Superior Court Penalties

                                    Regions and Judges of Ontario

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      Peter Karl Roscoe

 

               Nov  2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                            Contents

 

 

                                                                                                                                                            Page

 

 

Introduction                                                                                                                                            1

 

Summary of Penalties For All Regions                                                                                                  3

 

 

Eastern Region

 

Eastern Region Judicial Summary                                                                                                          6

 

Eastern Region Financial Data                                                                                                                7

 

Eastern Region Cases                                                                                                                              8

 

 

Toronto Region

 

Toronto Region Judicial Summary                                                                                                        23

 

Toronto Region Financial Data                                                                                                              24

 

Toronto Region Cases                                                                                                                            25

 

 

Central East Region

 

Central East Region Judicial Summary                                                                                                 42

 

Central East Region Financial Data                                                                                                       43

 

Central East Region Cases                                                                                                                     44

 

 

Central South Region

 

Central South Region Judicial Summary                                                                                               61

 

Central South Region Financial Data                                                                                                     62

 

Central South Region Cases                                                                                                                   63

 

 

Central West Region

 

Central West Region Judicial Summary                                                                                                 78

 

Central West Region Financial Data                                                                                                       79

 

Central West Region Cases                                                                                                                     80

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                  page

 

Southwest Region

 

Southwest Region Region Judicial Summary                                                                                             93

 

Southwest Region Region Financial Data                                                                                                   94

 

Southwest Region Region Cases                                                                                                                 95

 

 

 

Northwest Region Region

 

Northwest Region Region Judicial Summary                                                                                           104

 

Northwest Region Region Financial Data                                                                                                 105

 

Northwest Region Region Cases                                                                                                               106

 

 

 

Northeast Region

 

Northeast Region Judicial Summary                                                                                                         114

 

Northeast Region Financial Data                                                                                                               115

 

Northeast Region Cases                                                                                                                              116

 

 

 

Conclusions

 

 

Regional Discrimination Indexes                                                                                                122

 

Judicial Discrimination Indexes                                                                                                  124

 

Financial Data                                                                                                                              126

 

Penalties Against Self Represented Litigants                                                                              129

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                           Introduction

 

 

 

This study examines 13 potentially punitive measures which may be ordered by Ontario Superior Court judges in family divorce actions. All categories except cost penalties, comes from data collected between Jan 2000 to Oct 2006, on the Canlii legal network. Cost penalties data has been taken from a separate study which extended from Jan 2000 to Aug 2007. All cases which fit category criteria in the timespan have been included. The penalty categories evaluated in this study span most major aspects of divorce. Contempt and default primarily relate to the violation of court orders. They often lead to the imposition of other penalties. Imputed income, prejudgment interest, and lump sums, are representative of financial measures. Imputed income is generally connected with support determinations, and prejudgment interest with equalization. Supervised access reflects concerns regarding children. Added emphasis has been given by using the interim impact on children to assess major and minor penalization with regards to restraining orders and exclusive possession of the family home. Summary judgment and striking pleadings could be described as procedural issues. Cost determinations are made at most hearings. Usually the benefits of cost penalties are given to the party the judge determines to be the overall winner. Not all measures examined could be properly termed as penalties, but they all have the potential of leaving that impression on those whom they are imposed. Extreme applications could most certainly have a punitive quality. To facilitate analysis, penalties have been classified as major or minor. Although a small amount of interpretation must be used in classification, a list of criteria for eah penalty type is reproduced below. In general, it can be said that major penalties are those which most clearly have severe impact on an individual. Or those with the most negative potential on the outcome of the divorce. Total penalties show who received the most penalties and major penalties who received the worst. The one thing all penalties have in common is that they are imposed on divorcing litigants against their will. Consent agreements are not included unless the issue initially consented subsequently becomes contested.

 

 

 

Major and Minor Penalty Classification

 

 

                 Penalty

             Minor Penalty

 

                     Major Penalty

 

 

 

 

 

Contempt

C

Purged, overturned on appeal, minor less than 5 K penalty

 

Greater than 5 K penalty, imprisonment, or other penalty that would affect divorce outcome

 

 

 

 

 

Costs ( before appeal )

Cts

 

 

 

Interim Motion Costs

 

Less than 6.5 K

 

Greater than 6.5 K

Divorce Action Costs

 

Less than 15 K

 

Greater than 15 K

Post Divorce Action Costs

 

Less than 10 K

 

Greater than 10 K

 

 

 

 

 

Default

D

Set aside, overturned on appeal, minor less than 5 K penalty

 

Greater than 5 K penalty, imprisonment, or other penalty that would affect divorce outcome, vesting or charging order

 

 

 

 

 

Exclusive Possession of the Family Home

Ep

Overturned, occupancy rent or equivalent payments, non custodial spouse gets the home, minor timespan until sale

 

Opposing spouse gets interim custody and interim possession of the home

 

 

 

 

 

Freezing

F

Removed, overturned on appeal, only against a minor asset, mutual orders

 

Major or all assets

 

 

 

 

 

Imputed Income

Ip

Overturned on appeal, less than 15 % of declared income, support recipient

 

Over 15 % of declared income

 

 

 

 

 

Lump Sum

L

Overturned on appeal, less than 5 K

 

Greater than 5 K

 

 

 

 

 

Prejudment Interest

Pr

Overturned on appeal, Less than 5 K

 

Greater than 5 K

 

 

 

 

 

Restraining Order ( excluding restrained from moving or changing childrens names )

Ro

Overturned on appeal, rescinded, mutual, restrained from moving

 

Includes children, issued or upheld by the family court, issued by other agency if it results in interim custody, or possession of the family home

 

 

 

 

 

Security ( excluding equalization held in trust for both parties )

Sc

Overturned on appeal, insurance policy less than 500 K, passports for access to children

 

Insurance policy greater than 500 K

 

 

 

 

 

Striking Pleadings

St

Overturned on appeal, minor issue or pleading only

 

All others

 

 

 

 

 

Summary Judgment

Js

Overturned on appeal, minor issue only

 

All others

 

 

 

 

 

Supervised Access

Sa

Overturned on appeal, varied before trial, supervised party gets joint or sole custody of children

 

All others

 

 

 

 

 

Penalties may be imposed at interim hearings, divorce trials, and in post divorce actions. Not all cases are reported on legal networks. Interim hearings especially are often underrepresented. . Rulings may sometimes be obtained from other appearances such as trials, variations, appeals, or defaults. The endorsement where the penalty is discussed is the reference given in the case summaries. Penalties were divided into regions by the assignment of the judge who made the rulings. It would appear there is some interregional mobility of judges. A few judges may have been reassigned from other districts, and others may of just been given temporary assignments. Judges who have retired but were active during the time period are included. The nature of legal networks is such that they try to include a full range of examples. This means that most unusual or extreme cases are recorded. The result is that minor penalties may be under reported, but most major penalties should be represented. Since penalties against females are less common it is likely that they are mostly reported. Case summaries for all the data used in this study may be found after the judicial and financial data for each region. Conclusions follow on page  .

 

 

 

 

 

 

Data Summary

 

 

MJ = Male Judge            FJ = Female Judge

 

 

 

              Penalties Against Men

 

          Penalties Against Women

       Region

#  Male Judges

# M J Rulings

# Female Judges

# F J Rulings

 

#  Male Judges

# M J Rulings

# Female Judges

# F J Rulings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eastern

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

    20

    86

    10

  154

 

      7

    12

      5

    18

Major Penalties

    15

    46

    10

  102

 

      1

      1

      2

      4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Toronto

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

    16

    73

    24

  203

 

      5

      6

    11

    29

Major Penalties

    15

    55

    23

  155

 

      1

      2

      3

      9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Central East

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

    17

  122

      9

  104

 

      9

    23

      7

    14

Major Penalties

    14

    82

      9

    85

 

      8

    13

      4

      6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Central South

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

    25

  192

      5

    19

 

    12

    44

      2

      3

Major Penalties

    23

  122

      5

    13

 

      9

    15

      1

      1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Central West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

    13

  117

      6

    65

 

    12

    30

      5

    22

Major Penalties

    13

    75

      6

    46

 

      4

      4

      2

      8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

South West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

    15

    95

      6

    31

 

      8

    22

      4

    10

Major Penalties

    14

    59

      6

    17

 

      3

      4

      2

      2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

      9

    77

      1

    23

 

      9

    25

      1

      8

Major Penalties

      9

    39

      1

    14

 

      6

      9

      1

      3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North East

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

      8

    44

      3

    22

 

      7

    11

      4

      5

Major Penalties

      7

    30

      2

    13

 

      1

      5

      1

      2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

  123

  806

    64

  621

 

    69

  173

    39

  109

Major Penalties

  110

  509

    63

  445

 

    33

    53

    16

    35

 

 

 

 

Penalties Against Men

 

 

 

 

                                                                Type   of   Penalty

      Region

C

Cts

D

Ep

F

Ip

Js

L

Pr

Ro

Sa

Sc

St

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eastern

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   6

 76

 12

   9

   9

 32

   2

 18

   9

 25

 12

 20

 10

Major Penalties

   2

 33

   8

   6

   7

 27

   2

 16

   4

 16

 11

   7

   8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Toronto

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   8

 70

 14

 12

 13

 56

   5

 23

 10

 16

   4

 36

   7

Major Penalties

   7

 41

 10

   8

 11

 53

   5

 22

   5

 10

   3

 23

   7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Central East

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   3

 55

 12

   8

   8

 36

   5

 17

   6

 23

 14

 25

 15

Major Penalties

   2

 28

   9

   7

   7

 34

   4

 13

   1

 17

 12

 20

 14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Central South

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   1

 90

   5

 13

   4

 25

   3

 14

   9

 15

 15

 13

   1

Major Penalties

   0

 43

   4

   8

   5

 23

   2

 14

   4

 12

 12

   5

   1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Central West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   2

 43

   7

   6

 15

 41

   4

 19

   7

 14

   7

 17

   1

Major Penalties

   2

 24

   4

   4

   6

 38

   3

 14

   2

   6

   6

 12

   1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

South West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   3

 28

   4

   3

   3

 19

   2

 26

   3

 10

   4

 19

   3

Major Penalties

   3

 10

   3

   1

   2

 17

   2

 21

   1

   4

   3

 6

   2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   2

 26

   3

   8

   8

   9

   2

   8

   3

 12

  2

 17

   1

Major Penalties

   1

   7

   3

   6

   6

   6

   2

   5

   3

   8

  2

   5

   1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North East

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   0

 15

   7

   4

   2

 15

   1

   7

   2

   5

   1

   7

   0

Major Penalties

   0

   6

   7

   4

   0

 12

   1

   6

   1

   3

   1

   3

   0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

 27

402

 64

  63

 62

233

 24

132

 49

120

 59

154

 38

Major Penalties

 17

192

 48

 44

 44

210

 21

111

 26

 76

 50

 81

 34

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Penalties Against Women

 

 

 

 

                                                                Type   of   Penalty

      Region

C

Cts

D

Ep

F

Ip

Js

L

Pr

Ro

Sa

Sc

St

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eastern

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   2

 14

   2

   1

   2

   3

   0

   0

   0

   3

   1

   1

   1

Major Penalties

   0

   3

   0

   1

   0

   0

   0

   0

   0

   0

   1

   0

   0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Toronto

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   1

 13

   4

   1

   6

   2

   0

   0

   0

   4

   1

   1

   2

Major Penalties

   0

   4

   0

   0

   3

   0

   0

   0

   0

   1

   1

   0

   2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Central East

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   2

 17

   0

   1

   3

   8

   0

   1

   0

   3

   2

   0

   0

Major Penalties

   2

   8

   0

   1

   2

   2

   0

   1

   0

   2

   2

   0

   0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Central South

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   2

 27

   0

   3

   1

   6

   0

   0

   0

   7

   0

   0

   1

Major Penalties

   1

 11

   0

   0

   0

   2

   0

   0

   0

   2

   0

   0

   1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Central West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   5

 16

   0

   3

 13

   4

   1

   0

   0

   8

   3

   0

   0

Major Penalties

   3

   4

   0

   1

   0

   0

   0

   0

   0

   2

   2

   0

   0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

South West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   3

 11

   0

   0

   0

   7

   4

   0

   0

   2

   1

   0

   0

Major Penalties

   1

   2

   0

   0

   0

   1

   2

   0

   0

   0

   0

   0

   0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   0

 14

   1

   1

   1

   2

   2

   1

   2

   5

   2

   1

   1

Major Penalties

   0

   3

   0

   0

   0

   1

   2

   1

   0

   2

   1

   0

   1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North East

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

   1

   5

   0

   0

   2

   5

   0

   0

   1

   0

   0

   1

   1

Major Penalties

   1

   2

   0

   0

   0

   2

   0

   0

   1

   0

   0

   0

   0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Penalties

 16

117

   7

 10

 28

 37

   7

   2

   3

 32

 10

   4

   6

Major Penalties

   8

 37

   0

   3

   5

   8

   4

   2

   1

   9

   7

   0

   4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eastern Region  Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

 

 

 

Contents

 

1   Sex of judge            M – Male       F - Female

2   Region                         E - Eastern  Region

 

       # p – number of penalties        # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

 

 

 

 

    Penalties Against Men

 

 

    Penalties Against Women

 

      Total

 

    Major

 

 

       Total

 

     Major

     Judge

 1

 2

 

 # p

# sr

 

 # p

# sr

 

 

 # p

# sr

 

 # p

# sr

 

 

Aiken

F

E

 

 33

 13

 

 20

   9

 

 

  2

  1

 

  0

  0

Blishen

F

E

 

 25

 12

 

 20

 10

 

 

  2

  0

 

  0

  0

De Sousa

F

E

 

 33

 16

 

 26

 14

 

 

  6

  0

 

  2

  0

LaFrance-Cardinal

F

E

 

   2

   0

 

   1

   0

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Mackinnon J

F

E

 

 38

   9

 

 20

   3

 

 

  7

  0

 

  2

  0

Metivier

F

E

 

 10

   5

 

   3

   1

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Polowin

F

E

 

   6

   2

 

   2

   0

 

 

  1

  1

 

  0

  0

Robertson

F

E

 

   2

   1

 

   1

   0

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Toscano Roccano

F

E

 

   2

   1

 

   1

   0

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Trousdale

F

E

 

   5

   5

 

   5

   5

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Belch

M

E

 

   9

   4

 

   6

   2

 

 

  1

  0

 

  0

  0

Chadwick

M

E

 

   2

   1

 

   1

   0

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Charboneau

M

E

 

   3

   1

 

   3

   1

 

 

  1

  0

 

  0

  0

Cosgrove

M

E

 

   2

   0

 

   1

   0

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Cusson

M

E

 

   2

   1

 

   1

   1

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Hackland

M

E

 

   5

   0

 

   3

   0

 

 

  2

  0

 

  0

  0

Kealy

M

E

 

   1

   0

 

   0

   0

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Lalonde

M

E

 

   9

   6

 

   7

   5

 

 

  4

  3

 

  1

  0

Mackinnon C

M

E

 

   1

   0

 

   0

   0

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Macleod

M

E

 

   1

   0

 

   1

   0

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Manton

M

E

 

   1

   0

 

   0

   0

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Maranger

M

E

 

   1

   1

 

   1

   1

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Panet

M

E

 

   6

   3

 

   2

   2

 

 

  1

  0

 

  0

  0

Pedlar

M

E

 

   1

   0

 

   0

   0

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Power

M

E

 

 16

 10

 

   9

   5

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Roy

M

E

 

   4

   4

 

   2

   2

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Rutherford

M

E

 

   9

   4

 

   4

   3

 

 

  2

  0

 

  0

  0

Sedgwick

M

E

 

   5

   2

 

   4

   2

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Sheffield

M

E

 

   3

   1

 

   0

   0

 

 

  0

  0

 

  0

  0

Smith R

M

E

 

   6

   2

 

   1

   0

 

 

  1

  1

 

  1

  1

 

Female Judges

10

 

 

154

  62

 

102

  44

 

 

18

  2

 

  4

  0

Male judges

20

 

 

  86

  40

 

  46

  24

 

 

12

  4

 

  1

  1

Total

30

 

 

240

103

 

146

  68

 

 

30

  6

 

  5

  1

 

 

 

 

Eastern Region Financial Data        ( in 1000 $’s )

 

 

 

Male Lump Sums                missing 2

 

N = 16         Mean = 47.4       Total = 758.4

 

3.300 4.100 5.400 6.000 8.000 8.000 10.00 23.00 36.00 40.00 42.00 45.00 52.00 54.00 57.00 365.0

 

 

Male Imputed Income           missing 2

 

N = 28         Mean = 43.8         Total = 1226.2

 

2.000 5.600 8.000 11.00 13.00 13.00 15.00 18.00 25.00 25.00 27.00 28.00 28.00 31.00 33.00 40.00 40.00 45.00 47.00 50.00 61.60 68.00 69.00 85.00 94.00 97.00 115.0 132.0

 

 

Male Cost Penalties

 

N = 78         Mean = 12.3       Total = 978.9

 

0.5000 0.8000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.600 1.800 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 3.800 3.800 3.800 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.100 4.300 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.500 5.700 5.800 6.500 6.500 7.500 7.500 8.000 8.000 8.000 8.500 9.000 9.000 9.600 9.700 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 12.10 15.00 15.00 17.00 18.00 18.50 20.00 22.50 25.00 25.00 34.00 35.00 36.00 36.90 40.00 40.00 49.00 50.70 60.90 95.00

 

 

 

 

 

Female Cost Penalties

 

N = 14          Mean = 13.4         Total = 187.6

 

1.000 1.300 1.500 3.000 4.500 4.800 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 10.00 20.00 46.00 70.00

Eastern Region Case Summary

 

 

1)   Penalties Against Men

 

 

Contents

 

 

1  Sex of Judge                                               M – male                          F - female

 

2  Region                                Ce – central east                Cs – central south            Cw – central east

                                                 E – eastern                       Ne – north east                 Nw – north west

                                               Sw – south west                  T - Toronto

 

3  Sex of Mans Lawyer          M – male     F – female     L – lawyer     sr – self represented      ex – ex parte

 

4  Sex of Womans Lawyer     M – male     F – female     L – lawyer     sr – self represented      ex – ex parte

 

5  Major or Minor Penalty                               mj – major                      mn - minor

 

6  Type of Penalty                   C – contempt                         Cts – costs                           D – default

                                                Ep – exclusive possession of the family home            F – freezing assets

                                                Js – summary judgment          Ip – imputed income           L – lump sum

                                                Pr – prejudgment interest       Ro - restraining order     Sa - supervised access

                                                Sc – security                            St – striking pleadings

 

7  Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum          ( in 1000 $’s )

 

 

   Judge

 1

 2

3

4

                Case

  5

  6

  7

                 Description

 

 

Aitken

F

E

M

M

Abaza v. Abaza, 2001 CanLII 28192 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

25.0

Man claims 125 K income and is imputed to 171 by Mackinnon J and 150 K by Aitken J, 4.8 K per month total support

Aitken

F

E

M

M

Abaza v. Abaza, 2001 CanLII 28192 (ON S.C.)

mj

Pr

 

Wife gets unstated prejudgment interest, she is denied exclusive possession but family home is vested to her

Aitken

F

E

M

M

Bhoi v. Bhoi, 2001 CanLII 28172 (ON S.C.)

mn

C

 

Contempt $ 500 fine

Aitken

F

E

M

M

Bhoi v. Bhoi, 2001 CanLII 28172 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

2.0

2 K costs of motion

Aitken

F

E

M

M

Bhoi v. Bhoi, 2001 CanLII 28172 (ON S.C.)

mn

Sc

 

Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy

Aitken

F

E

sr

M

Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

13.0

Man declared 2 K income imputed to 15 K, man claims to be disabled but court finds he has a cash business

Aitken

F

E

sr

M

Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Sc

 

Woman owes man equalization but his income imputed and his equalization held as security for child support payments, unemployed, denied spousal support

Aitken

F

E

M

F

Buttrum v. Buttrum, 2001 CanLII 28187 (ON S.C.)

mj

L

36.0

36 K lump sum for spousal support

Aitken

F

E

M

F

Buttrum v. Buttrum, 2001 CanLII 28187 (ON S.C.)

mn

Pr

 

Prejudgment interest on equalization

Aitken

F

E

M

F

Buttrum v. Buttrum, 2001 CanLII 28187 (ON S.C.)

mn

Sc

 

Man must maintain a 100 K life insurance policy, also freezing order by Brennan J

Aitken

F

E

F

M

Cameron v. MacGillivray, 2005 CanLII 47696 (ON S.C.)

mn

Pr

 

Wife awarded prejudgment interest on 12 K equalization

Aitken

F

E

sr

M

Doherty v. Wilcox, 2007 CanLII 5527 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

4.0

Support variation, divided success, wife asks 8.3  K and gets 4 K

Aitken

F

E

sr

F

Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

5.0

5 K cost award for divorce trial, 5 K for 2 interim cost awards also

Aitken

F

E

sr

F

J.R. v. J.G., 2005 CanLII 14983 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ro

 

Restraining order for threatening, police assistance in retrieving items refused, mans contempt motion dismissed as he violated court orders, aceess to son suspended until he has counselling

Aitken

F

E

F

M

Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)

mj

F

 

40 K lump sum support, security on home and possessions and new wifes assets, pleadings struck, 21 K ordered paid to court, man and new wife sentenced to jail, costs, garnishment of wages 70 %

Aitken

F

E

F

M

Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)

mj

L

40.0

40 K lump sum support, security on home and possessions and new wifes assets, pleadings struck, 21K ordered paid to court, man and new wife sentenced to jail, costs, garnishment of wages 70 %

Aitken

F

E

F

M

Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)

mj

Sc

 

40 K lump sum support, security on home and possessions and new wifes assets, pleadings struck, 215 ordered paid to court, man and new wife sentenced to jail, costs, garnishment of wages 70 %

Aitken

F

E

sr

F

Jonas v. Jonas, 2003 CanLII 1967 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

22.5

Divorce action 2 day trial, husbands pleadings struck, 22.5 K costs

Aitken

F

E

M

F

N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.)

mj

D

 

No more motions until payments are made

Aitken

F

E

M

F

N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.)

mj

L

8.0

Lump sums of 4.5 K and 3.5 K for costs and arrears of support, didn’t make equalization payment of 15 K, support 2 K per month total, no more motions until support is paid, wife allowed to move to Nova Scotia with children

Aitken

F

E

M

F

N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ro

 

Man gets 18 month restraining order for assault, says wife assaulted him too, wife gets custody, allowed to move to Nova Scotia

Aitken

F

E

M

M

Scherr v. Scherr, 2004 CanLII 16252 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ep

 

Wife gets interim possession of the family home, man must pay $ 1325 child support and $ 500 spousal support retroactive

Aitken

F

E

M

M

Scherr v. Scherr, 2004 CanLII 16252 (ON S.C.)

mn

Sc

 

Man must designate wife as beneficiary of insurance policy

Aitken

F

E

M

M

Seguin v. Masterson, 2004 CanLII 196 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

3.8

Interim motion, wife asks 5.9 K and gets 3.8 K

Aitken

F

E

sr

M

Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1982 (ON S.C.)

mj

L

42.0

Lump sum 42 K for child support, pleadings struck, 15 K equalization and 15 K constructive trust

Aitken

F

E

sr

M

Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1982 (ON S.C.)

mj

Sa

 

Man given supervised access with conditions for unsupervised, conditions never met, no more contact, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, custody to wife no access order made, lump sum and imputation

Aitken

F

E

sr

M

Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1983 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

12.1

Wife asks 95.1 K for divorce action And gets 12 K for post appeal motion

Aitken

F

E

sr

M

Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1983 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

13.0

Man claims 27 K and is imputed to 40 K

Aitken

F

E

sr

F

Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 13820 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

33.0

Man retrains and is intentionally unemployed and imputed at former level of 33 K, arrears

Aitken

F

E

sr

F

Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 25768 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

5.0

Motion to vary support, wife asks for 8.7 K  and gets 5 K costs

Aitken

F

E

M

sr

Testa v. Basi, 2005 CanLII 25186 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ip

4.0

Man bankrupted and living in trailer is imputed from 21 K to 25 K per year

Aitken

F

E

sr

sr

TPS

mn

Sc

 

Both husband and wife must establish insurance policies as security

Aitken

F

E

M

F

Vukovic v. Vukovic, 2003 CanLII 1987 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

69.0

2K per month spousal support, 40 K arrears, man claims 101 K income and is imputed to 170 K

Blishen

F

E

ex

F

Ahern v. Ahern, 2007 CanLII 37672 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

5.0

$ 1762 per month child support, $ 270 per month spousal support, s.7 expenses and retroactive support of 35.9 K, 5 K costs

Blishen

F

E

M

M

Biddle v. Biddle, 2004 CanLII 52809 (ON S.C.)

mj

F

 

Man given non depletion order, 9 K per month total support, interim disbursement of 20 K to wife

Blishen

F

E

M

M

Biddle v. Biddle, 2004 CanLII 52809 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

94.0

Man declared 228 K imputed to 322 K, 9 K per month retroactive

Blishen

F

E

M

M

Biddle v. Biddle, 2005 CanLII 7660 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

12.0

Wife claims 19.5 K for interim support motion and gets 12 K

Blishen

F

E

sr

M

Cutillas v. Proulx, 2001 CanLII 28218 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ep

 

Wife gets exclusive possession and has had house for 3 years

Blishen

F

E

M

F

Hackett v. Leung, 2005 CanLII 27603 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Ep

 

Wife gets exclusive possession, 3.1 K per month child support and 1.7 K per month spousal support

Blishen

F

E

F

M

Hackett v. Leung, 2005 CanLII 42254 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

4.0

Motion, Wife claims 8.4 K and gets 4 K

Blishen

F

E

M

M

Kerr v. Kerr, 2005 CanLII 16613 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ro

 

Woman has called mans work, and influenced children, and called police, man has yelled and been angry , wife gets custody, 2.2 K per month total support,

Blishen

F

E

sr

M

Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502

mj

Ro

 

Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, vesting order, security, arrears

Blishen

F

E

sr

M

Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502

mj

Sa

 

Man charged with assault given supervised access at interim motion and trial

Blishen

F

E

sr

M

Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502

mj

Sc

 

Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, vesting order, security, arrears

Blishen

F

E

sr

M

Kim v. Kim 2001 CarswellOnt 502kim

mj

Ep

 

Man charged with assault, wife gets exclusive possession and interim custody, house transferred to wife at uncontested trial

Blishen

F

E

sr

M

N.L. v. B.P., 2000 CanLII 22516 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

28.0

Man claims 12 K income and is imputed to 40 K

Blishen

F

E

sr

M

N.L. v. B.P., 2000 CanLII 22516 (ON S.C.)

mj

Sc

 

Charging order to secure child support arrears not rescinded

Blishen

F

E

M

M

N.L. v. J.C., 2005 CanLII 4838 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

5.5

Interim motion  to strike pleadings, 2.5 K costs, previous interim motion for custody, 5.5 K costs

Blishen

F

E

M

M

N.L. v. J.C., 2005 CanLII 4838 (ON S.C.)

mn

D

 

Pleadings not struck but made to sign disclosure release

Blishen

F

E

sr

M

Orser v. Grant, 2003 CanLII 2277 (ON S.C.)

mj

St

 

Mans pleadings struck and his defense is disallowed including a constitutional challenge

Blishen

F

E

M

F

Piskor v. Piskor, 2004 CanLII 5023 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

18.0

Support variation, 18 K costs

Blishen

F

E

M

F

Roberts v. Roberts, 2004 CanLII 18250 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

27.0

Man declares 36 K and court imputes 63 K

Blishen

F

E

M

F

Stratton v. Kangas, 2001 CanLII 26440 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

28.0

Man on welfare is imputed to 28 K

Blishen

F

E

M

M

Stratton v. Kangas, 2002 CanLII 46690 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

2.0

Wife sucessful on 2 out of 3 issues, 3.5 K partial indemnity asked and gets 2 K

Blishen

F

E

sr

F

V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

15.0

Mans 26 K income imputed to 41 K, sexual assault on child allegations unproven, supervised access

Blishen

F

E

sr

F

V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ro

 

Restraining order, wife gets custody and asks access terminated,  first unsupervised, then by parents, then supervised access center ordered, wife makes sexual assault allegation

Blishen

F

E

sr

F

V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Sa

 

 Mans supervised access is continued, mother asks it be terminated, criminal record, ron stewart, child support increased

Blishen

F

E

M

M

Zlater v. Hartwick, 2007 CanLII 30664 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

9.6

Motion for university expense, 9.6 K costs, ruling better than offer to settle

De Sousa

F

E

M

M

Biraben v. Pelland, 2006 CanLII 25614 (ON S.C.)

mj

Sa

 

Man accused of assault allowed supervised access with grandparent, wife gets custody

De Sousa

F

E

M

M

Brophy v. Brophy, 2004 CanLII 25419 (ON C.A.)

 

mj

Cts

18.5

Default on 8 K per month support, 25 K arrears, 18.5 K costs, 12 K costs of appeal

De Sousa

F

E

M

M

Brophy v. Brophy, 2004 CanLII 25419 (ON C.A.)

mj

D

 

Default on 8 K per month support, 25 K arrears

De Sousa

F

E

M

M

Brophy v. Brophy, 2004 CanLII 25419 (ON C.A.)

mj

Ip

40.0

Man claims 200 K income and is imputed to 240 K, 8 K per month support

De Sousa

F

E

M

F

Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 1920 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

3.5

Interim motion for possession of home and leave to appeal, 3.5 K costs

De Sousa

F

E

M

F

Davis v Morris 2006 CanLII 8196 (ON C.A.)

mn

D

 

Motion to overturn ex parte default order striking pleadings dismissed, overturned on appeal

De Sousa

F

E

sr

F

Hinke v. Lake, 2007 CanLII 8635 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

10.0

Man achieves substancial success on motion to vary but wife gven 10 K costs

De Sousa

F

E

M

F

Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)

mj

F

 

Pleadings struck, freezing order

De Sousa

F

E

M

F

Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)

mj

St

 

Pleadings struck, freezing order

De Sousa

F

E

M

F

M.I. v. J.R., 2004 CanLII 52812 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Ro

 

Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, wife allowed to move to japan

De Sousa

F

E

M

F

M.I. v. J.R., 2004 CanLII 52812 (ON S.C.)

mj

Sa

 

Domestic assault, Childrens Aid orders no access, court then orders supervised access, wife given custody and allowed to move to Japan

De Sousa

F

E

M

F

M.I. v. J.R., 2005 CanLII 7663 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

15.0

Divorce action, wife allowed to move to Japan, 15 K costs

De Sousa

F

E

sr

F

M.M.F.1 v. G.R., 2004 CanLII 52811 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Ro

 

Man convicted of assault, then threats, hasn’t seen son in 2 years, acess denied

De Sousa

F

E

sr

F

M.M.F.1 v. G.R., 2004 CanLII 52811 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Sa

 

Charged with assault, plead guilty, harassment charges, wife denies access, supervised access at wifes discretion ordered, wife requests access terminated

De Sousa

F

E

M

M

M.R.P. v. M.A.P., 2006 CanLII 19444 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ro

 

Mutual restraining order, wife gets custody

De Sousa

F

E

Sr

F

Martin v. Martin, 2007 CanLII 8638 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

40.0

Support variation,40 K costs

De Sousa

F

E

M

M

P.(M.L.) v. P.(G.W.), 2000 CanLII 22462 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

L

365.0

Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 365 K lump sum

De Sousa

F

E

M

M

P.(M.L.) v. P.(G.W.), 2000 CanLII 22462 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Pr

 

Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 365 K lump sum

De Sousa

F

E

M

M

P.(M.L.) v. P.(G.W.), 2000 CanLII 22462 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Pr

 

Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 365 K lump sum

De Sousa

F

E

sr

F

P.R. v. K.R., 2003 CanLII 1918 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

36.9

Divorce action, pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 36.9 K costs

De Sousa

F

E

sr

M

P.S. v. J.S., 2005 CanLII 16590 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ro

 

Restraining order for assault, false sexual assault allegations, joint custody changed to sole custody to man

De Sousa

F

E

sr

M

Piskor v. Piskor, 2003 CanLII 53692 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

F

 

Man gets home and violates non dissipation order transferring ownership, wife gets 3.5 K per month spousal support, variation stayed until arrears paid

De Sousa

F

E

F

F

R.M. v. R.L.Z., 2004 CanLII 5024 (ON S.C

mj

L

10.0

10 K lumps sum compensatory support

De Sousa

F

E

sr

F

Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

F

 

Mans pleadings struck, non dissipation order, 36 K in cost arrears, child support default with FRO, refused variation

De Sousa

F

E

sr

F

Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

45.0

Man with no income and heavy stock losses imputed to 45 K and support set at 54 K

De Sousa

F

E

sr

F

Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Ro

 

 Wife gets restraining order from false assault allegations, man acquitted, court gives wife permanent restraining roorder, strikes pleadings, wife gets custody, imputed income, intentionally unemployed

De Sousa

F

E

sr

F

Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)

mj

St

 

Mans pleadings struck at interim ex parte motion, 1.5 K costs, denied leave to appeal, uncontested trial,

De Sousa

F

E

sr

F

Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2003 CanLII 2037 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

1.5

Mans pleadings struck at interim ex parte motion, 1.5 K costs, denied leave to appeal, uncontested trial

De Sousa

F

E

sr

M

Scott v. McKinley, 2002 CanLII 13273 (ON C.A.)

mj

Sa

 

Man gets only one supervised visit per year with his child, access increased to 3 times on appeal

De Sousa

F

E

M

M

Surrette v. Johnson, 2003 CanLII 2282 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

1.0

Support variation, divided success, 1 K costs

De Sousa

F

E

sr

M

Szivi v. Schwilgin, 2003 CanLII 2036 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

9.0

Motion for leave to appeal, 9 K costs

De Sousa

F

E

sr

M

Szivi v. Schwilgin, 2003 CanLII 2036 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

 

Husband did not include imputed income on notice of appeal

De Sousa

F

E

sr

M

Szivi v. Schwilgin, 2003 CanLII 2036 (ON S.C.)

mj

Sa

 

Supervised access continued

LaFrance-Cardinal

F

E

M

F

Fleming v. Lamb, 2004 CanLII 5001 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ro

 

Restraining order, wife gets interim custody

LaFrance-Cardinal

F

E

M

F

Wylie v. Leclair, 2003 CanLII 49737 (ON C.A.)

mn

Cts

1.0

1K trial costs changed to 11 K but man gets 3 K costs of appeal, 150 K unjust enrichment award reduced to 70 K

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 27600 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

17.0

Uncontested trial judgement against wife set aside, 17 K costs against husband and his lawyer

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Cass v. Dyke, 2004 CanLII 5095 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

132.0

Mans declared income of 43 K imputed to 175 K, 2.85 K per month total support, security deposit

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Cass v. Dyke, 2004 CanLII 5095 (ON S.C.)

mn

Sc

 

Man must maintain 100 K life insurance as security.

Mackinnon J

F

E

F

M

Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 2041 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Ep

 

Wife gets exclusive possession of family home, mans motion for summary judgment denied, 2 K costs

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

F

Dahdouh v. Dahdouh, 2003 CanLII 2041 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

2.0

Interim motions, 2 K costs

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Dalton v. Craig, 2001 CanLII 28168 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

5.6

Man claims 6.9 K income and is imputed to 12.5 K

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Dalton v. Craig, 2001 CanLII 28168 (ON S.C.)

mn

L

4.1

Wife gets 4.1 K retroactive lump sum for support and prejudgment interest

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Dalton v. Craig, 2001 CanLII 28168 (ON S.C.)

mn

Pr

 

Wife gets 4.1 K retroactive lump sum for support and prejudgment interest

Mackinnon J

F

E

F

M

F. v. V., 2002 CanLII 2767 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

95.0

Divorce action,  wife asks for 158 K   and gets 95 K costs

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Gomez v. Bartusch, 2003 CanLII 37828 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

3.5

Summary judgment denied, 3.5 K costs of motion

Mackinnon j

F

E

M

M

Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 11695 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

47.0

Man claims 55 K imputed to 102 K.

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 11695 (ON S.C.)

mn

Sc

47.0

Man must maintain 100 K life insurance as security.

Mackinnon j

F

E

M

M

Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 15397 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

25.0

Divorce action, wife asks 35 K and gets 25 K costs

Mackinnon J

F

E

sr

F

Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)

mn

C

 

Man found in contempt for disclosure, 2.5 K cost penalty by Roy J, income imputed to 100 K reset at trial

Mackinnon J

F

E

sr

F

Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ip

20.0

Man found in contempt for disclosure, 2.5 K cost penalty by Roy J, income imputed from 80 K to 100 K reset at trial

Mackinnon J

F

E

Sr

M

Irace v. Irace, 2004 CanLII 5020 (ON S.C.)

mj

C

 

Properties transferred to wife for sale

Mackinnon J

F

E

sr

M

Irace v. Irace, 2004 CanLII 5020 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

3.5

Contempt motion, 3.5 K costs

Mackinnon J

F

E

Sr

M

J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)

mj

St

 

Husbands pleadings struck, uncontested trial, imputed income, retroactive support, 40 K costs by Trousdale J

Mackinnon J

F

E

F

M

Likins v. MacKenzie, 2004 CanLII 15767 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

10.0

Divorce action. Arbitrators cost award of 110 K reduced to 67 K, 10 K costs

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

F

Mavis v. Mavis, 2005 CanLII 14002 (ON S.C.)

mn

Pr

 

Wife gets prejudgment interest on equalization at a lower rate

Mackinnon J

F

E

sr

M

N.(D.) v. E.(T.), 2000 CanLII 21156 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

6.5

Wife wins trial of custody and gets 6.5 K costs, asks for 10 K

Mackinnon J

F

E

sr

F

P.R. v. K.R., 2005 CanLII 44186 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

1.8

$ 1750 for 2 interim motions to set aside and leave to appeal the order of Byers J

Mackinnon J

F

E

Ex

L

Pelda v. O'Leary, 2006 CanLII 25536 (ON S.C.)

mj

F

 

Wife gets ex parte freezing order, man sells company and may be able to pay more spousal support

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Ramsey v. Proffitt, 2001 CanLII 28161 (ON S.C.)

mj

L

52.0

Woman has pension entitlement from separation agreement and man goes bankrupt, claim not defeated by bankruptcy, 52 K lump sum for equalization and support

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Ramsey v. Proffitt, 2001 CanLII 28161 (ON S.C.)

mn

F

 

Freezing order on RRSP until lump sum is paid

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Ramsey v. Proffitt, 2001 CanLII 28161 (ON S.C.)

mn

Pr

 

Pre judgment interest on 52 K award

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 42606 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

25.0

Support variation, wife asks 38 K gets 25 K plus prejudgment interest, man owes 79 K in arrears

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 42606 (ON S.C.)

mj

Pr

 

Support variation, wife asks 38 K gets 25 K plus prejudgment interest, man owes 79 K in arrears

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Silver v. Mercer, 2003 CanLII 2039 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

4.3

Wife gets 4.3 K for motion to set support

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Simpkins v. Simpkins, 2004 CanLII 28909 (ON C.A.)

mn

Sc

 

Mintes of settlement waving spousal support set aside for fraud, 2.3 K spousal support, man must designate wife as beneficiary of 200 K life insurance policy, 12 K costs of appeal.

Mackinnon J

F

E

sr

sr

Smith v. Smith, 2000 CanLII 22455 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

1.6

1.6 K costs

Mackinnon J

F

E

F

M

Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.)

mj

F

 

Mans 8 K bank account to be preserved and not depleted, contempt for depletion

Mackinnon J

F

E

F

M

Traversy v. Glover, 2006 CanLII 24130 (ON S.C.)

mj

L

57.0

57 K lump sum against past arrears claim

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Van Westerop v. Van Westerop, 2000 CanLII 22456 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

115.0

Man claims 35 K on taxes and is imputed to 150 K income

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Van Westerop v. Van Westerop, 2000 CanLII 22456 (ON S.C.)

mj

L

23.0

23 K lump sum for retroactive arrears

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Van Westerop v. Van Westerop, 2000 CanLII 22456 (ON S.C.)

mj

Sc

 

45 K GIC for security

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

L

Westendorp v. Westendorp, 2000 CanLII 22538 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

8.0

8 K costs for constitutional challenge, 4 K to wife and 4 K to FRO

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2003 CanLII 49378 (ON S.C.)

mn

L

3.3

Lump sum of 3.3 K for s.7 expenses, wife found in contempt for not selling house

Metivier

F

E

sr

M

Boileau v. Boileau, 2003 CanLII 2288 (ON S.C

mn

Sc

 

Secure support against life insurance policy or first charge on estate, 69 K of pension transferred to wife, $ 600 support, mild

Metivier

F

E

ex

M

Davis v. Morris, 2006 CanLII 8196 (ON C.A.)

mn

Cts

8.0

8 K costs of striking motion, varied to $ 750 on appeal, 6 K costs of appeal against wife.

Metivier

F

E

exr

M

Davis v. Morris, 2006 CanLII 8196 (ON C.A.)

mn

St

 

Mans pleading struck at ex parte hearing, overturned on appeal

Metivier

F

E

M

F

Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.)

mj

L

54.0

54 K lump sum including 20 K for spousal support and child support arrears and special expenses, imputed income, intentionally unemployed, life insurance policy for security

Metivier

F

E

M

F

Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.)

 

mn

Ro

 

Man convicted of assault, anger management courses, joint custody with primary residence to wife, paid 380 K equalization, 20 K lump sum retroactive spousal support arrears, 34 K retroactive child support arrears, 1.1 K per month child support

Metivier

F

E

M

F

Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.)

mn

Sc

 

Life insurance policy for security, 54 K lump sum, imputed income, intentionally unemployed, joint custody

Metivier

F

E

sr

M

Sleiman v. Sleiman, 2003 CanLII 1982 (ON S.C.)

mj

St

 

Mans pleadings struck, uncontested trial, 42 K lump sum child support

Metrivier

F

E

M

M

Glance v. Glance, 2000 CanLII 20393 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ep

 

Wife gets exclusive possession

Metrivier

F

E

M

F

Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

50.0

Additional 50 K per year income imputed, retroactive support, s.7 expenses, lump sum arrears

Metrivier

F

E

sr

M

O'Brien v. Griffin, 2004 CanLII 10709 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ip

61.6

Man claims 51.4 K income and is imputed to 115 K, 100 K arrears, vexatious litigant order, new trial of support ordered on appeal

Polowin

F

E

F

sr

Brazeau v. Lefebvre, 2003 CanLII 2165 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

5.0

Self represented wife gets 5 K costs

Polowin

F

E

sr

M

Fequet v. Petelka Fequet, 2003 CanLII 2200 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

9.7

Divorce action, husband asks for 21 K and  wife gets 9.7 K

Polowin

F

E

sr

F

P.R. v. K.R., 2005 CanLII 44186 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

0.5

$ 500 for interim motion

Polowin

F

E

F

M

Pollen v. Pollen, 2004 CanLII 5073 (ON S.C.)

mj

L

8.0

8 K lump sum for support

Polowin

F

E

M

F

Slack v. Slack, 2001 CanLII 28170 (ON S.C.)

mj

L

5.4

Wife gets 5.4 K spousal support lump sum and prejudment interest

Polowin

F

E

M

F

Slack v. Slack, 2001 CanLII 28170 (ON S.C.)

mn

Pr

 

Wife gets 5.4 K spousal support lump sum and prejudment interest

Robertson

F

E

sr

M

A. E. M. v. J. E. M., 2004 CanLII 22310 (ON C.A.)

mn

Ro

 

Restrianing order against man, 1.5 K costs of appeal

Robertson

F

E

M

M

Murano v. Murano, 2002 CanLII 49352 (ON C.A.)

mj

St

 

Mans pleadings struck for disclosure, sentenced to jail for contempt previously ordered by Dunbar K

Toscano Roccano

F

E

M

M

Lakhani v. Lakhani, 2003 CanLII 2160 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

9.0

9 K to wife for motion

Toscano Romano

F

E

sr

M

Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

1.5

Interim motion, 1.5 K costs

Trousdale

F

E

sr

M

J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

40.0

Husbands pleadings struck, uncontested trial, imputed income, retroactive support, 40 K costs

Trousdale

F

E

sr

M

J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

68.0

2 K income imputed to 70 K, pleadings struck, wife gets exclusive possession of home then vesting order, 1.3 K per month total support

Trousdale

F

E

sr

M

J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

L

 

2 lump sum payments already made, 40 K in retroactive child support, 3.5 K in retroactive spousal support, 53 K equalization and vesting order for house, 40 K costs, restraining order, pleadings struck

Trousdale

F

E

sr

M

J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ro

 

Domestic assault, temporary retraining order still in effect, pleadings struck, 40 K costs

Trousdale

F

E

sr

M

J.M.M. v. G.S.M., 2006 CanLII 6457 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Sa

 

Domestic assault, supervised access, hasn’t seen children, pleadings struck, imputed income, 45 K retroactive support, 35 K cost penalty

Belch

M

E

M

F

Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

97.0

Man imputed to 97 K wife imputed to 50 K, man must pay wife 1.2 K per month, retroactive support, wife mild

Belch

M

E

M

F

Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.)

mj

L

6.0

6 K lump sum for retroactive support,

Belch

M

E

M

F

Fleming v. Lamb, 2004 CanLII 5001 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

3.5

Wife asks 11 K and gets 3.5 K for support / income determination motion

Belch

M

E

sr

M

M. Al. O. v. Me. A. O., 2005 CanLII 2740 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

40.0

Man on unemployment imputed at 40 K per year

Belch

M

E

sr

M

M. Al. O. v. Me. A. O., 2005 CanLII 2740 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Sa

 

Plead guilty to assaulting kids, minimal supervised access with unspecified increased, imputed income

Belch

M

E

M

M

McCaw v. McCaw, 2007 CanLII 6920 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

35.0

Divorce action, wife asks 69 K gets 35 K costs

Belch

M

E

L

L

Murano, Re, 2004 CanLII 17633 (ON S.C.)

mj

D

 

Jailed for disclosure, denied a trial FRO default set to trial, owes 158 K

Belch

M

E

sr

M

Swanson v. Swanson, 2004 CanLII 48679 (ON S.C.)

mn

C

 

Man in contempt for not signing over house to wife and depleting bank account, Feb 2005 post trial motion

Belch

M

E

sr

sr

Young v. O'Neil, 2003 CanLII 2370 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ro

 

Granted as after separation man leaves phone messages and goes in house to take photos as evidence of differential living standards, income imputed

Chadwick

M

E

sr

M

Fisher v. Fisher, 2003 CanLII 2119 (ON S.C.)

mn

C

 

Mans contempt sufficiently purged

Chadwick

M

E

F

M

Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)

mj

C

 

Contempt, man gets 120 days and new wife gets 60 days in jail, fraudulent conveyance

Charbonneau

M

E

sr

F

P.R. v. K.R., 2006 CanLII 1676 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

D

 

Jail threatened, imputed income, intentionally unemployed, assets frozen

Charbonneau

M

E

L

L

Poirier v. Poirier, 2006 CanLII 2188 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

36.0

Divorce, 36 K costs

Charbonneau

M

E

M

M

Sliwinski v. Marks, 2005 CanLII 23106 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

34.0

Divorce action 34 K costs

Cosgrove

M

E

M

M

Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ep

 

Wife gets exclusive possession and has had house for 4 years, 11 interim orders

Cosgrove

M

E

M

F

N.S. v.D.S., 2002 CanLII 2711 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

3.5

3.5 K costs

Cusson

M

E

sr

M

Donaldson v. Dénommée, 2004 CanLII 53115 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

8.0

$ 625 child support and $ 800 spousal support, man makes 78 K per year, 8 K costs

Cusson

M

E

L

L

Lavigne v. MacCaskill, 2003 CanLII 2014 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ro

 

Wife falsely alleges assault and theft, child testifies wife is abusive, joint custody

Hackland

M

E

M

M

D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ro

 

Man charged with assault, wife gets custody, 2.3 K per month child support

Hackland

M

E

M

M

D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ip

8.0

Wife imputed at 25 K , Mans income increased by 8 K over claimed, man pays 4.5 K per month total support, wife mild

Hackland

M

E

M

M

K. v. K., 2004 CanLII 12506 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ro

 

Man charged with assault, charges withdrawn, wife gets custody, 15 K per month child support

Hackland

M

E

M

F

Lajoie v. Lajoie, 2005 CanLII 23684 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

31.0

Mans declared income is 12 K but is imputed to 43 K

Hackland

M

E

M

M

Taillon v. Taillon, 2005 CanLII 8688 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

L

 

Arrears of support to be paid as a lump sum

Kealy

M

E

M

F

Aukstuolyte v. Balchun, 2005 CanLII 27896 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ep

 

Wife gets exclusive possession

Lalonde

M

E

M

F

Bourgon v. Paquette, 2004 CanLII 5924 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

18.0

$ 500 per month interim spousal support, settled intention on children reserved for trial, 6.5 K retroactive arrears, man claims 47 K income imputed to 65 K, wife has 45 K income

Lalonde

M

E

M

F

D. H. v. A. G. P., 2004 CanLII 53228 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ro

 

Mutual retraining interim order granted , denied at trial, wife gets custody

Lalonde

M

E

M

F

Harris v. Harris, 2000 CanLII 17048 (ON C.A.)

 

mj

Sc

 

Second mortgage ordered put on mans property and assigned to wife for 5 K per month support, stay denied

Lalonde

M

E

sr

sr

J.B.G. v. L.B., 2004 CanLII 53230 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

20.0

Restraining order wife gets custody, answer struck, 20 K cost penalty, previous 12K cost penalty

Lalonde

M

E

sr

sr

J.B.G. v. L.B., 2004 CanLII 53230 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ro

 

Restraining order wife gets custody, answer struck, 20 K cost penalty

Lalonde

M

E

ex

F

Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

11.0

11 K costs for motion

Lalonde

M

E

ex

F

Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

85.0

Man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 100 K, lawyer quits, man has answered but is not present

Lalonde

M

E

ex

F

Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.)

mj

St

 

Mans pleadings struck

Mackinnon C

M

E

L

L

M.P. v. D.P., 2006 CanLII 15770 (ON S.C.)

mn

Sa

 

Wife makes false sexual assualt allegations and  man gets temporary supervised access, restored to unsupervised when allegations are dismissed, child exchanges at the police station

Macleod

M

E

F

M

Sanders v. Lacaille, 2005 CanLII 18722 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ro

 

Man accused of assault acquitted, no children, wife gets possession of home for 2 years and damages it when ordered to leave, wife given 40 K in constructive trust but must pay 14 K in damages and 14 K in occupation rent

Manton

M

E

M

M

D.Q. v. R.A., 2006 CanLII 42375 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

4.1

4.1 K for earlier motion, unemployed man imputed to 40 K

Maranger

M

E

sr

sr

Ainslie v. Bracken, 2006 CanLII 19461 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

 

Mans income imputed from claimed K to 80 K, 10 K support arrears, 3.4 K per month total support

Panet

M

E

sr

M

Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.)

mj

St

 

Man in breach of several paymwent orders, pleadings struck, security ordered for appeal of striking order, uncontested trial ordered

Panet

M

E

sr

M

Fisher v. Green, 2003 CanLII 2120 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

6.5

Wifes motion for retroactive support, wife claims 44 K gets 6.5 K

Panet

M

E

M

M

Kourany v. Salem, 2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ro

 

Some restrictions on contact and a provision for police enforcement, wife gets custody, child support secured by insurance policy, mild

Panet

M

E

M

M

Kourany v. Salem, 2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.)

mn

Sc

 

Some restrictions on contact and a provision for police enforcement, wife gets custody, child support secured by insurance policy, mild

Panet

M

E

sr

M

Marie Cunningham v. Charles LeFebvre, 2004 CanLII 54630 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

7.5

Interim motion, 7.5 K costs

Panet

M

E

M

F

Meredith v. Meredith, 2002 CanLII 2807 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

3.8

Divorce action, divided success, wife gets 3.8 K

Pedlar

M

E

M

M

Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ro

 

Man under no contact order with one of his 3 children

Power

M

E

M

M

Campeau v. Campeau, 2006 CanLII 19430 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

15.0

15 K for motion to have mans lawyer removed

Power

M

E

sr

M

Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 15761 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

8.5

Wife claims 16.5 K and gets 8.5 K for motion

Power

M

E

sr

M

Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

D

 

Child support arrears and threat of bankruptcy, order to put pension in trust until equalization paid

Power

M

E

sr

M

Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

0.8

Interim motion $ 750 costs

Power

M

E

sr

M

Dunklin v. Dunklin, 2006 CanLII 5877 (ON S.C.)

mn

Sc

 

Secure equalization against life insurance policy and make wife trustee of pension, retroactive child support

Power

M

E

M

M

Graff v. Graff, 2002 CanLII 2788 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

3.8

Interim motion, 3.8 K costs

Power

M

E

M

F

Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 38129 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

4.0

Garnishment hearing, 4 K costs

Power

M

E

M

F

Jonas v. Da Silva, 2003 CanLII 49354 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

D

 

 Freezes home and possessions impressed with a trust to benefit of wife. His mothers estate frozen and transferred to trust, garnisheed to 70 % income

Power

M

E

ex

M

Laiken v. Tatsambong, 2003 CanLII 29739 (ON S.C.)

mn

F

 

Wife gets ex parte freezing order which is later overturned

Power

M

E

M

F

Martin v. Martin, 2004 CanLII 48712 (ON S.C.)

mj

Sc

 

Man must hold at least 1 million dollars life insurance designated to wife for payments of 28 K per month in total support

Power

M

E

M

F

Martin v. Martin, 2005 CanLII 11809 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

49.0

Divorce action, wife asks 165 K and gets 49 K

Power

M

E

sr

sr

McLean v. Vallance, 2006 CanLII 28910 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

1.0

Wife claims 4.9 K and gets 1 K

Power

M

E

sr

F

P.R. v. K.R., 2005 CanLII 44186 (ON S.C.)

 

mn

Sc

 

5 K security to bring motion, vexatious, frivoluos abusive litigator, 10 K cost penalty , variation not heard despite FRO default, security overturned on appeal

Power

M

E

sr

F

P.R. v. K.R., 2006 CanLII 1676 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

10.0

Support variation, 10 K costs, 10 K costs of appeal

Power

M

E

sr

F

P.R. v. K.R., 2006 CanLII 1676 (ON S.C.)

mj

Js

 

Summary judgment on mans motion for variarion and access and constitutional challenges

Power

M

E

sr

F

Townsend v. Florentis, 2004 CanLII 25801 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ro

 

Man prohibited from the city of Kingston, no access to child

Roy

M

E

sr

M

Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 32470 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

50.7

Divorce action, wife asks 61 K gets 50.7 K

Roy

M

E

sr

M

Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 32470 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ip

11.0

Man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 21 K

Roy

M

E

sr

F

Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

2.5

2.5 K costs for motions

Roy

M

E

sr

F

Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)

mn

Sc

 

12 K arrears on house payments and 25 K costs to be secured against mans share of home

Rutherford

M

E

 

 

Craig v. Craig, 2005 CanLII 50263 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

1.5

Contempt motion against man dismissed 1.5 K for motion

Rutherford

M

E

sr

M

Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

3.0

Interim motion 3 K costs

Rutherford

M

E

M

F

Lantaigne v. Lantaigne, 2005 CanLII 39886 (ON S.C.)

mn

D

 

Default but FRO enforcement stayed and arrears reduced to 15 K from 44

Rutherford

M

E

sr

F

Luedtke v. Vuletic, 2001 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.)

mj

St

 

$ 140 per month child support and 50 % of s.7 expenses based on 18 K income, mans answer struck and he can’t participate at trial

Rutherford

M

E

sr

M

Marie Cunningham v. Charles LeFebvre, 2004 CanLII 54630 (ON S.C.)

mj

D

 

15 K advance to wife and 9.5 K in costs but answer not struck for failing to provide disclosure

Rutherford

M

E

M

M

Marks v. Tokarewicz, 2002 CanLII 2799 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

7.5

Interim motion on support application wife didn’t pay costs of precious order, 7.5 K costs

Rutherford

M

E

sr

M

Piskor v. Piskor, 2003 CanLII 53692 (ON S.C.)

mj

D

 

Stay of variation until man pays arrears, says he’s broke

Rutherford

M

E

M

M

Provenzano v. Provenzano, 2004 CanLII 5075 (ON S.C.)

mn

D

 

Set aside, womans lawyer doesn’t tell of ex parte order, lawyer pays costs

Rutherford

M

E

M

M

Sliwinski v. Marks, 2005 CanLII 23106 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

2.0

Interim motion 2 K costs

Sedgwick

M

E

M

F

Chen v. Chen, 2000 CanLII 22564 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ep

 

Wife gets exclusive possession

Sedgwick

M

E

sr

F

Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ro

 

Restraining order against man, wife gets possession of home and cistody

Sedgwick

M

E

M

F

Pearson v. Griffith, 2004 CanLII 21278 (ON S.C.)

mj

Js

 

Lump sum of 45 K ordered in Que, appeal denied, total payments ordered 188 K, paid 214 K and Ont court says it’s not an overpayment, variation denied

Sedgwick

M

E

M

F

Pearson v. Griffith, 2004 CanLII 21278 (ON S.C.)

mj

L

45.0

Lump sum of 45 K ordered, appeal denied, total payments ordered 188 K, paid 214 K and court says it’s not an overpayment, variation denied

Sedgwick

M

E

sr

M

Roberts v. Aasen, 2003 CanLII 2000 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

60.9

Custody and access 60.9 K award

Sheffield

M

E

M

F

Craig v. Craig, 2005 CanLII 50263 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

1.5

1.5 K for interim motion

Sheffield

M

E

sr

M

Cunningham v. Lefebvre, 2006 CanLII 5602 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

2.0

Interim motion, 2 K costs

Sheffield

M

E

M

F

Evans v. Evans, 2003 CanLII 2021 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ip

9.0

Man claims 83 K income and is imputed to 92 K

Smith R

M

E

L

L

Bourget v. Bourget, 2006 CanLII 2888 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ip

2.0

Mans income imputed upwards 2 K per year for overtime, minor

Smith R

M

E

M

M

Butler v. Poelstra, 2006 CanLII 41661 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

5.7

Divorce action, wife asks 16.3 K and gets 5.7 K costs

Smith R

M

E

F

M

Fournier v. Burton, 2006 CanLII 42370 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

4.0

Husband loses motion to have support terminated, 4 K costs

Smith R

M

E

sr

F

Francis v. Filion, 2003 CanLII 2423 (ON S.C.)

mn

Sc

 

40 K insurance policy as support

Smith R

M

E

F

M

Matysiak v. Phillips, 2004 CanLII 45449 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Sa

 

 Mans access terminated, first unsupervised, then supervised, then terminated, drug problem, criminal record

Smith R

M

E

sr

F

Trevisanutto v. Crnkovic, 2005 CanLII 19789 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

5.8

Motion to vary support, 5.8 K costs

 

 

 

2)   Penalties Against Women

 

 

Aitken

F

E

sr

F

Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2005 CanLII 47744 (ON S.C.)

mn

F

 

Mutual, Wife gets home for 2 years then sold, man gets 12 K bill on household payments, woman gets support

Aitken

F

E

sr

sr

TPS

mn

Sc

 

Both husband and wife must establish insurance policies as security

Blishen

F

E

M

M

Kerr v. Kerr, 2005 CanLII 16613 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ro

 

Mutual, woman has called mans work, and influenced children, and called police, man has yelled and been angry , wife gets custody, 2.2 K per month total support,

Blishen

F

E

F

F

O'Connor v. O'Connor, 2007 CanLII 8930 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

5.0

Motion to vary support, husband claims 19.8 K and gets 5 K, wife claims 8.4 K

DeSousa

F

E

F

F

A.D. v. M.J., 2006 CanLII 37515 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

8.0

Motion, wife found in contempt, 8 K costs

De Sousa

F

E

F

F

Ladisa v. Ladisa, 2004 CanLII 15138 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

10.0

Divorce action, wife claims 35 K costs, husband claims 28 K and gets 10 K, appeal dismissed

De Sousa

F

E

M

M

M.R.P. v. M.A.P., 2006 CanLII 19444 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ro

 

Mutual restraining order, wife get custody

De Sousa

F

E

M

M

Marks v. Tokarewicz, 2003 CanLII 1995 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

20.0

20K costs, 8.8 K costs of appeal

De Sousa

F

E

M

F

Sloss v. Forget, 2005 CanLII 4843 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

6.0

Motion for mobility and support, 6 K costs

De Sousa

F

E

F

M

Viertelhausen v. Burbridge, 2006 CanLII 11238 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

7.0

Support trial, 7 K costs

Mackinnon

F

E

M

M

Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2003 CanLII 49378 (ON S.C.)

mn

C

 

Found in contempt for failure to sell house but not in contempt for not admitting child was not in school and collecting support, sentencing hearing to be held

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

F

B.K. v. A.P., 2005 CanLII 27602 (ON S.C.)

 

mj

Sa

 

With holds child in violation of custody order, contempt, 30 days in jail and 2.5 K suspended, , no access 1 month, supervised access 1 month, then unsupervised if no breaches

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

F

B.K. v. A.P., 2005 CanLII 27602 (ON S.C.)

 

mn

C

 

With holds child in violation of custody order, contempt, 30 days in jail and 2.5 K suspended, , no access 1 month, supervised access 1 month, then unsupervised if no breaches

Mackinnon J

F

E

F

M

D.W. v. C.O, 2006 CanLII 16361 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

3.0

Child support application, 3 K costs

Mackinnon J

F

E

F

M

D.W. v. C.O., 2006 CanLII 13554 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ip

5.0

With a former income of 134 K and current declared income of 33 K given transitional imputation of 38 K then 62 K

Mackinnon J

F

E

sr

M

Griffore v. Adsett, 2001 CanLII 28207 (ON S.C.)

mj

Ep

 

Man gets exclusive possession and $ 1000 child support and $ 700 spousal support

Mackinnon J

F

E

M

M

Zadegan v. Zadegan, 2005 CanLII 48697 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

4.8

Motion  to vary support, husband gets  4.8 K

Polowin

F

E

M

ex

Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.)

mn

St

 

Woman who didn’t answers has pleadings struck, but decision is overturned

Belch

M

E

M

F

Bedi v. Bedi, 2004 CanLII 34426 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ip

50.0

Man imputed to 97 K wife imputed to 50 K, man must pay wife 1.2 K per month, retroactive support, wife mild

Charboneau

M

E

F

M

Guénette v. Brisebois, 2004 CanLII 33294 (ON S.C.)

 

mn

Cts

1.0

Husband  gets interim custody, divided success, 3 motions 1 K costs to be paid by wife

Hackland

M

E

M

M

Charron v. Fulham, 2004 CanLII 17656 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

4.5

4.5 K costs on child support variation

Hackland

M

E

M

M

D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ip

25.0

Wife imputed at 25 K , Mans income increased by 8 K over claimed, man pays 4.5 K per month total support, wife mild

Lalonde

M

E

M

ex

Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.)

mn

D

 

Pleadings struck then set aside, suit with lawyers 

Lalonde

M

E

M

ex

Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

46.0

46 K for uncontested divorce action, set aside

Lalonde

M

E

M

ex

Campeau v. Campeau, 2005 CanLII 25948 (ON S.C.)

mn

F

 

Wife pleadings struck, sells property and husband files fraudulent conveyance action, sale reversed then order set aside

Lalonde

M

E

M

F

D. H. v. A. G. P., 2004 CanLII 53228 (ON S.C.)

mn

Ro

 

Mutual retraining interim order granted , denied at trial, wife gets custody

Panet

M

E

F

M

Nicholls v. Peterson, 2007 CanLII 43497 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

1.3

$1,250 for uncontested trial, womans pleadings struck, 2 other $ 500 cost penalties

Rutherford

M

E

M

M

Craig v. Craig, 2005 CanLII 50263 (ON S.C.)

mn

Cts

1.5

Contempt motion for disclosure dismissed, 1.5 K costs

Rutherford

M

E

M

M

Marks v. Tokarewicz, 2002 CanLII 2799 (ON S.C.)

mn

D

 

Denied motion for support due to default on costs, overturned and her motion may proceed

Smith R

M

E

M

sr

Coady v. Boyle, 2004 CanLII 15122 (ON S.C.)

mj

Cts

70.0

70 K costs against wife

 

 

 

 

Toronto Region  Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary

 

 

 

Contents

 

1   Sex of judge              M – Male          F - Female

2   Region                            T – Toronto Region

 

     # p – number of penalties        # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants

 

 

 

 

 

     Penalties Against Men

 

 

   Penalties Against Women

 

      Total

 

    Major

 

 

       Total

 

     Major

     Judge

 1

 2

 

 # p

# sr

 

 # p

# sr

 

 

 # p

# sr

 

 # p

# sr

 

 

Backhouse

F

T

 

 18

   6

 

 17

   6

 

 

   1

   0

 

   0

   0

Bain

F

T

 

   2

   1

 

   1

   1

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Beaulieu

F

T

 

   2

   0

 

   1

   0

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Benotto

F

T

 

   9

   3

 

   7

   2

 

 

   4

   2

 

   4

   2

Croll

F

T

 

 10

   4

 

   6

   2

 

 

   3

   0

 

   0

   0

Goodman

F

T

 

   5

   0

 

   5

   0

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Greer

F

T

 

 29

 11

 

 22

   9

 

 

   4

   2

 

   2

   2

Herman

F

T

 

   9

   2

 

   5

   2

 

 

   1

   1

 

   0

   0

Himel

F

T

 

   9

   4

 

   7

   4

 

 

   1

   0

 

   0

   0

Karakatsanis

F

T

 

 12

   2

 

 10

   2

 

 

   1

   0

 

   1

   0

Kitely

F

T

 

   9

   1

 

   7

   1

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Klowak

F

T

 

   3

   1

 

   2

   0

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Lax

F

T

 

   7

   0

 

   6

   0

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Low

F

T

 

   7

   4

 

   4

   2

 

 

   1

   0

 

   1

   0

Macdonald

F

T

 

 14

   1

 

   8

   1

 

 

   5

   0

 

   0

   0

McWatt

F

T

 

   2

   0

 

   1

   0

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Mesbur

F

T

 

 16

   2

 

 14

   2

 

 

   7

   1

 

   1

   0

Pepall

F

T

 

   4

   0

 

   4

   0

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Sachs

F

T

 

 17

   3

 

 12

   2

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Speigel

F

T

 

   1

   1

 

   1

   1

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Stewart

F

T

 

 12

   2

 

 10

   1

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Swinton

F

T

 

   1

   0

 

   1

   0

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Young

F

T

 

   3

   0

 

   3

   0

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Thorburn

F

T

 

   2

   2

 

   1

   1

 

 

   1

   0

 

   0

   0

Archibald

M

T

 

   2

   0

 

   2

   0

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Aston

M

T

 

 18

   4

 

 12

   2

 

 

   5

   3

 

   2

   2

Belobaba

M

T

 

   1

   0

 

   1

   0

 

 

   0

   0

 

   0

   0

Brown

M

T

 

   5

   0

 

   2

   0

 

 

   0