. Arbitrators cost award of 110 K reduced to 67 K, 10 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	F	Mavis v. Mavis, 2005 CanLII 14002 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets prejudgment interest on equalization at a lower rate
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	M	N.(D.) v. E.(T.), 2000 CanLII 21156 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.5	Wife wins trial of custody and gets 6.5 K costs, asks for 10 K
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2005 CanLII 44186 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.8	$ 1750 for 2 interim motions to set aside and leave to appeal the order of Byers J
Mackinnon J	F	E	Ex	L	Pelda v. O'Leary, 2006 CanLII 25536 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Wife gets ex parte freezing order, man sells company and may be able to pay more spousal support
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Ramsey v. Proffitt, 2001 CanLII 28161 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	52.0	Woman has pension entitlement from separation agreement and man goes bankrupt, claim not defeated by bankruptcy, 52 K lump sum for equalization and support
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Ramsey v. Proffitt, 2001 CanLII 28161 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Freezing order on RRSP until lump sum is paid
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Ramsey v. Proffitt, 2001 CanLII 28161 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Pre judgment interest on 52 K award
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 42606 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	25.0	Support variation, wife asks 38 K gets 25 K plus prejudgment interest, man owes 79 K in arrears
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 42606 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Support variation, wife asks 38 K gets 25 K plus prejudgment interest, man owes 79 K in arrears
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Silver v. Mercer, 2003 CanLII 2039 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.3	Wife gets 4.3 K for motion to set support
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Simpkins v. Simpkins, 2004 CanLII 28909 (ON C.A.)	mn	Sc		Mintes of settlement waving spousal support set aside for fraud, 2.3 K spousal support, man must designate wife as beneficiary of 200 K life insurance policy, 12 K costs of appeal.
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	sr	Smith v. Smith, 2000 CanLII 22455 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.6	1.6 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mans 8 K bank account to be preserved and not depleted, contempt for depletion
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	Traversy v. Glover, 2006 CanLII 24130 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	57.0	57 K lump sum against past arrears claim
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Van Westerop v. Van Westerop, 2000 CanLII 22456 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	115.0	Man claims 35 K on taxes and is imputed to 150 K income
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Van Westerop v. Van Westerop, 2000 CanLII 22456 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	23.0	23 K lump sum for retroactive arrears
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Van Westerop v. Van Westerop, 2000 CanLII 22456 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		45 K GIC for security
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	L	Westendorp v. Westendorp, 2000 CanLII 22538 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.0	8 K costs for constitutional challenge, 4 K to wife and 4 K to FRO
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2003 CanLII 49378 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	3.3	Lump sum of 3.3 K for s.7 expenses, wife found in contempt for not selling house
Metivier	F	E	sr	M	Boileau v. Boileau, 2003 CanLII 2288 (ON S.C	mn	Sc		Secure support against life insurance policy or first charge on estate, 69 K of pension transferred to wife, $ 600 support, mild
Metivier	F	E	ex	M	Davis v. Morris, 2006 CanLII 8196 (ON C.A.)	mn	Cts	8.0	8 K costs of striking motion, varied to $ 750 on appeal, 6 K costs of appeal against wife.
Metivier	F	E	exr	M	Davis v. Morris, 2006 CanLII 8196 (ON C.A.)	mn	St		Mans pleading struck at ex parte hearing, overturned on appeal
Metivier	F	E	M	F	Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	54.0	54 K lump sum including 20 K for spousal support and child support arrears and special expenses, imputed income, intentionally unemployed, life insurance policy for security
Metivier	F	E	M	F	Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Man convicted of assault, anger management courses, joint custody with primary residence to wife, paid 380 K equalization, 20 K lump sum retroactive spousal support arrears, 34 K retroactive child support arrears, 1.1 K per month child support
Metivier	F	E	M	F	Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Life insurance policy for security, 54 K lump sum, imputed income, intentionally unemployed, joint custody
Metivier	F	E	sr	M	Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1982 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 42 K lump sum child support
Metrivier	F	E	M	M	Glance v. Glance, 2000 CanLII 20393 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Metrivier	F	E	M	F	Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	50.0	Additional 50 K per year income imputed, retroactive support, s.7 expenses, lump sum arrears
Metrivier	F	E	sr	M	O'Brien v. Griffin, 2004 CanLII 10709 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	61.6	Man claims 51.4 K income and is imputed to 115 K, 100 K arrears, vexatious litigant order, new trial of support ordered on appeal
Polowin	F	E	F	sr	Brazeau v. Lefebvre, 2003 CanLII 2165 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Self represented wife gets 5 K costs
Polowin	F	E	sr	M	Fequet v. Petelka Fequet, 2003 CanLII 2200 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	9.7	Divorce action, husband asks for 21 K and wife gets 9.7 K
Polowin	F	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2005 CanLII 44186 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.5	$ 500 for interim motion
Polowin	F	E	F	M	Pollen v. Pollen, 2004 CanLII 5073 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	8.0	8 K lump sum for support
Polowin	F	E	M	F	Slack v. Slack, 2001 CanLII 28170 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	5.4	Wife gets 5.4 K spousal support lump sum and prejudment interest
Polowin	F	E	M	F	Slack v. Slack, 2001 CanLII 28170 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets 5.4 K spousal support lump sum and prejudment interest
Robertson	F	E	sr	M	A. E. M. v. J. E. M., 2004 CanLII 22310 (ON C.A.)	mn	Ro		Restrianing order against man, 1.5 K costs of appeal
Robertson	F	E	M	M	Murano v. Murano, 2002 CanLII 49352 (ON C.A.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck for disclosure, sentenced to jail for contempt previously ordered by Dunbar K
Toscano Roccano	F	E	M	M	Lakhani v. Lakhani, 2003 CanLII 2160 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	9.0	9 K to wife for motion
Toscano Romano	F	E	sr	M	Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Interim motion, 1.5 K costs
Trousdale	F	E	sr	M	J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	40.0	Husbands pleadings struck, uncontested trial, imputed income, retroactive support, 40 K costs
Trousdale	F	E	sr	M	J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	68.0	2 K income imputed to 70 K, pleadings struck, wife gets exclusive possession of home then vesting order, 1.3 K per month total support
Trousdale	F	E	sr	M	J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)	mj	L		2 lump sum payments already made, 40 K in retroactive child support, 3.5 K in retroactive spousal support, 53 K equalization and vesting order for house, 40 K costs, restraining order, pleadings struck
Trousdale	F	E	sr	M	J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Domestic assault, temporary retraining order still in effect, pleadings struck, 40 K costs
Trousdale	F	E	sr	M	J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Domestic assault, supervised access, hasn’t seen children, pleadings struck, imputed income, 45 K retroactive support, 35 K cost penalty
Belch	M	E	M	F	Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	97.0	Man imputed to 97 K wife imputed to 50 K, man must pay wife 1.2 K per month, retroactive support, wife mild
Belch	M	E	M	F	Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	6.0	6 K lump sum for retroactive support,
Belch	M	E	M	F	Fleming v. Lamb, 2004 CanLII 5001 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Wife asks 11 K and gets 3.5 K for support / income determination motion
Belch	M	E	sr	M	M. Al. O. v. Me. A. O., 2005 CanLII 2740 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man on unemployment imputed at 40 K per year
Belch	M	E	sr	M	M. Al. O. v. Me. A. O., 2005 CanLII 2740 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Plead guilty to assaulting kids, minimal supervised access with unspecified increased, imputed income
Belch	M	E	M	M	McCaw v. McCaw, 2007 CanLII 6920 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	35.0	Divorce action, wife asks 69 K gets 35 K costs
Belch	M	E	L	L	Murano, Re, 2004 CanLII 17633 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Jailed for disclosure, denied a trial FRO default set to trial, owes 158 K
Belch	M	E	sr	M	Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Man in contempt for not signing over house to wife and depleting bank account, Feb 2005 post trial motion
Belch	M	E	sr	sr	Young v. O'Neil, 2003 CanLII 2370 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Granted as after separation man leaves phone messages and goes in house to take photos as evidence of differential living standards, income imputed
Chadwick	M	E	sr	M	Fisher v. Fisher, 2003 CanLII 2119 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Mans contempt sufficiently purged
Chadwick	M	E	F	M	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Contempt, man gets 120 days and new wife gets 60 days in jail, fraudulent conveyance
Charbonneau	M	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2006 CanLII 1676 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Jail threatened, imputed income, intentionally unemployed, assets frozen
Charbonneau	M	E	L	L	Poirier v. Poirier, 2006 CanLII 2188 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	36.0	Divorce, 36 K costs
Charbonneau	M	E	M	M	Sliwinski v. Marks, 2005 CanLII 23106 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	34.0	Divorce action 34 K costs
Cosgrove	M	E	M	M	Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession and has had house for 4 years, 11 interim orders
Cosgrove	M	E	M	F	N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	3.5 K costs
Cusson	M	E	sr	M	Donaldson v. Dénommée, 2004 CanLII 53115 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.0	$ 625 child support and $ 800 spousal support, man makes 78 K per year, 8 K costs
Cusson	M	E	L	L	Lavigne v. MacCaskill, 2003 CanLII 2014 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Wife falsely alleges assault and theft, child testifies wife is abusive, joint custody
Hackland	M	E	M	M	D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, 2.3 K per month child support
Hackland	M	E	M	M	D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	8.0	Wife imputed at 25 K , Mans income increased by 8 K over claimed, man pays 4.5 K per month total support, wife mild
Hackland	M	E	M	M	K. v. K., 2004 CanLII 12506 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Man charged with assault, charges withdrawn, wife gets custody, 15 K per month child support
Hackland	M	E	M	F	Lajoie v. Lajoie, 2005 CanLII 23684 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	31.0	Mans declared income is 12 K but is imputed to 43 K
Hackland	M	E	M	M	Taillon v. Taillon, 2005 CanLII 8688 (ON S.C.)	mj	L		Arrears of support to be paid as a lump sum
Kealy	M	E	M	F	Aukstuolyte v. Balchun, 2005 CanLII 27896 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Lalonde	M	E	M	F	Bourgon v. Paquette, 2004 CanLII 5924 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	18.0	$ 500 per month interim spousal support, settled intention on children reserved for trial, 6.5 K retroactive arrears, man claims 47 K income imputed to 65 K, wife has 45 K income
Lalonde	M	E	M	F	D. H. v. A. G. P., 2004 CanLII 53228 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual retraining interim order granted , denied at trial, wife gets custody
Lalonde	M	E	M	F	Harris v. Harris, 2000 CanLII 17048 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		Second mortgage ordered put on mans property and assigned to wife for 5 K per month support, stay denied
Lalonde	M	E	sr	sr	J.B.G. v. L.B., 2004 CanLII 53230 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	Restraining order wife gets custody, answer struck, 20 K cost penalty, previous 12K cost penalty
Lalonde	M	E	sr	sr	J.B.G. v. L.B., 2004 CanLII 53230 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order wife gets custody, answer struck, 20 K cost penalty
Lalonde	M	E	ex	F	Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	11.0	11 K costs for motion
Lalonde	M	E	ex	F	Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	85.0	Man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 100 K, lawyer quits, man has answered but is not present
Lalonde	M	E	ex	F	Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck
Mackinnon C	M	E	L	L	M.P. v. D.P., 2006 CanLII 15770 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Wife makes false sexual assualt allegations and man gets temporary supervised access, restored to unsupervised when allegations are dismissed, child exchanges at the police station
Macleod	M	E	F	M	Sanders v. Lacaille, 2005 CanLII 18722 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man accused of assault acquitted, no children, wife gets possession of home for 2 years and damages it when ordered to leave, wife given 40 K in constructive trust but must pay 14 K in damages and 14 K in occupation rent
Manton	M	E	M	M	D.Q. v. R.A., 2006 CanLII 42375 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.1	4.1 K for earlier motion, unemployed man imputed to 40 K
Maranger	M	E	sr	sr	Ainslie v. Bracken, 2006 CanLII 19461 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Mans income imputed from claimed K to 80 K, 10 K support arrears, 3.4 K per month total support
Panet	M	E	sr	M	Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Man in breach of several paymwent orders, pleadings struck, security ordered for appeal of striking order, uncontested trial ordered
Panet	M	E	sr	M	Fisher v. Green, 2003 CanLII 2120 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.5	Wifes motion for retroactive support, wife claims 44 K gets 6.5 K
Panet	M	E	M	M	Kourany v. Salem, 2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Some restrictions on contact and a provision for police enforcement, wife gets custody, child support secured by insurance policy, mild
Panet	M	E	M	M	Kourany v. Salem, 2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Some restrictions on contact and a provision for police enforcement, wife gets custody, child support secured by insurance policy, mild
Panet	M	E	sr	M	Marie Cunningham v. Charles LeFebvre, 2004 CanLII 54630 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.5	Interim motion, 7.5 K costs
Panet	M	E	M	F	Meredith v. Meredith, 2002 CanLII 2807 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.8	Divorce action, divided success, wife gets 3.8 K
Pedlar	M	E	M	M	Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man under no contact order with one of his 3 children
Power	M	E	M	M	Campeau v. Campeau, 2006 CanLII 19430 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	15 K for motion to have mans lawyer removed
Power	M	E	sr	M	Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 15761 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.5	Wife claims 16.5 K and gets 8.5 K for motion
Power	M	E	sr	M	Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Child support arrears and threat of bankruptcy, order to put pension in trust until equalization paid
Power	M	E	sr	M	Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.8	Interim motion $ 750 costs
Power	M	E	sr	M	Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Secure equalization against life insurance policy and make wife trustee of pension, retroactive child support
Power	M	E	M	M	Graff v. Graff, 2002 CanLII 2788 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.8	Interim motion, 3.8 K costs
Power	M	E	M	F	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 38129 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Garnishment hearing, 4 K costs
Power	M	E	M	F	Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Freezes home and possessions impressed with a trust to benefit of wife. His mothers estate frozen and transferred to trust, garnisheed to 70 % income
Power	M	E	ex	M	Laiken v. Tatsambong, 2003 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Wife gets ex parte freezing order which is later overturned
Power	M	E	M	F	Martin v. Martin, 2004 CanLII 48712 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man must hold at least 1 million dollars life insurance designated to wife for payments of 28 K per month in total support
Power	M	E	M	F	Martin v. Martin, 2005 CanLII 11809 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	49.0	Divorce action, wife asks 165 K and gets 49 K
Power	M	E	sr	sr	McLean v. Vallance, 2006 CanLII 28910 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	Wife claims 4.9 K and gets 1 K
Power	M	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2005 CanLII 44186 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		5 K security to bring motion, vexatious, frivoluos abusive litigator, 10 K cost penalty , variation not heard despite FRO default, security overturned on appeal
Power	M	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2006 CanLII 1676 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	Support variation, 10 K costs, 10 K costs of appeal
Power	M	E	sr	F	P.R. v. K.R., 2006 CanLII 1676 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Summary judgment on mans motion for variarion and access and constitutional challenges
Power	M	E	sr	F	Townsend v. Florentis, 2004 CanLII 25801 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man prohibited from the city of Kingston, no access to child
Roy	M	E	sr	M	Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 32470 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	50.7	Divorce action, wife asks 61 K gets 50.7 K
Roy	M	E	sr	M	Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 32470 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	11.0	Man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 21 K
Roy	M	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	2.5 K costs for motions
Roy	M	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		12 K arrears on house payments and 25 K costs to be secured against mans share of home
Rutherford	M	E			Craig v. Craig, 2005 CanLII 50263 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Contempt motion against man dismissed 1.5 K for motion
Rutherford	M	E	sr	M	Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Interim motion 3 K costs
Rutherford	M	E	M	F	Lantaigne v. Lantaigne, 2005 CanLII 39886 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Default but FRO enforcement stayed and arrears reduced to 15 K from 44
Rutherford	M	E	sr	F	Luedtke v. Vuletic, 2001 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		$ 140 per month child support and 50 % of s.7 expenses based on 18 K income, mans answer struck and he can’t participate at trial
Rutherford	M	E	sr	M	Marie Cunningham v. Charles LeFebvre, 2004 CanLII 54630 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		15 K advance to wife and 9.5 K in costs but answer not struck for failing to provide disclosure
Rutherford	M	E	M	M	Marks v. Tokarewicz, 2002 CanLII 2799 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.5	Interim motion on support application wife didn’t pay costs of precious order, 7.5 K costs
Rutherford	M	E	sr	M	Piskor v. Piskor, 2003 CanLII 53692 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Stay of variation until man pays arrears, says he’s broke
Rutherford	M	E	M	M	Provenzano v. Provenzano, 2004 CanLII 5075 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Set aside, womans lawyer doesn’t tell of ex parte order, lawyer pays costs
Rutherford	M	E	M	M	Sliwinski v. Marks, 2005 CanLII 23106 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	Interim motion 2 K costs
Sedgwick	M	E	M	F	Chen v. Chen, 2000 CanLII 22564 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Sedgwick	M	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order against man, wife gets possession of home and cistody
Sedgwick	M	E	M	F	Pearson v. Griffith, 2004 CanLII 21278 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Lump sum of 45 K ordered in Que, appeal denied, total payments ordered 188 K, paid 214 K and Ont court says it’s not an overpayment, variation denied
Sedgwick	M	E	M	F	Pearson v. Griffith, 2004 CanLII 21278 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	45.0	Lump sum of 45 K ordered, appeal denied, total payments ordered 188 K, paid 214 K and court says it’s not an overpayment, variation denied
Sedgwick	M	E	sr	M	Roberts v. Aasen, 2003 CanLII 2000 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	60.9	Custody and access 60.9 K award
Sheffield	M	E	M	F	Craig v. Craig, 2005 CanLII 50263 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	1.5 K for interim motion
Sheffield	M	E	sr	M	Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	Interim motion, 2 K costs
Sheffield	M	E	M	F	Evans v. Evans, 2003 CanLII 2021 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	9.0	Man claims 83 K income and is imputed to 92 K
Smith R	M	E	L	L	Bourget v. Bourget, 2006 CanLII 2888 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	2.0	Mans income imputed upwards 2 K per year for overtime, minor
Smith R	M	E	M	M	Butler v. Poelstra, 2006 CanLII 41661 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.7	Divorce action, wife asks 16.3 K and gets 5.7 K costs
Smith R	M	E	F	M	Fournier v. Burton, 2006 CanLII 42370 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Husband loses motion to have support terminated, 4 K costs
Smith R	M	E	sr	F	Francis v. Filion, 2003 CanLII 2423 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		40 K insurance policy as support
Smith R	M	E	F	M	Matysiak v. Phillips, 2004 CanLII 45449 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Mans access terminated, first unsupervised, then supervised, then terminated, drug problem, criminal record
Smith R	M	E	sr	F	Trevisanutto v. Crnkovic, 2005 CanLII 19789 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.8	Motion to vary support, 5.8 K costs

2) Penalties Against Women

Aitken	F	E	sr	F	Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual, Wife gets home for 2 years then sold, man gets 12 K bill on household payments, woman gets support
Aitken	F	E	sr	sr	TPS	mn	Sc		Both husband and wife must establish insurance policies as security
Blishen	F	E	M	M	Kerr v. Kerr, 2005 CanLII 16613 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual, woman has called mans work, and influenced children, and called police, man has yelled and been angry , wife gets custody, 2.2 K per month total support,
Blishen	F	E	F	F	O'Connor v. O'Connor, 2007 CanLII 8930 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Motion to vary support, husband claims 19.8 K and gets 5 K, wife claims 8.4 K
DeSousa	F	E	F	F	A.D. v. M.J., 2006 CanLII 37515 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.0	Motion, wife found in contempt, 8 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	F	F	Ladisa v. Ladisa, 2004 CanLII 15138 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	10.0	Divorce action, wife claims 35 K costs, husband claims 28 K and gets 10 K, appeal dismissed
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	M.R.P. v. M.A.P., 2006 CanLII 19444 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order, wife get custody
De Sousa	F	E	M	M	Marks v. Tokarewicz, 2003 CanLII 1995 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	20K costs, 8.8 K costs of appeal
De Sousa	F	E	M	F	Sloss v. Forget, 2005 CanLII 4843 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.0	Motion for mobility and support, 6 K costs
De Sousa	F	E	F	M	Viertelhausen v. Burbridge, 2006 CanLII 11238 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	7.0	Support trial, 7 K costs
Mackinnon	F	E	M	M	Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2003 CanLII 49378 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Found in contempt for failure to sell house but not in contempt for not admitting child was not in school and collecting support, sentencing hearing to be held
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	F	B.K. v. A.P., 2005 CanLII 27602 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		With holds child in violation of custody order, contempt, 30 days in jail and 2.5 K suspended, , no access 1 month, supervised access 1 month, then unsupervised if no breaches
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	F	B.K. v. A.P., 2005 CanLII 27602 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		With holds child in violation of custody order, contempt, 30 days in jail and 2.5 K suspended, , no access 1 month, supervised access 1 month, then unsupervised if no breaches
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	D.W. v. C.O, 2006 CanLII 16361 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	Child support application, 3 K costs
Mackinnon J	F	E	F	M	D.W. v. C.O., 2006 CanLII 13554 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	5.0	With a former income of 134 K and current declared income of 33 K given transitional imputation of 38 K then 62 K
Mackinnon J	F	E	sr	M	Griffore v. Adsett, 2001 CanLII 28207 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Man gets exclusive possession and $ 1000 child support and $ 700 spousal support
Mackinnon J	F	E	M	M	Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2005 CanLII 48697 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.8	Motion to vary support, husband gets 4.8 K
Polowin	F	E	M	ex	Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.)	mn	St		Woman who didn’t answers has pleadings struck, but decision is overturned
Belch	M	E	M	F	Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	50.0	Man imputed to 97 K wife imputed to 50 K, man must pay wife 1.2 K per month, retroactive support, wife mild
Charboneau	M	E	F	M	Guénette v. Brisebois, 2004 CanLII 33294 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	Husband gets interim custody, divided success, 3 motions 1 K costs to be paid by wife
Hackland	M	E	M	M	Charron v. Fulham, 2004 CanLII 17656 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.5	4.5 K costs on child support variation
Hackland	M	E	M	M	D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	25.0	Wife imputed at 25 K , Mans income increased by 8 K over claimed, man pays 4.5 K per month total support, wife mild
Lalonde	M	E	M	ex	Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Pleadings struck then set aside, suit with lawyers
Lalonde	M	E	M	ex	Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	46.0	46 K for uncontested divorce action, set aside
Lalonde	M	E	M	ex	Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Wife pleadings struck, sells property and husband files fraudulent conveyance action, sale reversed then order set aside
Lalonde	M	E	M	F	D. H. v. A. G. P., 2004 CanLII 53228 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual retraining interim order granted , denied at trial, wife gets custody
Panet	M	E	F	M	Nicholls v. Peterson, 2007 CanLII 43497 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.3	$1,250 for uncontested trial, womans pleadings struck, 2 other $ 500 cost penalties
Rutherford	M	E	M	M	Craig v. Craig, 2005 CanLII 50263 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Contempt motion for disclosure dismissed, 1.5 K costs
Rutherford	M	E	M	M	Marks v. Tokarewicz, 2002 CanLII 2799 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Denied motion for support due to default on costs, overturned and her motion may proceed
Smith R	M	E	M	sr	Coady v. Boyle, 2004 CanLII 15122 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	70.0	70 K costs against wife

Toronto Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

Contents

1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female

2 Region T – Toronto Region

# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

			Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
			Total		Major		Total		Major
Judge	1	2	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr

Backhouse	F	T	18	6	17	6	1	0	0	0
Bain	F	T	2	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
Beaulieu	F	T	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Benotto	F	T	9	3	7	2	4	2	4	2
Croll	F	T	10	4	6	2	3	0	0	0
Goodman	F	T	5	0	5	0	0	0	0	0
Greer	F	T	29	11	22	9	4	2	2	2
Herman	F	T	9	2	5	2	1	1	0	0
Himel	F	T	9	4	7	4	1	0	0	0
Karakatsanis	F	T	12	2	10	2	1	0	1	0
Kitely	F	T	9	1	7	1	0	0	0	0
Klowak	F	T	3	1	2	0	0	0	0	0
Lax	F	T	7	0	6	0	0	0	0	0
Low	F	T	7	4	4	2	1	0	1	0
Macdonald	F	T	14	1	8	1	5	0	0	0
McWatt	F	T	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Mesbur	F	T	16	2	14	2	7	1	1	0
Pepall	F	T	4	0	4	0	0	0	0	0
Sachs	F	T	17	3	12	2	0	0	0	0
Speigel	F	T	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
Stewart	F	T	12	2	10	1	0	0	0	0
Swinton	F	T	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Young	F	T	3	0	3	0	0	0	0	0
Thorburn	F	T	2	2	1	1	1	0	0	0
Archibald	M	T	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
Aston	M	T	18	4	12	2	5	3	2	2
Belobaba	M	T	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Brown	M	T	5	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
Clark	M	T	6	2	4	2	0	0	0	0
Czurtin	M	T	3	0	3	0	0	0	0	0
Day	M	T	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
Ferrier	M	T	2	0	1	0	1	0	0	0
Grossi	M	T	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Hoilett	M	T	5	4	5	4	0	0	0	0
Jarvis	M	T	6	5	4	4	0	0	0	0
Jennings	M	T	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Keenan	M	T	2	2	2	2	1	0	0	0
OConnell	M	T	6	0	5	0	0	0	0	0
Paisley	M	T	10	2	9	2	0	0	0	0
Spence	M	T	4	2	3	1	0	0	0	0

Female Judges	24	203	50	155	39	30	7	9	4
Male judges	16	73	22	54	17	7	3	2	2
Total	40	276	72	209	56	37	10	11	6

Toronto Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )

Male Lump Sums missing 2

N = 22 Mean = 82.1 Total = 1806.8

1.800 5.000 12.00 14.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 26.00 30.00 30.00 35.00 43.00 50.00 57.00 57.00 93.00 101.0 180.0 200.0 350.0 447.0

Male Imputed Income missing 6

N = 51 Mean = 215.6 Total = 10995.6

4.000 8.000 11.00 12.00 14.00 15.00 18.00 21.00 23.00 28.00 28.00 30.00 30.00 31.00 33.00 33.00 35.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 46.00 46.00 48.00 49.00 49.00 51.00 52.00 53.00 55.00 55.00 58.00 58.00 58.00 60.00 60.00 61.00 68.00 77.00 77.00 79.00 87.00 100.0 155.0 170.0 190.0 250.0 305.0 309.0 1120. 1900. 4755

Male Cost Penalties

N = 69 Mean = 51.8 Total = 3574.2

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.100 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 2.000 2.000 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.500 3.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.500 6.200 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.000 7.500 7.500 10.00 10.80 12.00 12.50 13.50 14.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.80 16.50 17.00 17.80 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 25.00 33.80 34.00 35.00 42.00 45.00 56.00 70.00 70.00 75.00 85.80 93.00 200.0 2250

Female Cost Penalties

N = 13 Mean = 10.4 Total = 135.5

1.500 1.500 2.000 2.000 3.500 3.500 4.000 4.250 5.500 8.000 18.00 25.00 56.00

Toronto Region Case Summary

1) Penalties Against Men

Contents

1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female

2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east

E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west

Sw – south west T - Toronto

3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor

6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default

Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets

Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum

Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access

Sc – security St – striking pleadings

7 Amount of impution of yearly income or cost penalty ( in 1000 $’s )

Judge

1

2

3

4

Case

5

6

7

Description

		T	sr	M	Fantin v. Gillingham-Corkun Fantin, 2003 CanLII 2114 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Man found in contempt purges it by providing some documents ordered
		T	F	M	Kucyi v. Kucyi, 2007 ONCA 758 (CanLII)	mj	Cts	20.0	$ 1709 per month child support and $ 2700 per month spousal support, appeal dismissed and new arbitration award to be made, 47 K arrears, 20 K costs
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Allaire v. Allaire, 2003 CanLII 26263 (ON C.A.)	mj	L	35.0	35 K lump sum for retroactive arrears, upheld on appeal
Backhouse	F	T	sr	F	Ballentine v. Ballentine, 2001 CanLII 28151 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.5	7.5 K costs for dismissed motion to vary support, man declared a vextacious litigant, 307 K arrears, 6.2 K costs of appeal
Backhouse	F	T	sr		Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII)	mj	C		2 months in jail for failure to pay security and dissipating assets, appeal dismissed
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Debora v. Debora, 2004 CanLII 44791 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Order freezing some of mans assets continued
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Debora v. Debora, 2004 CanLII 44791 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	4755.0	Child support of 23 K per month, 951 K retroactive award, man claims 745 K income and is imputed to 5.5 million per year
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Debora v. Debora, 2005 CanLII 7671 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	2250.0	Wife asks for 2.6 million and gets 2.25 million for divorce
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Debora v. Debora, 2005 CanLII 7671 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 2.4 million prejudgment interest
Backhouse	F	T	L	L	Duhnych v. Duhnych, 2003 CanLII 2190 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		18 K from proceeds of home to be paid into court as security
Backhouse	F	T	sr	L	Kalla v. Kalla, 2003 CanLII 2322 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Security for 105 K equalization as a mortgage, husbands share of family home transferred to wife.
Backhouse	F	T	sr	M	Kordic v. Bernachi, 2007 CanLII 34844 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	15 K costs for motion to change support
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	LeVan v. LeVan, 2006 CanLII 31020 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	170.0	Man claims a maximum of 200 K income and is imputed to 370 K, separation agreement reopened and equalization redone due to incomplete disclosure
Backhouse	F	T	sr	M	Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.0	10 K costs
Backhouse	F	T	L	L	Nicolaides v. Nicolaides, 2007 CanLII 56522 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non dissapation order
Backhouse	F	T	L	F	Nordin v. Joslin, 2005 CanLII 14004 (ON S.C.D.C.)	mj	Cts	6.2	6.2 K for support reduction motion and 5 K for appeal
Backhouse	F	T	M	sr	O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 2367 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man must post 10 K security, appeal dismissed
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Scholes v. Scholes, 2003 CanLII 2349 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive interim possession, $ 1325 in child support and spousal support per month
Backhouse	F	T	M	M	Tannahill v. Tannahill, 2005 CanLII 51025 (ON C.A.)	mj	D		Default leads to 30 K lump sum order, denied appeal
Backhouse	F	T	sr	M	Writer v. Peroff, 2006 CanLII 38363 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.5	Mans has his pleadings struck dismissed, 12.5 K costs, 12 K costs of appeal
Bain	F	T	M	M	Demarchi v. Selwyn, 2002 CanLII 2722 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	93.0	93 K lump sum made credited towards monthly payments
Bain	F	T	sr	M	DeMarco v. DeMarco, 2005 CanLII 6389 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, restraining order
Beaulieu	F	T	M	M	Gonawati v. Teitsson, 2000 CanLII 22541 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	42.0	Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest, 42 K costs
Beaulieu	F	T	M	M	Gonawati v. Teitsson, 2000 CanLII 22541 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest, 42 K costs
Benotto	F	T	M	M	Cutaia-Mahler v. Mahler, 2001 CanLII 28138 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	15 K for motion to vary support
Benotto	F	T	M	F	Davis v. Nusca, 2003 CanLII 2301 (ON S.C.D.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K costs for motion, leave to appeal denied, mother move to Sweden with children in interim
Benotto	F	T	M	M	Evans v. Gravely, 2000 CanLII 22593 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	23.0	Man claims 17 K taxablre income and is imputed to 40 K
Benotto	F	T	sr	L	Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	20 K costs and interest
Benotto	F	T	sr	L	Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	14.0	14 K lump sum retroactive support and prejudgment interest
Benotto	F	T	sr	L	Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		14 K lump sum retroactive support and pre judgment interest
Benotto	F	T	M	M	P.L.C. v. C.J.P., 2007 CanLII 57080 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Summary judgment on custody and access, supervised access in 2001 still in effect in 2007
Benotto	F	T	M	M	P.L.C. v. C.J.P., 2007 CanLII 57080 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Summary judgment on custody and access, supervised access in 2001 still in effect in 2007
Benotto	F	T			Stanghi v. Stanghi, 2001 CanLII 5784 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man claims no income and is imputed to 40 K, variation denied, appeal dismissed with costs
Croll	F	T	sr		Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII)	mn	Cts	1.0	1 K costs of motion
Croll	F	T	sr		Hartman 2005	mj	Ip
Croll	F	T	M	F	Murray v. Murray, 2005 CanLII 30304 (ON C.A.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets retroactive support and prejudgment interest and costs, overturned on appeal
Croll	F	T	M	F	Parker v. Parker, 2004 CanLII 14179 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Interim motion for custody and support, wife gets 5 K
Croll	F	T	M	M	Riel v. Holland, 2003 CanLII 3433 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	15.0	3.4 spousal support per month, 2.2 child support per month, man claims 55 K and is imputed to 132 K per year, 15 K costs
Croll	F	T	M	M	Riel v. Holland, 2003 CanLII 3433 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	77.0	3.4 spousal support per month, 2.2 child support per month, man claims 55 K and is imputed to 132 K per year, 15 K costs
Croll	F	T	M	M	Riel v. Holland, 2003 CanLII 3433 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		Charging order over home and cottage as security for support
Croll	F	T	M	L	Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Non dissipation order
Croll	F	T	sr	F	Y.T. v. J.K.1, 2006 CanLII 4908 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		20 K security with court for compliance with order, wife says husband abused her, gets sole custody to move to Japan
Croll	F	T	sr	M	Y.T. v. J.K.1, 2006 CanLII 4908 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody, man must post 20 K security with court until child is 15, wife allowed to move to Japan
Goodman	F	T	L	L	Colford v. Colford, 2005 CanLII 13032 (ON SC)	mj	L	43.0	Lump of 43 K for past arrears of 80 K, alienated from son who won’t see him, must get life insurance designated to son until son turns 27
Goodman	F	T	M	M	Nolan v. MacLean, 2006 CanLII 38865 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession of the family home and interim custody
Goodman	F	T	L	L	Reid v. Saliba, 2005 CanLII 48321 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Default on support, payment as a lump sum with interest
Goodman	F	T	L	L	Reid v. Saliba, 2005 CanLII 48321 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	57.0	Man must rollover 57 K of pension in lump sum to wife
Goodman	F	T	L	L	Rose v. Rose, 2005 CanLII 46401 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		May not encumber deplete or sell business
Greer	F	T	sr	M	Akerboom v. Steele, 2004 CanLII 29451 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	51.0	Man is unemployed, imputed to 51 K per year
Greer	F	T	sr	M	Akerboom v. Steele, 2004 CanLII 29451 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Proceeds from sale of home ordered as security for support
Greer	F	T	M	F	Brans v. Brans, 2000 CanLII 22471 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	250.0	Man claims maximum income of 200 K and is imputed to 450 K
Greer	F	T	M	F	Chen v. Chen, 2000 CanLII 22564 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Man must transfer second taxi license to wife and lease it off her to continue employment, wife already got the first taxi license for equalization, FRO moves to take away his license
Greer	F	T	M	F	Chen v. Chen, 2000 CanLII 22564 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	15.0	Man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 30 K, home transferred to wife, both his taxi licenses, man hasn’t seen his children in 10 years, 100 K life insurance for security, 22 K arrears, unstated costs
Greer	F	T	M	F	Chen v. Chen, 2000 CanLII 22564 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		100 K life insurance policy to secure support
Greer	F	T	sr	F	Dang v. Hornby, 2006 CanLII 12973 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	30.0	Man with 10 K income claimed intentionally unemployed and imputed to 40 K
Greer	F	T	L	L	Debora v. Debora, 2005 CanLII 7671 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man must post 3 million to court as security for wifes claims
Greer	F	T	F	M	Di Luca v. Di Luca, 2003 CanLII 2343 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	58.0	Man and wife imputed, man claims 88 K and is imputed to 146 K, man pays equivalent of 3 K support per month, wife mild
Greer	F	T	F	M	Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 CanLII 15236 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man must post 100 K security to court
Greer	F	T	F	sr	Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	17.8	17.8 K arrears on costs and 12.8 K interest on arrears on costs, interest on costs rescinded,
Greer	F	T	F	sr	Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, Man must go bankrupt to erase support interest, denied variation
Greer	F	T	M	M	Huck v. Huck, 2004 CanLII 22079 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	46.0	2.5 K per month spousal support, 20 K arrears, 43 K equalization, man claims 39 K income including 24 K loan and is imputed to 85 K, arrears 20.4 K
Greer	F	T	M	M	Iankilevitch v. Iankilevitch, 2004 CanLII 20533 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		100 K insurance used as security for support
Greer	F	T	sr	M	Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Man in contempt for bankruptcy, 180 K lump sum, spousal support from pension to wife
Greer	F	T	sr	M	Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	20 K costs for divorce action
Greer	F	T	sr	F	Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	180.0	180 K lump sum
Greer	F	T	sr	M	Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Life insurance policy to secure support, 180 K lump sum, bankruptcy, contempt
Greer	F	T	M	M	Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 4025 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	101	30 K lump sum support, an additional 71 K to be paid within 30 days.50 K interim disbursement, 35 K extraordinary expense, 8 K per month child support, interim motion
Greer	F	T	M	F	Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 47780 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Man found in contempt for disclosure, 93 K cost penalty
Greer	F	T	M	M	Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 47780 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	93.0	Interim motion to determine support, wife asks 99 K gets 93 K
Greer	F	T	M		Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	3.0 K costs for interim motion
Greer	F	T	M		Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order
Greer	F	T	F	M	Selznick v. Selznick, 2002 CanLII 2778 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	60.0	5 K per month child support, 3.1 K s.7 expense, 6 K spousal support per month, 44 K retroactive arrears, man claims 300 K income and is imputed to 360 K
Greer	F	T	F	F	Tu v. Tu, 2000 CanLII 22591 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife given minor prejudgment and post judgment interest on support arrears
Greer	F	T	sr	M	Writer v. Peroff, 2006 CanLII 38363 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	34.0	Mans has his pleadings struck dismissed, 12.5 K costs, 12 K costs of appeal, 34 K for costs of uncontested trial
Greer	F	T	sr	F	Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.)	mj	C	2.0	2 K costs for contempt motion, 6 K arrears, 7 K for forensic accountant, pleadings struck
Greer	F	T	sr	F	Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		2 K costs for contempt motion, 6 K arrears, 7 K for forensic accountant, pleadings struck
Greer	F	T	sr	F	Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K costs for contempt motion, 6 K arrears, 7 K for forensic accountant, pleadings struck
Herman	F	T	M	M	Adamson v. Steed, 2007 CanLII 1328 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	3 day trial, wife asks 47.5 K gets 20 K
Herman	F	T	M	M	Altobello v. Altobello, 2006 CanLII 44265 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	Motion, 2.5 K costs
Herman	F	T	M	F	Davis v. Tangredi, 2006 CanLII 44269 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		5 million held frozen
Herman	F	T	M	F	D'Costa v. D'Costa, 2005 CanLII 56207 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	13.5	Support variation, wife asks for 19.3 K and gets 13.5 K
Herman	F	T	L	F	Ferazzutti v. Ferazzutti, 2006 CanLII 44271 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	14.0	Man claims 33 K income and is imputed to 47 K
Herman	F	T	M	M	Molson v. Molson, 2006 CanLII 44277 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		A large number of mans business deductions not allowed, man imputed to 422 K but claimed income not clearly stated
Herman	F	T	M	M	Molson v. Molson, 2006 CanLII 44277 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		500 K life insurance while children still receive support
Herman	F	T	F	F	O'Reilly v. O'Reilly, 2006 CanLII 44279 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	4.0	Man consents to impution at 20 K but is imputed to 24 K, recieves $ 500 per month spousal support
Herman	F	T	sr	F	Tock v. Tock, 2006 CanLII 44281 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	4 K costs remaining owing, 450 K life insurance policy as long as he is obligated to pay support
Himel	F	T	M	M	Kennedy v. Kennedy, 2000 CanLII 22437 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Non depletion order, man must pay 1 K per month spousal support, must hold life insurance designating wife
Himel	F	T	M	M	Kennedy v. Kennedy, 2000 CanLII 22437 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Non depletion order, man must pay 1 K per month spousal support, must hold life insurance designating wife
Himel	F	T	M	M	Lenz v. Broadhurst Main, 2004 CanLII 5059 (ON S.C	mj	L	20.0	30 K lump sum payment reduced to 20 K, man sues his lawyers
Himel	F	T	sr	M	Orszak v. Orszak, 2000 CanLII 22529 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	55.0	Man must provide car of 15 K lump so wife can get car, man claims 45 K income and is imputed to 100 K, 9 K arrears
Himel	F	T	sr	M	Orszak v. Orszak, 2000 CanLII 22529 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	15.0	Man must provide car of 15 K lump so wife can get car, man claims 45 K income and is imputed to 100 K, 9 K arrears
Himel	F	T	M	F	Segal v. Qu, 2001 CanLII 28201 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual retraining order, man pays time limited 2.5 K spousal support
Himel	F	T	F	F	Yue v. Earl-McIntyre, 2001 CanLII 28178 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Summary judgment granted against man on access, no motions for a year, security, cost penalty reduced on appeal
Himel	F	T	sr	F	Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.0	Man retroactively imputed to current 250 K imputed income, 7 K costs
Himel	F	T	sr	F	Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Man retroactively imputed to current 250 K imputed income, 7 K costs
Karakatsanis	F	T	sr	m	Campbell v. Szoke, 2003 CanLII 2291 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	8.0	Mans maximum income over 6 years is 16 K imputed to 24 K, man must pay 1.1 K per month in spousal support
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	M	David v. McCain, 2006 CanLII 9302 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	Interim motion for custody access, wife asks 20 K and gets 15 K, husband asks 40 K and gets increased access
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	F	A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 1969 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Restraining order for assault, wife requests it be made permanent denied, wife makes 2 unsubstantiated complaints to Childrens Aid, third party child exchanges, wife asks for access to children terminated or limited, supervised access denied
Karakatsanis	F	T	sr	M	Fantin v. Gillingham-Corkun Fantin, 2003 CanLII 2114 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Man traded from stock account and lost money contrary to preservation order
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	M	Fisher v. Wenger, 2003 CanLII 2312 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man must pay funds from sale of condo into the court
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	F	Fox v. Fox, 2006 CanLII 21065 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	85.8	Divorce action with a 10 day trial, wife asks 200 K gets 85.8 K
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	F	Matanovic v. Matanovic, 2005 CanLII 47788 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	Interim motion, wife asks 10.3 K and gets 2.5 K
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	M	Meikle v. Meikle, 2003 CanLII 2032 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	17.0	Support variaton, 17 K costs
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	M	Meikle v. Meikle, 2003 CanLII 2183 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	55.0	55 K extra income imputed to man from RRSP’s
Karakatsanis	F	T	M	F	Pinizzotto v. Pinizzotto, 2005 CanLII 34355 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	12.0	Man claims 63 K income and is imputed to 75 K
Karakatsanis	F	T	F	M	Rueter v. Rueter, 2003 CanLII 2231 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	33.0	$ 1017 per month child support and $ 1066 per month s.7 expenses, and $ 1500 per month spousal support, man claims 45 K income imputed to 78 K
Kitely	F	T	M	F	Daemi v. Morovati, 2003 CanLII 2092 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	31.0	Man is unemployed and is imputed to 31 K, variation denied, man declares bankruptcy
Kitely	F	T	M	F	Kolody Ardan v. Ardan, 2002 CanLII 2689 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets interim custody and exclusive possession
Kitely	F	T	M	M	Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	53.0	Man with previously variable income is unemployed, income imputed to 53 K, support arrears, lump sum payment
Kitely	F	T	M	M	Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.)	mn	L	1.8	Lump sum of $ 1750 but 22 K in calculated arrears of support
Kitely	F	T	F	M	Percival v. Percival, 2000 CanLII 22517 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	100.0	Man claims 800 K after tax income and is imputed to 900 K, 8 K per month support, 40 K retroactive arrears
Kitely	F	T	M	F	Reyes v. Rollo, 2001 CanLII 28260 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife awarded prejudgment interest
Kitely	F	T		M	Sait v. Thorne, 2006 CanLII 44280 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	200.0	Over 200 K in costs, 188 K is support related and survives mans bankruptcy
Kitely	F	T	M	M	Scholes v. Scholes, 2003 CanLII 2349 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	35.0	Man claims his income at 25 K and court imputes at 60 K
Kitely	F	T	F	F	Ul Haq v. Ul Haq, 2003 CanLII 2263 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	60.0	Man declares 24 K imputed to 84 K, retroactive arrears of support and s.7 expenses
Kitely	F	T	sr	F	Ul Haq v. Ul Haq, 2003 CanLII 2263 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Ex parate restraining order, wife gets custody
Klowak	F	T	M	F	Sharf v. Sharf, 2004 CanLII 5765 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, 15 K per month total support
Klowak	F	T	sr	sr	Tyll v. Dini-Tyll, 2003 CanLII 2262 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Man works out of home so cash flow may be more than reported, imputed to 30 K
Lax	F	T	M	F	Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Man ordered in default, eventually set aside by Macdonald J
Lax	F	T	M	F	Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		12.5 K costs and 4 K security for costs for motion to set aside default to proceed, costs and security and default set aside
Lax	F	T	M	F	Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts		12.5 K costs and 4 K security for costs for motion to set aside default to proceed, costs and security and default set aside
Lax	F	T	M	M	Jordan v. Stewart, 2002 CanLII 2678 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	87.0	Previous declared income of 140 K imputed to 227 K, 5.6 K per month in total support
Lax	F	T	M	sr	O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 1931 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Man must comply with 10 K security order to receive trial judgment
Lax	F	T	M	sr	O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 2366 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	46.0	Man claims 35 K income and is imputed at 81 K
Lax	F	T	M	M	Rueter v. Rueter, 2002 CanLII 2733 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Adjourned motion to strike pleading for not paying interim support. Permission to combine suit for flipping assets
Low	F	T	sr	M	A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 2409 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	56.0	Wife gets 56 K cost penalty on custody access variation action, offset against 8 K owed in costs for interim motion by husband
Low	F	T	sr	M	Hartmann v. Frantel, 2004 CanLII 16317 (ON C.A.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, appeal dismissed
Low	F	T	sr	L	Kordic v. Bernachi, 2006 CanLII 38875 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		15 K security to make motion
Low	F	T	sr	L	Kordic v. Bernachi, 2007 CanLII 34844 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	5 K costs for motion
Low	F	T	L	L	L.L.B. v. D.A., 2002 CanLII 2769 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Ex parte restraining order, then complaint to Childrens Aid gets second restraining order and access temporarily suspended, wife gets custody and is allowed to move to Manitoba
Low	F	T	M	sr	McGoey v. McGoey, 2003 CanLII 2179 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Maintain insurance policy in wifes name to secure support
Low	F	T	L	L	Ristimaki v. Cooper, 2004 CanLII 16074 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, man leaves country
Macdonald	F	T	F	M	Aunger v. Aunger, 2004 CanLII 39015 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	200.0	200 K lump sum support, wife already got 2 lump payments of 42 K
Macdonald	F	T	F	M	Aunger v. Aunger, 2005 CanLII 9665 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	33.8	33.8 K for trial
Macdonald	F	T	M	F	Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Husband gets default of over 13 K in costs penalties set aside but gets cost penalty of 1.5 K
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	Gill v. Jhajj, 2003 CanLII 2126 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession of home by lying to the court and husband gets occupation rent
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	H.1 v. H.2, 2004 CanLII 43947 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	70.0	Divorce action, 70 K cost
Macdonald	F	T	F	F	Hamid v. Hamid, 2003 CanLII 2128 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with assault, wife gets custody
Macdonald	F	T	sr	M	Kaplanis v. Kaplanis, 2003 CanLII 2145 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	18.0	Man claims 20 K income and is imputed to 38 K, wife makes 42 K
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	McDougall Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 5876 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Man under non dissipation order
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	McDougall Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	57.0	57 K lump sum, must continue to pay 4.2 K per month support until lump sum is paid
Macdonald	F	T	M	F	Nichele v. Nichele, 2003 CanLII 1901 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Preliminary hearing in motion to vary support order, 5 K costs, man is allowed to proceed
Macdonald	F	T	M	F	Pantchevski v. Pantchevska, 2005 CanLII 7672 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	49.0	Man claims 9 K income and is imputed to 58 K
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 9423 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	70.0	Lump sum of 350 K for child support, costs of 70 K
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 9423 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	350.0	Lump sum of 350 K for child support, costs of 70 K
Macdonald	F	T	M	W	Sawyers v. McKechnie, 2003 CanLII 2232 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Both parents charged with assault, woman gets custody
McWatt	F	T	M	F	De Zen v. De Zen, 2002 CanLII 45410 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	1900.0	Man quits job due to back problem, court rules intentionally unemployed and imputes income of 1.9 million per year
McWatt	F	T	M	F	Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	1.5 K costs for interim motion
Mesbur	F	T	sr	sr	Brown v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 43896 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	33.0	Man earns 20 K or less and is imputed to 53 K, appeal dismissed
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Buttarazzi v. Buttarazzi, 2005 CanLII 5869 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Arrested for assault, he says she assaulted him, wife gets custody, 10 K per month total support, 116 K in arrears, freezing order
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Buttarazzi v. Buttarazzi, 2005 CanLII 5869 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	309.0	Man claims 90 K and is imputed to 399 K by arbitrator and award is made a court order, freezing order
Mesbur	F	T	M	F	Dhanna v. Dhanna, 2004 CanLII 46660 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Non dissipation order against man continued
Mesbur	F	T	F	M	Dhanna v. Dhanna, 2004 CanLII 46660 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	77.0	Man not working but imputed to 77 K per year, Man must pay 2.5 K per month total support, non depletion order
Mesbur	F	T	M	F	Dhanna v. Dhanna, 2004 CanLII 46660 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Non depletion and trust account order continued for man until he repays about 180 K then his portion of the trust will be released., wifes funds released, marriage contract set aside, income imputed
Mesbur	F	T	F	L	Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	$ 1000 to wife and mans motion to vary may proceed
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Haroun v. Haroun, 2001 CanLII 28128 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	58.0	Man claims 172 K income and is imputed to 230 K., 6 K per month spousal support, 250 K advance on equalization already paid
Mesbur	F	T	sr	m	Herskovits v. Herskovits, 2001 CanLII 28233 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	30.0	30 K lump sum
Mesbur	F	T	sr	sr	Ingles v. Watt, 2003 CanLII 2136 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man given supervised access, wife must pay half the costs, wife refuses to pay and man gets no access
Mesbur	F	T	F	F	Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	58.0	Man unemployed and presents plan for new business. Asks income be imputed at 30 K but court imputes at 88 K
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Onogi v. Elguindi, 2005 CanLII 23686 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	26.0	2 voluntary lump sums of 22 K and 24 K, court orders 26 K lump sum, equalization of 485 K and support of 5 K per month,. lump sum figures in US $
Mesbur	F	T	M	F	Tauber v. Tauber, 2001 CanLII 28234 (ON S.C.)	mj	L		Wife gets 3 ½ years prejudgment interest on 500 K spousal support lump sum at 4 %
Mesbur	F	T	M	F	Tauber v. Tauber, 2001 CanLII 28234 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 3 ½ years prejudgment interest on 500 K spousal support lump sum at 4 %
Mesbur	F	T	L	L	Waese v. Bojman, 2001 CanLII 28221 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	61.0	Man clains 49 K income and is imputed to 110 K, wife has income of 1.1 million in past 3 years and is imputed to 125 K
Mesbur	F	T	M	F	Wilcox v. Wilcox, 2003 CanLII 2272 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Mans support overpayment to be held by FRO as security for variation motion
Pepall	F	T	M	F	Danylkiw v. Danylkiw, 2003 CanLII 2283 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	15.0	Man pays 15 K lump for spousal support and 2 K per month child support, fraudulently reports income, children move in with man, wife ordered to pay retroactive support
Pepall	F	T	F	M	Stein v. Stein, 2002 CanLII 2780 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Pleadings struck for support default
Pepall	F	T	F	M	Stein v. Stein, 2002 CanLII 2780 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, 15 previous court orders, man ordered to pay 5 K per month
Pepall	F	T	M	M	Stein v. Stein, 2003 CanLII 46771 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		Security held for costs paid out, man wins appeal and gets most returned
Sachs	F	T	M	M	Baldwin v. Funston, 2004 CanLII 21282 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Life insurance policy as security
Sachs	F	T	sr	M	Bechler v. Bechler, 2004 CanLII 32270 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	11.0	Mans income 37 K, imputed to 48 K
Sachs	F	T	sr	M	Bechler v. Bechler, 2004 CanLII 879 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	10.8	Divorce action, wife claims 48K gets 10.8 K
Sachs	F	T	M	F	Bronfman v. Bronfman, 2000 CanLII 22710 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Man made to deposit security with ex wifes lawyers
Sachs	F	T	L	L	Clegg v. Clegg, 2000 CanLII 22636 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets prejudgment interest on 1.7 million for 4 years
Sachs	F	T	M	sr	Duhnych v. Duhnych, 2004 CanLII 11777 (ON S.C.)	mj	L		Home secured against lump sum payment, for failure to pay 39 K of 42 K income
Sachs	F	T	M	sr	Duhnych v. Duhnych, 2004 CanLII 11777 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Home secured against lump sum payment, for failure to pay 39 K of 42 K income, 61 K arrears, imputed income
Sachs	F	T	M	sr	Duhnych v. Duhnych, 2004 CanLII 11777 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Sachs	F	T	M	M	Fisher v. Wenger, 2003 CanLII 2312 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Man found in contempt twice for selling property, first time 5 day imprisonment, second time sentencing hearing
Sachs	F	T	M	F	Gardiman v. Brown, 2006 CanLII 40789 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Motion for access and crossmotion for support, 4 K costs
Sachs	F	T	M	sr	Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Spousal support default, security deposit 25 K, unemployed, 14 K arrears, variation denied
Sachs	F	T	M	sr	Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Must post 25 K security to be held in trust against support and pay 14 K in arrears
Sachs	F	T	M	sr	Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.)\	mj	Ip	48.0	Man is unemployed but held to former income level of 48 K, variation denied
Sachs	F	T	F	M	Mondino v. Mondino, 2004 CanLII 21293 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Mans share of home held as security for support
Sachs	F	T	F	M	Mondino v. Mondino, 2004 CanLII 21293 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Man subject to restraining order, ousts wife from house, wife gets custody, 2 K per month total support
Sachs	F	T	sr	L	Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, can be reinstated if he pays arrears and costs, man leaves country and is arrested as an absconding debtor
Sachs	F	T	M	F	Sarafinchin v. Sarafinchin, 2000 CanLII 22639 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	305.0	Man claims 80 K income and is imputed to 385 K per year, 4.2 K child support per month, retroactive arrears
Speigel	F	T	sr	F	Hosannah v. Hosannah, 2004 CanLII 9498 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.0	Appeal, wife asks for 13.8 K and gets 7 K costs for motion
Stewart	F	T	M	F	Bekarkhanchi v. Bozchelouei, 2003 CanLII 30463 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Default judgement of lump sum child and spousal support, 447 equalization payment, variation denied
Stewart	F	T	M	F	Bekarkhanchi v. Bozchelouei, 2003 CanLII 30463 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	447.0	Lump sum child and spousal support and equalization payment of 447 K, variation denied
Stewart	F	T	M	F	Bekarkhanchi v. Bozchelouei, 2003 CanLII 30463 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		GIC held as security for lump sum
Stewart	F	T	M	F	Bekarkhanchi v. Bozchelouei, 2004 CanLII 7044 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.0	7 K costs of motion
Stewart	F	T	F	M	Dickie v. Dickie, 2006 CanLII 10735 (ON C.A.)	mj	C		Contempt motion, 16.5 K
Stewart	F	T	F	M	Dickie v. Dickie, 2006 CanLII 10735 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	16.5	Contempt motion, 16.5 K
Stewart	F	T	sr	m	Milunovic v. Milunovic, 2004 CanLII 19101 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Mans supervised access changed to unsupervised, increase in support
Stewart	F	T	M	M	Noethe v. Noethe, 2004 CanLII 31863 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	Wife gets summary judgment against husband, security had been ordered, 15 K costs
Stewart	F	T	M	M	Noethe v. Noethe, 2004 CanLII 31863 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Wife gets summary judgment against husband, security had been ordered, 15 K costs
Stewart	F	T	M	M	Qi v. Fung, 2006 CanLII 16366 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Motion for child support, husbands income imputed to 40 K, 1.5 K costs
Stewart	F	T	M	M	Romanski v. Romanska, 2004 CanLII 9784 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	12.0	12 K lump sun for retroactive spousal support
Stewart	F	T	M	M	Witz v. Witz, 2004 CanLII 27102 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Proceeds from sale of home held as security in case of equalization payment, 75 K paid out to wife
Swinton	F	T	M	M	S. D. v. R. L., 2004 CanLII 6323 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wife and husband are charged with assault, wife gets custody, wife moves in with boyfriend and has him charged with threats and harassment and changes locks on his house
Thorburn	F	T	sr		Grimalyuk v. Concelos, 2007 CanLII 1325 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, restraining order
Thorburn	F	T	sr		Grimalyuk v. Concelos, 2007 CanLII 1325 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	4 K total costs
Young	F	T	M	M	Di Matteo v. Del Medico, 2005 CanLII 27011 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	68.0	Man claims 28 K imputed to 96 K, retroactive support, expert witnesses, 1.2 K per month child support
Young	F	T	M	M	Giacco v. Papadopoulos, 2006 CanLII 40790 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	20.0	Combined $ 6021 per month child support and spousal support, husband claims 72 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife get interim disbursement of 25 K, 20 K costs
Young	F	T	M	M	Giacco v. Papadopoulos, 2006 CanLII 40790 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	28.0	Combined $ 6021 per month child support and spousal support, husband claims 72 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife get interim disbursement of 25 K, 20 K costs
Archibald	M	T	F	M	Altobello v. Altobello, 2006 CanLII 44264 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife has exclusive possession until she vacates, husband claim for damages is dismissed
Archibald	M	T	F	M	Shoniker v. Gibbs, 2006 CanLII 6915 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	190.0	Man claims 265 K income and is imputed to 455 K
Aston	M	T	M	M	Ayoub v. Osman, 2006 CanLII 9309 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	49.0	Man claims 28 K income tax and is imputed to 77 K, 4.7 K per month total support, variation dismissed
Aston	M	T	M	M	Ayoub v. Osman, 2006 CanLII 9309 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man earlier convicted of assault, wife alleges and doesn’t appear for trial so charges are dropped, then convicted for assaulting children, 46 K per year support
Aston	M	T	sr	M	Cantwell v. Cantwell, 2000 CanLII 22450 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	30.0	30 K lump sum for support from man who is unemployed
Aston	M	T	M	M	Delellis v. Delellis and Delellis, 2005 CanLII 36447 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	45.0	Family claim including constructive trust, wife and child win 50 K and 10 K cost, claim 45 K costs
Aston	M	T	M	M	Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick, 2004 CanLII 13318 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Prejudgment interest on multimillion dollar equalization will be about 100 K, 6.5 K spousal support per month
Aston	M	T	M	M	Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick, 2004 CanLII 13318 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Man must keep life insurance policy designated to wife and children
Aston	M	T	sr	M	Fraser v. McKinlay, 2004 CanLII 5857 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Aston	M	T	M	M	Gartley v. Thibert, 2002 CanLII 2726 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Adult child in school quits and mom doesn’t tell FRO. Man gets mostly varied
Aston	M	T	M	M	Marshall v. Marshall, 2002 CanLII 2724 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.0	Support claim, husband spends 20 K, and is given 12 K cost penalty
Aston	M	T	M	M	Marshall v. Marshall, 2002 CanLII 2724 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Support claim, husband spends 20 K, and is given 12 K cost penalty, life insurance policy for security
Aston	M	T	sr	sr	Matheson v. Matheson, 2003 CanLII 1949 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Default set aside with variation
Aston	M	T	M	M	Moore v. Fernandes, 2001 CanLII 28263 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Non depletion order
Aston	M	T	M	M	Osmar v. Osmar, 2000 CanLII 20380 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	25.0	Wife asks for 33 K and gets 25 K for trial
Aston	M	T	M	M	Picard v. Picard, 2001 CanLII 28214 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	79.0	Man claims 448 K income and is imputed to 527 K
Aston	M	T	sr	M	R.P.H. v. V.M., 2003 CanLII 2109 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order for drunken abuse, police called, wife gets custody, supervised child exchanges
Aston	M	T	M	M	Sims-Howarth v. Bilcliffe, 2000 CanLII 22584 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	5 K for motion
Aston	M	T	M	M	Snjaric. v. Snjaric, 2003 CanLII 1964 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Charging order on mans property as security for support
Aston	M	T	M	M	Witzel v. Witzel, 2004 CanLII 5006 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Life insurance policy as security for support
Belobaba	M	T	M	F	Feher v. Healey, 2006 CanLII 33312 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	14.0	Husband sues wife over transfer of home and loses, wife asks for 26 K and gets 14 K
Brown	M	T	L	L	Javaid v. Valmas, 2006 CanLII 37882 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.5	5.5 K costs for contempt motion
Brown	M	T	L	L	Kaplun v. Kaplun, 2007 CanLII 38396 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.5	7.5 K for motion
Brown	M	T	L	L	Lyons v. Tuffner, 2007 CanLII 30665 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Interim motion, 1.5 K costs
Brown	M	T	L	L	Nicolaides v. Nicolaides, 2007 CanLII 56522 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	30.0	Man on welfare imputed to 36 K and denied spousal support
Brown	M	T	L	L	Nicolaides v. Nicolaides, 2007 CanLII 56522 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Mutual non dissapation order continued against mans request to have it lifted
Clark	M	T	L	L	Babb v. Downer, 2005 CanLII 3371 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Mans income imputed many times higher than he claimed, costs 4 K
Clark	M	T	M	M	Babb v. Downer, 2005 CanLII 6047 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Costs of motion 4 K
Clark	M	T	M	F	Copp v. Copp, 2004 CanLII 34077 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	Divorce Action, 15 K costs
Clark	M	T	sr	L	Kordic v. Bernachi, 2006 CanLII 38875 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	5.0	15 K security to make motion, 5 K costs, 18 K costs still owing
Clark	M	T	sr	L	Kordic v. Bernachi, 2006 CanLII 38875 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		15 K security to make motion, 5 K costs, 18 K costs still owing
Clark	M	T	F	M	Molitor v. Andreou, 2006 CanLII 3481 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Interim support motion, husband ordered to pay 5.3 K per month support, 5 K costs
Czurtin	M	T	M	F	Jordan v. Stewart, 2007 CanLII 11716 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.0	Motion to vary support, wife asks 13.5 K and gets 7 K
Czutrin	M	T	M	M	K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	52.0	Man spends 2 ½ years in jail from mothers allegations, supervised access, income imputed to 52 K while in jail, 40 K arrears
Czutrin	M	T	M	M	K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man spends 2 ½ years in jail from mothers allegations, supervised access, income imputed to 52 K while in jail, 40 K arrears
Day	M	T	sr	F	Ziomek v. La Selva, 2001 CanLII 28197 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	2.5 K for interim motion
Ferrier	M	T	M	M	Kondovski v. Kondovski, 2006 CanLII 24455 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Mans motion to vary support and rescind arrears dismissed on summary judgment, costs $ 1500
Ferrier	M	T	M	M	Kondovski v. Kondovski, 2006 CanLII 24455 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Mans motion to vary support and rescind arrears dismissed on summary judgment, costs $ 1500
Grossi	M	T	M	M	Fabro v. Ferrante, 2003 CanLII 1952 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Establish life insurance as security for child support, common law wife gets constructive trust on family home
Hoilett	M	T	M	M	Goryjowski v. Goryjowska, 2005 CanLII 3395 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	21.0	Mans income imputed at 21 K
Hoilett	M	T	sr		Grimalyuk v. Concelos, 2007 CanLII 1325 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, restraining order
Hoilett	M	T	sr	F	Richards v. Richards, 2005 CanLII 3398 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		False records, income imputed, equalization based on her figures, a defaulting payor by not giving records
Hoilett	M	T	sr	F	Richards v. Richards, 2005 CanLII 3398 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man claims 20 K income is imputed to 60 K
Hoilett	M	T	sr	F	Richards v. Richards, 2005 CanLII 3398 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man charged with threatening wife, wife gets custody, man says he has no income, imputed at 60 K, 1.9 K per month total support, 50 K equalization
Jarvis	M	T	sr	M	Bechler v. Bechler, 2004 CanLII 32270 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	2.5 K for motion
Jarvis	M	T	sr		Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII)	mj	F		Non dissipation order, june 2006
Jarvis	M	T	sr		Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII)	mj	Sc		Man must deposit 317 K to court as security, june 2006
Jarvis	M	T	sr		Bush v. Mereshensky, 2007 ONCA 679 (CanLII)	mn	Cts	5.0	5 K costs, june 2006
Jarvis	M	T	F	sr	Kumar v. McKenna (Kumar), 2003 CanLII 2156 (ON S.C.)l	mn	L	5.0	38 K arrears and 5 K lump sum award to be taken from mans portion of sale of home
Jarvis	M	T	sr	F	MacLeod v. MacLeod, 2003 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	1 K for interim motion, man goes bankrupt, retroactive arrears, man doesn’t appear at hearing
Jenkins	M	Sw	M	M	Rizzo v. Rizzo, 2001 CanLII 28119 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Man found in contempt 6.5 K penalty
Jennings	M	T	M	F	Nasser v. Mayer-Nasser, 2000 CanLII 5654 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession but husband may sleep in house until wife has husband arrested
Keenan	M	T	sr	sr	Harrison v. Harrison, 2004 CanLII 6216 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		6.2 K arrears and 1.1 K costs, ordered imprisoned if he doesn’t pay
Keenan	M	T	sr	sr	Harrison v. Harrison, 2004 CanLII 6216 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.1	6.2 K arrears and 1.1 K costs, ordered imprisoned if he doesn’t pay
O’Connell	M	T	M	M	Giacco v. Papadopoulos, 2006 CanLII 40790 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	28.0	Man claims 72 K and is imputed to 100 K in 2004, order upheld in 2006
O’Connell	M	T	M	M	Manis v. Manis, 2001 CanLII 3851 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		Doesn’t comply with security order, depletes assets, contempt, imprisonment, appeal dismissed for non compliance
O’Connell	M	T	M	M	Maurici v. Maurici, 2001 CanLII 24161 (ON C.A.)	mj	L	50.0	50 K lump sum upheld on appeal
O’Connell	M	T	F	M	Mondino v. Mondino, 2004 CanLII 21293 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
OConnell	M	T	M	M	Pirner v. Pirner, 2005 CanLII 44166 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	155.0	Man claims 20 K income and is imputed to 175 K
OConnell	M	T	M	M	Pirner-Moser v. Pirner, 2003 CanLII 27465 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		Cottage used as security in past, 45 days to pay lump sum or transfer
Paisley	M	T	M	F	Borger v. Jan, 2006 CanLII 17324 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession for previous 3 years, child support 15.3 K per month spousal support 9 K
Paisley	M	T	M	F	Borger v. Jan, 2006 CanLII 17324 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	1120.0	9 K per month spousal support, 15.3 K per month child support, man claims 176 K salary and income is imputed to 1296 K, wifes income imputed to 35 K
Paisley	M	T	M	M	Burke v. Burke, 2003 CanLII 2290 (ON S.C.D.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Unemployed man held to former 53 K income, lowered to 40 K on appeal
Paisley	M	T	L	L	Colford v. Colford, 2005 CanLII 13032 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	25.0	25 K lump sum for support arrears
Paisley	M	T	M	F	Flikerski v. Flikerski, 2001 CanLII 28126 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	$1500 costs of motion
Paisley	M	T	M	M	Iankilevitch v. Iankilevitch, 2004 CanLII 20533 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, affirmed at 3 further hearings, man must pay $ 1262 per month child support and $ 300 spousal support
Paisley	M	T	M	F	Marinangeli v. Marinangeli, 2003 CanLII 27673 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	35.0	Appeal of support dismissed with 40 K reduction, 35 K costs of appeal added to trial
Paisley	M	T	M	F	Narayan v. Padathe, 2006 CanLII 19943 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	75.0	Divorce action, 75 K costs
Paisley	M	T	sr	M	Ostrovskaia v. Ostrovsky, 2001 CanLII 28176 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets permanent exclusive possession, husband drags out procedures purposefully
Paisley	M	T	sr	M	Ostrovskaia v. Ostrovsky, 2001 CanLII 28176 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 4 years prejudgment interest
Spence	M	T	sr	M	Johnson v. Schwalm, 2006 CanLII 13771 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.8	Contempt motion, 15.8 K costs, ordered imprisoned if he doesn’t pay
Spence	M	T	sr	M	Johnson v. Schwalm, 2006 CanLII 13771 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Contempt motion, $ 750 fine and 45 days in jail if he doesn’t pay fine and costs
Spence	M	T	M	M	Weslock v. Weslock, 2003 CanLII 44337 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Vesting order so wife gets condo, deemed to admit allegations against him due to default
Spence	M	T	M	M	Weslock v. Weslock, 2003 CanLII 44337 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Man in default, summary judgment for wife on property including vesting order

2) Penalties Against Women

Backhouse	F	T	M	F	Miller v. Shankman, 2004 CanLII 5063 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip	20.0	Unemployed wife imputed to 20 K income, gets 3 K per month spousal support
Benotto	F	T	M	sr	C.A.M. v. D.M., 2003 CanLII 18880 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	45.0	Woman given supervised access and 45 K cost penalty, appeal dismissed
Benotto	F	T	M	sr	C.A.M. v. D.M., 2003 CanLII 18880 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sa		Woman given supervised access and 45 K cost penalty, appeal dismissed
Benotto	F	T	M	M	Woolf v. Woolf, 2001 CanLII 8591 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	25.0	Womans pleadings struck, appeal dismissed, 25 K costs
Benotto	F	T	M	M	Woolf v. Woolf, 2001 CanLII 8591 (ON C.A.)	mj	St		Womans pleadings struck, appeal dismissed, 25 K costs
Croll	F	T	M	F	Guziolek v. Guziolek, 2006 CanLII 10740 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Man gets eclusive possession and wife gets occupancy rent, man has kids, house ordered sold
Croll	F	T	M	F	Tierney-Hynes v. Hynes, 2005 CanLII 35770 (ON C.A.)	mn	Js		Womans variaton motion dismissed, overturned on appeal
Croll	F	T	sr	M	Y.T. v. J.K.1, 2006 CanLII 4908 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody, man must post 20 K security with court until child is 15, wife allowed to move to Japan
Greer	F	T	F	M	Di Luca v. Di Luca, 2003 CanLII 2343 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Man and wife imputed, man pays equivalent of 3 K support per month, wife mild
Greer	F	T	M	sr	Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	45.0	Womans pleadings struck, claims 30 K income, imputed to 75 K
Greer	F	T	M	sr	Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual restraining order
Greer	F	T	M	sr	Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Womans pleadings struck, june 2004, unstated costs, uncontested trial, claims 30 K income and imputed to 75 K, husband gets custody, 22 K retroactive arrears, home and cottage tranferred to man
Herman	F	T	M	sr	Dagorne v. Cormack, 2007 CanLII 28223 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	Interim motion, 0.75 K cost penalty, second interim 0.75 cost penalty, wife hasn’t paid first penalty
Himel	F	T	M	F	Segal v. Qu, 2001 CanLII 28201 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual retraining order, man pays time limited 2.5 K spousal support
Karakatsanis	F	T	F	M	A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 2409 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	56.0	Wife gets 56 K cost penalty on custody access variation action, offset against 8 K owed in costs for interim motion by husband
Low	F	T	sr	M	A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 2409 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	8.0	Wife gets 56 K cost penalty on custody access variation action, offset against 8 K owed in costs for interim motion by husband
Macdonald	F	T	F	M	Bespaly v. Bespaly, 2003 CanLII 2287 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Contempt 1.5 K penalty later imposed by Benotto J
Macdonald	F	T	F	M	Bespaly v. Bespaly, 2003 CanLII 2287 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.25	Contempt motion for arrears, 4.25 K cost including 0.75 K for cost submissions
Macdonald	F	T	M	F	Brittain v. Brittain, 2003 CanLII 2289 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	3.5 K for costs of denied mobility motion
Macdonald	F	T	M	M	McDougall Pearce v. Murphy, 2004 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K costs for motion to be paid out of 55 K lump sum
Macdonald	F	T	M	F	Sawyers v. McKechnie, 2003 CanLII 2232 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Both parents charged with assault, woman gets custody
Mesbur	F	T	F	L	Bunt v. Assuras, 2003 CanLII 17952 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Defaulted divorce judgement, set aside, man sues lawyers
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Burmi v. Dhiman, 2001 CanLII 28206 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K costs for motion to amend pleadings for damage claim and add husbands parents, motion allowed but spousal support denied fo 7 week marriage
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Cundill v. Cundill, 2004 CanLII 30891 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.5	5.5 K for costs of motion
Mesbur	F	T	M	M	Grierson v. Brunton, 2004 CanLII 4019 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	13.0	13 K in imputed income to unemployed wife, previous job was over 30 K average
Mesbur	F	T	sr	M	Milunovic v. Milunovic, 2004 CanLII 19101 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Default divorce judgement set aside, and no contempt found over access
Mesbur	F	T	M	sr	Santos v. Santos, 2007 CanLII 920 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.5	1.5 K costs of interim motion
Mesbur	F	T	L	L	Waese v. Bojman, 2001 CanLII 28221 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Man clains 49 K income and is imputed to 110 K, wife has income of 1.1 million in past 3 years and is imputed to 125 K
Thorburn	F	T	M	M		mn	D		Woman defaults payments under separation agreement, man get garnishment order that is stayed
Aston	M	T	M	M	Gartley v. Church, 2002 CanLII 2727 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.5	Motion to adjust support overpayment, Husband is partially successful and claims 27 K and gets 3.5 K, wife claims 25 K
Aston	M	T	M	sr	L.C.M. v. C.A.V., 2003 CanLII 47888 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order against wife, husband gets custody of triplets wifes access denied
Aston	M	T	M	M	Sharpe v. Ebers, 2002 CanLII 2725 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Support variation, 4 K costs
Aston	M	T	M	sr	Vandenelsen v. Merkley, 2003 CanLII 1965 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	30.0	Wife who abducted children imputed to 30 K per year though unemployed, temporary suspension of support payable and some arrears rescinded
Aston	M	T	M	sr	Vandenelsen v. Merkley, 2003 CanLII 1965 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Woman abducts children, made to deposit passport as security for access, order overturned, criminal charges
Ferrier	M	T	sr	M	Milunovic v. Milunovic, 2004 CanLII 19101 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Womans default later overturned by Mesbur J
Keenan	M	T	L	L	Kallaba v. Bylykbashi, 2006 CanLII 3953 (ON C.A.)	mn	Js		Wifes motion for support is dismissed on summary judgment, wife gets security and vexacious litigant rulings overturned on appeal

Central Eastern Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

Contents

1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female

2 Region Ce – Central East Region

# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

			Penalties Against Men				Penalties Against Women
			Total		Major		Total		Major
Judge	1	2	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr	# p	# sr

Boyko	F	Ce	1	0	1	0	2	0	1	0
Dunbar	F	Ce	5	0	5	0	0	0	0	0
Eberhard	F	Ce	25	11	17	5	3	2	0	0
Ferguson	F	Ce	9	3	6	3	1	0	0	0
Lack	F	Ce	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Olah	F	Ce	11	1	9	1	2	1	0	0
Rogers	F	Ce	21	9	18	9	2	0	1	0
Scott	F	Ce	20	10	19	10	3	1	3	1
Wildman	F	Ce	10	8	9	7	1	0	1	0
Bryant	M	Ce	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Ditomaso	M	Ce	9	6	9	6	3	0	2	0
Glass	M	Ce	2	0	0	0	3	0	3	0
Graham	M	Ce	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0
Howden	M	Ce	18	3	14	2	4	0	2	0
Ingram	M	Ce	4	2	3	1	0	0	0	0
Logan	M	Ce	3	1	1	0	0	0	0	0
MacDougall	M	Ce	10	2	8	2	1	0	1	0
Mackinnon	M	Ce	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Magda	M	Ce	7	1	4	0	0	0	0	0
McIssac	M	Ce	5	0	4	0	2	1	1	1
Misner	M	Ce	4	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Nelson	M	Ce	5	0	2	0	1	0	0	0
Perkins	M	Ce	32	4	23	4	5	1	2	1
Stong	M	Ce	5	1	2	0	0	0	0	0
Timms	M	Ce	7	6	3	3	2	0	1	0
Wood	M	Ce	7	1	6	1	2	0	1	0

Female Judges	9	104	42	85	35	14	4	6	1
Male judges	17	122	29	82	20	23	2	13	2
Total	26	226	71	167	54	37	6	19	3

Central East Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )

Male Lump Sums missing 4

N = 11 Mean = 42.8 Total = 470.8

5.000 6.700 10.00 11.00 22.00 40.00 44.00 50.00 66.00 79.00 137.0

Male Imputed Income missing 8

N = 27 Mean = 75.5 Total = 2038.5

6.000 10.80 13.00 14.00 16.00 20.00 20.00 21.00 22.00 25.00 26.00 33.00 35.00 40.00 40.00 41.00 48.00 50.00 52.00 55.00 60.00 64.00 66.00 67.00 220.0 293.0 681.0

Male Cost Penalties

N = 53 Mean = 22.0 Total = 1166.0

0.7000 1.000 1.400 2.000 2.100 2.500 3.000 3.000 3.500 4.000 4.000 4.300 4.500 4.500 4.700 4.700 5.000 5.000 5.200 5.500 6.000 6.000 7.000 7.000 7.300 9.000 10.00 10.00 10.20 10.50 11.00 12.00 12.50 12.80 15.00 15.00 15.50 15.70 16.00 16.20 16.60 21.30 24.40 28.70 40.00 42.00 44.00 45.00 45.90 64.00 87.90 91.60 320.0

Female Cost Penalties

N = 17 Mean = 9.1 Total = 154.7

0.3000 0.7000 0.7000 1.300 1.800 2.000 2.000 3.500 7.500 9.000 10.00 10.00 15.00 15.00 16.00 20.00 40.00

Central East Region Case Summary

1) Penalties Against Men

Contents

1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female

2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east

E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west

Sw – south west T - Toronto

3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte

5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor

6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default

Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets

Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum

Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access

Sc – security St – striking pleadings

7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )

Judge

1

2

3

4

Case

5

6

7

Description

						mj	Js		Mans suit for damages for fraud over childs paternity dismissed, claim for past support dismissed bur arrears rescinded and support terminated
						mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, $ 383 per month child support and $ 700 spousal support
		Ce	l	l	McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2002 CanLII 2803 (ON S.C.)		Sa		Though primary caregiver in past made by wife to undergo supervised access, custody and access settled prior to trial
Boyko	F	Ce	M	M	Lascala v. Lascala, 2004 CanLII 5013 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	24.4	Divorce action, husbands pleadings struck, uncontested trial wife asks 100K gets 24.4 K
Dunbar	F	Ce	L	L	Berzins v. Straughan, 2002 CanLII 2695 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Granted but award for damages denied, husband convicted of assault, daughter testifies, wife gets custody,
Dunbar	F	Ce			Griffin 2004	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck
Dunbar	F	Ce	M	M	Lindo v. Lindo, 2002 CanLII 2702 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	50.0	Lump sum over 50 K given by transfer of home, $ 225 per month spousal support
Dunbar	F	Ce	M	M	Lindo v. Lindo, 2002 CanLII 2702 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man imprisoned for assault not allowed back home, vesting order on house to wife
Dunbar	F	E	M	M	Murano v. Murano, 2002 CanLII 49352 (ON C.A.)	mj	C		Man sentenced to jail for contempt for failing to provide disclosure
Dunbar	F	Ce	M	F	Vukovic v. Vukovic, 2003 CanLII 1987 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		23 K held as security, security and 17 K more ordered to wife for spousal support arrears
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	sr	Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	50.0	Man must be hiding income so set at 50 K per year, wife imputed at 64 K, Man must pay 1.1 K per year, wife mild
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	sr	Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order, police visit to get personal items, wife gets custody, underemployed, mans stated income doubled by court
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	sr	Courchesne v. Courchesne, 2004 CanLII 5003 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	13.0	Intransient with alcohol problem for many years ordered to pay 43 K in arrears and imputed from 12 K claimed to 25 K, must pay $ 600 per month
Eberhard	F	Ce			Critch v. Critch, 2005 CanLII 16630 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.0	Motion, 4 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	F	Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	40.0	Divorce action, wife asks 58 K gets 40 K, man had a lawyer at trial
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	F	Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mans properties including those transferred to others are frozen for 90 days so wife can make claims against them
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	F	Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Mans payment is secured against his mortgage
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	F	Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	350.0	Wife has exclusive possession for 36 months and man is ordered to pay 350 K mortgage due to fraudulent loan he forged wifes signature to get, criminal charges
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	F	Di Manno v. Di Manno, 2002 CanLII 2673 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	1 K per month spousal support, 1.6 K per month child support and $ 50 per month s.7 expense, 4 K arrears, man claims 60 K income and is imputed to 100 K
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	M	Ernyes v. Rachlin, 2004 CanLII 47867 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.5	Contempt motion, 4.5 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	M	F	J.H. v. S.H., 2004 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession, $ 305 per month child support and $ 1000 spousal support
Eberhard	F	Ce	L	L	Korevaar v. Allard, 2003 CanLII 2151 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	20.0	Man with declared income of 46 K imputed to 66 K
Eberhard	F	Ce	L	L	Korevaar v. Allard, 2003 CanLII 2151 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Supervised access, both spouses have other children, domestic violence history, impaired driving, urine testing and AA meetings ordered, inspection for alcohol by supervisor, must turn over car keys to supervisor install device on car ignition, supervision during visits relaxed, 2.4 K per month total support ordered
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr(ex)	F	Koster v. Koster, 2002 CanLII 2693 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.0	Ex parte trial, vesting order on home separation agreement overturned, support ordered though man denies being a parent, 6 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr( ex)	F	Koster v. Koster, 2002 CanLII 2693 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Ex parte trial, vesting order on home separation agreement overturned, support ordered though man denies being a parent, 6 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	ex	Leroux v. Walker, 2001 CanLII 28194 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Man owes 4.1 K arrears and must pay $ 125 per month
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	M	McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.0	$ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K, 1 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	M	McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	14.0	$ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K, 1 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	L	L	McNaughton v. Price, 2006 CanLII 1453 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	64.0	Man claims 36 K income and is imputed to 100 K
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	F	Pratt v. Pratt, 2003 CanLII 2201 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	10.0	Divorce action, husband given supervised access to children, divided success, 10 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	F	Pratt v. Pratt, 2003 CanLII 2201 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Divorce action, husband given supervised access to children, divided success, 10 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	L	L	Savage v. Agnello, 2002 CanLII 2768 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	16.0	Man claims 99 K and is imputed to 115 K
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	M	Stancheff v. Stancheff, 2006 CanLII 22144 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.5	Variation, 2.5 K costs
Eberhard	F	Ce	sr	L	Ward v. Bates, 2005 CanLII 2947 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	66.0	Lump sums of 48 K and 18 K forced by FRO to pay arrears, intentionally unemployed, imputed income 100 K must borrow to stay out of jail, variation denied
Ferguson	F	Ce	sr	F	Cabral v. Cabral, 2005 CanLII 21872 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Custody and access variation, supervised access, security, 21.3 K costs
Ferguson	F	Ce	sr	F	Cabral v. Cabral, 2005 CanLII 21872 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Custody and access variation, supervised access, security, 21.3 K costs
Ferguson	F	Ce	F	M	Dorion v. Merkley, 2006 CanLII 38357 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.2	Husband loses interim motion 5.2 K costs
Ferguson	F	Ce	sr	M	Goodfellow v. Goodfellow, 2005 CanLII 4847 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	20.0	Man claims 40 K income and is imputed to 60 K, variation refused
Ferguson	F	Ce	M	M	Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	6.0	6 K costs for interim motions to vary support
Ferguson	F	Ce	M	M	Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	293.0	Man claims 62 K income but is not varied and must continue paying at 355 K income.
Ferguson	F	Ce	M	M	Lascala v. Lascala, 2004 CanLII 5013 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 24 K costs
Ferguson	F	Ce	M	F	Merkand v. Merkand, 2006 CanLII 33420 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.1	Interim motion on access variation, 2.1 K costs
Ferguson	F	Ce	M	F	Sciuk v. Sciuk, 2005 CanLII 16642 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		10 K to be held for security
Lack	F	Ce	M	M	Coscarella v. Coscarella, 2000 CanLII 20376 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	1.4	Interim motion, wife asks 2.6 K and gets 1.4 K, no costs for either side in divorce action
Lack	F	Ce	M	M	Laue v. Laue, 2000 CanLII 20295 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		60 K arrears, man clains a 2 K per year income, variation denied
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	Berry v. Ollerenshaw, 2003 CanLII 2405 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Allegations of drug use and sexual abuse by non biological father, supervised access, leave to appeal granted
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	60.0	Man claims 65 K imputed to 125 K, One year of spousal support at 2.5 K then unemployed wife imputed to 20 K and spousal support drops to 1.75 K for 5 years, wife minor
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	22.0	22 K lump sum retroactive arrears
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets prejudgment interest on 22 K equalization
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	David v. David, 2004 CanLII 46652 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of assault, wife gets children, 4 K per month support
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	David v. David, 2005 CanLII 10541 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	42.0	Divorce trial, wife gets 42 K
Olah	F	Ce	M	F	Denby v. Denby, 2003 CanLII 2097 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	28.7	Divorve action, 4 day trial, 28.7 K costs
Olah	F	Ce	F	M	MacPherson v. MacPherson, 2005 CanLII 28543 (ON S.C.)	mn	C		Lump sum 11 K support arrears, contempt, 1.5 K penalty
Olah	F	Ce	F	M	MacPherson v. MacPherson, 2005 CanLII 28543 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	11.0	Lump sum 11 K support arrears, contempt, 1.5 K penalty
Olah	F	Ce	sr	M	Rilli v. Rilli, 2006 CanLII 34451 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	48.0	$ 1050 per month spousal support, man unemployed has 48 K income imputed to him, wife is unemployed and remarried to man who makes 14.4 K per year, wife has 9 K income imputed to her
Olah	F	Ce	M	M	Tomasone v. Tomasone, 2005 CanLII 1074 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		5 K security for motion
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	F	Aguilera v. Reid, 2006 CanLII 6196 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Assault charges, supervised access ordered, drugs, criminal record, final order for supervised access
Rogers	F	Ce	M	sr	Chernyakhovsky v. Chernyakhovsky, 2005 CanLII 6048 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	26.0	Man claims income 35 K and is imputed to 61 K
Rogers	F	Ce	F	M	Cook v. Burton, 2005 CanLII 1063 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Charging order for 30 K against property and life insurance policy as security for support
Rogers	F	Ce	M	M	Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42935 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	0.7	0.7 K for interim motion
Rogers	F	Ce	ex	M	Ho v. Ho, 2003 CanLII 2315 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Preservation order already made against man, his pleadings struck, man does not answer, ex parte freezing order against mans family
Rogers	F	Ce	F	F	Ierullo v. Ierullo, 2006 CanLII 33301 (ON C.A.)	mn	Cts	4.0	4 K costs of motion to vary and 5 K costs of appeal
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	sr	L.S.M. v. A.M., 2006 CanLII 13413 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	35.0	Man unemployed and waiting for surgery imputed to 35 K per year
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	sr	L.S.M. v. A.M., 2006 CanLII 13413 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man jailed for domestic assault, wife claims he’s a drug addict, wife gets custody, imputed income, intentionally umemployed
Rogers	F	Ce	F	F	Martin (Shore) v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5060 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	64.0	Answer struck, uncontested trial, 64 K in costs total, 15 K security already ordered, wifes pleadings also struck
Rogers	F	Ce	F	F	Martin (Shore) v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 5060 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Answer struck, uncontested trial, 64 K in costs total, 15 K security already ordered, wifes pleadings also struck
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	F	Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	11.0	Uncontested trial, husbands pleadings struck, 11 K costs
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	F	Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Granted, the applicant has sworn to fear and 1 year order to let the respondents anger abates, 49 K equalization payment to go to FRO to secure support, arrears of retroactive support order varied, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 11K cost penalty
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	F	Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Uncontested trial,49 K equalization payment to be held by FRO for security for support
Rogers	F	Ce	M	M	Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 12363 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Abducts child, no charges, supervised access at wifes discretion, must give up passport to get access
Rogers	F	Ce	M	M	Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 12363 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Must give wife passport to get supervised access at her discretion
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	M	Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 45956 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	7.0	Interims motions to strike pleadings, 7 K costs
Rogers	F	Ce	sr	M	Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 45956 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck for failure to produce financial disclosure, uncontested trial ordered, 7 K costs
Rogers	F	Ce		sr	Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	44.0	Lump sum and arrears and costs of 44 K owing, pleadings struck, must pay before he can ask for a variation, non dissipation order
Rogers	F	Ce	M	sr	Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mans pleadings struck, non dissipation order, lump sum spousal support, 44 K in cost arrears, man violates non dissipation order
Rogers	F	Ce	M	sr	Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	44.0	Lump sum and arrears and costs of 44 K owing, pleadings struck, must pay before he can ask for a variation, non dissipation order
Rogers	F	Ce	L	sr	Sigro-DiGiosaffatte v. DiGiosaffatte, 2003 CanLII 2238 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck for disclosure, man blames lawyer, uncontesed trial, 44 K owing in costs
Scott	F	Ce	M	F	Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2003 CanLII 2056 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Restraining order not to seek information from others, 5 K recognizance in case of breach
Scott	F	Ce	M	f	Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2003 CanLII 2056 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		5 K recognizance for restraining order, bad faith, income and value of business imputed
Scott	F	Ce	M	F	Beaumont v. Beaumont, 2006 CanLII 20528 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	87.9	Divorce action, 84.9 K costs, and 3 K costs to apportion award.
Scott	F	Ce	sr	sr	Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	52.0	Man claims he is unemployed and is imputed to 52 K
Scott	F	Ce	M	sr	Coletta v. Jones Coletta, 2003 CanLII 2412 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Mutual, wife gets home and sells farm where man lives violating order, sentenced to jail for contempt, support not mentioned
Scott	F	Ce	F	M	Harris v. Stuart Harris, 2005 CanLII 28789 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	40.0	Lump sum payment of 40 K for spousal support, equalization would of gone 10 K against the wife so she is given additional 10 K unjust enrichment award brining total lump to 50 K
Scott	F	Ce	M	sr	Hill v. Hill, 2002 CanLII 2790 (ON S.C	mj	Ip	67.0	Mans declared income of 58 K imputed to 125 K
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	Cts	45.0	Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income imputed to 60 K, 137 K lump sum support, 45 K costs, appeal dismissed
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip		Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income imputed to 60 K, 137 K lump sum support, 45 K costs, appeal dismissed
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	L	137.0	Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income imputed to 60 K, 137 K lump sum support, 45 K costs, appeal dismissed
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ro		Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sa		Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	Sc		Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order
Scott	F	Ce	ex	sr	Kennedy v. Sinclair, 2003 CanLII 57393 (ON C.A.)	mj	St		Mans answer struck, uncontested trial, income,supervised access, restraining order, vesting order on pension and other assets, violated freezing order
Scott	F	Ce	F	M	Lawson v. Lawson, 2006 CanLII 26573 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip	66.0	Man quits job for farming and is imputed to 66 K, lowered to 60 K on appeal, 15 K costs of appeal
Scott	F	Ce	sr	M	Mindzak v. Turner, 2006 CanLII 9705 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		2 ½ years supervised access changed to unsupervised 4 hours a week, completed parenting classes, mother objects, support increased
Scott	F	Ce	M	M	T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Man allowed to proceed with spousal support but all other issues dismissed, restraining order, freezing order, costs
Scott	F	Ce	M	M	T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Man allowed to proceed with spousal support but all other issues dismissed, restraining order, freezing order, costs
Scott	F	Ce	M	M	T. S. v. E. J. S., 2002 CanLII 2851 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Granted for wife and child, man convicted of domestic assault, mans application to extend time limits for equalization dismissed, claim for access dismissed, wifes application for spousal support allowed to proceed, mans assets frozen
Scott	F	Ce	F	M	Wright v. Ingham, 2006 CanLII 591 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Man charged with assault, wife gets custody and mans access changed back to unsupervised
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	L	Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	L	Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	L	Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	L	Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		15 K costs, summary judgment, pleadings struck, 1 million insurance policy
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	sr	Higgins v. Higgins, 2006 CanLII 33303 (ON C.A.)	mj	Ip		6.7 K lump sum on account of arrears and 1K per month payments, 3.8 K per month child and spousal support, income imputed to 100 K, lump sum overturned on appeal
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	sr	Higgins v. Higgins, 2006 CanLII 33303 (ON C.A.)	mn	L	6.7	6.7 K lump sum on account of arrears and 1K per month payments, 3.8 K per month child and spousal support, income imputed to 100 K, lump sum overturned on appeal
Wildman	F	Ce	sr	sr	J.B.G. v. L.B., 2004 CanLII 53230 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Husbands answer struck
Wildman	F	Ce	M	M	Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck and can be reinstated on motion if he complies with 60 K payment and disclosure
Wildman	F	Ce	ex	M	Shamli v. Shamli, 2004 CanLII 12363 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Wife gets ex parte orders freezing and seizing mans assets, man moved money out of country and abducted son, man gets supervised access, pleadings struck
Wildman	F	Ce	F	F	Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 22662 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.5	Wifes loses motion for summary judgment, man pays 10.5 K costs
Bryant	M	Ce	M	F	Lee v. Lee, 2004 CanLII 5056 (ON S.C.)	mn	L		Unspecified one time lump support them motion for interim spousal and child support of 1.1 K per month granted
Ditomaso	M	Ce	sr	F	Lalonde v. Lalonde, 2005 CanLII 16637 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	21.0	Man on unemployment is intentionally unemployed, 21 K support arrears, imputed to 27 K per year
Ditomaso	M	Ce	F	F	Margie v. Akogyeram, 2006 CanLII 16369 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	10.2	Default for not abiding by court order to sell home, pleadings struck, 10.2 K costs
Ditomaso	M	Ce	F	F	Margie v. Akogyeram, 2006 CanLII 16369 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck for non compliance in sale of the family home, 10.2 K costs
Ditomaso	M	Ce	M	M	Martin-Shore v. Shore, 2004 CanLII 17019 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	16.6	I0 K costs against husband for questioning at which wife refused to answer, husbands motion to vary support stayed and 6.6 K costs for motion
Ditomaso	M	Ce	sr	M	Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.)	mj	D	267.0	Default on child and spousal support Charging order on property and RRSP, 25K lump sum arrears no motion to vary until paid 500 K imputed income
Ditomaso	M	Ce	sr	M	Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Man claims 3 year average 263 K income and is imputed to 530 K
Ditomaso	M	Ce	sr	M	Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	25.0	Charging order against property and RRSP, 25 K lump sum payment
Ditomaso	M	Ce	sr	M	Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Charging order against property and RRSP, 25 K lump sum payment
Ditomaso	M	Ce	sr	M	Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 9674 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	45.9	Motion to stay support and arrears and security, 45.9 K costs
Glass	M	Ce	M	F	Kirby v. Chappell, 2003 CanLII 1990 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	9.0	Divorce action with trial, 9 K costs
Glass	M	Ce	L	L	Wood v. Wood, 2002 CanLII 2717 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.5	Interim motion, wife claims 7.7 K and gets 5.5 K, husband claims 8.2 K
Graham	M	Ce	sr	sr	A.N. v. M.A.Z., 2006 CanLII 12316 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Man pays 1.8 K per month based on an imputed income
Graham	M	Ce	sr	sr	Desjardins v. Waters, 2006 CanLII 1203 (ON S.C.)	mn	D		Child support default, minor reduction of arrears, separation agreement overturned, imputed income
Howden	M	Ce	L	L	J.J.C. v. K.G.M., 2004 CanLII 10578 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Man imprisoned and unemployed and imputed in arrears to Social services 38 K, varied to 11K
Howden	M	Ce	M	M	Manning v. Manning, 2004 CanLII 33295 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	Support variation, 15.K
Howden	M	Ce	M	F	Merghani v. Merghani, 2000 CanLII 22473 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Uncontested trial, 300 K equalization, charging order on taxi license, unknown imputation of income, 32 K helds from seizure of property by FRO given to wife for default not set aside
Howden	M	Ce	M	F	Merghani v. Merghani, 2000 CanLII 22473 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Uncontested trial, 300 K equalization, charging order on taxi license, unknown imputation of income, 32 K helds from seizure of property by FRO given to wife for default not set aside
Howden	M	Ce	M	F	Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	4.7	Interim motion to vary support, 4.7 K costs
Howden	M	Ce	sr	F	Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Denied variation for support, costs, access changed, leave requirement
Howden	M	Ce	M	F	Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	40.0	Man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 50 K
Howden	M	Ce	M	F	Mills v. Mills, 2004 CanLII 4793 (ON S.C.)	mn	Js		Wife granted summary judgement, minor adjustment of minutes of settlement
Howden	M	Ce	sr	sr	Murch v. Bell, 2003 CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	6.0	Must claims 24 K income and is imputed to 30 K
Howden	M	Ce	sr	sr	Murch v. Bell, 2003 CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Must put life insurance policy of 75 K in place designated to wife
Howden	M	Ce	M	M	Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 34415 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Mans income imputed 130 K per month, wife at 41 K per month, man pays 1.2 K per month total support, wife mild
Howden	M	Ce	M	M	Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 886 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	91.6	Divorce action, 91.6 K costs
Howden	M	Ce	M	M	Naidoo v. Naidoo, 2004 CanLII 886 (ON S.C.)	mj	Pr		Wife gets 5 K prejudgment interest, 90 K in total costs
Howden	M	Ce	L	F	Sloan v. Sloan, 2006 CanLII 38366 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.5	Support variation denied, 12.5 costs, man is intentionally unemployed
Howden	M	Ce	L	L	Stone v. Stone, 2005 CanLII 2946 (ON S.C.)	mj	C		Man in contempt for selling assets
Howden	M	Ce	L	L	Stone v. Stone, 2005 CanLII 2946 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Can’t file an answer until he pays, contempt for selling assets when under non dissapation order
Howden	M	Ce	F	M	Tavernier v. Tavernier, 2004 CanLII 5089 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	2.0	2 K for motion
Ingram	M	Ce	M	M	Dasilva v. Dasilva, 2004 CanLII 5043 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Wife gets restraining order and custody, 1.8 K per month total support
Ingram	M	Ce	sr	sr	J.P.M.P. v. G.W.F., 2003 CanLII 2337 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order at motion without notice, complaints by both parties to the Childrens Aid and police, his gun seized by police, wife gets custody, mans access to be supervised by another adult
Ingram	M	Ce	sr	sr	J.P.M.P. v. G.W.F., 2003 CanLII 2337 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Restraining order at motion without notice, complaints by both parties to the Childrens Aid and police, his gun seized by police, wife gets custody, mans access to be supervised by another adult
Ingram	M	Ce	F	F	Raaymakers v. Green, 2004 CanLII 39 (ON S.	mj	L	79.0	79 K lump for spousal support giving wife the house with no equalization, 1.2 K child support and 1.4 K spousal support continued, 10 K lump penalty for failing to disclose financial information
Logan	M	Ce	M	F	J.H. v. S.H., 2004 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Income imputed to father but not specified, 1 K spousal support, joint custody switched to sole custody to wife
Logan	M	Ce	M	F	J.H. v. S.H., 2004 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		9K lump sum to secure 1 K spousal support, joint custody removed to wife sole custody, he has monthly deficeit, previous order to secure 150 K life insurance
Logan	M	Ce	sr	M	Stancheff v. Stancheff, 2005 CanLII 2059 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Must hold 200 K private insurance and designate wife and children beneficiary of work related policies and benefits and wife is trustee,
MacDougall	M	Ce	M	M	Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	41.0	Mans imputed income increased from 58 K to 99 K
MacDougall	M	Ce	M	M	Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Restraining order against man, joint custody
MacDougall	M	Ce	F	M	Grant v. Grant, 2001 CanLII 28159 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets 2 years prejudgment interest
MacDougall	M	Ce	sr	F	R.J.J. v. K.R.J., 2004 CanLII 34359 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession of the family home and interim custody
MacDougall	M	Ce	sr		R.J.J. v. K.R.J., 2004 CanLII 34359 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Domestic violence, impaired driving, drugs, jail, supervised access ordered, children want unsupervised, summary judgement denied and access set to trial
MacDougall	M	Ce	F	F	Salzmann v. Salzmann, 2004 CanLII 5009 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	55.0	3.6 K spousal support per month, 2 K child support per month including s.7 expense, retroactive arrears, man claims 170 K per year income and is imputed to 225 K
MacDougall	M	Ce	M	F	Warren v. Gilbert, 2006 CanLII 16488 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.0	15 K costs of appeal added to costs of trial
MacDougall	M	Ce	M	F	Warren v. Gilbert, 2006 CanLII 16488 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Man earns modest rental income that doesn’t cover his bills, imputed to 40 K
MacDougall	M	Ce	M	F	Warren v. Gilbert, 2006 CanLII 16488 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order, 100K bond, man complains about justice system, wife gets custody 90 K equalization held in trust as security, 10 K support arrears, imputed income
MacDougall	M	Ce	M	F	Warren v. Gilbert, 2006 CanLII 16488 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Restraining order, 100K bond, man complains about justice system, wife gets custody 90 K, constructive trust equalization held in trust as security, 10 K support arrears, imputed income
Mackinnon	M	Ce	F	M	Hyatt v. Whitney, 2002 CanLII 49537 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest on mans arrears
Magda	M	Ce	M	M	Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of assault, wife gets custody and exclusive possession of home, Wife gets 167 K equalization, imputed income
Magda	M	Ce	M	M	Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip		Imputed to 75 K per year, 1.8 K per month support, vesting order on house, s.7 expenses
Magda	M	Ce	M	M	Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.)	mj	L	10.0	10 K interim lump payment for support, 175 vesting order on home with husbands share held in trust as security, 169 K equalization, domestic assault
Magda	M	Ce	M	M	Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Vesting order securing 175 K child and spousal support proceeds to be held in trust, 169 K equalization, domestic assault
Magda	M	Ce	M	sr	Hatzidemetriou v. Hatzidemetriou, 2002 CanLII 2789 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Man charged with assault, charges withdrawn, wife gets custody
Magda	M	Ce	M	M	Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	3.0	3 K costs of interim motion, pleadings struck, 50 K arrears
Magda	M	Ce	sr	M	Sokoljuk v. Sokoljuk, 2002 CanLII 2814 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	5.0	Non dissipation order against man, wife gets support, man must pay into court funds held in foreign bank account, 5 K costs of motion
McIsaac	M	Ce			Martin 2004	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck
McIsaac	M	Ce	M	M	Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	22.0	$ 199 per month child support, 2 K arrears, variation denied, loses job because FRO takes drivers license, income held imputed at former 22 K
McIsaac	M	Ce	M	F	R. v. R., 2004 CanLII 15271 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife gets interim custody and exclusive possession, non depletion, mutual restraining order, man must get drug testing
McIsaac	M	Ce	M	F	R. v. R., 2004 CanLII 15271 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Wife gets interim custody and exclusive possession, non depletion, mutual restraining order, man must get drug testing
McIssac	M	Ce	L	L	Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		FRO default, variation refused
Misner	M	Ce	M	M	Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25890 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ep		Wife gets exclusive possession
Misner	M	Ce	M	M	Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25890 (ON S.C.)	mn	L		Lump sum for retroactive support to be based on imputed income, equalization 351 K
Misner	M	Ce	M	M	Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25900 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest
Misner	M	Ce	M	F	Marchildon v. Irwin, 2004 CanLII 15738 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Man convicted of assault, wife gets custody, termination of access denied, man must pay $ 200 extra per month on arrears of support
Nelson	M	Ce	M	M	Dalgleish v. Dalgleish, 2003 CanLII 1944 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife has had exclusive possession for 2 ½ years, order vesting the home to her, occupational rent denied but now she must pay the costs
Nelson	M	Ce	M	M	Harrison v. Harrison, 2001 CanLII 28123 (ON S.C.)	mn	F		Spousal support 2.4 K and child support 0.6 K retroactive, life insurance policy for security, mutual non depletion order
Nelson	M	Ce	M	M	Harrison v. Harrison, 2001 CanLII 28123 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sc		Spousal support 2.4 K and child support 0.6 K retroactive, life insurance policy for security, mutual non depletion order
Nelson	M	Ce	M	F	K.(L.) v. G.(T.), 2006 CanLII 19333 (ON S.C.)	mn	Sa		Wife makes various allegations of assault by child on father, allegations found unsubstanciated and access restored, mans contempt motion denied
Nelson	M	Ce	L	L	Shoval v. Shoval, 2005 CanLII 20817 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sa		Wife allowed to move to Isreal with child makes allegations of sexual abuse, access suspended, supervised access in Isreal offered by mother, court allows order
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Bemrose v. Fetter, 2006 CanLII 8201 (ON S.C.)	mn	Cts	10.0	Priest fails to declare honorariums. Both he and wife imputed, both mild, 10 K costs, appealed to the Court of Appeal and overturned, 25 K costs against wife from the appeal
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Bemrose v. Fetter, 2006 CanLII 8201 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ip		Priest fails to declare honorariums. Both he and wife imputed, both mild, 10 K costs, appealed to the Court of Appeal and overturned, 25 K costs against wife from the appeal
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Buttarazzi v. Buttarazzi, 2005 CanLII 5869 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ro		Restraining order continued, freezing order extended to house
Perkins	M	Ce	sr	F	Cabral v. Cabral, 2005 CanLII 21872 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	21.3	Custody and access variation, supervised access, security, 21.3 K costs
Perkins	M	Ce	F	sr	Church v. Church, 2003 CanLII 1942 (ON S.C.)	mj	Sc		Life insurance policy for security, complex separation agreement including 25 K security for costs for variation motion
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42934 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	16.0	Wife gets husbands answer struck, 16 K costs and 5 K costs of appeal
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Costabile v. Costabile, 2004 CanLII 42935 (ON S.C.)	mj	St		Husband in violation of disclosure orders. pleadings struck, uncontested trial ordered, appeal denied
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Costabile v. Costabile, 2005 CanLII 44377 (ON C.A.)	mn	Cts	5.0	2.5 K held for security to be given to wife, pleadings struck, appeal dismissed 5 K costs
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Costabile v. Costabile, 2005 CanLII 44377 (ON C.A.)	mn	Sc		2.5 K held for security to be given to wife, pleadings struck, appeal dismissed 5 K costs
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 1276 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	10.8	Man claims 10.2 K income and is imputed to 21 K
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 19156 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	16.2	Dividided success in application, husband pays 15K and 1.2 K for costs ruling
Perkins	M	Ce	sr	L	Diciaula v. Mastrogiacomo, 2006 CanLII 11928 (ON S.C.D.C.)	mj	St		Mans pleadings struck reinstated and then reinstatement overturned on appeal, impited income, supervised access, 12.5 K costs of appeal
Perkins	M	Ce	F	F	Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 2661 (ON S.C.)	mj	Js		Summary judgment on support as mans pleadings were struck and he is denied participating
Perkins	M	Ce	sr	F	Domb v. Domb, 2002 CanLII 45568 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	12.0	Husbands pleadings struck, 12 K costs for motion
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Duguay v. Thompson-Duguay, 2000 CanLII 22515 (ON S.C.)	mj	D		Separation agreement overturned due to mans default in paying support
Perkins	M	Ce	M	M	Elieff v. Elieff, 2007 CanLII 15787 (ON S.C.)	mj	Cts	15.5	Interims motions, wife claims 20 K gets 15.5 K
Perkins	M	Ce	F	M	Fung v. Lin, 2001 CanLII 28193 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ip	681.0	Man claims 139 K income and is imputed to 820 K on capital gains
Perkins	M	Ce	F	M	Fung v. Lin, 2001 CanLII 28193 (ON S.C.)	mn	Pr		Wife awarded prejudgment interest on retroactive support award
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Haunert-Faga v. Faga, 2005 CanLII 39324 (ON C.A.)	mn	St		Pleadings struck is overturned by Court of Appeal if man submits disclosure
Perkins	M	Ce	sr	M	Ho v. Ho, 2003 CanLII 2315 (ON S.C.)	mj	F		Preservation order against mans assets but when wife has them seized they are already gone, mans pleadings struck
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Kirsteins v. Kirsteins, 2004 CanLII 36077 (ON S.C.)	mj	Ep		Wife is given exclusive possession, non depletion order, mutual restraining order, $ 700 per month child support and $ 1000 spousal support, joint custody, oldest child lives with father
Perkins	M	Ce	M	F	Kirsteins v. Kirsteins, 2004 CanLII 36077 (ON S.C.)	mn	Ro		Mutual allegations mutual non harassment order, son testifies mothers allegations aren’t true, joint custody with primary residence with wife, 1.8 K per month total su