Federal Support Study Child Support 902k
Legend
1 Payors Court Ordered Income per Year in $ 1000’s
2 Income Claimed by Payors per Year in $ 1000’s
3 Total Support Ordered ( median for payment group for s.7 expense used where $ figures are not stated, . and any other periodic expenses described are included ) per Year in 1000 $’s
4 Payors Claimed Income after Support Payment
5 Tax on Payors Claimed Income ( minus a 10 K personal exemption ) per Year in $ 1000’s
6 Fixed Support Award Expense ( median for payment group and award type used where $ figures are not stated ) per Year in $ 1000’s
7 Payors Claimed Income after Support Payment and Tax per Year in $ 1000’s
8 Payors Disposable Incme after Support Payment, Tax and Fixed Award Expenses per Year in $ 1000’s
9 Support Recipients Income per Year in $ 1000’s
10 Blank
11 Type of Support ( c= Child Support, s = Spousal Support, b = Both Child and Spousal Support )
12 Court ( s = Superior Court, o = Ontario Court of Justice, y = Court of Appeal )
13 Case and Canlii File Number
14 Child Support ( only values where $ figures are stated ) per Month in $’s
15 Spousal Support ( only values where $ figures are stated ) per Month in $’s
16 Description of Outcome
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Case | 14 | 15 | Outcome | 
| 72.5 | 0.0 | 
 | 
 | 20.6 | 42.5 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Burisch v. Gosal, 2007 CanLII 2647 (ON S.C.) | 
 | 
 | Support for 1 child at 72.5 K income per year, 42.5 K arrears, imputed at 72.5 K per year while unemployed | 
| 50 | 0.0 | 14.4 | (14.4) | 0.0 | 40.0 | (14.4) | (54.4)) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Derek Cross v. Lila Cross, 2004 CanLII 13409 (ON S.C.) | 1200 | 
 | $ 700 per month child support and $ 500 per month s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and income imputed to 50 K, 40 K arrears | 
| 30.0 | 0.0 | 4.8 | (4.8) | 0.0 | 13.8 | (4.8) | (18.6) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) | 398 | 
 | $ 398 per month child support, contempt penalty 10 K, 15 K security, wife makes false criminal allegations, man claims no income and is imputed to 30 K, 1.75 K retroactive s.7 award, arrears | 
| 9.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | (1.2) | 0.0 | 40.0 | (1.2) | (41.2) | 
 | 
 | c | y | Difrancesco v. Couto, 2001 CanLII 8613 (ON C.A.) | 102 | 
 | $ 102 per month child support, man claims no income and 9 K per year is imputed, arrears 40 K | 
| 27.0 | 0.0 | 4.4 | (4.4) | 0.0 | 22.0 | (4.4) | (26.0) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Lalonde v. Lalonde, 2005 CanLII 16637 (ON S.C.) | 365 | 
 | $ 240 per month child support and $ 125 per month s.7 expenses, 22 K arrears, man claims no income and is imputed to 27 K per year | 
| 35 | 0.0 | 5.4 | (5.4) | 5.3 | 17.0 | (5.4) | (22.4) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.) | 448 | 
 | $ 448 per month child support, 17 K arrears, variation denied, man quit job and is unemployed and income imputed at 35 K, 3.5 K costs | 
| 48.0 | 0.0 | 5.7 | (5.7) | 0.0 | 14.0 | (5.7) | (19.7) | 30.0 | 
 | c | s | Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.) | 474 | 
 | $ 762 per month child support lowered to $ 474, arrears 14 K, 25 K security deposit ordered, man unemployed is imputed to 48 K income, wife earns 30 K per year | 
| 54.0 | 0.0 | 5.4 | (5.4) | 0.0 | 54.0 | (5.4) | (19.1) | 65.0 | 
 | c | y | Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2004 CanLII 1785 (ON C.A.) 
 | 454 | 
 | $ 454 per month child support based on income imputed to 45 K but support set at 54 K, man claims no income, 8 K arrears, 46 K costs | 
| 23.6 | 0.0 | 3.8 | (3.8) | 0.0 | 12.0 | (3.8) | (15.8) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Fournier v. Hynes, 2007 CanLII 2653 (ON S.C.) | 320 | 
 | $ 320 per month child support and $ 100 per month repayment of arrears, man claims to be unemployed but income of 23.6 K imputed | 
| 50 | 0.0 | 14.7 | (14.7) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (14.7) | (14.7) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Azimi v. Mirzaei, 2007 CanLII 16445 (ON S.C.) | 1229 | 
 | $ 429 per month child support and $ 800 s.7 expense, man unemployed is imputed to 50 K income, man is denied spousal support | 
| 60.6 | 0.0 | 11.5 | (11.5) | 0.0 | 2.8 | (11.5) | (14.3) | 48.8 | 
 | c | s | Tughan v. Tughan, 2003 CanLII 2355 (ON S.C.) | 830 | 
 | $ 830 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, 55 % s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and incomeis imputed to 60.6 K, wifes income is 48.8 K per year | 
| 47 | 0.0 | 11.7 | (11.7) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (11.7) | (11.7) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Razavi-Brahimi v. Ershadi, 2007 ONCJ 406 (CanLII) | 975 | 
 | $ 515 per month child support and $ 460 per month s.7 expense, man is unemployed but imputed to 47 K per year income | 
| 81.0 | 0.0 | 8.8 | (8.8) | 0.0 | 2.8 | (8.8) | (11.6) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pysznyj v. Pysznyj, 2007 CanLII 4881 (ON S.C.) | 734 | 
 | $ 734 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, man on unemployment is imputed to 81 K per year. | 
| 57.0 | 0.0 | 5.8 | (5.8) | 0.0 | 5.7 | (5.8) | (11.5) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Malleye v. Brereton, 2007 ONCJ 216 (CanLII) | 484 | 
 | $ 484 child support not varied or arrears rescinded, man intentionally unemployed and imputed at former 57 K | 
| 56 | 0.0 | 9.3 | (9.3) | 0.0 | 2.0 | (9.3) | (11.3) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Hirtle v. Earl, 2007 CanLII 20282 (ON S.C.) | 775 | 
 | $ 775 per month child support based on 56 K income, man is unemployed and denied variation, 2 K arrears | 
| 35 | 0.0 | 5.5 | (5.5) | 0.0 | 5.7 | (5.5) | (11.2) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bhullar v. Bhullar, 2005 CanLII 18718 (ON S.C.) | 
 | 
 | Support for 1 child based on an imputed income of 35 K and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrearsman claims no income, previous 5 years income tax average 19 K | 
| 
 | 0.0 | 3.6 | (3.6) | 0.0 | 6.3 | (3.6) | (9.9) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Pompey v. Pompey, 1992 CanLII 4044 (ON C.J.) | 300 | 
 | $ 300 per month child support, 6.3 K arrears, man is unemployed but must contiunue paying at former level | 
| 60.0 | 0.0 | 9.6 | (9.6) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (9.6) | (9.6) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Léveillé v. Lemieux, 2002 CanLII 2694 (ON S.C.) | 530 | 
 | $ 507 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses and 2 1 K airfares per year, man quits job as a teacher and starts a convenience store, claims a 6 K loss and is imputed to 60 K per year | 
| 33 | 0.0 | 7.9 | (7.9) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (7.9) | (7.9) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.) | 663 | 
 | $ 663 per month child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 33 K, mans proceeds from sale of home to be held as security for support | 
| 33 | 0.0 | 7.9 | (7.9) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (7.9) | (7.9) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 13820 (ON S.C.) | 633 | 
 | $ 633 child support per month intentionally unemployed for going back to school, no variation, 33 K income imputed | 
| 39.0 | 0.0 | 6.7 | 0.0 | (6.7) | 0.0 | (6.7) | (6.7) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Zagar v. Zagar, 2006 ONCJ 296 (CanLII) | 557 | 
 | $ 557 per month child support, man unemployed and imputed at 39 K | 
| 16.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | (1.5) | 4.6 | (1.5) | (6.1) | 
 | 
 | c | y | Drygala v. Pauli, 2002 CanLII 41868 (ON C.A.) | 127 | 
 | $ 127 per month retroactive 3 years, man claims 7.3 K loss and is imputed to 16 K per year | 
| 30.0 | 0.0 | 5.4 | (5.4) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (5.4) | (5.4) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Abdilla v. Abdilla, 2004 CanLII 35086 (ON S.C.) | 446 | 
 | $ 446 child support per month, unemployed and income imputed to 30 K | 
| 20 | 0.0 | 4.6 | (4.6) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (4.6) | (4.6) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Marchese v. Marchese, 2002 CanLII 40030 (ON S.C.) | 265 | 
 | $ 265 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man studying for PHD has 20 K income imputed | 
| 22 | 0.0 | 2.4 | (2.4) | 0.0 | 2.0 | (2.4) | (4.4) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.) | 199 | 
 | $ 199 per month child support, 2 K arrears, variation denied, loses job because FRO takes drivers license, income held imputed at former 22 K | 
| 20 | 0.0 | 3.7 | (3.7) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (3.7) | (3.7) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 37233 (ON S.C.) | 308 | 
 | $ 308 interim child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 20 K income | 
| 35.0 | 0.0 | 3.7 | (3.7) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (3.7) | (3.7) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bowman v. Cheluk, 2003 CanLII 1938 (ON S.C.) | 305 | 
 | $ 305 child support, $ 2500 spousal support paid by wife terminated, man is unemployed but income is imputed to 35 K | 
| 25.0 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 0.0 | (2.7) | 0.0 | (2.7) | (2.7) | 19 | 
 | c | s | Clewlow v. Clewlow, 2004 CanLII 7355 (ON S.C.) | 222 | 
 | $ 222 child support and $ 140 spousal support based on imputed income of 25 K, man laid off and gets some work as a handiman, wife earns 19 K | 
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 | (1.4) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (1.4) | (1.4) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bak v. Dobell, 2005 CanLII 36463 (ON S.C.) | 117 | 
 | $ 117 per month child support, man supported by father, court finds man has no income | 
| 26.0 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 13.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Trafford v. Trafford, 2006 ONCJ 389 (CanLII) 
 | 216 | 
 | $ 216 per month for 1 child based on imputed income of 26 K, man declares 13 K income | 
| 51 | 0.0 | 8.6 | (8.6) | 0.0 | 11.5 | (8.6) | 20.1 | 16.0 | 
 | c | s | P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.) | 713 | 
 | $ 713 per month child support, retroactive arrears of 11.5 K, man claims no income and is imputed to 51 K, wife makes 16 K per year | 
| 1624.0 | 0.0 | 121.2 | 1502.8 | 749.1 | 22.0 | 753.7 | 731.7 | 33.7 | 
 | c | s | De Zen v. De Zen, 2002 CanLII 45410 (ON S.C.) | 10100 | 
 | 10.1 K per month child support retroactive, 4.9 K per month s.7 expenses, man quits job and court imputes income of 1.9 million to him, wife makes 33.7 K per year | 
| 15.0 | 2.0 | 3.5 | (1.5) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (1.5) | (1.5) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.) | 294 | 
 | $ 294 child support per month, man claims 2 K income and is imputed to 15 K | 
| 18 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 21.0 | 1.1 | (22.1) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Cherry v. Cherry, 2004 CanLII 1649 (ON S.C.) | 144 | 
 | $ 144 per month child support based on an imputed income of 18 K for failing to make efforts to become employed, man on disability with benefits of 2.8 K per year, 32 K arrears rescinded to 21 K | 
| 13.0 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 1.6 | (4.4) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.) | 200 | 
 | $ 200 per month child support, 6 K in s.7 expense arrears, man declares 4 K income and is imputed to 13 K. | 
| 17.0 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 9.7 | 3.4 | (6.3) | 
 | 
 | c | o | B.O.v. A.K.O., 2005 ONCJ 328 (CanLII) | 134 | 
 | $ 134 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 17 K, 9.7 K arrears | 
| 30.0 | 5.0 | 6.8 | (1.8) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (1.8) | (1.8) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Ike v. Ike, 2005 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) | 568 | 
 | $ 568 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 30 K | 
| 40.0 | 6.5 | 11.0 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 49.5 | 4.5 | (45.0) | 65.0 | 
 | c | s | L.A.G. v. M.E.F.G., 2004 CanLII 53222 (ON S.C.) | 920 | 
 | $ 570 per month child support and $ 350 per month s.7 expenses, man on welfare imputed to 40 K, wifes income 65 K, 49.5 K arrears | 
| 15.6 | 8.5 | 3.0 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 16 | 
 | c | o | Faragova v. Farag, 2007 ONCJ 73 (CanLII) 
 | 248 | 
 | $ 248 per month child support, man claims 8.5 K per year income and is imputed to 15.6 K, wife makes 16 K per year | 
| 58.0 | 9.0 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 48.0 | 4.2 | (44.2) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pantchevski v. Pantchevska, 2005 CanLII 7672 (ON S.C.) | 400 | 
 | $ 400 per month child support, 48 K in arrears, man claims 9 K income but is denied variation and must pay at income of 58 K , wife is on social assistance | 
| 10.0 | 10 | 7.8 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 45 | (5.8) | (50.8) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Maurice v. Maurice, 2003 CanLII 2418 (ON S.C.) | 653 | 
 | $ 653 per month child support, 45 K arrears, set off against 40 K of his value in home, mans income 10 K | 
| 50.0 | 10.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 35.0 | 1.0 | (34.0) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.) | 750 | 
 | $ 750 per month child support, spousal support satisfied by 35 K lump sum, man claims income of 10 K and is imputed to 50 K | 
| 40.0 | 10.0 | 6.8 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 3.2 | (9.8) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Dang v. Hornby, 2006 CanLII 12973 (ON S.C.) | 570 | 
 | $ 570 per month child support reduced from $ 762, 13 K arrears, income imputed from 10 K claimed to 40 K | 
| 50.0 | 10.0 | 13.8 | (3.8) | 0.0 | 4.7 | (3.8) | (8.5) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) | 1152 | 
 | $ 700 per month child support and $ 452 per month s.7 expenses, 2.7 K arrears, 2.2 K retroactive s.7 arrears man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 50 K | 
| 21 | 10.2 | 4.0 | 8.2 | 0.0 | 5.7 | 8.2 | 2.5 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 1276 (ON S.C.) | 337 | 
 | $ 297 and $ 40 s.7 expenses per month child support retroactive, man claims 10.2 K income and is imputed to 21 K | 
| 10.8 | 10.8 | 1.9 | 8.9 | 0.2 | 5.7 | 8.7 | 3.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.) | 158 | 
 | $ 158 per month retroactive child support, claim of undue hardship denied, mans income 10.8 K per year | 
| 22.0 | 11.0 | 9.2 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 39.4 | 
 | c | s | Bonair v. Bonair, 2007 CanLII 28322 (ON S.C.) | 770 | 
 | $ 770 per month for 2 children, man claims income of 11 K and is imputed to 22 K, wifes income is 39.4 K per year | 
| 16.1 | 11.1 | 2.8 | 11.1 | 0.2 | 14.4 | 10.9 | (3.5) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Clark v. Clark, 2002 CanLII 2773 (ON S.C.) | 237 | 
 | $ 900 per month child support changed to $ 700 changed to $ 237, husband diagnosed with cancer , 14.4 K arrears, man claims 11.1 K and is imputed to 16.1 K per year | 
| 25.0 | 12.0 | 5.7 | 6.3 | 0.4 | 43.6 | 6.3 | (37.3) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Courchesne v. Courchesne, 2004 CanLII 5003 (ON S.C.) | 474 | 
 | Man must pay former level of $ 600 per month but now child support is $ 474 and remainder goes to arrears, 77.1 K arrears reduced to 43.6 K, income imputed to 25 K from claimed 12 K | 
| 50.0 | 12.0 | 13.4 | (1.4) | 0.4 | 19.0 | (1.8) | (20.8) | 64 | 
 | c | s | Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.) | 1116 | 
 | $ 917 per month child support and $ 199 per month s.7 expenses, man claims he makes $ 6.25 per hour and has no money, income imputed to 50 K per year, wifes income 64 K per year, 10 K retroactive arrears, total arrears 19 K | 
| 47.0 | 12.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 0.4 | 24.0 | 3.6 | (20.4) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.) | 669 | 
 | $ 669 per month child support, arrears 24 K, man on disability imputed to 47 K per year income | 
| 69.0 | 12.0 | 14.4 | (2.4) | 0.4 | 14.0 | (2.8) | (16.8) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Alsafouti v. Alsafouti, 2005 CanLII 34576 (ON S.C.) | 1200 | 
 | $ 1200 per month child support, 14 K arrears, man loses job and claims income of 12 K but imputed to 69 K former level, no recession, drivers license removed | 
| 43.0 | 12.0 | 9.6 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 12.0 | 2.0 | (10.0) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Lajoie v. Lajoie, 2005 CanLII 23684 (ON S.C.) | 800 | 
 | $ 800 per month child support, 12 K arrears, man claims 12 K income but is imputed to 43 K | 
| 40.0 | 12.0 | 7.2 | 4.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Mollica v. Melchionna, 2006 CanLII 41526 (ON S.C.) | 601 | 
 | $ 601 per month child support, man claims 12 K income and is imputed to 40 K | 
| 28.0 | 12.0 | 1.2 | 10.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 10.4 | 10.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | O'Neill v. O'Neill, 2004 CanLII 8231 (ON S.C.) | 100 | 
 | $ 100 per month child support, man claims 12 K and is imputed to 28 K | 
| 30 | 12.6 | 5.4 | 24.6 | 4.2 | 8.4 | 20.4 | 12.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.) | 446 | 
 | $ 446 per month child support, arrears 8.4 K, man claims 12.6 K income and is imputed to 30 K | 
| 90.0 | 13.0 | 9.7 | 12.3 | 0.6 | 30.0 | 11.6 | (18.4) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Azevedo v. Clements, 2003 CanLII 20711 (ON C.J.) 
 | 806 | 
 | Man must pay $ 806 per month child support and 30 K arrears because he cannot make a 28 K lump sum payment, man claims 13 K income and is imputed to 90 K | 
| 27.0 | 13.0 | 6.5 | 13.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 12.4 | 12.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Barbaric v. Nielsen, 2007 CanLII 14320 (ON S.C.) | 543 | 
 | $ 543 per month child support, income imputed to 27 K, 13 K claimed | 
| 43.0 | 14.0 | 8.6 | 5.4 | 0.8 | 5.5 | 4.6 | (0.9) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Shaw-McInnis v. Crawford, 2003 CanLII 2241 (ON S.C.) | 714 | 
 | $ 714 per month original child support lowered as children reach majority, arrears 5.5 K, mans declared income of 14 K imputed to 43 K and no relief for time on welfare | 
| 35.0 | 14.2 | 4.0 | 10.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 9.4 | 9.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pochodaj v. Pochodaj, 2006 CanLII 13104 (ON S.C.) | 333 | 
 | $333 child support per month based imputed income of 35 K, man declares income of 14.2 K | 
| 72.0 | 14.4 | 7.9 | 6.5 | 0.9 | 7.9 | 5.6 | (2.3) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Pinnock v. McDowell (Clarke), 2007 ONCJ 327 (CanLII) | 661 | 
 | $ 661 per month child support, 3 years retroactive support, man claims 14.4 K and is imputed to 72 K per year income | 
| 15 | 15 | 3.0 | 12.0 | 1.1 | 15.0 | 10.9 | (4.1) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Lantaigne v. Lantaigne, 2005 CanLII 39886 (ON S.C.) | 250 | 
 | $ 250 per month child support reduced from $ 500, 40 K arrears rescinded to 15 K, enforcement stayed, man has 15 K income, wife has higher income | 
| 100.0 | 15.0 | 21.8 | (6.8) | 1.1 | 11.0 | (7.8) | (18.8) | 96.0 | 
 | c | s | Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.) | 1820 | 
 | $ 1404 per month child support and 5 K per year s.7 expense, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife makes 96 K per year, mans pleadings struck, 11 K costs | 
| 26.0 | 15.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | D.B. v. J.B., 2006 CanLII 726 (ON S.C.) | 500 | 
 | $ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 26 K | 
| 17.5 | 17.5 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Montgomery v. Montgomery, 2007 ONCJ 3 (CanLII) | 431 | 
 | $ 431 per month child support for 4 children based on a gross income of 17.5 K, arrears rescinded. | 
| 17.8 | 17.8 | 2.4 | 15.4 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 13.8 | 11.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Self v. Reid, 2006 ONCJ 30 (CanLII) | 200 | 
 | $ 139 for child support and $ 61 for s.7 expenses and 1.2 K arrears and 1 K costs, mans income 17.8 K | 
| 18 | 18 | 3.4 | 14.6 | 1.7 | 15.1 | 12.9 | (2.2) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Vaughan v. Vaughan, 2007 ONCJ 21 (CanLII) | 281 | 
 | $ 281 child support 15.1 K arrears, mans income 18 K per year | 
| 18 | 18 | 3.2. | 14.8 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 13.1 | 13.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Luedtke v. Vuletic, 2001 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) | 140 | 
 | $ 140 per month child support and 50 % of s.7 expenses based on 18 K income, mans answer struck and he can’t participate at trial | 
| 35.0 | 18.0 | 8.2 | 9.8 | 1.7 | 36.0 | 8.1 | (44.1) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Mahoney v. Laderoute, 2007 CanLII 37893 (ON S.C.) | 681 | 
 | $ 681 per month child support, 36 K retroactive arrears, man claims 18 K income and is imputed to 35 K | 
| 35.0 | 18.0 | 6.0 | 12.0 | 1.7 | 30.0 | 10.3 | (19.7) | 
 | 
 | c | s | DiMillo v. DiMillo, 2007 CanLII 1340 (ON S.C.) | 504 | 
 | $ 504 K per month child support, 30 K arrears, 18 K income claimed imputed to 35 K, cannot ask for access to child until he pays 15 K | 
| 70.0 | 18.5 | 9.2 | 9.3 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 38.0 | 
 | c | o | Urban v. Warner, 2005 ONCJ 330 (CanLII) | 766 | 
 | $ 586 per month child support and 60 % of 300 per month s.7 expense, man claims income of 18.5 K and is imputed to 70 K, wife makes 38 K | 
| 18.7 | 18.7 | 1.7 | 17.0 | 1.8 | 24.0 | 15.2 | (8.8) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Hamilton v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 35 (CanLII) | 145 | 
 | $ 145 per month child support based on an income of 18.7 K, 24 K arrears | 
| 18.7 | 18.7 | 5.6 | 13.1 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 11 | 
 | c | o | Paszkiewicz v. Paszkiewicz, 2006 ONCJ 476 (CanLII) | 463 | 
 | $ 463 per month child support for 2 children, man makes 18.7 K and wife makes 11 K | 
| 19 | 19 | 4.5 | 14.5 | 1.9 | 40.5 | 13.6 | (26.9) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Woodland v. Woodland, 2005 CanLII 34591 (ON S.C.) | 375 | 
 | Child support reduced from $ 541 to $ 375, arrears fixed at 40 K, mans income 19 K | 
| 19 | 19 | 6.0 | 13.0 | 1.9 | 17.0 | 11.1 | (5.9) | 
 | 
 | c | o | DuQuesnay v. Scrivens, 2007 ONCJ 257 (CanLII) | 500 | 
 | $ 500 per month child support, 17 K arrears, man claims 19 K average income, over 10 K owing to social services | 
| 19 | 19 | 4.1 | 14.9 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 13.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Mlambo v. Mlambo, 2007 ONCJ 240 (CanLII) | 339 | 
 | $ 339 per month for 3 children based on income of 19 K | 
| 22 | 20 | 2.3 | 17.7 | 2.1 | 5.7 | 15.6 | 9.9 | 
 | 
 | c | o | H.F. v. P.F., 2007 ONCJ 170 (CanLII) | 188 | 
 | $ 188 per month child support, retoactive arrears 20 K, imputed income to 22 K | 
| 
 | 20 | 6.0 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Stutz v. Stutz Sorrenson, 2002 CanLII 2815 (ON S.C.) | 500 | 
 | $ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 20 K income and is imputed higher | 
| 175.0 | 20.0 | 12.1 | 7.9 | 2.1 | 59.0 | 5.8 | (53.2) | 40.0 | 
 | c | y | Pirner v. Pirner, 2005 CanLII 44166 (ON C.A.) | 1010 | 
 | $ 4400 per month child support changed to $ 2023 then changed to $ 1010, 59 K arrears, man claims 20 K income and is imputed to 175 K, wife has 40 K income | 
| 34.0 | 20.0 | 3.6 | 17.3 | 2.1 | 12.0 | 15.2 | (27.2) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Spencer v. Scarlett, 2005 ONCJ 300 (CanLII) | 304 | 
 | $ 304 per month child support, 12 K arrears, imprisoned for default 90 days, man claims 20 K average income but must pay on 34 K income | 
| 40.0 | 20.0 | 8.8 | 11.2 | 2.1 | 9.6 | 9.1 | (0.5) | 50.0 | 
 | c | o | Deane v. Riar-Deane, 2007 ONCJ 427 (CanLII) 
 | 737 | 
 | $ 367 per month child support, $ 365 per month s.7 expense, 7.3 K retroactive arrears, 2.3 K s.7 expense arrears, mans income imputed to 40 K and wifes income 50 K | 
| 20.2 | 20.2 | 2.0 | 18.2 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 16.1 | 15.5 | 
 | 
 | c | o | G.R.L. v. S.L., 2005 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) | 167 | 
 | $ 167 child support per month, $ 611 in retroactive arrears, man pays two other child support claims, mans income 20.2 K per year | 
| 20.8 | 20.8 | 3.4 | 17.4 | 2.3 | 11.5 | 15.1 | 3.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Barker-Papos v. Mihaly, 2005 ONCJ 259 (CanLII) | 285 | 
 | $ 285 per month child support based on an income of 20.8 K, 11.5 K arrears | 
| 20.8 | 20.8 | 1.2 | 19.6 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 17.3 | 16.4 | 4.8 | 
 | c | o | D.H. v. C.B., 2006 ONCJ 521 (CanLII) 
 | 100 | 
 | $ 100 per month child support as guidelines would be undue hardship, 7 ½ year retroactive claim rejected and $ 900 retroactive order made, mans income 20.8 K and wifes income 4.8 K per year. | 
| 21.2 | 21.2 | 3.6 | 17.6 | 2.3 | 46.0 | 15.3 | (30.7) | 
 | 
 | c | s | G.P.M. v. S.J.F., 2005 CanLII 19840 (ON S.C.) | 300 | 
 | $ 1804 child support reduced to $ 410 then later $ 300, spousal support terminated, 36 K costs and 10 K for assault and 28 K for equalization, mans income 21.2 K | 
| 21.4 | 21.4 | 3.9 | 17.5 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 15.1 | 15.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bell v. Bell, 2006 CanLII 23927 (ON S.C. | 327 | 
 | $ 327 per month for natural son and step daughter, man has unemployment income of 21.4 K, man denies being parent of stepdaughter | 
| 21.8 | 21.8 | 1.8 | 20.0 | 2.5 | 3.9 | 17.5 | 13.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | C.U. v. D.D., 2007 ONCJ 478 (CanLII) | 148 | 
 | $ 148 per month child support, 2 years 2 months retroactive support, mans income 21.8 K | 
| 21.8 | 21.8 | 2.1 | 19.7 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 17.2 | 17.2 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Jackpine v. Gamsby, 2003 CanLII 26235 (ON C.J.) | 178 | 
 | $ 350 per month child support changed to $ 178, mans income is 21.8 K | 
| 26.0 | 22.0 | 4.5 | 18.5 | 2.5 | 14.1 | 16.0 | 1.9 | 
 | 
 | c | o | V.C.E. v. C.E.T., 2004 ONCJ 309 (CanLII) | 379 | 
 | $ 379 m per month child support, 3 years 1 month retroactive arrears, man claims 22 K income and is imputed to 26 K | 
| 37.0 | 22.0 | 9.8 | 12.2 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 42.0 | 
 | c | s | Hakim-Kyei v. Kyei, 2005 CanLII 34581 (ON S.C.) | 820 | 
 | $ 535 in child support and $ 285 in s.7 expenses, mans income imputed from 22 K claimed to 37 K, wife earns 42 K per year | 
| 41.6 | 22.3 | 4.5 | 17.8 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 15.2 | 15.2 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Parkes v. Zayachkowski, 2005 ONCJ 106 (CanLII) 
 | 359 | 
 | $ 379 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims 22.3 K income and is imputed to 41.6 K per year | 
| 53.0 | 23.0 | 8.9 | 14.1 | 2.7 | 22.8 | 11.4 | (11.4) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.) | 739 | 
 | $ 739 per month child support, 21 K arrears, $ 1750 K lump sum spousal support award, man claims 23 K income and is imputed to 53 K | 
| 28.0 | 23.0 | 3.0 | 22.0 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 19.3 | 19.3 | 37.9 | 
 | c | o | Jaworski v. Jaworski, 2004 CanLII 7695 (ON C.J.) | 250 | 
 | $ 250 per month child support and $ 130 per month s.7 expense retroactive, man claims income of 23 K and is imputed to 28 K, wife has income of 37.9 K | 
| 23.5 | 23.5 | 5.2 | 18.3 | 2.8 | 5.7 | 15.5 | 9.8 | 35.9 | 
 | c | s | Zeray v. Khassay, 2007 CanLII 38404 (ON S.C.) 
 | 435 | 
 | $ 335 per month child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man has income of 23.5 K per year and wife earns 35.9 K | 
| 30.0 | 24.0 | 6.8 | 17.2 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Murch v. Bell, 2003 CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.) | 440 | 
 | $ 400 per month child support and $ 40 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 30 K | 
| 39.0 | 24.0 | 6.7 | 17.3 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Priftis v. Priftis, 2005 CanLII 47093 (ON S.C.) | 557 | 
 | $ 557 per month child support, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 39 K | 
| 24 | 24 | 4.2 | 19.8 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 16.8 | 16.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Perkins v. O'Neill, 2005 CanLII 39892 (ON S.C.) | 350 | 
 | $ 350 per month interim child support based on an income of 24 K | 
| 24 | 24 | 2.6 | 21.4 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 18.4 | 18.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | R.P.H. v. V.M., 2003 CanLII 2109 (ON S.C.) | 213 | 
 | $ 213 per month child support based on imputed income of 24 K | 
| 116.0 | 25.0 | 14.6 | 10.4 | 3.2 | 21.1 | 7.2 | (13.9) | 35.0 | 
 | c | o | Ciolfe (Caravatta) v. Ciolfe, 2006 ONCJ 118 (CanLII) | 880 | 
 | $ 880 per month child support and 86 % of s.7 expenses, 2 years retroactive arrears, man claims 25 K income and is imputed to 116 K, wifes income 35 K, 5 K costs | 
| 25.0 | 25.0 | 7.9 | 17.1 | 3.2 | 8.5 | 14.1 | 5.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Woodbridge v. Hayes, 2004 ONCJ 168 (CanLII) | 660 | 
 | $ 660 per month child support reduced to $ 360, 8.5 K arrears, mans income 25 K | 
| 35.8 | 25.0 | 9.6 | 15.4 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 12.2 | 12.2 | 15 | 
 | c | o | Terry v. Clarke, 2006 ONCJ 496 (CanLII) | 800 | 
 | $ 516 per month child support, $ 283 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 25 K and is imputed to 35.8 K per year income, wife makes 15 K | 
| 45.0 | 26.0 | 9.1 | 17.0 | 3.4 | 10.1 | 13.6 | 3.5 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Smith v. Addison, 2004 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) | 635 | 
 | $ 635 per month child support and s.7 expenses, 10.1 K arrears, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 45 K per year | 
| 44.0 | 26.0 | 17.8 | 8.2 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Szucs v. Freeman, 2007 ONCJ 96 (CanLII) 
 | 1484 | 
 | $ 1484 per month child support from income imputed at 44 K, man claims income of 26 K | 
| 40.0 | 26.0 | 7.0 | 19.0 | 3.4 | 4.8 | 15.6 | 10.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.) | 580 | 
 | $ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K | 
| 75 | 26 | 8.2 | 66.8 | 21.4 | 0.0 | 45.4 | 45.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kowalczyk v. Slavner, 2006 CanLII 40996 (ON S.C.) | 680 | 
 | $ 680 per month interim child support, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 75 K | 
| 26.3 | 26.3 | 2.8 | 23.5 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 20.1 | 20.1 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Z.(A.) v. W.(J.), 2004 ONCJ 161 (CanLII) | 235 | 
 | $ 235 per month child support based on an income of 26.3 K | 
| 54.0 | 26.4 | 10.5 | 15.9 | 3.5 | 15.7 | 12.4 | (3.3) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Lee v. Wright, 2007 ONCJ 476 (CanLII) 
 | 750 | 
 | $ 450 per month child support and $ 330 per month s.7 expense, 11.3 K arrears, mans claims 26.4 K income and is imputed to 54 K, 4.4 K costs | 
| 27.0 | 27.0 | 5.1 | 21.9 | 3.6 | 13.0 | 18.3 | 5.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kampman v. Kampman, 2006 CanLII 38657 (ON S.C.) | 429 | 
 | $ 429 per month child support and 13 K arrears, mans income 27 K. | 
| 41.0 | 27.0 | 7.8 | 19.8 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 16.2 | 16.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.) | 650 | 
 | $ 585 per month child support and $ 65 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 27 K income and is imputed to 41 K | 
| 27.9 | 27.9 | 4.2 | 23.7 | 3.8 | 12.0 | 19.9 | 7.9 | 15 | 
 | c | o | K.E.A. v. D.M.J.1, 2007 ONCJ 165 (CanLII) | 350 | 
 | $ 180 per month child support. Undue hardship due to second family, arrears, mans income 27.9 K and wifes income 15 K | 
| 96.0 | 28.0 | 14.4 | 13.6 | 4.2 | 28.0 | 9.4 | (18.6) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Di Matteo v. Del Medico, 2005 CanLII 27011 (ON S.C.) | 1200 | 
 | $ 1200 per month child support, income imputed to 96 K from claimed 28 K, retroactive arrears | 
| 28.0 | 28.0 | 9.5 | 18.5 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 14.7 | 11.7 | 30 | 
 | c | s | Simpson v. Simpson, 2004 CanLII 14116 (ON S.C.) | 789 | 
 | $ 525 child support and $ 250 spousal support reduced to $ 689 child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expense. Arrears reduced to 3 K, man earns 28 K wife earns 30 K per year | 
| 29.0 | 29.0 | 7.3 | 21.7 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Fuller v. Da Ponte, 2005 ONCJ 265 (CanLII) 
 | 607 | 
 | $ 285 per month child support and $ 322 per month s.7 expense, mans income 29 K | 
| 29.0 | 29.0 | 4.3 | 24.7 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 20.7 | 20.7 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Alvarez v. Vargas, 2006 ONCJ 474 (CanLII) 
 | 360 | 
 | $ 258 per month child support and $ 102 per month s.7 expense, man makes 29 K per year | 
| 88.0 | 30.0 | 14.7 | 15.3 | 4.2 | 40.0 | 11.2 | (28.8) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) | 894 | 
 | $ 794 per month child support and $ 100 s.7 expense and 54 % of school expenses, man claims 30 K income imputed to 88 K, 40 K arrears | 
| 30.0 | 30.0 | 3.1 | 26.9 | 4.2 | 41.0 | 22.7 | (18.3) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kumar v. McKenna (Kumar), 2003 CanLII 2156 (ON S.C.) | 258 | 
 | $ 258 per month child support and 5 K lump sum spousal support award, 80 K arrears reduced to 36 K, man earns 30 K per year and is incapacitated | 
| 88.2 | 30.0 | 9.8 | 20.2 | 4.2 | 12.0 | 16.0 | 4.0 | 120.0 | 
 | c | s | Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) | 694 | 
 | $ 694 per month child support and 47 % of s.7 expenses, arrears, wife makes 120 K income.and man claims 30 K imputed to 88.2 K | 
| 30.0 | 30.0 | 5.4 | 24.6 | 4.2 | 12.0 | 20.4 | 8.4 | 10 | 
 | c | s | Tyll v. Dini-Tyll, 2003 CanLII 2262 (ON S.C.) | 446 | 
 | $ 446 per month child support, arrears, income imputed to 30 K, wife makes 10 K per year | 
| 30.0 | 30.0 | 5.4 | 24.6 | 4.2 | 7.7 | 20.2 | 12.5 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kalla v. Kalla, 2003 CanLII 2322 (ON S.C.) | 446 | 
 | $ 834 child support order changed to $ 557 then changed to $ 446, man on disability earns 2.5 K per month, 7.7 arrears | 
| 54.0 | 30.0 | 11.8 | 18.2 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Schiller v. Schiller, 2007 CanLII 1343 (ON S.C.) | 980 | 
 | $ 980 per month child support based on imputed income of 54 K, man claims income of 30 K | 
| 30.0 | 30.0 | 9.9 | 20.1 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 15.9 | 15.9 | 65 | 
 | c | s | R.J.R.H. v. A.A.H., 2004 CanLII 34792 (ON S.C.) | 827 | 
 | $ 267 per month child support and $ 560 s.7 expense, father says he won’t pay if he doesn’t get to see daughter, fathers income 30 K per year, mothers income 65 K | 
| 30.3 | 30.3 | 6.3 | 24.0 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 19.8 | 19.8 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Hazel v. Leslie, 2007 ONCJ 543 (CanLII) | 400 | 
 | $ 400 per month child support, s.7 expenses, mans income 30.3 K per year | 
| 30.5 | 30.5 | 8.2 | 22.3 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 18.0 | 18.0 | 60.9 | 
 | c | s | Harmsworth v. Harmsworth, 2003 CanLII 1961 (ON S.C.) | 682 | 
 | $ 452 child support per month and $ 130 s.7 expenses, man makes 30.5 K and wife 60.9 K | 
| 66.0 | 31.0 | 6.6 | 24.4 | 4.4 | 0.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 57.0 | 
 | c | s | Rivard v. Trepanier, 2003 CanLII 2345 (ON S.C.) | 550 | 
 | $ 550 child support per month, man claims 31 K income and is imputed to 66 K, wifes income 57 K | 
| 31.2 | 31.2 | 3.4 | 27.8 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 23.3 | 23.3 | 8.6 | 
 | c | o | Pollard v. Deale, 2003 CanLII 27021 (ON C.J.).. | 281 | 
 | $ 281 per month child support based on an income of 31.2 K, wife makes 8.6 K per year | 
| 31.9 | 31.9 | 7.2 | 24.7 | 4.6 | 19.0 | 20.1 | 1.1 | 39.6 | 
 | c | o | Ramrud v. Lutchman, 2006 ONCJ 501 (CanLII) | 478 | 
 | $ 476 per month and 45 % of s.7 expenses based on mans income of 31.9 K, wifes income is 39.6 K, 19 K arrears | 
| 32.5 | 32.5 | 3.6 | 28.9 | 4.7 | 1.0 | 24.2 | 23.2 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Ciffolillo v. Nieweglowski, 2007 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) | 298 | 
 | $ 298 per month child support, arrears 1 K, fathers income 32.5 K per year | 
| 32.5 | 32.5 | 3.8 | 28.7 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 24.0 | 24.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Harvey v. Baker, 2007 ONCJ 574 (CanLII) | 320 | 
 | $ 320 per month child support for one child based on income of 32.5 K | 
| 33.0 | 33.0 | 7.8 | 25.2 | 4.9 | 55.0 | 20.3 | (35.0) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kauric v. Kauric, 2006 CanLII 21594 (ON S.C.) | 650 | 
 | $ 650 per month child support reduced from $ 1500, 41 K US arrears, mans income 33 K | 
| 67.0 | 33.0 | 7.2 | 25.8 | 4.9 | 11.0 | 20.9 | 9.9 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Rivard v. Hankiewicz, 2007 ONCJ 180 (CanLII) | 603 | 
 | $ 555 per month child support and $ 53 per month s.7 expenses, 11 K retroactive arrears, man claims 37 K and is grossed up to 67 K | 
| 33.0 | 33.0 | 3.5 | 29.5 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 24.7 | 24.7 | 28 | 
 | c | o | Duguay v. Duguay, 2005 ONCJ 269 (CanLII) | 294 | 
 | $ 294 per month child support based on an income of 33 K, wife makes 28 K | 
| 33.3 | 33.3 | 7.3 | 26.0 | 4.9 | 3.0 | 21.1 | 18.1 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Yackobeck v. Brazeau, 2002 CanLII 46583 (ON C.J.) | 483 | 
 | $ 483 per month child support and ½ of s.7 expenses, support based on an income of 33.3 K per year, 3k costs | 
| 33.5 | 33.5 | 5.4 | 28.1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 23.1 | 23.1 | 
 | 
 | c | o | S.S. v. M.S. and P.A., 2006 ONCJ 311 (CanLII) 
 | 327 | 
 | $ 327 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man makes 33.5 K income per year | 
| 77.0 | 34.0 | 12.0 | 24.0 | 5.1 | 0.0 | 18.9 | 18.9 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Hagner v. Hawkins, 2005 CanLII 43294 (ON S.C.) | 1000 | 
 | $ 1000 per month child support upheld, intentionally unemployed, 34 K income as teacher imputed to 77 K | 
| 46.0 | 34.0 | 5.4 | 28.6 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 23.6 | 19.6 | 23.0 | 
 | c | o | McClymonth v. Wray, 2001 CanLII 26483 (ON C.J.) | 446 | 
 | $ 401 per month child support, man claims income of 34 K and is imputed to 46 K, wife has income of 23 K, 4 K costs | 
| 34.0 | 34.0 | 7.8 | 26.2 | 5.1 | 0.0 | 21.1 | 21.1 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Zoldy v. Zoldy, 2007 ONCJ 24 (CanLII) | 651 | 
 | $ 651 per month for 3 children based on an income of 34 K | 
| 35.0 | 35.0 | 5.8 | 29.2 | 5.3 | 40.6 | 23.9 | (16.7) | 
 | 
 | c | s | K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.) | 481 | 
 | $ 481 per month child support, man must pay on imputed income for 2 ½ years he was in jail, arrears 40.6 K, mans income imputed at 35 K while in jail | 
| 35.0 | 35.0 | 6.3 | 28.7 | 5.3 | 20.0 | 23.4 | 3.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Dang v. Duong, 2006 CanLII 34339 (ON S.C.) | 521 | 
 | $ 521 per month interim child support for 2 children based on 35 K income, wife gets 20 K lump sum support payment | 
| 35.0 | 35.0 | 10.7 | 24.3 | 5.3 | 2.5 | 19.0 | 16.5 | 29.1 | 
 | c | s | McLean v. Rice, 2005 CanLII 3470 (ON S.C.) | 893 | 
 | Total child support payments $ 893 per month including $ 275 s.7 expense, 2.5 K retroactive arrears, man makes 36 K wife makes 29.1 K per year | 
| 35.0 | 35.0 | 8.1 | 26.9 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 21.6 | 17.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bell v. Lloyd-Bell, 2005 CanLII 39875 (ON S.C.) | 672 | 
 | $ 672 per month in child support, arrears of $ 4275, mans income 35 K | 
| 80.0 | 35.0 | 9.1 | 25.9 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 20.6 | 20.6 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Laufer v. Laufer, 2006 CanLII 32997 (ON S.C.) | 719 | 
 | $ 719 per month child support, 83 % s.7 expenses, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 80 K | 
| 50.0 | 35.0 | 10.1 | 24.9 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 21.7 | 21.7 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Tran v. Lee, 2003 CanLII 11863 (ON S.C.) | x | 
 | $ 700 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims income of 35 K but income of 50 K imputed | 
| 81.0 | 35.0 | 7.6 | 27.4 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 22.1 | 22.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 2366 (ON S.C.) | 643 | 
 | $ 643 per month child support, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 81 K | 
| 35.0 | 35.0 | 6.1 | 28.9 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 23.6 | 23.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Kelly v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 242 (CanLII) | 506 | 
 | $ 506 per month child support, mans income 35 K | 
| 35.0 | 35.0 | 6.0 | 29.0 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 23.7 | 23.7 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Collis v. Wilson, 2003 CanLII 2413 (ON S.C.) | 375 | 
 | $ 375 per month in child support and s.7 expenses based on income of 35 K | 
| 36.0 | 36.0 | 5.2 | 30.8 | 5.5 | 11.0 | 25.3 | 14.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | J.J.C. v. K.G.M., 2004 CanLII 10578 (ON S.C.) | 433 | 
 | $ 433 per month child support, mother denies all access and remarries, 80 K arrears cut to 11 K, mans current income 36 K | 
| 36.0 | 36.0 | 9.7 | 26.3 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 20.8 | 20.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Fraser v. McKinlay, 2004 CanLII 5857 (ON S.C.) | 682 | 
 | $ 682 per month child support based on 36 K income, s.7 expenses | 
| 55.0 | 36.0 | 10.7 | 25.3 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 21.9 | 20.9 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.) | 768 | 
 | $ 768 per month child support and 61 % of s.7 expenses and 1 K in past s.7 expenses, man claims 36 K income and is imputed to 55 K | 
| 36.0 | 36.0 | 6.5 | 29.5 | 5.5 | 2.4 | 24.0 | 21.6 | 60.0 | 
 | c | s | L.N. v. D.E.N., 2006 CanLII 42602 (ON S.C.) | 545 | 
 | $ 545 per month child support, 2.4 K arrears, mothers income 60 K fathers income 36 K | 
| 36.0 | 36.0 | 8.8 | 27.2 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 21.7 | 21.7 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Lamontagne v. Lamontagne, 2006 ONCJ 498 (CanLII) | 730 | 
 | $ 705 per month child support for 3 children based on income of 36 K, $ 25 per month s.7 expenses, hardship due to second family | 
| 48.0 | 36.0 | 5.4 | 30.6 | 5.5 | 3.2 | 25.1 | 21.9 | 
 | 
 | c | o | St. Amant (Peddie) v. Walkingshaw, 2006 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) | 448 | 
 | $ 448 per month child support raised frrom $ 89, $ 1750 s.7 lump- sum expense, income imputed fron 36 K claimed to 48 K, 1.4 K retroactive arrears | 
| 37.0 | 37.0 | 4.1 | 32.9 | 5.7 | 42.8 | 27.2 | (15.6) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Pisani v. Jackson, 2007 ONCJ 243 (CanLII) | 345 | 
 | $ 345 per month child support on income of 37 K, 42.8 K in arrears | 
| 37.0 | 37.0 | 8.4 | 28.6 | 5.7 | 12.0 | 22.9 | 10.9 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Simmons v. Yandt, 2004 CanLII 8101 (ON S.C.) | 698 | 
 | $ 698 per month child support, arrears reduced based on actual income, mans income 37 K | 
| 38.0 | 38.0 | 9.5 | 28.5 | 5.9 | 0.0 | 22.6 | 22.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Lewis v. Crearer, 2007 ONCJ 353 (CanLII) | 792 | 
 | $ 502 per month child support and $ 290 per month s.7 expenses, mans income imputed to 38 K | 
| 38.0 | 38.0 | 5.0 | 33.0 | 5.9 | 3.2 | 27.1 | 23.9 | 10 | 
 | c | o | Jepson v. Cresnjovec, 2007 ONCJ 466 (CanLII) | 415 | 
 | $ 415 per month child support, 3.2 K retroactive lump sum, mans income 38 K wifes average income 10 K | 
| 38.0 | 38.0 | 4.0 | 34.0 | 5.9 | 1.0 | 27.9 | 26.9 | 
 | 
 | c | o | T.(P.) v. A.(S.), 2004 ONCJ 295 (CanLII) | 332 | 
 | $ 332 per month child support, retroactive arrears of $ 950, mans income 38 K | 
| 39.0 | 39.0 | 6.9 | 32.1 | 6.1 | 40.0 | 26.0 | (14.0) | 
 | 
 | c | s | D'Souza v. D'Souza, 2003 CanLII 1933 (ON S.C.) | 557 | 
 | $ 557 per month interim child support, 40 K arrears based on a 39 K income | 
| 39.0 | 39.0 | 8.9 | 30.1 | 6.1 | 5.7 | 24.0 | 18.3 | 30.5 | 
 | c | s | Taillon v. Taillon, 2005 CanLII 8688 (ON S.C.) 
 | 740 | 
 | $ 740 per month child support, retroactive arrears of support to be paid as a lump sum, refused set off with 37 % of time, man earns 39 K wife earns 30.5 K | 
| 39.0 | 39.0 | 7.1 | 31.9 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 25.8 | 19.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Olaveson v. Olaveson, 2007 CanLII 23168 (ON S.C.) | 591 | 
 | $ 591 per month child support based on income of 39 K, 6 K retroactive arrears | 
| 40.0 | 40.0 | 7.7 | 32.3 | 6.3 | 12.0 | 26.0 | 14.0 | 12 | 
 | c | s | Berzins v. Straughan, 2002 CanLII 2695 (ON S.C.) | 645 | 
 | $ 345 per month in child support and $ 300 in s.7 expenses, arrears, restraining order, mans income 40 K wifes 12 K | 
| 40.0 | 40.0 | 4.1 | 35.9 | 6.3 | 12.0 | 29.6 | 17.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Baxter v. Beharry, 2006 ONCJ 1 (CanLII) | 345 | 
 | $ 345 per month on 2 child support orders, man is wrongfully imputed to 1 million income, most arrears rescinded as income retroactively varied to closer to 100 K and finally to 40 K per year on both orders. welfare is opposing party | 
| 40.0 | 40.0 | 12.3 | 27.7 | 6.3 | 0.0 | 21.4 | 21.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bielak-Montemurro v. Montemurro, 2007 CanLII 2800 (ON S.C.) | 1021 | 
 | $ 771 per month child support and $ 250 per month s.7 expenses based on an income of 40 K | 
| 63.7 | 40.0 | 12.0 | 28.3 | 6.3 | 0.0 | 22.0 | 22.0 | 64.0 | 
 | c | s | Roberts v. Roberts, 2004 CanLII 18250 (ON S.C.) | 996 | 
 | $ 866 child support with $ 130 s.7 expenses, man claims 40 K income and is imputed to 63.7 K, wifes income 64 K per year | 
| 40.0 | 40.0 | 10.2 | 29.8 | 6.3 | 0.0 | 23.5 | 23.5 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Viertelhausen v. Burbridge, 2006 CanLII 5311 (ON S.C.) | 855 | 
 | $ 855 per month child support, man seeks termination and wife seeks retroactive, mans income 40 K | 
| 40.0 | 40.0 | 3.9 | 36.1 | 6.3 | 5.7 | 29.8 | 24.1 | 35.6 | 
 | c | o | Cook v. Cleverdon, 2005 ONCJ 262 (CanLII) | 325 | 
 | $ 325 per month child support, retroactive arrears, father pays $ 300 in support for other children from other marriages also, mothers income 35.6 K and fathers income 40 K | 
| 56.0 | 40.0 | 9.3 | 30.7 | 6.3 | 0.0 | 24.4 | 24.4 | 22.0 | 
 | c | s | Barta v. Barta, 2005 CanLII 468 (ON S.C.) | 775 | 
 | $ 775 child support, 2.9 K arrears expunged, man claims income of 40 K imputed to 56 K, wife earns 22 K per year | 
| 73.0 | 41.0 | 7.2 | 33.8 | 6.6 | 0.0 | 27.2 | 27.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Chute v. Chute, 2006 CanLII 1915 (ON S.C.) | 596 | 
 | $ 596 per month in child support, variation denied, spousal support claim pending, man claims 41 K income after bankruptcy and is imputed to 73 K | 
| 41 | 41 | 7.0 | 34.0 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kocsis v. Kocsis, 2002 CanLII 2716 (ON S.C.) | 583 | 
 | $ 583 per month child support from biological father who earns 41 K per year | 
| 41.9 | 41.9 | 15.5 | 25.4 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 18.7 | 18.7 | 3.3 | 
 | c | s | Kingsley v. Kingsley, 2006 CanLII 19038 (ON S.C.) | 960 | 
 | $ 1200 per month child support varied to $ 960, s.7 expenses, mans income 41.9 K and wifes income 3.3 K per year | 
| 42.0 | 42.0 | 4.9 | 37.1 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 30.4 | 30.4 | 46 | 
 | c | s | Kimmerly v. Parks, 2005 CanLII 40368 (ON S.C.) | 410 | 
 | $ 410 total child support per month, 9 K arrears to be paid $ 100 per month, $ 48 per month s.7 expenses retroactive, mans income 42 K and wife earns 46 K per year, | 
| 42.0 | 42.0 | 4.6 | 37.4 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 30.7 | 30.7 | 13 | 
 | c | o | Buckner v. Card, 2007 ONCJ 51 (CanLII) 
 | 386 | 
 | $ 386 per month child support, wife and child live in Alberta, man has 42 K income wife makes 13 K per year | 
| 43.0 | 43.0 | 7.8 | 35.2 | 6.9 | 14.5 | 28.3 | 13.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Man v. Phamisith, 2007 CanLII 46698 (ON S.C.) | 650 | 
 | $ 651 per month child support, $ 1400 lump sum spousal support, 9.1 K retroactive arrears, 4 K costs, mans income 43 K | 
| 43.0 | 43.0 | 6.0 | 33.0 | 6.9 | 12.0 | 26.1 | 14.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.) | 371 | 
 | $ 600 spousal and $ 750 child changed to $ 1500 child and $ 600 spousal, changed to $ 371 child only, s.7 expenses, Over 80 K arrears rescinded to 12 K, 17.8 K arrears on costs and 12.8 K interest on arrears on costs, interest on costs rescinded, mans income 43 K | 
| 43.7 | 43.7 | 7.4 | 36.3 | 7.1 | 9.3 | 29.0 | 19.7 | 23.7 | 
 | c | s | Ricketts v. Thomas, 2004 CanLII 12990 (ON S.C.) | 619 | 
 | $ 619 per month child support, no order for spousal support, 9.3 retroactive arrears with some due to Ont Works, mans income 43.7 K and wifes is 23.7 K | 
| 43.8 | 43.8 | 10.2 | 33.6 | 7.1 | 2.2 | 26.5 | 24.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Difede v. Difede, 2007 CanLII 4574 (ON S.C.) | 855 | 
 | $ 855 per month child support, based on an income of 43.8 K per year, s.7 expense and 2.2 retroactive s.7 expense arrears | 
| 43.9 | 43.9 | 10.1 | 33.8 | 7.1 | 16.9 | 26.7 | 9.8 | 37.4 | 
 | c | s | Simmons v. Simmons, 2007 CanLII 40221 (ON S.C.) | 843 | 
 | $ 763 per month child support plus $ 80 per month s.7 expenses, 3.2 K retroactive arrears and 10.4 K arrears, mans income 43.9 K and wifes income 37.4 K per year, 3.3 K costs | 
| 44.0 | 44.0 | 5.1 | 38.9 | 7.2 | 8.5 | 31.7 | 23.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Hines v. Hines, 2006 CanLII 28737 (ON S.C.) | 423 | 
 | $ 423 per month child support based on 44 K income, 8.5 K lump sum spousal award | 
| 44.7 | 44.7 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 30.5 | 
 | c | s | Sills v. Sills, 2002 CanLII 2705 (ON S.C.) | 
 | 
 | Guideline support for 3 children and an unspecified portion of s.7 expenses, father earns 44.7 K and mother earns 30.5 K per year | 
| 45.0 | 45.0 | 9.3 | 35.7 | 7.4 | 0.0 | 28.3 | 28.3 | 36.0 | 
 | c | s | A.P. v. G.P., 2006 CanLII 9976 (ON S.C.) | 775 | 
 | $ 635 per month child support and $ 140 s.7 expenses, mans income 45 K per year and wifes income is 36 K per year | 
| 45.0 | 45.0 | 4.8 | 40.2 | 7.4 | 0.0 | 32.8 | 32.8 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Malcolm v. Vassell, 2005 ONCJ 77 (CanLII) | 387 | 
 | $ 387 per month child support, no access to child, mans income 45 K | 
| 45.4 | 45.4 | 7.7 | 37.7 | 7.5 | 2.2 | 30.2 | 28.0 | 12 | 
 | c | o | Kocko v. Kocko, 2004 CanLII 12571 (ON C.J.) | 641 | 
 | $ 391 per month child support changed from temporary order of $ 920 per month, $ 250 per month s.7 expense based on an income of 45.4 K, wifes income 12 K per year, 2.2 K retroactive s.7 expense | 
| 46.0 | 46.0 | 10.6 | 35.4 | 8.7 | 6.5 | 26.7 | 20.2 | 37.6 | 
 | c | s | Cava v. Cava, 2005 CanLII 19815 (ON S.C.) | 760 | 
 | $ 660 for both children and 1.2 K per year s.7 expense and $ 859 retroactive s.7 expense, arrears, retroactive monthly award, mans income 46 K and wifes income 37.6 K per year | 
| 65.0 | 46.0 | 5.6 | 40.4 | 8.7 | 10.0 | 31.7 | 21.7 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Vangroenigen v. Vangroenigen, 2005 CanLII 38896 (ON S.C.) | 466 | 
 | $ 466 per month child support, $ 500 per month spousal support terminated for 10 K lump sum payment, man declares 46 K income but is imputed to 65 K for overtime | 
| 46.5 | 46.5 | 5.4 | 41.1 | 8.8 | 19.0 | 32.3 | 13.3 | 19.0 | 
 | c | s | Glomba v. Wray, 2003 CanLII 1960 (ON S.C.) | 466 | 
 | $ 400 child support and $ 66 daycare expense, mans income 46.5 K and wife earns 19 K, arrears | 
| 47.0 | 47.0 | 8.5 | 38.5 | 8.9 | 32.0 | 29.6 | (2.4) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Ricafort v. Ricafort, 2006 ONCJ 520 (CanLII) | 710 | 
 | $ 710 per month for 2 children based on 47 K imputed income, 32 K arrears, 60 days in jail for not producing financial documents | 
| 47.0 | 47.0 | 5.0 | 42.0 | 8.9 | 6.8 | 33.1 | 26.3 | 18.3 | 
 | c | s | Paul v. Misselbrook, 2006 CanLII 13553 (ON S.C.) | 414 | 
 | $ 414 per month child support, 6.8 K retroactive award, mans income 47 K and wife earns 18.3 K | 
| 47.0 | 47.0 | 10.4 | 36.6 | 8.9 | 0.0 | 27.7 | 27.7 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Weening v. Weening, 2004 CanLII 9706 (ON S.C.) | 866 | 
 | $ 866 per month in child support, man makes 47 K per year | 
| 47.1 | 47.1 | 8.0 | 39.1 | 8.9 | 0.0 | 30.2 | 30.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Nowakowski v. Nowakowski, 2003 CanLII 2191 (ON S.C.) | 663 | 
 | $ 663 interim child support, wife gets exclusive possession of home, mans income 47.1 K | 
| 49.0 | 49.0 | 12.9 | 35.1 | 12.1 | 19.0 | 23.0 | 4.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Caterini v. Zaccaria, 2002 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.) | 1074 | 
 | $ 1074 child support per month, 16 K rescinded from arrears, mans income 49 K | 
| 49.0 | 49.0 | 9.9 | 39.1 | 12.1 | 9.7 | 27.0 | 17.3 | 53.0 | 
 | c | o | Hillier v. Hillier, 2005 ONCJ 120 (CanLII) | 700 | 
 | $ 700 per month child support, 9.7 K retroactive s.7 expense, man makes 49 K wife makes 53 K per year | 
| 49.0 | 49.0 | 11.2 | 37.8 | 12.1 | 2.0 | 25.7 | 23.7 | 34.0 | 
 | c | s | B. P. v. T.-L. P., 2003 CanLII 2446 (ON S.C.) | 806 | 
 | $ 683 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses, father earns 49 K mother earns 34 K, costs 2 K | 
| 49.1 | 49.1 | 10.8 | 38.3 | 12.2 | 0.0 | 26.1 | 26.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2004 CanLII 9465 (ON S.C.) | 901 | 
 | $ 901 per month child support for 3 children, mans income 49.1 K | 
| 49.5 | 49.5 | 7.8 | 41.7 | 12.3 | 0.0 | 29.4 | 29.4 | 31 | 
 | c | s | Simmonds v. Simmonds, 2007 CanLII 8007 (ON S.C.) | 650 | 
 | $ 450 per month and $ 200 per month in s.7 expenses, father earns 49.5 K and mother earns 31 K | 
| 50.0 | 50.0 | 12.0 | 38.0 | 12.5 | 30.0 | 25.5 | (4.5) | 47.0 | 
 | c | s | Perry v. Perry, 2007 CanLII 20982 (ON S.C.) | 1003 | 
 | $ 753 per month child support and 3 K per year s.7 expenses, 19 K arrears, mans income 50 K, wife earns 47 K per year, 11 K costs | 
| 50.0 | 50.0 | 9.3 | 40.7 | 12.5 | 7.2 | 28.2 | 21.0 | 61.0 | 
 | c | s | Gill v. Jhajj, 2003 CanLII 2126 (ON S.C.) | 777 | 
 | $ 777 per month child support, 7.2 K arrears, man makes 50 K and wife makes 61 K | 
| 50.0 | 50.0 | 8.4 | 41.6 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 29.1 | 29.1 | 12.0 | 
 | c | s | Santos v. Santos, 2006 CanLII 21793 (ON S.C.) | 700 | 
 | $ 400 per month child support and $ 300 per month contribution to RESP and pays mortgage and insurance, man makes 50 K and wife makes 12 K per year | 
| 50.0 | 50.0 | 5.7 | 44.3 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 31.8 | 31.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Reid v. Mulder, 2005 CanLII 38108 (ON S.C.) | 475 | 
 | $ 475 per month child support, support to end when mother moves to Fiji, mans income 50 K and wife is a student who will make 50 K on return to Fiji | 
| 50.8 | 50.8 | 5.3 | 45.5 | 12.7 | 7.0 | 32.8 | 25.8 | 24.0 | 
 | c | s | Cook v. Ryder, 2003 CanLII 2085 (ON S.C.) 
 | 438 | 
 | $ 216 per month child support and $ 222 per month s.7 expense, 7 K retroactive arrears, mans income 50.8 K per year and wife has income of 24 K | 
| 51.0 | 51.0 | 8.2 | 42.8 | 12.8 | 12.0 | 30.0 | 18.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Gabriel v. Robinson, 2005 ONCJ 327 (CanLII | 560 | 
 | $ 250 per month child support raised to $ 455, and $ 105 per month s.7 expenses, 12 K retroactive arrears, man earns 51 K per year | 
| 52.0 | 52.0 | 5.2 | 46.8 | 13.1 | 12.0 | 33.7 | 21.7 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Anderson v. Hamilton, 2006 ONCJ 110 (CanLII) | 430 | 
 | $ 430 per month child support, arrears, man makes 52 K income per year | 
| 52.0 | 52.0 | 10.9 | 41.1 | 13.1 | 6.3 | 28.5 | 22.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Prince v. Prince, 2006 CanLII 27873 (ON S.C.) | 783 | 
 | $ 783 per month child support and s.7 expenses, arrears 6.3 K, mans income 52 K per year | 
| 52.5 | 52.5 | 5.7 | 46.8 | 13.2 | 27.2 | 33.6 | 6.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Ross (Gedcke) v. Gedcke, 2005 CanLII 50881 (ON S.C.) | 477 | 
 | $ 477 child support per month, 27.2 K retroactive arrears, mans income 52.5 K | 
| 53.0 | 53.0 | 5.4 | 47.6 | 13.4 | 5.7 | 34.2 | 28.5 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Heimbecker-Wood v. Campbell, 2004 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) | 450 | 
 | $ 450 per month child support, retroactive arrears of almost 2 years at over twice previously ordered income , man makes 53 K per year | 
| 53.0 | 53.0 | 6.0 | 47.0 | 13.4 | 0.0 | 33.6 | 33.6 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Hughes v. Hughes, 2005 CanLII 44395 (ON S.C.) | 500 | 
 | $ 500 per month interim child support based on income of 53 K | 
| 53.4 | 53.4 | 5.9 | 47.5 | 13.5 | 1.4 | 34.0 | 32.6 | 28.0 | 
 | c | s | Paulson v. Lamarre, 2006 CanLII 42380 (ON S.C.) | 494 | 
 | $ 494 per month child support, arrears 1.4 K, mans income 53.4 K and wifes income 28 K | 
| 53.5 | 53.5 | 7.0 | 46.5 | 13.6 | 5.7 | 32.9 | 27.2 | 49.0 | 
 | c | s | Trevisanutto v. Crnkovic, 2005 CanLII 19789 (ON S.C.) | 580 | 
 | $ 580 per month child support plus retroactive arrears of 5.7 K, fathers income 53.5 K and mothers income 49 K | 
| 54.0 | 54.0 | 11.8 | 42.2 | 13.7 | 4.0 | 28.5 | 24.5 | 2.7 | 
 | c | s | MacLeod v. MacLeod, 2003 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) | 982 | 
 | $ 982 per month child support, spousal support of $ 1500 per month set aside, wife may make a new application for spousal support, mans income 54 K, wife claims 2.7 K income per year, retroactive arrears | 
| 54.0 | 54.0 | 10.6 | 43.4 | 13.7 | 4.0 | 29.7 | 25.7 | 52.0 | 
 | c | s | Dodd v. Dodd, 2003 CanLII 2100 (ON S.C.) | 755 | 
 | $ 755 per month child support and s.7 expenses, 4 K retroactive arrears, fathers income 54 K and wifes income 52 K per year | 
| 54.0 | 54.0 | 11.7 | 42.3 | 13.7 | 0.0 | 28.6 | 28.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Lee v. Wright, 2007 ONCJ 454 (CanLII) 
 | 852 | 
 | $ 504 per month child support and $ 348 per month s.7 expense based on an income of 54 K | 
| 55.0 | 55.0 | 5.9 | 49.1 | 14.0 | 19.0 | 35.1 | 16.1 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Stiebel v. Stiebel, 2004 ONCJ 425 (CanLII) | 495 | 
 | $ 800 per month child support reduced to $ 495, 19 K arrears to be paid on imputed income, mans income 55 K per year | 
| 55.0 | 55.0 | 7.6 | 47.4 | 14.0 | 2.9 | 33.4 | 30.5 | 26.0 | 
 | c | s | Montemurro v. Shavalier, 2003 CanLII 1976 (ON S.C.) | 635 | 
 | $ 468 child support for remaining dependant, must pay 2 K directly to older daughter, 2.9 K arrears, man makes 55 K and wife makes 26 K per year | 
| 55.0 | 55.0 | 9.0 | 46.0 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 32.0 | 32.0 | 24.0 | 
 | c | s | McCarthy v. McCarthy, 2006 CanLII 19439 (ON S.C.) | 750 | 
 | $ 750 per month child support, man makes 55 K and wife makes 24 K per year | 
| 56.6 | 56 | 17.6 | 38.4 | 14.4 | 6.0 | 24.0 | 18.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Facchin v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 33118 (ON S.C.) | 1463 | 
 | $ 648 child support is raised to guidelines cause less than income and unexplained, $ 815 S.7 expense, retroactive award, mans income 56 K, 2 K costs | 
| 56.0 | 56.0 | 8.8 | 47.2 | 14.3 | (6.4) | 32.9 | 39.3 | 42.0 | 
 | c | s | Scodras v. Scodras, 2005 CanLII 14146 (ON S.C.) | 731 | 
 | $ 731 per month child support, overpayment of 6.4 K, mans income is 56 K and wifes income is 42 K per year | 
| 56.0 | 56.6 | 9.4 | 46.6 | 14.4 | 27.0 | 32.2 | 5.2 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Garcia-Talavera (Fernandes) v. Fernandes, 2006 ONCJ 27 (CanLII) 
 | 780 | 
 | $ 780 per month for 2 children based on 56 K income, separation agreement overturned and 27 K retroactive award | 
| 58.0 | 58.0 | 20.3 | 37.7 | 15.0 | 9.0 | 23.7 | 14.7 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Brown v. Rowe, 2007 ONCJ 545 (CanLII) | 1358 | 
 | $ 1358 per month child support based on income of 58 K, s.7 expenses, 9 K arrears | 
| 58.0 | 58.0 | 7.5 | 50.5 | 14.9 | 18.2 | 36.5 | 18.3 | 30 | 
 | c | s | L.K. v. G.K., 2007 CanLII 9612 (ON S.C.) | 496 | 
 | $ 496 per month child support, s.7 expenses, change of residence of child to mother, father owes 18.2 K retroactive arrears, mans income 58 K and womans income 30 K | 
| 99.0 | 58.0 | 11.1 | 46.9 | 15.0 | 0.0 | 31.9 | 31.9 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.) | 927 | 
 | $927 per month child support, mans income imputed from 58 K to 99 K | 
| 58.0 | 58.0 | 2.4 | 55.6 | 15.0 | 0.0 | 40.6 | 40.6 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Dent v. Flynn, 2005 CanLII 14317 (ON S.C.) | 200 | 
 | $ 200 per month child support, father has new family with 3 special needs children, man earns 58 K per year | 
| 59.0 | 59.0 | 9.6 | 39.4 | 15.3 | 8.0 | 24.1 | 16.1 | 22.0 | 
 | c | s | Roy v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 18693 (ON S.C.) | 800 | 
 | $ 800 per month child support to be reduced to $ 509, father must pay 8 K of university expenses, fathers income 59 K and mothers income 22 K | 
| 59.0 | 59.0 | 10.3 | 48.7 | 15.3 | 0.0 | 33.4 | 33.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Malka v. Seliktar, 2004 CanLII 34933 (ON S.C.) | 858 | 
 | Guideline support for one child from an income of 59 K, add on payments of $ 379 per month for daycare | 
| 59.4 | 59.4 | 11.2 | 48.2 | 15.5 | 5.1 | 32.7 | 27.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Ferril v. Chen, 2006 ONCJ 301 (CanLII) | 935 | 
 | $ 557 per month child support and $ 378 per month s.7 expense, 5.1 K arrears, mans income 59.4 K per year | 
| 60.0 | 60.0 | 7.6 | 52.4 | 15.6 | 45.7 | 36.8 | (8.9) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Plotz v. Boehmer Plotz, 2004 CanLII 5072 (ON S.C.) | 507 | 
 | $ 1700 spousal support and $300 child support varied to $ 507 child support and $ 1 spousal support, arrears fixed at 40 K, retroactive s.7 expenses, mans income 60 K, wife remarries man with 85 K income | 
| 60.0 | 60.0 | 6.1 | 53.9 | 15.6 | 24.3 | 38.3 | 14.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Norman v. Chernev, 2004 ONCJ 385 (CanLII) 
 | 507 | 
 | $ 507 per month child support, man has made no payment and is 4 years in arrears, mans income 60 K per year | 
| 100.0 | 60.0 | 10.6 | 49.4 | 15.6 | 0.0 | 33.8 | 33.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Clifford v. Heinzl, 2007 CanLII 23335 (ON S.C.) | 877 | 
 | $ 877 per month child support, man claims 60 K income and is imputed to 100 K | 
| 60.0 | 60.0 | 6.1 | 53.9 | 15.6 | 2.1 | 38.3 | 36.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Scott v. Jolicoeur, 2005 CanLII 2058 (ON S.C.) | 507 | 
 | $ 507 per month in child support and 2.1 K arrears, guilty of contempt given suspended sentence, mans income 60 K per year | 
| 60.0 | 60.0 | 6.0 | 54.0 | 15.6 | 0.0 | 38.4 | 38.4 | 26.0 | 
 | c | s | Lee v. Lee, 2006 CanLII 5612 (ON S.C.) | 500 | 
 | $ 500 child support, $ 500 spousal, child support ended, man makes 60 K and wife makes 26 K | 
| 60.0 | 60.0 | 6.7 | 53.3 | 15.6 | 0.0 | 39.7 | 39.7 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Perry v. Perry, 2006 ONCJ 387 (CanLII) | 557 | 
 | $ 557 per month child support based on an income of 60 K | 
| 60.8 | 60.8 | 6.2 | 54.6 | 15.8 | 20.8 | 38.8 | 18.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Balo v. Motlagh (Madsen), 2004 ONCJ 166 (CanLII) | 514 | 
 | $ 514 per month child support, retroactive arrears of 20.8 K, fathers income 60.8 K | 
| 139.0 | 61.0 | 25.2 | 35.8 | 15.9 | 0.0 | 19.9 | 19.9 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Vanderzalm v. Vanderzalm, 2003 CanLII 2356 (ON S.C.) | 2100 | 
 | $1500 spousal support and $ 2100 child support changed to $ 2100 child support, man claims income of 61 K but must pay on an income of 139 K per year | 
| 61.0 | 61.0 | 10.4 | 50.6 | 15.9 | 4.5 | 34.7 | 30.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Roote v. Thompson, 2005 CanLII 47790 (ON S.C.) | 863 | 
 | $ 863 per month child support based on income of 61 K, 4.5 K retroactive arrears | 
| 61.0 | 61.0 | 10.6 | 50.4 | 15.9 | 0.0 | 34.5 | 34.5 | 63.0 | 
 | c | o | Bertram v. Murdock, 2006 ONCJ 69 (CanLII | 880 | 
 | $ 531 child support when child is at home and $ 406 when at school, $ 4550 per year tuition expenses, father makes 61 K and mother makes 63 K per year | 
| 61.0 | 61.0 | 9.2 | 51.8 | 15.9 | 0.0 | 35.9 | 35.9 | 69.0 | 
 | c | s | Matwiyw v. Matwiyw, 2004 CanLII 7764 (ON S.C.) | 770 | 
 | $ 841 child support order varied to $ 770, fathers income 61 K mothers income 69 K | 
| 62.9 | 62.9 | 16.0 | 44.9 | 16.5 | 1.4 | 28.4 | 27.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Shaw v. Friesen, 2007 CanLII 19796 (ON S.C.) | 1000 | 
 | 1 K per month child support, s.7 expenses, 1.4 K arrears, mans income 69.2 K | 
| 63.0 | 63.0 | 17.4 | 45.6 | 16.5 | 71.0 | 29.1 | (41.9) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Huber v. Huber, 2003 CanLII 2134 (ON S.C.) | 1120 | 
 | $1120 per month child support and half s.7 expenses, 71 K retroactive arrears, man makes 63 K per year | 
| 63.2 | 63.2 | 6.4 | 57.0 | 16.6 | 0.0 | 40.4 | 40.4 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Nikita v. Nikita, 2002 CanLII 46584 (ON C.J.) | 531 | 
 | $ 531 per month child support and $ 295 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 63.2 K | 
| 64.0 | 64.0 | 10.8 | 53.2 | 16.8 | 190.0 | 36.4 | (153.6) | 24 | 
 | c | s | Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.) | 900 | 
 | $ 900 per month child support and 180 K lump sum to be taken from pension after man has declared bankruptcy, 10 K costs, 180 K spousal support lump sum, man makes 64 K and wife makes 24 K | 
| 250.0 | 64.0 | 48.9 | 15.1 | 16.8 | 22.0 | (1.7) | (23.7) | 0.0 | 
 | c | s | Bruzas v. Bruzas, 2005 CanLII 36267 (ON S.C.) | 3400 | 
 | 3.4 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, reteroactive arrears, man claims 64 K income and is imputed to 250 K | 
| 85.0 | 65.0 | 24.7 | 40.3 | 14.0 | 9.7 | 26.3 | 16.6 | 21.6 | 
 | c | s | Colafranceschi v. Colafranceschi, 2005 CanLII 10646 (ON S.C.) | 1380 | 
 | 1.2 K child support and $ 180 per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man claims income of 65 K and is imputed to 85 K, wife has income of 21.6 K | 
| 65.0 | 65.0 | 14.2 | 50.8 | 17.1 | 0.0 | 33.7 | 33.7 | 35.0 | 
 | c | s | Jones v. Murray, 2005 CanLII 23318 (ON S.C.) | 1182 | 
 | $ 2260 per month child support reduced to $ 1182 by separation agreement, man makes 65 K and wife makes 35 K per year | 
| 66.0 | 66.0 | 14.9 | 51.1 | 17.4 | 20.2 | 33.7 | 13.5 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Kent v. Schellenberg, 2005 ONCJ 260 (CanLII) | 908 | 
 | $ 550 per month child support and 4.3 K university expenses, 35 months at $ 500 per month retroactive arrears and 2.7 K for past years s.7 expenses, man earns 66 K per year | 
| 66.0 | 66.0 | 14.2 | 51.8 | 17.4 | 0.0 | 34.4 | 34.4 | 17.0 | 
 | c | s | Levesque v. Levesque, 2003 CanLII 2166 (ON S.C.) | 1183 | 
 | $ 844 child support per month and $ 343 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 66 K and wifes income 17 K per year before support | 
| 66.0 | 66.0 | 8.4 | 57.6 | 17.4 | 0.0 | 40.2 | 40.2 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Whitlock v. Whitlock, 2005 ONCJ 266 (CanLII) | 696 | 
 | $ 696 per month child support, mans income 66 K per year | 
| 66.3 | 66.3 | 11.9 | 54.4 | 17.5 | 4.9 | 36.5 | 31.6 | 32 | 
 | c | s | Davies v. Davies, 2007 CanLII 2365 (ON S.C.) | 992 | 
 | $ 992 per month child support, husband makes $ 1400 per month mortgage payments too, mans income 66.3 K and wifes income 32 K per year | 
| 67.0 | 67.0 | 12.6 | 54.4 | 17.8 | 7.9 | 36.6 | 28.7 | 
 | 
 | c | y | Shea v. Fraser, 2007 ONCA 224 (CanLII) | 1048 | 
 | $ 600 per month child support and $ 448 per month s.7 expenses, 7.9 K arrears, man declares bankruptcy, mans income 67 K | 
| 67.3 | 67.3 | 16.0 | 51.3 | 17.9 | 0.0 | 33.4 | 33.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pepin v. Jung, 2003 CanLII 2048 (ON S.C.) | 1330 | 
 | $ 900 per month child support, $ 430 in s.7 expenses per month, mans income 67.3 K per year | 
| 68.0. | 68.0 | 13.5 | 54.5 | 18.1 | 0.0 | 36.4 | 36.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Byrne v. Byrne, 2003 CanLII 2073 (ON S.C.) | 1123 | 
 | $ 1123 child support per month, spousal support terminated, mans income 68.4 K per year | 
| 70.0 | 70.0 | 19.9 | 50.1 | 18.7 | 9.5 | 31.4 | 21.9 | 50.0 | 
 | c | o | Griffiths v. Griffiths, 2007 ONCJ 26 (CanLII) | 1322 | 
 | $ 1322 per month child support plus dental expense, 9.5 K arrears, man makes 70 K and wife makes 50 K per year | 
| 71.3 | 71.3 | 7.9 | 63.4 | 19.1 | 0.0 | 44.3 | 44.3 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Cocirla v. Barbu and Marques, 2006 ONCJ 278 (CanLII) | 656 | 
 | $ 656 per month child support, man has income of 71.3 K | 
| 72.0 | 72.0 | 9.6 | 62.4 | 19.3 | 28.7 | 43.1 | 14.4 | 26.0 | 
 | c | s | Mendler v. Mendler, 2006 CanLII 6693 (ON S.C.) | 800 | 
 | $ 800 per month child support, retroactive 23 K lump sum award, retroactive arrears, mans income 72 K and wifes income 26 K | 
| 73.5 | 73.5 | 6.9 | 66.6 | 20.9 | 61.6 | 45.7 | (15.9) | 65.5 | 
 | c | s | Traversy v. Glover, 2006 CanLII 24130 (ON S.C.) | 577 | 
 | $ 577 per month child support and 4.5 K additional retroactive s.7 expense, 57.1 K lump sum award, wife may reapply for periodic support, man makes 73.5 K and wife makes 65.5 K per year | 
| 84.0 | 75.0 | 12.5 | 62.5 | 21.4 | 0.0 | 41.1 | 41.1 | 7.3 | 
 | c | s | Boissy v. Boissy, 2004 CanLII 7047 (ON S.C.) | 1043 | 
 | $ 1043 per month interim child support, man claims average income of 75 K and is imputed to 84 K due to non taxable non cash benefits, wifes income before support 7.3 K, husband declares bankruptcy | 
| 75.0 | 75.0 | 9.3 | 65.7 | 21.4 | 2.7 | 44.3 | 41.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Lee v. Dunphy, 2006 ONCJ 499 (CanLII) 
 | 778 | 
 | $ 688 per month child support and $ 90 s.7 expenses per month based on an income of 75 K, 2.7 K costs | 
| 75.0 | 75.0 | 7.3 | 67.7 | 21.4 | 0.0 | 46.3 | 46.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Nebel v. Robertson, 2003 CanLII 4374 (ON S.C.) | 606 | 
 | $ 606 per month child support changed to guidelines from separation agreement amount of $ 300, mans income 75 K per year | 
| 76.0 | 76.0 | 24.5 | 51.5 | 21.8 | 0.0 | 29.7 | 29.7 | 0.0 | 
 | c | s | Tustian v. Dancey, 2004 CanLII 48179 (ON S.C.) | 1922 | 
 | $ 1922 per month child support including $ 300 s.7 expenses, must pay $ 111 per month for insurance covering children too, support obligations for a second divorce and 2 kids with present partner, man earns 76 K, wife is remarried and new husband earns 160 K and supports her | 
| 80.1 | 76.4 | 12.5 | 63.9 | 21.9 | 0.0 | 42.0 | 42.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Fantin v. Gillingham-Corkun Fantin, 2003 CanLII 2114 (ON S.C.) | 1043 | 
 | $ 639 per month child support and $ 404 s.7 expenses, man claims 76.4 K and is imputed to 80.1 K | 
| 77.0 | 77.0 | 12.0 | 65.0 | 22.1 | 66.9 | 42.9 | (24.0) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Sodoski v. Dudgeon, 2004 ONCJ 424 (CanLII) | 1000 | 
 | $ 1000 per month child support, 26.9 K arrears, 40 K retroactive s.7 expenses, man makes 77 K | 
| 77.0 | 77.0 | 19.9 | 57.1 | 22.1 | 0.0 | 35.0 | 35.0 | 40 | 
 | c | s | A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 1969 (ON S.C.) | 1659 | 
 | $ 1001 per month child support and special expenses up to $ 658 per month, husband earns 77 K per year and wife earns 40 K per year | 
| 80.0 | 80.0 | 18.9 | 61.1 | 21.8 | 25.0 | 39.3 | 14.3 | 49.0 | 
 | c | s | Zlatar v. Hartwick, 2007 CanLII 22344 (ON S.C.) | 1241 | 
 | $ 908 per month child support, 4 K per year s.7 expenses, 25 K retroactive arrears, man makes 80 K and wife makes 49 K per year. | 
| 81.7 | 81.7 | 16.3 | 65.4 | 25.4 | 22.0 | 40.0 | 18.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Sharpley v. Sharpley, 2005 ONCJ 483 (CanLII) | 1360 | 
 | $ 1360 per month child support raised from $ 858 that was based on false income, mans income 81.7 K, 15 K retroactive arrears, 6 K contempt award and 1 K costs | 
| 100.0 | 82.0 | 9.3 | 72.7 | 25.4 | 7.0 | 47.3 | 40.3 | 20.0 | 
 | c | s | Sanders v. Sanders, 2003 CanLII 2347 (ON S.C.) | 773 | 
 | $773 child support and s.7 daycare expenses, $ 850 interim spousal support terminated, claim for unequal division rejected, man claims 82 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife has 20 K income, 7 K costs | 
| 83.0 | 83.0 | 16.7 | 66.3 | 25.8 | 8.2 | 40.2 | 32.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pollen v. Pollen, 2004 CanLII 5073 (ON S.C.) | 1392 | 
 | $1200 and $ 192 retroactive child support for child who is now no longer dependant, 8 K lump sum support, man makes 83 K per year | 
| 83.3 | 83.3 | 15.1 | 68.2 | 25.9 | 0.0 | 42.3 | 42.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Lane v. Lane, 2002 CanLII 2794 (ON S.C.) | 1261 | 
 | $ 918 per month child support and $ 343 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 83.3 K | 
| 85.0 | 85.0 | 26.0 | 59.0 | 32.6 | 0.0 | 26.4 | 26.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 2003 CanLII 2227 (ON S.C.) | 691 | 
 | $ 691 per month child support for one child and 50 % of the university expenses for the other child, mans income is 85 K | 
| 89.0 | 89.0 | 16.8 | 72.2 | 34.3 | 18.0 | 37.9 | 19.9 | 47.9 | 
 | c | s | Clarke v. Clarke, 2007 CanLII 50596 (ON S.C.) | 1063 | 
 | $ 1063 per month child support, s.7 expenses, 18 K arrears, man makes 89 K and wife makes 47.9 K | 
| 90.0 | 90.0 | 18.5 | 71.5 | 34.7 | 9.7 | 36.8 | 27.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bromley v. Brown, 2005 CanLII 19798 (ON S.C.) | 1209 | 
 | $ 1209 per month child support, s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, mans income 90 K | 
| 90.0 | 90.0 | 10.0 | 80.0 | 34.7 | 9.1 | 45.3 | 36.2 | 182.0 | 
 | c | s | Umholtz v. Umholtz, 2003 CanLII 2025 (ON S.C.) | 832 | 
 | $ 832 now directly payable to daughter, s.7 expenses, 9.1 K retroactive arrears payable to mother from funds held for equalization, husband makes 90 K and wife makes 182 K per year | 
| 94.0 | 94.0 | 12.0 | 82.0 | 36.5 | 0.0 | 45.5 | 45.5 | 38.2 | 
 | c | s | Murphy v. Murphy, 2003 CanLII 2187 (ON S.C.) 
 | 998 | 
 | $ 998 total child support per month including $ 277 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 94 K and wifes income 38.2 K per year | 
| 100.0 | 100 | 27.0 | 73.0 | 39.1 | 0.0 | 33.9 | 33.9 | 46.1 | 
 | c | s | Johnson v. Castellano, 2006 CanLII 34434 (ON S.C.) | 2250 | 
 | $ 1825 per month child support and $ 425 per month s.7 expenses, man is given support reduction for lower earnings due to depression but must now assume former income, wife makes 46.1 K per year | 
| 101.0 | 101.0 | 10.7 | 90.3 | 39.5 | 9.7 | 58.5 | 49.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kourany v. Salem, 2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.) | 889 | 
 | $ 889 per month child support, retroactive arrears, mans income 101.6 K per year | 
| 105.0 | 105.0 | 15.0 | 89.0 | 41.2 | 0.0 | 47.8 | 47.8 | 18.0 | 
 | c | s | Potyrala v. Potyrala, 2007 CanLII 43499 (ON S.C.) | 916 | 
 | $ 916 per month interim child support, retroactivity to be decided at trial, 85 % s.7 expenses, mans income 105 K wifes income 18 K | 
| 110.0 | 110.0 | 18.1 | 91.4 | 44.1 | 0.0 | 47.3 | 47.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Sprason v. Murray, 2007 CanLII 26613 (ON S.C.) | 1506 | 
 | $ 959 child support per month and $ 6572 per year s.7 expense, mans income 110 K per year | 
| 114.0 | 114.0 | 39.6 | 74.4 | 45.1 | 79.0 | 29.3 | (49.7) | 0.0 | 
 | c | s | Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 41003 (ON S.C.) | 3300 | 
 | 1.8 K per month indexed child support, 1.5 K per month s.7 expenses, 79 K arrears, variation denied, man makes 114 K per year and wife is unemployed | 
| 120.0 | 115.0 | 6.0 | 109.0 | 45.6 | 0.0 | 63.4 | 63.4 | 21.0 | 
 | c | s | Duggan v. Elson, 2007 CanLII 45910 (ON S.C.) | 500 | 
 | $ 500 per month interim spousal support, man claims 115 K and is imputed to 120 K, wife has 21 K income per year | 
| 161.0 | 117.0 | 24.2 | 92.8 | 46.4 | 70.0 | 46.4 | (23.6) | 46.3 | z | c | s | Miner v. Miner, 2004 CanLII 5064 (ON S.C.) | 2020 | 
 | $ 2020 per month child support, 70 K lump sum spousal support, man makes 161 K and wife makes 46.3 K per year, man must continue to pay on separation agreement despite claiming lower 117 K income | 
| 118.0 | 118.0 | 14.9 | 103.1 | 46.9 | 19.0 | 56.2 | 37.2 | 67.0 | 
 | c | s | Childs v. Childs, 2005 CanLII 11981 (ON S.C.) | 1245 | 
 | $ 1020 child support and $ 225 s.7 expenses. 19 K retroactive arrears, man makes 118 K and wife makes 67 K | 
| 127.0 | 127.0 | 22.8 | 104.2 | 50.8 | 11.7 | 53.4 | 41.7 | 43.8 | 
 | c | s | Wilson v. Desrochers, 2006 CanLII 23947 (ON S.C.) | 1897 | 
 | $ 1721 per month child support, $ 176 s.7 expense per month and 2 K retroactive award, retroactive arrears, fathers income 126.6 K mothers income 43.8 K per year | 
| 132.0 | 132.0 | 21.4 | 110.8 | 56.6 | 70.0 | 54.2 | (15.8) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Wilson v. Sinden, 2007 CanLII 47161 (ON S.C.) | 1783 | 
 | $ 1783 per month child support, 70 K in arrears,mans income 132 K per year | 
| 200.0 | 134.0 | 19.7 | 114.3 | 57.5 | 26.8 | 56.8 | 30.0 | 24.0 | 
 | c | o | A.(L.C.) v. A.(R.J.), 2003 CanLII 52484 (ON C.J.) | 1308 | 
 | $ 1308 per month child support, 86 % s.7 expenses, arrears 26.8 K, father claims 134 K income and is imputed to 200 K, mother makes 24 K, | 
| 138.0 | 138.0 | 24.0 | 114.0 | 59.4 | 40.0 | 54.6 | 14.6 | 39.0 | 
 | c | s | Bond v. Bond, 2007 CanLII 41898 (ON S.C.D.C.) | 2000 | 
 | 2 K per month for 2 children, retroactive child support of 40 K, mans income 138 K per year and wifes income 39 K per year | 
| 138.0 | 138.0 | 23.7 | 114.3 | 59.4 | 0.0 | 54.9 | 54.9 | 31 | 
 | c | s | McCrea v. McCrea, 2005 CanLII 378 (ON S.C.) | 1640 | 
 | $ 1640 per month child support reduced from $ 2850, s.7 expenses, father has 138 K income and mother has 31 K income | 
| 139.0 | 139.0 | 12.0 | 127.0 | 59.9 | 0.0 | 67.1 | 67.1 | 91.0 | 
 | c | y | Park v. Thompson, 2005 CanLII 14132 (ON C.A.) | 1000 | 
 | $ 1000 per month child support in trust fund, man makes 139 K and wife makes 91 K, s.7 expenses, 70 K retroactive arrears overturned on appeal | 
| 147.0 | 147.0 | 39.3 | 107.7 | 63.6 | 25.0 | 44.1 | 19.1 | 57.0 | 
 | c | s | Fisher v. Green, 2003 CanLII 2311 (ON S.C.) | 2600 | 
 | 2.6 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, 25 K retroactive arrears,mans income 147 K including overtime and wifes income 57 K per year | 
| 150.0 | 150.0 | 31.2 | 118.8 | 65.0 | 0.0 | 53.8 | 53.8 | 63.0 | 
 | c | s | Ruel v. Juodis, 2005 CanLII 14133 (ON S.C.) | 2600 | 
 | $ 1233 per month child support and $ 675 s.7 expense and $ 690 discretionary extra expense per month, man makes 150 K and wife makes 40 K and is imputed to 63 K per year | 
| 151.0 | 151.0 | 19.0 | 132.0 | 65.4 | 24.9 | 66.6 | 41.7 | 290.0 | 
 | c | s | Manning v. Manning, 2004 CanLII 33295 (ON S.C.) | 1250 | 
 | $ 1250 child support per month, 34 % s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, fathers income grossed up to 151.8 K and mothers 289.5 K per year, 15.2 K costs | 
| 154.0 | 154.0 | 63.3 | 90.1 | 66.8 | 40.0 | 23.3 | (16.7) | 38.5 | 
 | c | s | D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.) | 4600 | 
 | 4.6 K per month child support including 75 % s.7 expenses, 40 K retroactive s.7 arrears, man makes 154 K per year and wife makes 38.5 K | 
| 165.0 | 165.0 | 27.7 | 137.3 | 71.9 | 3.9 | 65.4 | 61.5 | 75 | 
 | c | o | Osmak-Bonk v. Bonk, 2004 ONCJ 167 (CanLII) | 2305 | 
 | 1.93 K per month child support and 9.4 K s.7 expense, $ 365 per month s.7 expense, retroactive arrears 3.9 K, arrears, mans income 165 K, wifes income is 75 K per year | 
| 179.0 | 179.0 | 19.6 | 159.4 | 78.4 | 25.0 | 81.0 | 56.0 | 30.3 | 
 | c | s | Wentsell v. Schumacher, 2004 CanLII 15668 (ON S.C.) | 1300 | 
 | 1.3 K per month child support, 87 % of s.7 expenses, 25 K, arrears, fathers income 179 K and mothers income 30.3 K per year | 
| 221.0 | 221.0 | 47.4 | 173.6 | 97.9 | (16.3) | 75.7 | 92.0 | 41.9 | 
 | c | s | Zimmerman v. Doe, 2007 CanLII 28755 (ON S.C.) | 3977 | 
 | $ 2500 per month child support and s.7 expenses of $ 1477 per month and reimbursement for 16.3 K prior s.7 expenses, man makes 221 K per year and wife makes 41.9 K | 
| 250.0 | 250.0 | 12.0 | 238.0 | 111.4 | 0.0 | 126.6 | 126.6 | 
 | 
 | c | y | Tierney-Hynes v. Hynes, 2005 CanLII 35770 (ON C.A.) | 1000 | 
 | Originally $ 1500 child support and $ 300 spousal support, varied in Manitoba to 1 K child support, appeal of dismissal of spousal support allowed, man makes 250 K per year | 
| 275.0 | 275.0 | 24.8 | 250.2 | 123.0 | 24.0 | 127.0 | 103.0 | 26 | 
 | c | s | Cowie v. Makin, 2004 CanLII 5762 (ON S.C.) | 2065 | 
 | $ 2065 per month in child support, 24 K arrears set against equalization, mans income 275 K and wifes income changed from 110 K to 26 K per year | 
| 290.0 | 290.0 | 39.6 | 250.4 | 129.9 | 50.0 | 120.1 | 70.1 | 54.0 | 
 | c | s | Monaghan v. Monaghan, 2002 CanLII 2676 (ON S.C.) | 3300 | 
 | 3.3 K per month child support, man pays 50 K per year of childrens university expenses, man makes 290 K and wife makes 54 K per year | 
| 320.0 | 320.0 | 50.1 | 269.9 | 143.9 | 53.0 | 125.1 | 72.1 | 75.0 | 
 | c | s | Hugel v. Hugel, 2004 CanLII 15763 (ON S.C.) | 3500 | 
 | 3.5 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, 28 K retroactive lump sum spousal support, man earns 25 K compensatory lump sum support, 320 K and wife earns 75 K per year | 
| 787.0 | 328.0 | 117.6 | 210.4 | 152.2 | 22.0 | 58.2 | 36.2 | 193.0 | 
 | c | s | Howe v. Tremblay, 2007 CanLII 44350 (ON S.C.) | 9800 | 
 | 5.7 K per month child support and 4.1 K per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man claims 328 K income and is imputed to 767 K as non recurring income is included, wifes income is 193 K per year | 
| 502.0 | 502.0 | 180.0 | 322.0 | 228.3 | 12.0 | 93.7 | 81.7 | 0.0 | 
 | c | s | V.A.W. v. R.C.L., 2004 CanLII 7043 (ON S.C.) | 15000 | 
 | 15 K per month ongoing child support, 12 K retroactive arrears, man makes over 500 K and wife is unemployed | 
| 559 | 559 | 46.5 | 512.5 | 254.8 | 22.0 | 257.2 | 235.2 | 76 | 
 | c | s | Werden v. Werden, 2005 CanLII 45741 (ON S.C.) | 3875 | 
 | 3.2 K child support per month, retroactive arrears, mans income 559 K per year and wifes income 76 K per year | 
| 5500 | 745 | 276.0 | 469.0 | 341.1 | 951.0 | 127.9 | (823.1) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Debora v. Debora, 2004 CanLII 44791 (ON S.C.) | 23000 | 
 | Child support of 23 K per month, 951 K retroactive award, man claims 745 K income and is imputed to 5.5 million per year | 
| 811.0 | 766.0 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 0.0 | 
 | c | s | K.C. v. S.B., 2007 CanLII 17035 (ON S.C.) | 
 | 
 | Support set on 811 K income for 1 child and at least $ 1.3 K per month s.7 expenses, 51 K s.7 expenses arrears, retoractive support and arrears, income imputed 45 K above declared | 
| 769.0 | 769.0 | 106.5 | 662.5 | 352.3 | 107.0 | 310.2 | 203.2 | 270 | 
 | c | s | Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 4025 (ON S.C.) | 8200 | 
 | 72 K retroactive arrears of child support, 35 K retroactive arrears 75 % of s.7 expenses, 8.2 K per month child support, man makes 769 K per year and wife makes 270 K | 
| 777.0 | 777.0 | 107.7 | 669.3 | 356.0 | 0.0 | 313.3 | 313.4 | 40.0 | 
 | c | s | Bladwin v. Funston, 2004 CanLII 878 (ON S.C.) | 8300 | 
 | 8.3 K per month child support and 95 % of s.7 expenses | 
| 2000 | 2000 | 181.2 | 1818.8 | 928.0 | 0.0 | 890.0 | 890.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pakka v. Nygard, 2004 CanLII 5071 (ON S.C.) | 15100 | 
 | 15.1 K per month child support, mans income 2000 K per year | 
| 5000 | 5000 | 228.0 | 4772.0 | 2315.8 | 0.0 | 2456.2 | 2456.2 | 30.0 | 
 | c | s | Quinn v. Keiper, 2005 CanLII 43685 (ON S.C.) | 19000 | 
 | 10 million equalization, 5 K per month child support, father pays between 10 and 18.5 K per month s.7 expenses, man makes 5000 K and wife makes 30 K per year | 
Legend
1 Payors Court Ordered Income per Year in $ 1000’s
2 Income Claimed by Payors per Year in $ 1000’s
3 Total Support Ordered ( median for payment group for s.7 expense used where $ figures are not stated, . and any other periodic expenses described are included ) per Year in 1000 $’s
4 Payors Court Ordered Income after Support Payment
5 Tax on Payors Court Ordered Income ( minus a 10 K personal exemption ) per Year in $ 1000’s
6 Fixed Support Award Expense ( median for payment group and award type used where $ figures are not stated ) per Year in $ 1000’s
7 Payors Court Ordered Income after Support Payment and Tax per Year in $ 1000’s
8 Payors Disposable Income after Support Payment, Tax and Fixed Award Expenses per Year in $ 1000’s
9 Support Recipients Income per Year in $ 1000’s
10 Blank
11 Type of Support ( c= Child Support, s = Spousal Support, b = Both Child and Spousal Support )
12 Court ( s = Superior Court, o = Ontario Court of Justice, y = Court of Appeal )
13 Case and Canlii File Number
14 Child Support ( only values where $ figures are stated ) per Month in $’s
15 Spousal Support ( only values where $ figures are stated ) per Month in $’s
16 Description of Outcome
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Case | 14 | 15 | Outcome | 
| 
 | 0.0 | 3.6 | 
 | 
 | 6.3 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Pompey v. Pompey, 1992 CanLII 4044 (ON C.J.) | 300 | 
 | $ 300 per month child support, 6.3 K arrears, man is unemployed but must contiunue paying at former level | 
| 
 | 20 | 6.0 | 
 | 
 | 0.0 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Stutz v. Stutz Sorrenson, 2002 CanLII 2815 (ON S.C.) | 500 | 
 | $ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 20 K income and is imputed higher | 
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 | (1.4) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (1.4) | (1.4) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bak v. Dobell, 2005 CanLII 36463 (ON S.C.) | 117 | 
 | $ 117 per month child support, man supported by father, court finds man has no income | 
| 9 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 7.8 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | c | y | Difrancesco v. Couto, 2001 CanLII 8613 (ON C.A.) | 102 | 
 | $ 102 per month child support, man claims no income and 9 K per year is imputed, arrears 40 K | 
| 10 | 10 | 7.8 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 45 | (5.8) | (50.8) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Maurice v. Maurice, 2003 CanLII 2418 (ON S.C.) | 653 | 
 | $ 653 per month child support, 45 K arrears, set off against 40 K of his value in home, mans income 10 K | 
| 10.8 | 10.8 | 1.9 | 8.9 | 0.2 | 5.7 | 8.7 | 3.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.) | 158 | 
 | $ 158 per month retroactive child support, claim of undue hardship denied, mans income 10.8 K per year | 
| 13 | 4 | 2.4 | 11.6 | 0.6 | 6.0 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.) | 200 | 
 | $ 200 per month child support, 6 K in s.7 expense arrears, man declares 4 K income and is imputed to 13 K. | 
| 15 | 2 | 3.5 | 11.5 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 10.4 | 10.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.) | 294 | 
 | $ 294 child support per month, man claims 2 K income and is imputed to 15 K | 
| 15 | 15 | 3.0 | 12.0 | 1.1 | 15.0 | 10.9 | (4.1) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Lantaigne v. Lantaigne, 2005 CanLII 39886 (ON S.C.) | 250 | 
 | $ 250 per month child support reduced from $ 500, 40 K arrears rescinded to 15 K, enforcement stayed, man has 15 K income, wife has higher income | 
| 16 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 14.5 | 1.3 | 4.6 | 13.2 | 8.6 | 
 | 
 | c | y | Drygala v. Pauli, 2002 CanLII 41868 (ON C.A.) | 127 | 
 | $ 127 per month retroactive 3 years, man claims 7.3 K loss and is imputed to 16 K per year | 
| 16.1 | 11.1 | 2.8 | 13.3 | 1.3 | 14.4 | 12.0 | (2.4) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Clark v. Clark, 2002 CanLII 2773 (ON S.C.) | 237 | 
 | $ 900 per month child support changed to $ 700 changed to $ 237, husband diagnosed with cancer , 14.4 K arrears, man claims 11.1 K and is imputed to 16.1 K per year | 
| 17 | 5 | 1.6 | 15.4 | 1.5 | 9.7 | 13.9 | 4.1 | 
 | 
 | c | o | B.O.v. A.K.O., 2005 ONCJ 328 (CanLII) | 134 | 
 | $ 134 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 17 K, 9.7 K arrears | 
| 17.5 | 17.5 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Montgomery v. Montgomery, 2007 ONCJ 3 (CanLII) | 431 | 
 | $ 431 per month child support for 4 children based on a gross income of 17.5 K, arrears rescinded. | 
| 17.8 | 17.8 | 2.4 | 15.4 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 13.8 | 11.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Self v. Reid, 2006 ONCJ 30 (CanLII) | 200 | 
 | $ 139 for child support and $ 61 for s.7 expenses and 1.2 K arrears and 1 K costs, mans income 17.8 K | 
| 18 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 16.3 | 1.7 | 21.0 | 14.6 | (6.4) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Cherry v. Cherry, 2004 CanLII 1649 (ON S.C.) | 144 | 
 | $ 144 per month child support based on an imputed income of 18 K for failing to make efforts to become employed, man on disability with benefits of 2.8 K per year, 32 K arrears rescinded to 21 K | 
| 18 | 18 | 3.4 | 14.6 | 1.7 | 15.1 | 12.9 | (2.2) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Vaughan v. Vaughan, 2007 ONCJ 21 (CanLII) | 281 | 
 | $ 281 child support 15.1 K arrears, mans income 18 K per year | 
| 18 | 18 | 3.2. | 14.8 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 13.1 | 13.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Luedtke v. Vuletic, 2001 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) | 140 | 
 | $ 140 per month child support and 50 % of s.7 expenses based on 18 K income, mans answer struck and he can’t participate at trial | 
| 18.7 | 18.7 | 1.7 | 17.0 | 1.8 | 24.0 | 15.2 | (8.8) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Hamilton v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 35 (CanLII) | 145 | 
 | $ 145 per month child support based on an income of 18.7 K, 24 K arrears | 
| 19 | 19 | 6.0 | 13.0 | 1.9 | 17.0 | 11.1 | (5.9) | 
 | 
 | c | o | DuQuesnay v. Scrivens, 2007 ONCJ 257 (CanLII) | 500 | 
 | $ 500 per month child support, 17 K arrears, man claims 19 K average income, over 10 K owing to social services | 
| 19 | 19 | 4.1 | 14.9 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 13.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Mlambo v. Mlambo, 2007 ONCJ 240 (CanLII) | 339 | 
 | $ 339 per month for 3 children based on income of 19 K | 
| 19 | 19 | 4.5 | 14.5 | 1.9 | 40.5 | 13.6 | (26.9) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Woodland v. Woodland, 2005 CanLII 34591 (ON S.C.) | 375 | 
 | Child support reduced from $ 541 to $ 375, arrears fixed at 40 K, mans income 19 K | 
| 20 | 0.0 | 4.6 | 15.4 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Marchese v. Marchese, 2002 CanLII 40030 (ON S.C.) | 265 | 
 | $ 265 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man studying for PHD has 20 K income imputed | 
| 20 | 0.0 | 3.7 | 16.3 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 14.2 | 14.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 37233 (ON S.C.) | 308 | 
 | $ 308 interim child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 20 K income | 
| 20.2 | 20.2 | 2.0 | 18.2 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 16.1 | 15.5 | 
 | 
 | c | o | G.R.L. v. S.L., 2005 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) | 167 | 
 | $ 167 child support per month, $ 611 in retroactive arrears, man pays two other child support claims, mans income 20.2 K per year | 
| 20.8 | 20.8 | 3.4 | 17.4 | 2.3 | 11.5 | 15.1 | 3.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Barker-Papos v. Mihaly, 2005 ONCJ 259 (CanLII) | 285 | 
 | $ 285 per month child support based on an income of 20.8 K, 11.5 K arrears | 
| 21 | 10.2 | 4.0 | 17.0 | 2.3 | 5.7 | 14.7 | 9.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 1276 (ON S.C.) | 337 | 
 | $ 297 and $ 40 s.7 expenses per month child support retroactive, man claims 10.2 K income and is imputed to 21 K | 
| 21.2 | 21.2 | 3.6 | 17.6 | 2.3 | 46.0 | 15.3 | (30.7) | 
 | 
 | c | s | G.P.M. v. S.J.F., 2005 CanLII 19840 (ON S.C.) | 300 | 
 | $ 1804 child support reduced to $ 410 then later $ 300, spousal support terminated, 36 K costs and 10 K for assault and 28 K for equalization, mans income 21.2 K | 
| 21.4 | 21.4 | 3.9 | 17.5 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 15.1 | 15.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bell v. Bell, 2006 CanLII 23927 (ON S.C. | 327 | 
 | $ 327 per month for natural son and step daughter, man has unemployment income of 21.4 K, man denies being parent of stepdaughter | 
| 21.8 | 21.8 | 1.8 | 20.0 | 2.5 | 3.9 | 17.5 | 13.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | C.U. v. D.D., 2007 ONCJ 478 (CanLII) | 148 | 
 | $ 148 per month child support, 2 years 2 months retroactive support, mans income 21.8 K | 
| 21.8 | 21.8 | 2.1 | 19.7 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 17.2 | 17.2 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Jackpine v. Gamsby, 2003 CanLII 26235 (ON C.J.) | 178 | 
 | $ 350 per month child support changed to $ 178, mans income is 21.8 K | 
| 22 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 19.6 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 17.1 | 15.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.) | 199 | 
 | $ 199 per month child support, 2 K arrears, variation denied, loses job because FRO takes drivers license, income held imputed at former 22 K | 
| 22 | 20 | 2.3 | 19.7 | 2.5 | 5.7 | 17.2 | 11.5 | 
 | 
 | c | o | H.F. v. P.F., 2007 ONCJ 170 (CanLII) | 188 | 
 | $ 188 per month child support, retoactive arrears 20 K, imputed income to 22 K | 
| 23.6 | 0.0 | 3.8 | 19.2 | 2.9 | 12.0 | 16.3 | 4.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Fournier v. Hynes, 2007 CanLII 2653 (ON S.C.) | 320 | 
 | $ 320 per month child support and $ 100 per month repayment of arrears, man claims to be unemployed but income of 23.6 K imputed | 
| 24 | 24 | 4.2 | 19.8 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 16.8 | 16.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Perkins v. O'Neill, 2005 CanLII 39892 (ON S.C.) | 350 | 
 | $ 350 per month interim child support based on an income of 24 K | 
| 24 | 24 | 2.6 | 21.4 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 18.4 | 18.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | R.P.H. v. V.M., 2003 CanLII 2109 (ON S.C.) | 213 | 
 | $ 213 per month child support based on imputed income of 24 K | 
| 25 | 12 | 5.7 | 19.3 | 3.2 | 43.6 | 16.1 | (26.9) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Courchesne v. Courchesne, 2004 CanLII 5003 (ON S.C.) | 474 | 
 | Man must pay former level of $ 600 per month but now child support is $ 474 and remainder goes to arrears, 77.1 K arrears reduced to 43.6 K, income imputed to 25 K from claimed 12 K | 
| 25 | 25 | 7.9 | 17.1 | 3.2 | 8.5 | 14.1 | 5.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Woodbridge v. Hayes, 2004 ONCJ 168 (CanLII) | 660 | 
 | $ 660 per month child support reduced to $ 360, 8.5 K arrears, mans income 25 K | 
| 26 | 13 | 2.6 | 23.4 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Trafford v. Trafford, 2006 ONCJ 389 (CanLII) 
 | 216 | 
 | $ 216 per month for 1 child based on imputed income of 26 K, man declares 13 K income | 
| 26 | 15 | 6.0 | 20.0 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 16.6 | 16.6 | 
 | 
 | c | s | D.B. v. J.B., 2006 CanLII 726 (ON S.C.) | 500 | 
 | $ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 26 K | 
| 26 | 22 | 4.5 | 21.5 | 3.4 | 14.1 | 18.1 | 4.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | V.C.E. v. C.E.T., 2004 ONCJ 309 (CanLII) | 379 | 
 | $ 379 m per month child support, 3 years 1 month retroactive arrears, man claims 22 K income and is imputed to 26 K | 
| 26.3 | 26.3 | 2.8 | 23.5 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 20.1 | 20.1 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Z.(A.) v. W.(J.), 2004 ONCJ 161 (CanLII) | 235 | 
 | $ 235 per month child support based on an income of 26.3 K | 
| 27 | 0.0 | 4.4 | 22.6 | 3.6 | 22.0 | 19.0 | (3.0) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Lalonde v. Lalonde, 2005 CanLII 16637 (ON S.C.) | 365 | 
 | $ 240 per month child support and $ 125 per month s.7 expenses, 22 K arrears, man claims no income and is imputed to 27 K per year | 
| 27 | 13 | 6.5 | 20.5 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 16.9 | 16.9 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Barbaric v. Nielsen, 2007 CanLII 14320 (ON S.C.) | 543 | 
 | $ 543 per month child support, income imputed to 27 K, 13 K claimed | 
| 27 | 27 | 5.1 | 21.9 | 3.6 | 13.0 | 18.3 | 5.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kampman v. Kampman, 2006 CanLII 38657 (ON S.C.) | 429 | 
 | $ 429 per month child support and 13 K arrears, mans income 27 K. | 
| 28 | 12 | 1.2 | 26.8 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 23.0 | 23.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | O'Neill v. O'Neill, 2004 CanLII 8231 (ON S.C.) | 100 | 
 | $ 100 per month child support, man claims 12 K and is imputed to 28 K | 
| 29 | 29 | 4.3 | 24.7 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 20.7 | 20.7 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Alvarez v. Vargas, 2006 ONCJ 474 (CanLII) 
 | 360 | 
 | $ 258 per month child support and $ 102 per month s.7 expense, man makes 29 K per year | 
| 29 | 29 | 7.3 | 21.7 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Fuller v. Da Ponte, 2005 ONCJ 265 (CanLII) 
 | 607 | 
 | $ 285 per month child support and $ 322 per month s.7 expense, mans income 29 K | 
| 30.0 | 0.0 | 5.4 | 24.6 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 20.4 | 20.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Abdilla v. Abdilla, 2004 CanLII 35086 (ON S.C.) | 446 | 
 | $ 446 child support per month, unemployed and income imputed to 30 K | 
| 30 | 0.0 | 4.8 | 25.2 | 4.2 | 13.8 | 21.0 | 7.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) | 398 | 
 | $ 398 per month child support, contempt penalty 10 K, 15 K security, wife makes false criminal allegations, man claims no income and is imputed to 30 K, 1.75 K retroactive s.7 award, arrears | 
| 30 | 12.6 | 5.4 | 24.6 | 4.2 | 8.4 | 20.4 | 12.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.) | 446 | 
 | $ 446 per month child support, arrears 8.4 K, man claims 12.6 K income and is imputed to 30 K | 
| 30 | 24 | 6.8 | 23.2 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 19.0 | 19.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Murch v. Bell, 2003 CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.) | 440 | 
 | $ 400 per month child support and $ 40 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 30 K | 
| 30 | 30 | 5.4 | 24.6 | 4.2 | 7.7 | 20.2 | 12.5 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kalla v. Kalla, 2003 CanLII 2322 (ON S.C.) | 446 | 
 | $ 834 child support order changed to $ 557 then changed to $ 446, man on disability earns 2.5 K per month, 7.7 arrears | 
| 30 | 30 | 3.1 | 26.9 | 4.2 | 41.0 | 22.7 | (18.3) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kumar v. McKenna (Kumar), 2003 CanLII 2156 (ON S.C.) | 258 | 
 | $ 258 per month child support and 5 K lump sum spousal support award, 80 K arrears reduced to 36 K, man earns 30 K per year and is incapacitated | 
| 30 | 5.0 | 6.8 | 23.2 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 19.0 | 19.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Ike v. Ike, 2005 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) | 568 | 
 | $ 568 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 30 K | 
| 30.3 | 30.3 | 6.3 | 24.0 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 19.8 | 19.8 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Hazel v. Leslie, 2007 ONCJ 543 (CanLII) | 400 | 
 | $ 400 per month child support, s.7 expenses, mans income 30.3 K per year | 
| 32.5 | 32.5 | 3.6 | 28.9 | 4.7 | 1.0 | 24.2 | 23.2 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Ciffolillo v. Nieweglowski, 2007 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) | 298 | 
 | $ 298 per month child support, arrears 1 K, fathers income 32.5 K per year | 
| 32.5 | 32.5 | 3.8 | 28.7 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 24.0 | 24.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Harvey v. Baker, 2007 ONCJ 574 (CanLII) | 320 | 
 | $ 320 per month child support for one child based on income of 32.5 K | 
| 33 | 0.0 | 7.9 | 25.1 | 4.9 | 0.0 | 20.2 | 20.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.) | 663 | 
 | $ 663 per month child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 33 K, mans proceeds from sale of home to be held as security for support | 
| 33 | 0.0 | 7.9 | 25.1 | 4.9 | 0.0 | 20.2 | 20.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 13820 (ON S.C.) | 633 | 
 | $ 633 child support per month intentionally unemployed for going back to school, no variation, 33 K income imputed | 
| 33 | 33 | 7.8 | 25.2 | 4.9 | 55.0 | 20.3 | (35.0) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kauric v. Kauric, 2006 CanLII 21594 (ON S.C.) | 650 | 
 | $ 650 per month child support reduced from $ 1500, 41 K US arrears, mans income 33 K | 
| 33.3 | 33.3 | 7.3 | 26.0 | 4.9 | 3.0 | 21.1 | 18.1 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Yackobeck v. Brazeau, 2002 CanLII 46583 (ON C.J.) | 483 | 
 | $ 483 per month child support and ½ of s.7 expenses, support based on an income of 33.3 K per year, 3k costs | 
| 33.5 | 33.5 | 5.4 | 28.1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 23.1 | 23.1 | 
 | 
 | c | o | S.S. v. M.S. and P.A., 2006 ONCJ 311 (CanLII) 
 | 327 | 
 | $ 327 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man makes 33.5 K income per year | 
| 34 | 20 | 3.6 | 30.4 | 5.1 | 12.0 | 25.3 | 13.3 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Spencer v. Scarlett, 2005 ONCJ 300 (CanLII) | 304 | 
 | $ 304 per month child support, 12 K arrears, imprisoned for default 90 days, man claims 20 K average income but must pay on 34 K income | 
| 34 | 34 | 7.8 | 26.2 | 5.1 | 0.0 | 21.1 | 21.1 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Zoldy v. Zoldy, 2007 ONCJ 24 (CanLII) | 651 | 
 | $ 651 per month for 3 children based on an income of 34 K | 
| 35 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 29.5 | 5.3 | 5.7 | 24.2 | 18.5 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bhullar v. Bhullar, 2005 CanLII 18718 (ON S.C.) | 
 | 
 | Support for 1 child based on an imputed income of 35 K and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrearsman claims no income, previous 5 years income tax average 19 K | 
| 35 | 0.0 | 3.7 | 31.3 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 26.0 | 26.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bowman v. Cheluk, 2003 CanLII 1938 (ON S.C.) | 305 | 
 | $ 305 child support, $ 2500 spousal support paid by wife terminated, man is unemployed but income is imputed to 35 K | 
| 35 | 0.0 | 5.4 | 29.6 | 5.3 | 17.0 | 24.3 | 8.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.) | 448 | 
 | $ 448 per month child support, 17 K arrears, variation denied, man quit job and is unemployed and income imputed at 35 K, 3.5 K costs | 
| 35 | 14.2 | 4.0 | 31.0 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 25.7 | 25.7 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pochodaj v. Pochodaj, 2006 CanLII 13104 (ON S.C.) | 333 | 
 | $333 child support per month based imputed income of 35 K, man declares income of 14.2 K | 
| 35 | 18 | 6.0 | 29.0 | 5.3 | 30.0 | 23.7 | (6.4) | 
 | 
 | c | s | DiMillo v. DiMillo, 2007 CanLII 1340 (ON S.C.) | 504 | 
 | $ 504 K per month child support, 30 K arrears, 18 K income claimed imputed to 35 K, cannot ask for access to child until he pays 15 K | 
| 35 | 18 | 8.2 | 26.8 | 5.3 | 36.0 | 21.5 | (14.5) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Mahoney v. Laderoute, 2007 CanLII 37893 (ON S.C.) | 681 | 
 | $ 681 per month child support, 36 K retroactive arrears, man claims 18 K income and is imputed to 35 K | 
| 35 | 35 | 6.1 | 28.9 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 23.6 | 23.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Kelly v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 242 (CanLII) | 506 | 
 | $ 506 per month child support, mans income 35 K | 
| 35 | 35 | 8.1 | 26.9 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 21.6 | 17.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bell v. Lloyd-Bell, 2005 CanLII 39875 (ON S.C.) | 672 | 
 | $ 672 per month in child support, arrears of $ 4275, mans income 35 K | 
| 35 | 35 | 6.0 | 29.0 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 23.7 | 23.7 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Collis v. Wilson, 2003 CanLII 2413 (ON S.C.) | 375 | 
 | $ 375 per month in child support and s.7 expenses based on income of 35 K | 
| 35 | 35 | 6.3 | 28.7 | 5.3 | 20.0 | 23.4 | 3.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Dang v. Duong, 2006 CanLII 34339 (ON S.C.) | 521 | 
 | $ 521 per month interim child support for 2 children based on 35 K income, wife gets 20 K lump sum support payment | 
| 35 | 35 | 5.8 | 29.2 | 5.3 | 40.6 | 23.9 | (16.7) | 
 | 
 | c | s | K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.) | 481 | 
 | $ 481 per month child support, man must pay on imputed income for 2 ½ years he was in jail, arrears 40.6 K, mans income imputed at 35 K while in jail | 
| 36 | 36 | 8.8 | 27.2 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 21.7 | 21.7 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Lamontagne v. Lamontagne, 2006 ONCJ 498 (CanLII) | 730 | 
 | $ 705 per month child support for 3 children based on income of 36 K, $ 25 per month s.7 expenses, hardship due to second family | 
| 36 | 36 | 9.7 | 26.3 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 20.8 | 20.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Fraser v. McKinlay, 2004 CanLII 5857 (ON S.C.) | 682 | 
 | $ 682 per month child support based on 36 K income, s.7 expenses | 
| 36 | 36 | 5.2 | 30.8 | 5.5 | 11.0 | 25.3 | 14.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | J.J.C. v. K.G.M., 2004 CanLII 10578 (ON S.C.) | 433 | 
 | $ 433 per month child support, mother denies all access and remarries, 80 K arrears cut to 11 K, mans current income 36 K | 
| 37 | 37 | 4.1 | 32.9 | 5.7 | 42.8 | 27.2 | (15.6) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Pisani v. Jackson, 2007 ONCJ 243 (CanLII) | 345 | 
 | $ 345 per month child support on income of 37 K, 42.8 K in arrears | 
| 37 | 37 | 8.4 | 28.6 | 5.7 | 12.0 | 22.9 | 10.9 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Simmons v. Yandt, 2004 CanLII 8101 (ON S.C.) | 698 | 
 | $ 698 per month child support, arrears reduced based on actual income, mans income 37 K | 
| 38 | 38 | 9.5 | 28.5 | 5.9 | 0.0 | 22.6 | 22.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Lewis v. Crearer, 2007 ONCJ 353 (CanLII) | 792 | 
 | $ 502 per month child support and $ 290 per month s.7 expenses, mans income imputed to 38 K | 
| 38 | 38 | 4.0 | 34.0 | 5.9 | 1.0 | 27.9 | 26.9 | 
 | 
 | c | o | T.(P.) v. A.(S.), 2004 ONCJ 295 (CanLII) | 332 | 
 | $ 332 per month child support, retroactive arrears of $ 950, mans income 38 K | 
| 39 | 0.0 | 6.7 | 32.3 | 6.1 | 0.0 | 26.2 | 26.2 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Zagar v. Zagar, 2006 ONCJ 296 (CanLII) | 557 | 
 | $ 557 per month child support, man unemployed and imputed at 39 K | 
| 39 | 24 | 6.7 | 32.3 | 6.1 | 0.0 | 26.2 | 26.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Priftis v. Priftis, 2005 CanLII 47093 (ON S.C.) | 557 | 
 | $ 557 per month child support, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 39 K | 
| 39 | 39 | 6.9 | 32.1 | 6.1 | 40.0 | 26.0 | (14.0) | 
 | 
 | c | s | D'Souza v. D'Souza, 2003 CanLII 1933 (ON S.C.) | 557 | 
 | $ 557 per month interim child support, 40 K arrears based on a 39 K income | 
| 39 | 39 | 7.1 | 31.9 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 25.8 | 19.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Olaveson v. Olaveson, 2007 CanLII 23168 (ON S.C.) | 591 | 
 | $ 591 per month child support based on income of 39 K, 6 K retroactive arrears | 
| 40 | 10 | 6.8 | 33.2 | 6.3 | 13.0 | 26.9 | 13.9 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Dang v. Hornby, 2006 CanLII 12973 (ON S.C.) | 570 | 
 | $ 570 per month child support reduced from $ 762, 13 K arrears, income imputed from 10 K claimed to 40 K | 
| 40 | 12 | 7.2 | 32.8 | 6.3 | 0.0 | 26.5 | 26.5 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Mollica v. Melchionna, 2006 CanLII 41526 (ON S.C.) | 601 | 
 | $ 601 per month child support, man claims 12 K income and is imputed to 40 K | 
| 40 | 26 | 7.0 | 33.0 | 6.3 | 4.8 | 27.0 | 22.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.) | 580 | 
 | $ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K | 
| 40 | 40 | 4.1 | 35.9 | 6.3 | 12.0 | 29.6 | 17.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Baxter v. Beharry, 2006 ONCJ 1 (CanLII) | 345 | 
 | $ 345 per month on 2 child support orders, man is wrongfully imputed to 1 million income, most arrears rescinded as income retroactively varied to closer to 100 K and finally to 40 K per year on both orders. welfare is opposing party | 
| 40 | 40 | 12.3 | 27.7 | 6.3 | 0.0 | 21.4 | 21.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bielak-Montemurro v. Montemurro, 2007 CanLII 2800 (ON S.C.) | 1021 | 
 | $ 771 per month child support and $ 250 per month s.7 expenses based on an income of 40 K | 
| 40 | 40 | 10.2 | 29.8 | 6.3 | 0.0 | 23.5 | 23.5 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Viertelhausen v. Burbridge, 2006 CanLII 5311 (ON S.C.) | 855 | 
 | $ 855 per month child support, man seeks termination and wife seeks retroactive, mans income 40 K | 
| 41 | 27 | 7.8 | 33.2 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 27.6 | 27.6 | 
 | 
 | c | s | V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.) | 650 | 
 | $ 585 per month child support and $ 65 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 27 K income and is imputed to 41 K | 
| 41 | 41 | 7.0 | 34.0 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kocsis v. Kocsis, 2002 CanLII 2716 (ON S.C.) | 583 | 
 | $ 583 per month child support from biological father who earns 41 K per year | 
| 41.6 | 22.3 | 4.5 | 37.1 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 30.4 | 30.4 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Parkes v. Zayachkowski, 2005 ONCJ 106 (CanLII) 
 | 359 | 
 | $ 379 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims 22.3 K income and is imputed to 41.6 K per year | 
| 43 | 
 | 6.0 | 33.0 | 6.9 | 12.0 | 26.1 | 14.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.) | 371 | 
 | $ 600 spousal and $ 750 child changed to $ 1500 child and $ 600 spousal, changed to $ 371 child only, s.7 expenses, Over 80 K arrears rescinded to 12 K, 17.8 K arrears on costs and 12.8 K interest on arrears on costs, interest on costs rescinded, mans income 43 K | 
| 43 | 12 | 9.6 | 33.4 | 6.9 | 12.0 | 26.5 | 14.5 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Lajoie v. Lajoie, 2005 CanLII 23684 (ON S.C.) | 800 | 
 | $ 800 per month child support, 12 K arrears, man claims 12 K income but is imputed to 43 K | 
| 43 | 14 | 8.6 | 34.4 | 6.9 | 5.5 | 27.5 | 22.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Shaw-McInnis v. Crawford, 2003 CanLII 2241 (ON S.C.) | 714 | 
 | $ 714 per month original child support lowered as children reach majority, arrears 5.5 K, mans declared income of 14 K imputed to 43 K and no relief for time on welfare | 
| 43 | 43 | 7.8 | 35.2 | 6.9 | 14.5 | 28.3 | 13.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Man v. Phamisith, 2007 CanLII 46698 (ON S.C.) | 650 | 
 | $ 651 per month child support, $ 1400 lump sum spousal support, 9.1 K retroactive arrears, 4 K costs, mans income 43 K | 
| 43.8 | 43.8 | 4 | 29.5 | 7.1 | 2.2 | 22.4 | 20.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Difede v. Difede, 2007 CanLII 4574 (ON S.C.) | 855 | 
 | $ 855 per month child support, based on an income of 43.8 K per year, s.7 expense and 2.2 retroactive s.7 expense arrears | 
| 44 | 44 | 5.1 | 38.9 | 7.2 | 8.5 | 31.7 | 23.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Hines v. Hines, 2006 CanLII 28737 (ON S.C.) | 423 | 
 | $ 423 per month child support based on 44 K income, 8.5 K lump sum spousal award | 
| 44 | 26 | 17.8 | 26.2 | 7.2 | 0.0 | 19.0 | 19.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Szucs v. Freeman, 2007 ONCJ 96 (CanLII) 
 | 1484 | 
 | $ 1484 per month child support from income imputed at 44 K, man claims income of 26 K | 
| 45 | 26 | 9.1 | 37.4 | 7.4 | 10.1 | 30.0 | 19.9 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Smith v. Addison, 2004 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) | 635 | 
 | $ 635 per month child support and s.7 expenses, 10.1 K arrears, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 45 K per year | 
| 45 | 45 | 4.8 | 40.2 | 7.4 | 0.0 | 32.8 | 32.8 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Malcolm v. Vassell, 2005 ONCJ 77 (CanLII) | 387 | 
 | $ 387 per month child support, no access to child, mans income 45 K | 
| 47 | 12 | 8.0 | 39.0 | 8.9 | 24.0 | 30.1 | 6.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.) | 669 | 
 | $ 669 per month child support, arrears 24 K, man on disability imputed to 47 K per year income | 
| 47 | 47 | 8.5 | 38.5 | 8.9 | 32.0 | 29.6 | (2.4) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Ricafort v. Ricafort, 2006 ONCJ 520 (CanLII) | 710 | 
 | $ 710 per month for 2 children based on 47 K imputed income, 32 K arrears, 60 days in jail for not producing financial documents | 
| 47 | 0.0 | 11.7 | 35.3 | 8.9 | 0.0 | 26.4 | 26.4 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Razavi-Brahimi v. Ershadi, 2007 ONCJ 406 (CanLII) | 975 | 
 | $ 515 per month child support and $ 460 per month s.7 expense, man is unemployed but imputed to 47 K per year income | 
| 47 | 47 | 10.4 | 36.6 | 8.9 | 0.0 | 27.7 | 27.7 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Weening v. Weening, 2004 CanLII 9706 (ON S.C.) | 866 | 
 | $ 866 per month in child support, man makes 47 K per year | 
| 47.1 | 47.1 | 8.0 | 39.1 | 8.9 | 0.0 | 30.2 | 30.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Nowakowski v. Nowakowski, 2003 CanLII 2191 (ON S.C.) | 663 | 
 | $ 663 interim child support, wife gets exclusive possession of home, mans income 47.1 K | 
| 48 | 36 | 5.4 | 42.6 | 11.8 | 3.2 | 30.8 | 27.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | St. Amant (Peddie) v. Walkingshaw, 2006 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) | 448 | 
 | $ 448 per month child support raised frrom $ 89, $ 1750 s.7 lump- sum expense, income imputed fron 36 K claimed to 48 K, 1.4 K retroactive arrears | 
| 49 | 49 | 12.9 | 35.1 | 12.1 | 19.0 | 23.0 | 4.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Caterini v. Zaccaria, 2002 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.) | 1074 | 
 | $ 1074 child support per month, 16 K rescinded from arrears, mans income 49 K | 
| 49.1 | 49.1 | 10.8 | 38.3 | 12.2 | 0.0 | 26.1 | 26.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2004 CanLII 9465 (ON S.C.) | 901 | 
 | $ 901 per month child support for 3 children, mans income 49.1 K | 
| 50 | 10 | 9.0 | 41.0 | 12.5 | 35.0 | 28.5 | (6.5) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.) | 750 | 
 | $ 750 per month child support, spousal support satisfied by 35 K lump sum, man claims income of 10 K and is imputed to 50 K | 
| 50 | 35 | 10.1 | 39.9 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 27.4 | 27.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Tran v. Lee, 2003 CanLII 11863 (ON S.C.) | x | 
 | $ 700 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims income of 35 K but income of 50 K imputed | 
| 50 | 50 | 5.7 | 44.3 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 31.8 | 31.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Reid v. Mulder, 2005 CanLII 38108 (ON S.C.) | 475 | 
 | $ 475 per month child support, support to end when mother moves to Fiji, mans income 50 K and wife is a student who will make 50 K on return to Fiji | 
| 50 | 0.0 | 14.7 | 35.3 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 22.8 | 22.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Azimi v. Mirzaei, 2007 CanLII 16445 (ON S.C.) | 1229 | 
 | $ 429 per month child support and $ 800 s.7 expense, man unemployed is imputed to 50 K income, man is denied spousal support | 
| 50 | 0.0 | 14.4 | 35.6 | 12.5 | 40.0 | 23.1 | (16.9) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Derek Cross v. Lila Cross, 2004 CanLII 13409 (ON S.C.) | 1200 | 
 | $ 700 per month child support and $ 500 per month s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and income imputed to 50 K, 40 K arrears | 
| 50 | 10 | 13.8 | 36.2 | 12.5 | 4.7 | 23.7 | 19.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) | 1152 | 
 | $ 700 per month child support and $ 452 per month s.7 expenses, 2.7 K arrears, 2.2 K retroactive s.7 arrears man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 50 K | 
| 51 | 51 | 8.2 | 42.8 | 12.8 | 12.0 | 30.0 | 18.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Gabriel v. Robinson, 2005 ONCJ 327 (CanLII | 560 | 
 | $ 250 per month child support raised to $ 455, and $ 105 per month s.7 expenses, 12 K retroactive arrears, man earns 51 K per year | 
| 52 | 52 | 5.2 | 46.8 | 13.1 | 12.0 | 33.7 | 21.7 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Anderson v. Hamilton, 2006 ONCJ 110 (CanLII) | 430 | 
 | $ 430 per month child support, arrears, man makes 52 K income per year | 
| 52 | 52 | 10.9 | 41.1 | 13.1 | 6.3 | 28.5 | 22.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Prince v. Prince, 2006 CanLII 27873 (ON S.C.) | 783 | 
 | $ 783 per month child support and s.7 expenses, arrears 6.3 K, mans income 52 K per year | 
| 52.5 | 52.5 | 5.7 | 46.8 | 13.2 | 27.2 | 33.6 | 6.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Ross (Gedcke) v. Gedcke, 2005 CanLII 50881 (ON S.C.) | 477 | 
 | $ 477 child support per month, 27.2 K retroactive arrears, mans income 52.5 K | 
| 53 | 23 | 8.9 | 44.1 | 13.4 | 22.8 | 30.7 | 7.9 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.) | 739 | 
 | $ 739 per month child support, 21 K arrears, $ 1750 K lump sum spousal support award, man claims 23 K income and is imputed to 53 K | 
| 53 | 53 | 5.4 | 47.6 | 13.4 | 5.7 | 34.2 | 28.5 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Heimbecker-Wood v. Campbell, 2004 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) | 450 | 
 | $ 450 per month child support, retroactive arrears of almost 2 years at over twice previously ordered income , man makes 53 K per year | 
| 53 | 53 | 6.0 | 47.0 | 13.4 | 0.0 | 33.6 | 33.6 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Hughes v. Hughes, 2005 CanLII 44395 (ON S.C.) | 500 | 
 | $ 500 per month interim child support based on income of 53 K | 
| 54 | 26.4 | 10.5 | 43.5 | 13.7 | 15.7 | 29.8 | 14.1 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Lee v. Wright, 2007 ONCJ 476 (CanLII) 
 | 750 | 
 | $ 450 per month child support and $ 330 per month s.7 expense, 11.3 K arrears, mans claims 26.4 K income and is imputed to 54 K, 4.4 K costs | 
| 54 | 30 | 11.8 | 42.2 | 13.7 | 0.0 | 28.5 | 28.5 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Schiller v. Schiller, 2007 CanLII 1343 (ON S.C.) | 980 | 
 | $ 980 per month child support based on imputed income of 54 K, man claims income of 30 K | 
| 54 | 54 | 11.7 | 42.3 | 13.7 | 0.0 | 28.6 | 28.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Lee v. Wright, 2007 ONCJ 454 (CanLII) 
 | 852 | 
 | $ 504 per month child support and $ 348 per month s.7 expense based on an income of 54 K | 
| 55 | 36 | 10.7 | 43.3 | 14.0 | 1.0 | 29.3 | 28.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.) | 768 | 
 | $ 768 per month child support and 61 % of s.7 expenses and 1 K in past s.7 expenses, man claims 36 K income and is imputed to 55 K | 
| 55 | 55 | 5.9 | 49.1 | 14.0 | 19.0 | 35.1 | 16.1 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Stiebel v. Stiebel, 2004 ONCJ 425 (CanLII) | 495 | 
 | $ 800 per month child support reduced to $ 495, 19 K arrears to be paid on imputed income, mans income 55 K per year | 
| 56 | 0.0 | 9.3 | 46.7 | 14.4 | 2.0 | 32.3 | 30.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Hirtle v. Earl, 2007 CanLII 20282 (ON S.C.) | 775 | 
 | $ 775 per month child support based on 56 K income, man is unemployed and denied variation, 2 K arrears | 
| 56 | 56 | 9.4 | 46.6 | 14.4 | 27.0 | 32.2 | 5.2 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Garcia-Talavera (Fernandes) v. Fernandes, 2006 ONCJ 27 (CanLII) 
 | 780 | 
 | $ 780 per month for 2 children based on 56 K income, separation agreement overturned and 27 K retroactive award | 
| 56 | 56 | 17.6 | 38.4 | 14.4 | 6.0 | 24.0 | 18.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Facchin v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 33118 (ON S.C.) | 1463 | 
 | $ 648 child support is raised to guidelines cause less than income and unexplained, $ 815 S.7 expense, retroactive award, mans income 56 K, 2 K costs | 
| 57 | 0.0 | 5.8 | 51.2 | 14.6 | 5.7 | 36.6 | 30.9 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Malleye v. Brereton, 2007 ONCJ 216 (CanLII) | 484 | 
 | $ 484 child support not varied or arrears rescinded, man intentionally unemployed and imputed at former 57 K | 
| 58 | 9 | 4.8 | 53.2 | 15.0 | 48.0 | 38.2 | (9.8) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pantchevski v. Pantchevska, 2005 CanLII 7672 (ON S.C.) | 400 | 
 | $ 400 per month child support, 48 K in arrears, man claims 9 K income but is denied variation and must pay at income of 58 K , wife is on social assistance | 
| 58 | 58 | 2.4 | 55.6 | 15.0 | 0.0 | 40.6 | 40.6 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Dent v. Flynn, 2005 CanLII 14317 (ON S.C.) | 200 | 
 | $ 200 per month child support, father has new family with 3 special needs children, man earns 58 K per year | 
| 58 | 58 | 20.3 | 37.7 | 15.0 | 9.0 | 23.7 | 14.7 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Brown v. Rowe, 2007 ONCJ 545 (CanLII) | 1358 | 
 | $ 1358 per month child support based on income of 58 K, s.7 expenses, 9 K arrears | 
| 59 | 59 | 10.3 | 48.7 | 15.3 | 0.0 | 33.4 | 33.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Malka v. Seliktar, 2004 CanLII 34933 (ON S.C.) | 858 | 
 | Guideline support for one child from an income of 59 K, add on payments of $ 379 per month for daycare | 
| 59.4 | 59.4 | 11.2 | 48.2 | 15.5 | 5.1 | 32.7 | 27.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Ferril v. Chen, 2006 ONCJ 301 (CanLII) | 935 | 
 | $ 557 per month child support and $ 378 per month s.7 expense, 5.1 K arrears, mans income 59.4 K per year | 
| 60 | 0.0 | 9.6 | 50.4 | 15.6 | 0.0 | 34.8 | 34.8 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Léveillé v. Lemieux, 2002 CanLII 2694 (ON S.C.) | 530 | 
 | $ 507 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses and 2 1 K airfares per year, man quits job as a teacher and starts a convenience store, claims a 6 K loss and is imputed to 60 K per year | 
| 60 | 60 | 6.1 | 53.9 | 15.6 | 24.3 | 38.3 | 14.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Norman v. Chernev, 2004 ONCJ 385 (CanLII) 
 | 507 | 
 | $ 507 per month child support, man has made no payment and is 4 years in arrears, mans income 60 K per year | 
| 60 | 60 | 6.7 | 53.3 | 15.6 | 0.0 | 39.7 | 39.7 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Perry v. Perry, 2006 ONCJ 387 (CanLII) | 557 | 
 | $ 557 per month child support based on an income of 60 K | 
| 60 | 60 | 7.6 | 52.4 | 15.6 | 45.7 | 36.8 | (8.9) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Plotz v. Boehmer Plotz, 2004 CanLII 5072 (ON S.C.) | 507 | 
 | $ 1700 spousal support and $300 child support varied to $ 507 child support and $ 1 spousal support, arrears fixed at 40 K, retroactive s.7 expenses, mans income 60 K, wife remarries man with 85 K income | 
| 60 | 60 | 6.1 | 53.9 | 15.6 | 2.1 | 38.3 | 36.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Scott v. Jolicoeur, 2005 CanLII 2058 (ON S.C.) | 507 | 
 | $ 507 per month in child support and 2.1 K arrears, guilty of contempt given suspended sentence, mans income 60 K per year | 
| 60.8 | 60.8 | 6.2 | 54.6 | 15.8 | 20.8 | 38.8 | 18.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Balo v. Motlagh (Madsen), 2004 ONCJ 166 (CanLII) | 514 | 
 | $ 514 per month child support, retroactive arrears of 20.8 K, fathers income 60.8 K | 
| 61 | 61 | 10.4 | 50.6 | 15.9 | 4.5 | 34.7 | 30.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Roote v. Thompson, 2005 CanLII 47790 (ON S.C.) | 863 | 
 | $ 863 per month child support based on income of 61 K, 4.5 K retroactive arrears | 
| 62.9 | 62.9 | 16.0 | 44.9 | 16.5 | 1.4 | 28.4 | 27.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Shaw v. Friesen, 2007 CanLII 19796 (ON S.C.) | 1000 | 
 | 1 K per month child support, s.7 expenses, 1.4 K arrears, mans income 69.2 K | 
| 63 | 63 | 17.4 | 45.6 | 16.5 | 71.0 | 29.1 | (41.9) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Huber v. Huber, 2003 CanLII 2134 (ON S.C.) | 1120 | 
 | $1120 per month child support and half s.7 expenses, 71 K retroactive arrears, man makes 63 K per year | 
| 63.2 | 63.2 | 6.4 | 57.0 | 16.6 | 0.0 | 40.4 | 40.4 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Nikita v. Nikita, 2002 CanLII 46584 (ON C.J.) | 531 | 
 | $ 531 per month child support and $ 295 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 63.2 K | 
| 65 | 46 | 5.6 | 59.4 | 17.1 | 10.0 | 42.3 | 32.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Vangroenigen v. Vangroenigen, 2005 CanLII 38896 (ON S.C.) | 466 | 
 | $ 466 per month child support, $ 500 per month spousal support terminated for 10 K lump sum payment, man declares 46 K income but is imputed to 65 K for overtime | 
| 66 | 66 | 8.4 | 57.6 | 17.4 | 0.0 | 40.2 | 40.2 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Whitlock v. Whitlock, 2005 ONCJ 266 (CanLII) | 696 | 
 | $ 696 per month child support, mans income 66 K per year | 
| 66 | 66 | 14.9 | 51.1 | 17.4 | 20.2 | 33.7 | 13.5 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Kent v. Schellenberg, 2005 ONCJ 260 (CanLII) | 908 | 
 | $ 550 per month child support and 4.3 K university expenses, 35 months at $ 500 per month retroactive arrears and 2.7 K for past years s.7 expenses, man earns 66 K per year | 
| 67 | 33 | 7.2 | 59.8 | 17.8 | 11.0 | 42.0 | 31.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Rivard v. Hankiewicz, 2007 ONCJ 180 (CanLII) | 603 | 
 | $ 555 per month child support and $ 53 per month s.7 expenses, 11 K retroactive arrears, man claims 37 K and is grossed up to 67 K | 
| 67 | 67 | 12.6 | 54.4 | 17.8 | 7.9 | 36.6 | 28.7 | 
 | 
 | c | y | Shea v. Fraser, 2007 ONCA 224 (CanLII) | 1048 | 
 | $ 600 per month child support and $ 448 per month s.7 expenses, 7.9 K arrears, man declares bankruptcy, mans income 67 K | 
| 67.3 | 67.3 | 16.0 | 51.3 | 17.9 | 0.0 | 33.4 | 33.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pepin v. Jung, 2003 CanLII 2048 (ON S.C.) | 1330 | 
 | $ 900 per month child support, $ 430 in s.7 expenses per month, mans income 67.3 K per year | 
| 68. | 68 | 13.5 | 54.5 | 18.1 | 0.0 | 36.4 | 36.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Byrne v. Byrne, 2003 CanLII 2073 (ON S.C.) | 1123 | 
 | $ 1123 child support per month, spousal support terminated, mans income 68.4 K per year | 
| 69 | 12 | 14.4 | 54.6 | 18.4 | 14.0 | 36.2 | 22.2 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Alsafouti v. Alsafouti, 2005 CanLII 34576 (ON S.C.) | 1200 | 
 | $ 1200 per month child support, 14 K arrears, man loses job and claims income of 12 K but imputed to 69 K former level, no recession, drivers license removed | 
| 71.3 | 71.3 | 7.9 | 63.4 | 19.1 | 0.0 | 44.3 | 44.3 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Cocirla v. Barbu and Marques, 2006 ONCJ 278 (CanLII) | 656 | 
 | $ 656 per month child support, man has income of 71.3 K | 
| 72 | 14.4 | 7.9 | 64.1 | 19.3 | 7.9 | 44.8 | 36.9 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Pinnock v. McDowell (Clarke), 2007 ONCJ 327 (CanLII) | 661 | 
 | $ 661 per month child support, 3 years retroactive support, man claims 14.4 K and is imputed to 72 K per year income | 
| 72.5 | 0.0 | 
 | 
 | 20.6 | 42.5 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Burisch v. Gosal, 2007 CanLII 2647 (ON S.C.) | 
 | 
 | Support for 1 child at 72.5 K income per year, 42.5 K arrears, imputed at 72.5 K per year while unemployed | 
| 73 | 41 | 7.2 | 65.8 | 20.8 | 0.0 | 45.0 | 45.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Chute v. Chute, 2006 CanLII 1915 (ON S.C.) | 596 | 
 | $ 596 per month in child support, variation denied, spousal support claim pending, man claims 41 K income after bankruptcy and is imputed to 73 K | 
| 75 | 26 | 8.2 | 66.8 | 21.4 | 0.0 | 45.4 | 45.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kowalczyk v. Slavner, 2006 CanLII 40996 (ON S.C.) | 680 | 
 | $ 680 per month interim child support, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 75 K | 
| 75 | 75 | 9.3 | 65.7 | 21.4 | 2.7 | 44.3 | 41.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Lee v. Dunphy, 2006 ONCJ 499 (CanLII) 
 | 778 | 
 | $ 688 per month child support and $ 90 s.7 expenses per month based on an income of 75 K, 2.7 K costs | 
| 75 | 75 | 7.3 | 67.7 | 21.4 | 0.0 | 46.3 | 46.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Nebel v. Robertson, 2003 CanLII 4374 (ON S.C.) | 606 | 
 | $ 606 per month child support changed to guidelines from separation agreement amount of $ 300, mans income 75 K per year | 
| 77 | 34 | 12.0 | 65.0 | 22.1 | 0.0 | 42.9 | 42.9 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Hagner v. Hawkins, 2005 CanLII 43294 (ON S.C.) | 1000 | 
 | $ 1000 per month child support upheld, intentionally unemployed, 34 K income as teacher imputed to 77 K | 
| 77 | 77 | 12.0 | 65.0 | 22.1 | 66.9 | 42.9 | (24.0) | 
 | 
 | c | o | Sodoski v. Dudgeon, 2004 ONCJ 424 (CanLII) | 1000 | 
 | $ 1000 per month child support, 26.9 K arrears, 40 K retroactive s.7 expenses, man makes 77 K | 
| 80 | 35 | 9.1 | 69.9 | 23.1 | 0.0 | 46.6 | 46.6 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Laufer v. Laufer, 2006 CanLII 32997 (ON S.C.) | 719 | 
 | $ 719 per month child support, 83 % s.7 expenses, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 80 K | 
| 80.1 | 76.4 | 12.5 | 67.6 | 23.2 | 0.0 | 44.4 | 44.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Fantin v. Gillingham-Corkun Fantin, 2003 CanLII 2114 (ON S.C.) | 1043 | 
 | $ 639 per month child support and $ 404 s.7 expenses, man claims 76.4 K and is imputed to 80.1 K | 
| 81 | 0.0 | 8.8 | 72.2 | 23.4 | 2.8 | 48.8 | 46.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pysznyj v. Pysznyj, 2007 CanLII 4881 (ON S.C.) | 734 | 
 | $ 734 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, man on unemployment is imputed to 81 K per year. | 
| 81 | 35 | 7.6 | 73.4 | 23.4 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 2366 (ON S.C.) | 643 | 
 | $ 643 per month child support, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 81 K | 
| 81.7 | 81.7 | 16.3 | 65.4 | 25.4 | 22.0 | 40.0 | 18.0 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Sharpley v. Sharpley, 2005 ONCJ 483 (CanLII) | 1360 | 
 | $ 1360 per month child support raised from $ 858 that was based on false income, mans income 81.7 K, 15 K retroactive arrears, 6 K contempt award and 1 K costs | 
| 83 | 83 | 16.7 | 66.3 | 25.8 | 8.2 | 40.2 | 32.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pollen v. Pollen, 2004 CanLII 5073 (ON S.C.) | 1392 | 
 | $1200 and $ 192 retroactive child support for child who is now no longer dependant, 8 K lump sum support, man makes 83 K per year | 
| 83.3 | 83.3 | 15.1 | 68.2 | 25.9 | 0.0 | 42.3 | 42.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Lane v. Lane, 2002 CanLII 2794 (ON S.C.) | 1261 | 
 | $ 918 per month child support and $ 343 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 83.3 K | 
| 85 | 85 | 26.0 | 59.0 | 32.6 | 0.0 | 26.4 | 26.4 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 2003 CanLII 2227 (ON S.C.) | 691 | 
 | $ 691 per month child support for one child and 50 % of the university expenses for the other child, mans income is 85 K | 
| 88 | 30 | 14.7 | 73.3 | 33.9 | 40.0 | 39.4 | (0.6) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) | 894 | 
 | $ 794 per month child support and $ 100 s.7 expense and 54 % of school expenses, man claims 30 K income imputed to 88 K, 40 K arrears | 
| 90 | 13 | 9.7 | 80.3 | 34.7 | 30.0 | 45.6 | 15.6 | 
 | 
 | c | o | Azevedo v. Clements, 2003 CanLII 20711 (ON C.J.) 
 | 806 | 
 | Man must pay $ 806 per month child support and 30 K arrears because he cannot make a 28 K lump sum payment, man claims 13 K income and is imputed to 90 K | 
| 90 | 90 | 18.5 | 71.5 | 34.7 | 9.7 | 36.8 | 27.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Bromley v. Brown, 2005 CanLII 19798 (ON S.C.) | 1209 | 
 | $ 1209 per month child support, s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, mans income 90 K | 
| 96 | 28 | 14.4 | 81.6 | 37.3 | 28.0 | 44.3 | 16.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Di Matteo v. Del Medico, 2005 CanLII 27011 (ON S.C.) | 1200 | 
 | $ 1200 per month child support, income imputed to 96 K from claimed 28 K, retroactive arrears | 
| 99 | 58 | 11.1 | 87.9 | 38.6 | 0.0 | 49.3 | 49.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.) | 927 | 
 | $927 per month child support, mans income imputed from 58 K to 99 K | 
| 100 | 60 | 10.6 | 89.4 | 39.1 | 0.0 | 50.3 | 50.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Clifford v. Heinzl, 2007 CanLII 23335 (ON S.C.) | 877 | 
 | $ 877 per month child support, man claims 60 K income and is imputed to 100 K | 
| 101 | 101 | 10.7 | 90.3 | 39.5 | 9.7 | 58.5 | 49.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Kourany v. Salem, 2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.) | 889 | 
 | $ 889 per month child support, retroactive arrears, mans income 101.6 K per year | 
| 110 | 110 | 18.1 | 91.4 | 44.1 | 0.0 | 47.3 | 47.3 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Sprason v. Murray, 2007 CanLII 26613 (ON S.C.) | 1506 | 
 | $ 959 child support per month and $ 6572 per year s.7 expense, mans income 110 K per year | 
| 132 | 132 | 21.4 | 110.8 | 56.6 | 70.0 | 54.2 | (15.8) | 
 | 
 | c | s | Wilson v. Sinden, 2007 CanLII 47161 (ON S.C.) | 1783 | 
 | $ 1783 per month child support, 70 K in arrears,mans income 132 K per year | 
| 139 | 61 | 25.2 | 113.8 | 59.7 | 0.0 | 54.1 | 54.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Vanderzalm v. Vanderzalm, 2003 CanLII 2356 (ON S.C.) | 2100 | 
 | $1500 spousal support and $ 2100 child support changed to $ 2100 child support, man claims income of 61 K but must pay on an income of 139 K per year | 
| 250 | 250 | 12.0 | 238.0 | 111.4 | 0.0 | 126.6 | 126.6 | 
 | 
 | c | y | Tierney-Hynes v. Hynes, 2005 CanLII 35770 (ON C.A.) | 1000 | 
 | Originally $ 1500 child support and $ 300 spousal support, varied in Manitoba to 1 K child support, appeal of dismissal of spousal support allowed, man makes 250 K per year | 
| 2000 | 2000 | 181.2 | 1818.8 | 928.0 | 0.0 | 890.0 | 890.0 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Pakka v. Nygard, 2004 CanLII 5071 (ON S.C.) | 15100 | 
 | 15.1 K per month child support, mans income 2000 K per year | 
| 76 | 76 | 24.5 | 51.5 | 21.8 | 0.0 | 29.7 | 29.7 | 0.0 | 
 | c | s | Tustian v. Dancey, 2004 CanLII 48179 (ON S.C.) | 1922 | 
 | $ 1922 per month child support including $ 300 s.7 expenses, must pay $ 111 per month for insurance covering children too, support obligations for a second divorce and 2 kids with present partner, man earns 76 K, wife is remarried and new husband earns 160 K and supports her | 
| 114 | 114 | 39.6 | 74.4 | 45.1 | 79.0 | 29.3 | (49.7) | 0.0 | 
 | c | s | Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 41003 (ON S.C.) | 3300 | 
 | 1.8 K per month indexed child support, 1.5 K per month s.7 expenses, 79 K arrears, variation denied, man makes 114 K per year and wife is unemployed | 
| 250 | 64 | 48.9 | 201.1 | 111.4 | 22.0 | 89.7 | 67.7 | 0.0 | 
 | c | s | Bruzas v. Bruzas, 2005 CanLII 36267 (ON S.C.) | 3400 | 
 | 3.4 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, reteroactive arrears, man claims 64 K income and is imputed to 250 K | 
| 502 | 502 | 180.0 | 322.0 | 228.3 | 12.0 | 93.7 | 81.7 | 0.0 | 
 | c | s | V.A.W. v. R.C.L., 2004 CanLII 7043 (ON S.C.) | 15000 | 
 | 15 K per month ongoing child support, 12 K retroactive arrears, man makes over 500 K and wife is unemployed | 
| 811 | 766 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 0.0 | 
 | c | s | K.C. v. S.B., 2007 CanLII 17035 (ON S.C.) | 
 | 
 | Support set on 811 K income for 1 child and at least $ 1.3 K per month s.7 expenses, 51 K s.7 expenses arrears, retoractive support and arrears, income imputed 45 K above declared | 
| 54 | 54 | 11.8 | 42.2 | 13.7 | 4.0 | 28.5 | 24.5 | 2.7 | 
 | c | s | MacLeod v. MacLeod, 2003 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) | 982 | 
 | $ 982 per month child support, spousal support of $ 1500 per month set aside, wife may make a new application for spousal support, mans income 54 K, wife claims 2.7 K income per year, retroactive arrears | 
| 41.9 | 41.9 | 15.5 | 25.4 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 18.7 | 18.7 | 3.3 | 
 | c | s | Kingsley v. Kingsley, 2006 CanLII 19038 (ON S.C.) | 960 | 
 | $ 1200 per month child support varied to $ 960, s.7 expenses, mans income 41.9 K and wifes income 3.3 K per year | 
| 20.8 | 20.8 | 1.2 | 19.6 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 17.3 | 16.4 | 4.8 | 
 | c | o | D.H. v. C.B., 2006 ONCJ 521 (CanLII) 
 | 100 | 
 | $ 100 per month child support as guidelines would be undue hardship, 7 ½ year retroactive claim rejected and $ 900 retroactive order made, mans income 20.8 K and wifes income 4.8 K per year. | 
| 84 | 75 | 12.5 | 71.5 | 29.2 | 0.0 | 42.3 | 42.3 | 7.3 | 
 | c | s | Boissy v. Boissy, 2004 CanLII 7047 (ON S.C.) | 1043 | 
 | $ 1043 per month interim child support, man claims average income of 75 K and is imputed to 84 K due to non taxable non cash benefits, wifes income before support 7.3 K, husband declares bankruptcy | 
| 31.2 | 31.2 | 3.4 | 27.8 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 23.3 | 23.3 | 8.6 | 
 | c | o | Pollard v. Deale, 2003 CanLII 27021 (ON C.J.).. | 281 | 
 | $ 281 per month child support based on an income of 31.2 K, wife makes 8.6 K per year | 
| 30 | 30 | 5.4 | 24.6 | 4.2 | 12.0 | 20.4 | 8.4 | 10 | 
 | c | s | Tyll v. Dini-Tyll, 2003 CanLII 2262 (ON S.C.) | 446 | 
 | $ 446 per month child support, arrears, income imputed to 30 K, wife makes 10 K per year | 
| 38 | 38 | 5.0 | 33.0 | 5.9 | 3.2 | 27.1 | 23.9 | 10 | 
 | c | o | Jepson v. Cresnjovec, 2007 ONCJ 466 (CanLII) | 415 | 
 | $ 415 per month child support, 3.2 K retroactive lump sum, mans income 38 K wifes average income 10 K | 
| 18.7 | 18.7 | 5.6 | 13.1 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 11 | 
 | c | o | Paszkiewicz v. Paszkiewicz, 2006 ONCJ 476 (CanLII) | 463 | 
 | $ 463 per month child support for 2 children, man makes 18.7 K and wife makes 11 K | 
| 40 | 40 | 7.7 | 32.3 | 6.3 | 12.0 | 26.0 | 14.0 | 12 | 
 | c | s | Berzins v. Straughan, 2002 CanLII 2695 (ON S.C.) | 645 | 
 | $ 345 per month in child support and $ 300 in s.7 expenses, arrears, restraining order, mans income 40 K wifes 12 K | 
| 45.4 | 45.4 | 7.7 | 37.7 | 7.5 | 2.2 | 30.2 | 28.0 | 12 | 
 | c | o | Kocko v. Kocko, 2004 CanLII 12571 (ON C.J.) | 641 | 
 | $ 391 per month child support changed from temporary order of $ 920 per month, $ 250 per month s.7 expense based on an income of 45.4 K, wifes income 12 K per year, 2.2 K retroactive s.7 expense | 
| 50 | 50 | 8.4 | 41.6 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 29.1 | 29.1 | 12 | 
 | c | s | Santos v. Santos, 2006 CanLII 21793 (ON S.C.) | 700 | 
 | $ 400 per month child support and $ 300 per month contribution to RESP and pays mortgage and insurance, man makes 50 K and wife makes 12 K per year | 
| 42 | 42 | 4.6 | 37.4 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 30.7 | 30.7 | 13 | 
 | c | o | Buckner v. Card, 2007 ONCJ 51 (CanLII) 
 | 386 | 
 | $ 386 per month child support, wife and child live in Alberta, man has 42 K income wife makes 13 K per year | 
| 27.9 | 27.9 | 4.2 | 23.7 | 3.8 | 12.0 | 19.9 | 7.9 | 15 | 
 | c | o | K.E.A. v. D.M.J.1, 2007 ONCJ 165 (CanLII) | 350 | 
 | $ 180 per month child support. Undue hardship due to second family, arrears, mans income 27.9 K and wifes income 15 K | 
| 35.8 | 25 | 9.6 | 26.2 | 5.4 | 0.0 | 20.8 | 20.8 | 15 | 
 | c | o | Terry v. Clarke, 2006 ONCJ 496 (CanLII) | 800 | 
 | $ 516 per month child support, $ 283 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 25 K and is imputed to 35.8 K per year income, wife makes 15 K | 
| 15.6 | 8.5 | 3.0 | 12.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 12.6 | 12.6 | 16 | 
 | c | o | Faragova v. Farag, 2007 ONCJ 73 (CanLII) 
 | 248 | 
 | $ 248 per month child support, man claims 8.5 K per year income and is imputed to 15.6 K, wife makes 16 K per year | 
| 51 | 0.0 | 8.6 | 42.4 | 12.8 | 11.5 | 29.6 | 18.1 | 16 | 
 | c | s | P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.) | 713 | 
 | $ 713 per month child support, retroactive arrears of 11.5 K, man claims no income and is imputed to 51 K, wife makes 16 K per year | 
| 66 | 66 | 14.2 | 51.8 | 17.4 | 0.0 | 34.4 | 34.4 | 17 | 
 | c | s | Levesque v. Levesque, 2003 CanLII 2166 (ON S.C.) | 1183 | 
 | $ 844 child support per month and $ 343 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 66 K and wifes income 17 K per year before support | 
| 105 | 105 | 15.0 | 89.0 | 41.2 | 0.0 | 47.8 | 47.8 | 18 | 
 | c | s | Potyrala v. Potyrala, 2007 CanLII 43499 (ON S.C.) | 916 | 
 | $ 916 per month interim child support, retroactivity to be decided at trial, 85 % s.7 expenses, mans income 105 K wifes income 18 K | 
| 47 | 47 | 5.0 | 42.0 | 8.9 | 6.8 | 33.1 | 26.3 | 18.3 | 
 | c | s | Paul v. Misselbrook, 2006 CanLII 13553 (ON S.C.) | 414 | 
 | $ 414 per month child support, 6.8 K retroactive award, mans income 47 K and wife earns 18.3 K | 
| 25 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 22.3 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 19.1 | 19.1 | 19 | 
 | c | s | Clewlow v. Clewlow, 2004 CanLII 7355 (ON S.C.) | 222 | 
 | $ 222 child support and $ 140 spousal support based on imputed income of 25 K, man laid off and gets some work as a handiman, wife earns 19 K | 
| 46.5 | 46.5 | 5.4 | 41.1 | 8.8 | 19.0 | 32.3 | 13.3 | 19 | 
 | c | s | Glomba v. Wray, 2003 CanLII 1960 (ON S.C.) | 466 | 
 | $ 400 child support and $ 66 daycare expense, mans income 46.5 K and wife earns 19 K, arrears | 
| 100 | 82 | 9.3 | 90.7 | 39.1 | 7.0 | 51.6 | 44.6 | 20 | 
 | c | s | Sanders v. Sanders, 2003 CanLII 2347 (ON S.C.) | 773 | 
 | $773 child support and s.7 daycare expenses, $ 850 interim spousal support terminated, claim for unequal division rejected, man claims 82 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife has 20 K income, 7 K costs | 
| 120 | 115 | 6.0 | 114.0 | 47.8 | 0.0 | 66.2 | 66.2 | 21 | 
 | c | s | Duggan v. Elson, 2007 CanLII 45910 (ON S.C.) | 500 | 
 | $ 500 per month interim spousal support, man claims 115 K and is imputed to 120 K, wife has 21 K income per year | 
| 85 | 65 | 24.7 | 60.3 | 32.6 | 9.7 | 27.7 | 18.0 | 21.6 | 
 | c | s | Colafranceschi v. Colafranceschi, 2005 CanLII 10646 (ON S.C.) | 1380 | 
 | 1.2 K child support and $ 180 per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man claims income of 65 K and is imputed to 85 K, wife has income of 21.6 K | 
| 56 | 40 | 9.3 | 46.7 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 32.4 | 32.4 | 22.0 | 
 | c | s | Barta v. Barta, 2005 CanLII 468 (ON S.C.) | 775 | 
 | $ 775 child support, 2.9 K arrears expunged, man claims income of 40 K imputed to 56 K, wife earns 22 K per year | 
| 59 | 59 | 9.6 | 39.4 | 15.3 | 8.0 | 24.1 | 16.1 | 22.0 | 
 | c | s | Roy v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 18693 (ON S.C.) | 800 | 
 | $ 800 per month child support to be reduced to $ 509, father must pay 8 K of university expenses, fathers income 59 K and mothers income 22 K | 
| 46 | 34 | 5.4 | 40.6 | 8.7 | 4.0 | 27.9 | 23.9 | 23 | 
 | c | o | McClymonth v. Wray, 2001 CanLII 26483 (ON C.J.) | 446 | 
 | $ 401 per month child support, man claims income of 34 K and is imputed to 46 K, wife has income of 23 K, 4 K costs | 
| 43.7 | 43.7 | 7.4 | 36.3 | 7.1 | 9.3 | 29.0 | 19.7 | 23.7 | 
 | c | s | Ricketts v. Thomas, 2004 CanLII 12990 (ON S.C.) | 619 | 
 | $ 619 per month child support, no order for spousal support, 9.3 retroactive arrears with some due to Ont Works, mans income 43.7 K and wifes is 23.7 K | 
| 50.8 | 50.8 | 5.3 | 45.5 | 12.7 | 7.0 | 32.8 | 25.8 | 24 | 
 | c | s | Cook v. Ryder, 2003 CanLII 2085 (ON S.C.) 
 | 438 | 
 | $ 216 per month child support and $ 222 per month s.7 expense, 7 K retroactive arrears, mans income 50.8 K per year and wife has income of 24 K | 
| 55 | 55 | 9.0 | 46.0 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 32.0 | 32.0 | 24 | 
 | c | s | McCarthy v. McCarthy, 2006 CanLII 19439 (ON S.C.) | 750 | 
 | $ 750 per month child support, man makes 55 K and wife makes 24 K per year | 
| 64 | 64 | 10.8 | 53.2 | 16.8 | 190.0 | 36.4 | (153.6) | 24 | 
 | c | s | Malerba v. Malerba, 2004 CanLII 34791 (ON S.C.) | 900 | 
 | $ 900 per month child support and 180 K lump sum to be taken from pension after man has declared bankruptcy, 10 K costs, 180 K spousal support lump sum, man makes 64 K and wife makes 24 K | 
| 200 | 134 | 19.7 | 180.3 | 88.2 | 26.8 | 92.1 | 65.3 | 24 | 
 | c | o | A.(L.C.) v. A.(R.J.), 2003 CanLII 52484 (ON C.J.) | 1308 | 
 | $ 1308 per month child support, 86 % s.7 expenses, arrears 26.8 K, father claims 134 K income and is imputed to 200 K, mother makes 24 K, | 
| 55 | 55 | 7.6 | 47.4 | 14.0 | 2.9 | 33.4 | 30.5 | 26 | 
 | c | s | Montemurro v. Shavalier, 2003 CanLII 1976 (ON S.C.) | 635 | 
 | $ 468 child support for remaining dependant, must pay 2 K directly to older daughter, 2.9 K arrears, man makes 55 K and wife makes 26 K per year | 
| 60 | 60 | 6.0 | 54.0 | 15.6 | 0.0 | 38.4 | 38.4 | 26 | 
 | c | s | Lee v. Lee, 2006 CanLII 5612 (ON S.C.) | 500 | 
 | $ 500 child support, $ 500 spousal, child support ended, man makes 60 K and wife makes 26 K | 
| 72 | 72 | 9.6 | 62.4 | 19.3 | 28.7 | 43.1 | 14.4 | 26 | 
 | c | s | Mendler v. Mendler, 2006 CanLII 6693 (ON S.C.) | 800 | 
 | $ 800 per month child support, retroactive 23 K lump sum award, retroactive arrears, mans income 72 K and wifes income 26 K | 
| 275 | 275 | 24.8 | 250.2 | 123.0 | 24.0 | 127.0 | 103.0 | 26 | 
 | c | s | Cowie v. Makin, 2004 CanLII 5762 (ON S.C.) | 2065 | 
 | $ 2065 per month in child support, 24 K arrears set against equalization, mans income 275 K and wifes income changed from 110 K to 26 K per year | 
| 33 | 33 | 3.5 | 29.5 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 24.7 | 24.7 | 28 | 
 | c | o | Duguay v. Duguay, 2005 ONCJ 269 (CanLII) | 294 | 
 | $ 294 per month child support based on an income of 33 K, wife makes 28 K | 
| 53.4 | 53.4 | 5.9 | 47.5 | 13.5 | 1.4 | 34.0 | 32.6 | 28 | 
 | c | s | Paulson v. Lamarre, 2006 CanLII 42380 (ON S.C.) | 494 | 
 | $ 494 per month child support, arrears 1.4 K, mans income 53.4 K and wifes income 28 K | 
| 35 | 35 | 10.7 | 24.3 | 5.3 | 2.5 | 19.0 | 16.5 | 29.1 | 
 | c | s | McLean v. Rice, 2005 CanLII 3470 (ON S.C.) | 893 | 
 | Total child support payments $ 893 per month including $ 275 s.7 expense, 2.5 K retroactive arrears, man makes 36 K wife makes 29.1 K per year | 
| 28 | 28 | 9.5 | 18.5 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 14.7 | 11.7 | 30 | 
 | c | s | Simpson v. Simpson, 2004 CanLII 14116 (ON S.C.) | 789 | 
 | $ 525 child support and $ 250 spousal support reduced to $ 689 child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expense. Arrears reduced to 3 K, man earns 28 K wife earns 30 K per year | 
| 48 | 0.0 | 5.7 | 42.3 | 11.8 | 14.0 | 30.5 | 16.5 | 30 | 
 | c | s | Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.) | 474 | 
 | $ 762 per month child support lowered to $ 474, arrears 14 K, 25 K security deposit ordered, man unemployed is imputed to 48 K income, wife earns 30 K per year | 
| 58 | 58 | 7.5 | 50.5 | 14.9 | 18.2 | 36.5 | 18.3 | 30 | 
 | c | s | L.K. v. G.K., 2007 CanLII 9612 (ON S.C.) | 496 | 
 | $ 496 per month child support, s.7 expenses, change of residence of child to mother, father owes 18.2 K retroactive arrears, mans income 58 K and womans income 30 K | 
| 5000 | 5000 | 228.0 | 4772.0 | 2315.8 | 0.0 | 2456.2 | 2456.2 | 30 | 
 | c | s | Quinn v. Keiper, 2005 CanLII 43685 (ON S.C.) | 19000 | 
 | 10 million equalization, 5 K per month child support, father pays between 10 and 18.5 K per month s.7 expenses, man makes 5000 K and wife makes 30 K per year | 
| 179 | 179 | 19.6 | 159.4 | 78.4 | 25.0 | 81.0 | 56.0 | 30.3 | 
 | c | s | Wentsell v. Schumacher, 2004 CanLII 15668 (ON S.C.) | 1300 | 
 | 1.3 K per month child support, 87 % of s.7 expenses, 25 K, arrears, fathers income 179 K and mothers income 30.3 K per year | 
| 39 | 39 | 8.9 | 30.1 | 6.1 | 5.7 | 24.0 | 18.3 | 30.5 | 
 | c | s | Taillon v. Taillon, 2005 CanLII 8688 (ON S.C.) 
 | 740 | 
 | $ 740 per month child support, retroactive arrears of support to be paid as a lump sum, refused set off with 37 % of time, man earns 39 K wife earns 30.5 K | 
| 44.7 | 44.7 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 30.5 | 
 | c | s | Sills v. Sills, 2002 CanLII 2705 (ON S.C.) | 
 | 
 | Guideline support for 3 children and an unspecified portion of s.7 expenses, father earns 44.7 K and mother earns 30.5 K per year | 
| 49.5 | 49.5 | 7.8 | 41.7 | 12.3 | 0.0 | 29.4 | 29.4 | 31 | 
 | c | s | Simmonds v. Simmonds, 2007 CanLII 8007 (ON S.C.) | 650 | 
 | $ 450 per month and $ 200 per month in s.7 expenses, father earns 49.5 K and mother earns 31 K | 
| 138 | 138 | 23.7 | 114.3 | 59.4 | 0.0 | 54.9 | 54.9 | 31 | 
 | c | s | McCrea v. McCrea, 2005 CanLII 378 (ON S.C.) | 1640 | 
 | $ 1640 per month child support reduced from $ 2850, s.7 expenses, father has 138 K income and mother has 31 K income | 
| 66.3 | 66.3 | 11.9 | 54.4 | 17.5 | 4.9 | 36.5 | 31.6 | 32 | 
 | c | s | Davies v. Davies, 2007 CanLII 2365 (ON S.C.) | 992 | 
 | $ 992 per month child support, husband makes $ 1400 per month mortgage payments too, mans income 66.3 K and wifes income 32 K per year | 
| 1624 | 0.0 | 121.2 | 1502.8 | 749.1 | 22.0 | 753.7 | 731.7 | 33.7 | 
 | c | s | De Zen v. De Zen, 2002 CanLII 45410 (ON S.C.) | 10100 | 
 | 10.1 K per month child support retroactive, 4.9 K per month s.7 expenses, man quits job and court imputes income of 1.9 million to him, wife makes 33.7 K per year | 
| 49 | 49 | 11.2 | 37.8 | 12.1 | 2.0 | 25.7 | 23.7 | 34.0 | 
 | c | s | B. P. v. T.-L. P., 2003 CanLII 2446 (ON S.C.) | 806 | 
 | $ 683 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses, father earns 49 K mother earns 34 K, costs 2 K | 
| 65 | 65 | 14.2 | 50.8 | 17.1 | 0.0 | 33.7 | 33.7 | 35.0 | 
 | c | s | Jones v. Murray, 2005 CanLII 23318 (ON S.C.) | 1182 | 
 | $ 2260 per month child support reduced to $ 1182 by separation agreement, man makes 65 K and wife makes 35 K per year | 
| 116 | 25 | 14.6 | 101.4 | 46.0 | 21.1 | 55.4 | 34.3 | 35.0 | 
 | c | o | Ciolfe (Caravatta) v. Ciolfe, 2006 ONCJ 118 (CanLII) | 880 | 
 | $ 880 per month child support and 86 % of s.7 expenses, 2 years retroactive arrears, man claims 25 K income and is imputed to 116 K, wifes income 35 K, 5 K costs | 
| 40 | 40 | 3.9 | 36.1 | 6.3 | 5.7 | 29.8 | 24.1 | 35.6 | 
 | c | o | Cook v. Cleverdon, 2005 ONCJ 262 (CanLII) | 325 | 
 | $ 325 per month child support, retroactive arrears, father pays $ 300 in support for other children from other marriages also, mothers income 35.6 K and fathers income 40 K | 
| 23.5 | 23.5 | 5.2 | 18.3 | 2.8 | 5.7 | 15.5 | 9.8 | 35.9 | 
 | c | s | Zeray v. Khassay, 2007 CanLII 38404 (ON S.C.) 
 | 435 | 
 | $ 335 per month child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man has income of 23.5 K per year and wife earns 35.9 K | 
| 45.0 | 45 | 9.3 | 35.7 | 7.4 | 0.0 | 28.3 | 28.3 | 36.0 | 
 | c | s | A.P. v. G.P., 2006 CanLII 9976 (ON S.C.) | 775 | 
 | $ 635 per month child support and $ 140 s.7 expenses, mans income 45 K per year and wifes income is 36 K per year | 
| 43.9 | 43.9 | 10.1 | 33.8 | 7.1 | 16.9 | 26.7 | 9.8 | 37.4 | 
 | c | s | Simmons v. Simmons, 2007 CanLII 40221 (ON S.C.) | 843 | 
 | $ 763 per month child support plus $ 80 per month s.7 expenses, 3.2 K retroactive arrears and 10.4 K arrears, mans income 43.9 K and wifes income 37.4 K per year, 3.3 K costs | 
| 46 | 46 | 10.6 | 35.4 | 8.7 | 6.5 | 26.7 | 20.2 | 37.6 | 
 | c | s | Cava v. Cava, 2005 CanLII 19815 (ON S.C.) | 760 | 
 | $ 660 for both children and 1.2 K per year s.7 expense and $ 859 retroactive s.7 expense, arrears, retroactive monthly award, mans income 46 K and wifes income 37.6 K per year | 
| 28 | 23 | 3.0 | 25.0 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 21.2 | 21.2 | 37.9 | 
 | c | o | Jaworski v. Jaworski, 2004 CanLII 7695 (ON C.J.) | 250 | 
 | $ 250 per month child support and $ 130 per month s.7 expense retroactive, man claims income of 23 K and is imputed to 28 K, wife has income of 37.9 K | 
| 70 | 18.5 | 9.2 | 60.8 | 18.7 | 0.0 | 42.1 | 42.1 | 38 | 
 | c | o | Urban v. Warner, 2005 ONCJ 330 (CanLII) | 766 | 
 | $ 586 per month child support and 60 % of 300 per month s.7 expense, man claims income of 18.5 K and is imputed to 70 K, wife makes 38 K | 
| 94 | 94 | 12.0 | 82.0 | 36.5 | 0.0 | 45.5 | 45.5 | 38.2 | 
 | c | s | Murphy v. Murphy, 2003 CanLII 2187 (ON S.C.) 
 | 998 | 
 | $ 998 total child support per month including $ 277 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 94 K and wifes income 38.2 K per year | 
| 154 | 154 | 63.3 | 90.1 | 66.8 | 40.0 | 23.3 | (16.7) | 38.5 | 
 | c | s | D.F. v. J.S., 2004 CanLII 8474 (ON S.C.) | 4600 | 
 | 4.6 K per month child support including 75 % s.7 expenses, 40 K retroactive s.7 arrears, man makes 154 K per year and wife makes 38.5 K | 
| 138 | 138 | 24.0 | 114.0 | 59.4 | 40.0 | 54.6 | 14.6 | 39.0 | 
 | c | s | Bond v. Bond, 2007 CanLII 41898 (ON S.C.D.C.) | 2000 | 
 | 2 K per month for 2 children, retroactive child support of 40 K, mans income 138 K per year and wifes income 39 K per year | 
| 22 | 11 | 9.2 | 12.8 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 10.3 | 10.3 | 39.4 | 
 | c | s | Bonair v. Bonair, 2007 CanLII 28322 (ON S.C.) | 770 | 
 | $ 770 per month for 2 children, man claims income of 11 K and is imputed to 22 K, wifes income is 39.4 K per year | 
| 31.9 | 31.9 | 7.2 | 24.7 | 4.6 | 19.0 | 20.1 | 1.1 | 39.6 | 
 | c | o | Ramrud v. Lutchman, 2006 ONCJ 501 (CanLII) | 478 | 
 | $ 476 per month and 45 % of s.7 expenses based on mans income of 31.9 K, wifes income is 39.6 K, 19 K arrears | 
| 77 | 77 | 19.9 | 57.1 | 22.1 | 0.0 | 35.0 | 35.0 | 40 | 
 | c | s | A.J.K. v. S.L.M., 2003 CanLII 1969 (ON S.C.) | 1659 | 
 | $ 1001 per month child support and special expenses up to $ 658 per month, husband earns 77 K per year and wife earns 40 K per year | 
| 175 | 20 | 12.1 | 162.9 | 76.6 | 59.0 | 86.3 | 27.3 | 40 | 
 | c | y | Pirner v. Pirner, 2005 CanLII 44166 (ON C.A.) | 1010 | 
 | $ 4400 per month child support changed to $ 2023 then changed to $ 1010, 59 K arrears, man claims 20 K income and is imputed to 175 K, wife has 40 K income | 
| 777 | 777 | 107.7 | 669.3 | 356.0 | 0.0 | 313.3 | 313.4 | 40 | 
 | c | s | Bladwin v. Funston, 2004 CanLII 878 (ON S.C.) | 8300 | 
 | 8.3 K per month child support and 95 % of s.7 expenses | 
| 221 | 221 | 47.4 | 173.6 | 97.9 | (16.3) | 75.7 | 92.0 | 41.9 | 
 | c | s | Zimmerman v. Doe, 2007 CanLII 28755 (ON S.C.) | 3977 | 
 | $ 2500 per month child support and s.7 expenses of $ 1477 per month and reimbursement for 16.3 K prior s.7 expenses, man makes 221 K per year and wife makes 41.9 K | 
| 37 | 22 | 9.8 | 27.2 | 5.7 | 0.0 | 21.5 | 21.5 | 42 | 
 | c | s | Hakim-Kyei v. Kyei, 2005 CanLII 34581 (ON S.C.) | 820 | 
 | $ 535 in child support and $ 285 in s.7 expenses, mans income imputed from 22 K claimed to 37 K, wife earns 42 K per year | 
| 56 | 56 | 8.8 | 47.2 | 14.3 | (6.4) | 32.9 | 39.3 | 42 | 
 | c | s | Scodras v. Scodras, 2005 CanLII 14146 (ON S.C.) | 731 | 
 | $ 731 per month child support, overpayment of 6.4 K, mans income is 56 K and wifes income is 42 K per year | 
| 127 | 127 | 22.8 | 104.2 | 50.8 | 11.7 | 53.4 | 41.7 | 43.8 | 
 | c | s | Wilson v. Desrochers, 2006 CanLII 23947 (ON S.C.) | 1897 | 
 | $ 1721 per month child support, $ 176 s.7 expense per month and 2 K retroactive award, retroactive arrears, fathers income 126.6 K mothers income 43.8 K per year | 
| 42 | 42 | 4.9 | 37.1 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 30.4 | 30.4 | 46 | 
 | c | s | Kimmerly v. Parks, 2005 CanLII 40368 (ON S.C.) | 410 | 
 | $ 410 total child support per month, 9 K arrears to be paid $ 100 per month, $ 48 per month s.7 expenses retroactive, mans income 42 K and wife earns 46 K per year, | 
| 100 | 100 | 27.0 | 73.0 | 39.1 | 0.0 | 33.9 | 33.9 | 46.1 | 
 | c | s | Johnson v. Castellano, 2006 CanLII 34434 (ON S.C.) | 2250 | 
 | $ 1825 per month child support and $ 425 per month s.7 expenses, man is given support reduction for lower earnings due to depression but must now assume former income, wife makes 46.1 K per year | 
| 161 | 117 | 24.2 | 136.8 | 70.1 | 70.0 | 65.3 | (47.0) | 46.3 | 
 | c | s | Miner v. Miner, 2004 CanLII 5064 (ON S.C.) | 2020 | 
 | $ 2020 per month child support, 70 K lump sum spousal support, man makes 161 K and wife makes 46.3 K per year, man must continue to pay on separation agreement despite claiming lower 117 K income | 
| 50 | 50 | 12.0 | 38.0 | 12.5 | 30.0 | 25.5 | (4.5) | 47 | 
 | c | s | Perry v. Perry, 2007 CanLII 20982 (ON S.C.) | 1003 | 
 | $ 753 per month child support and 3 K per year s.7 expenses, 19 K arrears, mans income 50 K, wife earns 47 K per year, 11 K costs | 
| 89 | 89 | 16.8 | 72.2 | 34.3 | 18.0 | 37.9 | 19.9 | 47.9 | 
 | c | s | Clarke v. Clarke, 2007 CanLII 50596 (ON S.C.) | 1063 | 
 | $ 1063 per month child support, s.7 expenses, 18 K arrears, man makes 89 K and wife makes 47.9 K | 
| 60.6 | 0.0 | 11.5 | 49.1 | 15.8 | 2.8 | 33.3 | 30.5 | 48.8 | 
 | c | s | Tughan v. Tughan, 2003 CanLII 2355 (ON S.C.) | 830 | 
 | $ 830 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, 55 % s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and incomeis imputed to 60.6 K, wifes income is 48.8 K per year | 
| 53.5 | 53.5 | 7.0 | 46.5 | 13.6 | 5.7 | 32.9 | 27.2 | 49 | 
 | c | s | Trevisanutto v. Crnkovic, 2005 CanLII 19789 (ON S.C.) | 580 | 
 | $ 580 per month child support plus retroactive arrears of 5.7 K, fathers income 53.5 K and mothers income 49 K | 
| 80 | 80 | 18.9 | 61.1 | 21.8 | 25.0 | 39.3 | 14.3 | 49 | 
 | c | s | Zlatar v. Hartwick, 2007 CanLII 22344 (ON S.C.) | 1241 | 
 | $ 908 per month child support, 4 K per year s.7 expenses, 25 K retroactive arrears, man makes 80 K and wife makes 49 K per year. | 
| 40 | 20 | 8.8 | 31.2 | 6.3 | 9.6 | 24.9 | 15.3 | 50 | 
 | c | o | Deane v. Riar-Deane, 2007 ONCJ 427 (CanLII) 
 | 737 | 
 | $ 367 per month child support, $ 365 per month s.7 expense, 7.3 K retroactive arrears, 2.3 K s.7 expense arrears, mans income imputed to 40 K and wifes income 50 K | 
| 70 | 70 | 19.9 | 50.1 | 18.7 | 9.5 | 31.4 | 21.9 | 50 | 
 | c | o | Griffiths v. Griffiths, 2007 ONCJ 26 (CanLII) | 1322 | 
 | $ 1322 per month child support plus dental expense, 9.5 K arrears, man makes 70 K and wife makes 50 K per year | 
| 54 | 54 | 10.6 | 43.4 | 13.7 | 4.0 | 29.7 | 25.7 | 52.0 | 
 | c | s | Dodd v. Dodd, 2003 CanLII 2100 (ON S.C.) | 755 | 
 | $ 755 per month child support and s.7 expenses, 4 K retroactive arrears, fathers income 54 K and wifes income 52 K per year | 
| 49 | 49 | 9.9 | 39.1 | 12.1 | 9.7 | 27.0 | 17.3 | 53.0 | 
 | c | o | Hillier v. Hillier, 2005 ONCJ 120 (CanLII) | 700 | 
 | $ 700 per month child support, 9.7 K retroactive s.7 expense, man makes 49 K wife makes 53 K per year | 
| 290 | 290 | 39.6 | 250.4 | 129.9 | 50.0 | 120.1 | 70.1 | 54.0 | 
 | c | s | Monaghan v. Monaghan, 2002 CanLII 2676 (ON S.C.) | 3300 | 
 | 3.3 K per month child support, man pays 50 K per year of childrens university expenses, man makes 290 K and wife makes 54 K per year | 
| 66 | 31 | 6.6 | 59.4 | 17.4 | 0.0 | 42.0 | 42.0 | 57 | 
 | c | s | Rivard v. Trepanier, 2003 CanLII 2345 (ON S.C.) | 550 | 
 | $ 550 child support per month, man claims 31 K income and is imputed to 66 K, wifes income 57 K | 
| 147 | 147 | 39.3 | 107.7 | 63.6 | 25.0 | 44.1 | 19.1 | 57 | 
 | c | s | Fisher v. Green, 2003 CanLII 2311 (ON S.C.) | 2600 | 
 | 2.6 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, 25 K retroactive arrears,mans income 147 K including overtime and wifes income 57 K per year | 
| 36 | 36 | 6.5 | 29.5 | 5.5 | 2.4 | 24.0 | 21.6 | 60 | 
 | c | s | L.N. v. D.E.N., 2006 CanLII 42602 (ON S.C.) | 545 | 
 | $ 545 per month child support, 2.4 K arrears, mothers income 60 K fathers income 36 K | 
| 30.5 | 30.5 | 8.2 | 22.3 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 18.0 | 18.0 | 60.9 | 
 | c | s | Harmsworth v. Harmsworth, 2003 CanLII 1961 (ON S.C.) | 682 | 
 | $ 452 child support per month and $ 130 s.7 expenses, man makes 30.5 K and wife 60.9 K | 
| 50 | 50 | 9.3 | 40.7 | 12.5 | 7.2 | 28.2 | 21.0 | 61 | 
 | c | s | Gill v. Jhajj, 2003 CanLII 2126 (ON S.C.) | 777 | 
 | $ 777 per month child support, 7.2 K arrears, man makes 50 K and wife makes 61 K | 
| 61 | 61 | 10.6 | 50.4 | 15.9 | 0.0 | 34.5 | 34.5 | 63 | 
 | c | o | Bertram v. Murdock, 2006 ONCJ 69 (CanLII | 880 | 
 | $ 531 child support when child is at home and $ 406 when at school, $ 4550 per year tuition expenses, father makes 61 K and mother makes 63 K per year | 
| 150 | 150 | 31.2 | 118.8 | 65.0 | 0.0 | 53.8 | 53.8 | 63 | 
 | c | s | Ruel v. Juodis, 2005 CanLII 14133 (ON S.C.) | 2600 | 
 | $ 1233 per month child support and $ 675 s.7 expense and $ 690 discretionary extra expense per month, man makes 150 K and wife makes 40 K and is imputed to 63 K per year | 
| 50 | 12 | 13.4 | 36.6 | 12.5 | 19.0 | 24.1 | 5.1 | 64 | 
 | c | s | Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.) | 1116 | 
 | $ 917 per month child support and $ 199 per month s.7 expenses, man claims he makes $ 6.25 per hour and has no money, income imputed to 50 K per year, wifes income 64 K per year, 10 K retroactive arrears, total arrears 19 K | 
| 63.7 | 40 | 12.0 | 51.7 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 35.0 | 35.0 | 64 | 
 | c | s | Roberts v. Roberts, 2004 CanLII 18250 (ON S.C.) | 996 | 
 | $ 866 child support with $ 130 s.7 expenses, man claims 40 K income and is imputed to 63.7 K, wifes income 64 K per year | 
| 30 | 30 | 9.9 | 20.1 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 15.9 | 15.9 | 65 | 
 | c | s | R.J.R.H. v. A.A.H., 2004 CanLII 34792 (ON S.C.) | 827 | 
 | $ 267 per month child support and $ 560 s.7 expense, father says he won’t pay if he doesn’t get to see daughter, fathers income 30 K per year, mothers income 65 K | 
| 40 | 6.5 | 11.0 | 29.0 | 6.3 | 49.5 | 22.7 | (26.8) | 65 | 
 | c | s | L.A.G. v. M.E.F.G., 2004 CanLII 53222 (ON S.C.) | 920 | 
 | $ 570 per month child support and $ 350 per month s.7 expenses, man on welfare imputed to 40 K, wifes income 65 K, 49.5 K arrears | 
| 54 | 0.0 | 5.4 | 48.6 | 13.7 | 54.0 | 34.9 | (19.1) | 65 | 
 | c | y | Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2004 CanLII 1785 (ON C.A.) 
 | 454 | 
 | $ 454 per month child support based on income imputed to 45 K but support set at 54 K, man claims no income, 8 K arrears, 46 K costs | 
| 73.5 | 73.5 | 6.9 | 66.6 | 20.9 | 61.6 | 45.7 | (15.9) | 65.5 | 
 | c | s | Traversy v. Glover, 2006 CanLII 24130 (ON S.C.) | 577 | 
 | $ 577 per month child support and 4.5 K additional retroactive s.7 expense, 57.1 K lump sum award, wife may reapply for periodic support, man makes 73.5 K and wife makes 65.5 K per year | 
| 118 | 118 | 14.9 | 103.1 | 46.9 | 19.0 | 56.2 | 37.2 | 67.0 | 
 | c | s | Childs v. Childs, 2005 CanLII 11981 (ON S.C.) | 1245 | 
 | $ 1020 child support and $ 225 s.7 expenses. 19 K retroactive arrears, man makes 118 K and wife makes 67 K | 
| 61 | 61 | 9.2 | 51.8 | 15.9 | 0.0 | 35.9 | 35.9 | 69.0 | 
 | c | s | Matwiyw v. Matwiyw, 2004 CanLII 7764 (ON S.C.) | 770 | 
 | $ 841 child support order varied to $ 770, fathers income 61 K mothers income 69 K | 
| 165 | 165 | 27.7 | 137.3 | 71.9 | 3.9 | 65.4 | 61.5 | 75 | 
 | c | o | Osmak-Bonk v. Bonk, 2004 ONCJ 167 (CanLII) | 2305 | 
 | 1.93 K per month child support and 9.4 K s.7 expense, $ 365 per month s.7 expense, retroactive arrears 3.9 K, arrears, mans income 165 K, wifes income is 75 K per year | 
| 320 | 320 | 50.1 | 269.9 | 143.9 | 53.0 | 125.1 | 72.1 | 75 | 
 | c | s | Hugel v. Hugel, 2004 CanLII 15763 (ON S.C.) | 3500 | 
 | 3.5 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, 28 K retroactive lump sum spousal support, man earns 25 K compensatory lump sum support, 320 K and wife earns 75 K per year | 
| 559 | 559 | 46.5 | 512.5 | 254.8 | 22.0 | 257.2 | 235.2 | 76 | 
 | c | s | Werden v. Werden, 2005 CanLII 45741 (ON S.C.) | 3875 | 
 | 3.2 K child support per month, retroactive arrears, mans income 559 K per year and wifes income 76 K per year | 
| 139 | 139 | 12.0 | 127.0 | 59.9 | 0.0 | 67.1 | 67.1 | 91 | 
 | c | y | Park v. Thompson, 2005 CanLII 14132 (ON C.A.) | 1000 | 
 | $ 1000 per month child support in trust fund, man makes 139 K and wife makes 91 K, s.7 expenses, 70 K retroactive arrears overturned on appeal | 
| 100 | 15 | 21.8 | 78.2 | 20.7 | 11.0 | 57.5 | 46.5 | 96.0 | 
 | c | s | Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.) | 1820 | 
 | $ 1404 per month child support and 5 K per year s.7 expense, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife makes 96 K per year, mans pleadings struck, 11 K costs | 
| 88.2 | 30 | 9.8 | 78.4 | 18.0 | 12.0 | 60.4 | 48.4 | 120.0 | 
 | c | s | Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) | 694 | 
 | $ 694 per month child support and 47 % of s.7 expenses, arrears, wife makes 120 K income.and man claims 30 K imputed to 88.2 K | 
| 90 | 90 | 10.0 | 80.0 | 34.7 | 9.1 | 45.3 | 36.2 | 182 | 
 | c | s | Umholtz v. Umholtz, 2003 CanLII 2025 (ON S.C.) | 832 | 
 | $ 832 now directly payable to daughter, s.7 expenses, 9.1 K retroactive arrears payable to mother from funds held for equalization, husband makes 90 K and wife makes 182 K per year | 
| 787 | 328 | 117.6 | 669.4 | 360.6 | 22.0 | 308.8 | 286.8 | 193 | 
 | c | s | Howe v. Tremblay, 2007 CanLII 44350 (ON S.C.) | 9800 | 
 | 5.7 K per month child support and 4.1 K per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man claims 328 K income and is imputed to 767 K as non recurring income is included, wifes income is 193 K per year | 
| 769 | 769 | 106.5 | 662.5 | 352.3 | 107.0 | 310.2 | 203.2 | 270 | 
 | c | s | Paech v. Paech, 2004 CanLII 4025 (ON S.C.) | 8200 | 
 | 72 K retroactive arrears of child support, 35 K retroactive arrears 75 % of s.7 expenses, 8.2 K per month child support, man makes 769 K per year and wife makes 270 K | 
| 151 | 151 | 19.0 | 132.0 | 65.4 | 24.9 | 66.6 | 41.7 | 290.0 | 
 | c | s | Manning v. Manning, 2004 CanLII 33295 (ON S.C.) | 1250 | 
 | $ 1250 child support per month, 34 % s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, fathers income grossed up to 151.8 K and mothers 289.5 K per year, 15.2 K costs | 
| 5500 | 745 | 276.0 | 5224.0 | 2547.9 | 951.0 | 2676.1 | 1725.1 | 
 | 
 | c | s | Debora v. Debora, 2004 CanLII 44791 (ON S.C.) | 23000 | 
 | Child support of 23 K per month, 951 K retroactive award, man claims 745 K income and is imputed to 5.5 million per year |