Federal Support Study Child Support 902k
Legend
1 Payors Court Ordered Income per Year in $ 1000’s
2 Income Claimed by Payors per Year in $ 1000’s
3 Total Support Ordered ( median for payment group for s.7 expense used where $ figures are not stated, . and any other periodic expenses described are included ) per Year in 1000 $’s
4 Payors Claimed Income after Support Payment
5 Tax on Payors Claimed Income ( minus a 10 K personal exemption ) per Year in $ 1000’s
6 Fixed Support Award Expense ( median for payment group and award type used where $ figures are not stated ) per Year in $ 1000’s
7 Payors Claimed Income after Support Payment and Tax per Year in $ 1000’s
8 Payors Disposable Incme after Support Payment, Tax and Fixed Award Expenses per Year in $ 1000’s
9 Support Recipients Income per Year in $ 1000’s
10 Blank
11 Type of Support ( c= Child Support, s = Spousal Support, b = Both Child and Spousal Support )
12 Court ( s = Superior Court, o = Ontario Court of Justice, y = Court of Appeal )
13 Case and Canlii File Number
14 Child Support ( only values where $ figures are stated ) per Month in $’s
15 Spousal Support ( only values where $ figures are stated ) per Month in $’s
16 Description of Outcome
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Case |
14 |
15 |
Outcome |
|
72.5 |
0.0 |
|
|
20.6 |
42.5 |
|
|
|
|
c |
s |
Burisch v. Gosal, 2007 CanLII 2647 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support for 1 child at 72.5 K income per year, 42.5 K arrears, imputed at 72.5 K per year while unemployed |
|
50 |
0.0 |
14.4 |
(14.4) |
0.0 |
40.0 |
(14.4) |
(54.4)) |
|
|
c |
s |
Derek Cross v. Lila Cross, 2004 CanLII 13409 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 700 per month child support and $ 500 per month s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and income imputed to 50 K, 40 K arrears |
|
30.0 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
(4.8) |
0.0 |
13.8 |
(4.8) |
(18.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) |
398 |
|
$ 398 per month child support, contempt penalty 10 K, 15 K security, wife makes false criminal allegations, man claims no income and is imputed to 30 K, 1.75 K retroactive s.7 award, arrears |
|
9.0 |
0.0 |
1.2 |
(1.2) |
0.0 |
40.0 |
(1.2) |
(41.2) |
|
|
c |
y |
Difrancesco v. Couto, 2001 CanLII 8613 (ON C.A.) |
102 |
|
$ 102 per month child support, man claims no income and 9 K per year is imputed, arrears 40 K |
|
27.0 |
0.0 |
4.4 |
(4.4) |
0.0 |
22.0 |
(4.4) |
(26.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lalonde v. Lalonde, 2005 CanLII 16637 (ON S.C.) |
365 |
|
$ 240 per month child support and $ 125 per month s.7 expenses, 22 K arrears, man claims no income and is imputed to 27 K per year |
|
35 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
(5.4) |
5.3 |
17.0 |
(5.4) |
(22.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.) |
448 |
|
$ 448 per month child support, 17 K arrears, variation denied, man quit job and is unemployed and income imputed at 35 K, 3.5 K costs |
|
48.0 |
0.0 |
5.7 |
(5.7) |
0.0 |
14.0 |
(5.7) |
(19.7) |
30.0 |
|
c |
s |
Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.) |
474 |
|
$ 762 per month child support lowered to $ 474, arrears 14 K, 25 K security deposit ordered, man unemployed is imputed to 48 K income, wife earns 30 K per year |
|
54.0 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
(5.4) |
0.0 |
54.0 |
(5.4) |
(19.1) |
65.0 |
|
c |
y |
Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2004 CanLII 1785 (ON C.A.)
|
454 |
|
$ 454 per month child support based on income imputed to 45 K but support set at 54 K, man claims no income, 8 K arrears, 46 K costs |
|
23.6 |
0.0 |
3.8 |
(3.8) |
0.0 |
12.0 |
(3.8) |
(15.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Fournier v. Hynes, 2007 CanLII 2653 (ON S.C.) |
320 |
|
$ 320 per month child support and $ 100 per month repayment of arrears, man claims to be unemployed but income of 23.6 K imputed |
|
50 |
0.0 |
14.7 |
(14.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(14.7) |
(14.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
Azimi v. Mirzaei, 2007 CanLII 16445 (ON S.C.) |
1229 |
|
$ 429 per month child support and $ 800 s.7 expense, man unemployed is imputed to 50 K income, man is denied spousal support |
|
60.6 |
0.0 |
11.5 |
(11.5) |
0.0 |
2.8 |
(11.5) |
(14.3) |
48.8 |
|
c |
s |
Tughan v. Tughan, 2003 CanLII 2355 (ON S.C.) |
830 |
|
$ 830 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, 55 % s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and incomeis imputed to 60.6 K, wifes income is 48.8 K per year |
|
47 |
0.0 |
11.7 |
(11.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(11.7) |
(11.7) |
|
|
c |
o |
Razavi-Brahimi v. Ershadi, 2007 ONCJ 406 (CanLII) |
975 |
|
$ 515 per month child support and $ 460 per month s.7 expense, man is unemployed but imputed to 47 K per year income |
|
81.0 |
0.0 |
8.8 |
(8.8) |
0.0 |
2.8 |
(8.8) |
(11.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Pysznyj v. Pysznyj, 2007 CanLII 4881 (ON S.C.) |
734 |
|
$ 734 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, man on unemployment is imputed to 81 K per year. |
|
57.0 |
0.0 |
5.8 |
(5.8) |
0.0 |
5.7 |
(5.8) |
(11.5) |
|
|
c |
o |
Malleye v. Brereton, 2007 ONCJ 216 (CanLII) |
484 |
|
$ 484 child support not varied or arrears rescinded, man intentionally unemployed and imputed at former 57 K |
|
56 |
0.0 |
9.3 |
(9.3) |
0.0 |
2.0 |
(9.3) |
(11.3) |
|
|
c |
s |
Hirtle v. Earl, 2007 CanLII 20282 (ON S.C.) |
775 |
|
$ 775 per month child support based on 56 K income, man is unemployed and denied variation, 2 K arrears |
|
35 |
0.0 |
5.5 |
(5.5) |
0.0 |
5.7 |
(5.5) |
(11.2) |
|
|
c |
s |
Bhullar v. Bhullar, 2005 CanLII 18718 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support for 1 child based on an imputed income of 35 K and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrearsman claims no income, previous 5 years income tax average 19 K |
|
|
0.0 |
3.6 |
(3.6) |
0.0 |
6.3 |
(3.6) |
(9.9) |
|
|
c |
o |
Pompey v. Pompey, 1992 CanLII 4044 (ON C.J.) |
300 |
|
$ 300 per month child support, 6.3 K arrears, man is unemployed but must contiunue paying at former level |
|
60.0 |
0.0 |
9.6 |
(9.6) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(9.6) |
(9.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Léveillé v. Lemieux, 2002 CanLII 2694 (ON S.C.) |
530 |
|
$ 507 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses and 2 1 K airfares per year, man quits job as a teacher and starts a convenience store, claims a 6 K loss and is imputed to 60 K per year |
|
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
(7.9) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(7.9) |
(7.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.) |
663 |
|
$ 663 per month child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 33 K, mans proceeds from sale of home to be held as security for support |
|
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
(7.9) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(7.9) |
(7.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 13820 (ON S.C.) |
633 |
|
$ 633 child support per month intentionally unemployed for going back to school, no variation, 33 K income imputed |
|
39.0 |
0.0 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
(6.7) |
0.0 |
(6.7) |
(6.7) |
|
|
c |
o |
Zagar v. Zagar, 2006 ONCJ 296 (CanLII) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support, man unemployed and imputed at 39 K |
|
16.0 |
0.0 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
(1.5) |
4.6 |
(1.5) |
(6.1) |
|
|
c |
y |
Drygala v. Pauli, 2002 CanLII 41868 (ON C.A.) |
127 |
|
$ 127 per month retroactive 3 years, man claims 7.3 K loss and is imputed to 16 K per year |
|
30.0 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
(5.4) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(5.4) |
(5.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Abdilla v. Abdilla, 2004 CanLII 35086 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 child support per month, unemployed and income imputed to 30 K |
|
20 |
0.0 |
4.6 |
(4.6) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(4.6) |
(4.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Marchese v. Marchese, 2002 CanLII 40030 (ON S.C.) |
265 |
|
$ 265 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man studying for PHD has 20 K income imputed |
|
22 |
0.0 |
2.4 |
(2.4) |
0.0 |
2.0 |
(2.4) |
(4.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.) |
199 |
|
$ 199 per month child support, 2 K arrears, variation denied, loses job because FRO takes drivers license, income held imputed at former 22 K |
|
20 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
(3.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(3.7) |
(3.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 37233 (ON S.C.) |
308 |
|
$ 308 interim child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 20 K income |
|
35.0 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
(3.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(3.7) |
(3.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
Bowman v. Cheluk, 2003 CanLII 1938 (ON S.C.) |
305 |
|
$ 305 child support, $ 2500 spousal support paid by wife terminated, man is unemployed but income is imputed to 35 K |
|
25.0 |
0.0 |
2.7 |
0.0 |
(2.7) |
0.0 |
(2.7) |
(2.7) |
19 |
|
c |
s |
Clewlow v. Clewlow, 2004 CanLII 7355 (ON S.C.) |
222 |
|
$ 222 child support and $ 140 spousal support based on imputed income of 25 K, man laid off and gets some work as a handiman, wife earns 19 K |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.4 |
(1.4) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.4) |
(1.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Bak v. Dobell, 2005 CanLII 36463 (ON S.C.) |
117 |
|
$ 117 per month child support, man supported by father, court finds man has no income |
|
26.0 |
0.0 |
2.6 |
13.0 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Trafford v. Trafford, 2006 ONCJ 389 (CanLII)
|
216 |
|
$ 216 per month for 1 child based on imputed income of 26 K, man declares 13 K income |
|
51 |
0.0 |
8.6 |
(8.6) |
0.0 |
11.5 |
(8.6) |
20.1 |
16.0 |
|
c |
s |
P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.) |
713 |
|
$ 713 per month child support, retroactive arrears of 11.5 K, man claims no income and is imputed to 51 K, wife makes 16 K per year |
|
1624.0 |
0.0 |
121.2 |
1502.8 |
749.1 |
22.0 |
753.7 |
731.7 |
33.7 |
|
c |
s |
De Zen v. De Zen, 2002 CanLII 45410 (ON S.C.) |
10100 |
|
10.1 K per month child support retroactive, 4.9 K per month s.7 expenses, man quits job and court imputes income of 1.9 million to him, wife makes 33.7 K per year |
|
15.0 |
2.0 |
3.5 |
(1.5) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.5) |
(1.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.) |
294 |
|
$ 294 child support per month, man claims 2 K income and is imputed to 15 K |
|
18 |
2.8 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
21.0 |
1.1 |
(22.1) |
|
|
c |
s |
Cherry v. Cherry, 2004 CanLII 1649 (ON S.C.) |
144 |
|
$ 144 per month child support based on an imputed income of 18 K for failing to make efforts to become employed, man on disability with benefits of 2.8 K per year, 32 K arrears rescinded to 21 K |
|
13.0 |
4.0 |
2.4 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
6.0 |
1.6 |
(4.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.) |
200 |
|
$ 200 per month child support, 6 K in s.7 expense arrears, man declares 4 K income and is imputed to 13 K. |
|
17.0 |
5.0 |
1.6 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
9.7 |
3.4 |
(6.3) |
|
|
c |
o |
B.O.v. A.K.O., 2005 ONCJ 328 (CanLII) |
134 |
|
$ 134 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 17 K, 9.7 K arrears |
|
30.0 |
5.0 |
6.8 |
(1.8) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.8) |
(1.8) |
|
|
c |
o |
Ike v. Ike, 2005 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) |
568 |
|
$ 568 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
|
40.0 |
6.5 |
11.0 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
49.5 |
4.5 |
(45.0) |
65.0 |
|
c |
s |
L.A.G. v. M.E.F.G., 2004 CanLII 53222 (ON S.C.) |
920 |
|
$ 570 per month child support and $ 350 per month s.7 expenses, man on welfare imputed to 40 K, wifes income 65 K, 49.5 K arrears |
|
15.6 |
8.5 |
3.0 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
16 |
|
c |
o |
Faragova v. Farag, 2007 ONCJ 73 (CanLII)
|
248 |
|
$ 248 per month child support, man claims 8.5 K per year income and is imputed to 15.6 K, wife makes 16 K per year |
|
58.0 |
9.0 |
4.8 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
48.0 |
4.2 |
(44.2) |
|
|
c |
s |
Pantchevski v. Pantchevska, 2005 CanLII 7672 (ON S.C.) |
400 |
|
$ 400 per month child support, 48 K in arrears, man claims 9 K income but is denied variation and must pay at income of 58 K , wife is on social assistance |
|
10.0 |
10 |
7.8 |
2.2 |
0.0 |
45 |
(5.8) |
(50.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Maurice v. Maurice, 2003 CanLII 2418 (ON S.C.) |
653 |
|
$ 653 per month child support, 45 K arrears, set off against 40 K of his value in home, mans income 10 K |
|
50.0 |
10.0 |
9.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
35.0 |
1.0 |
(34.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.) |
750 |
|
$ 750 per month child support, spousal support satisfied by 35 K lump sum, man claims income of 10 K and is imputed to 50 K |
|
40.0 |
10.0 |
6.8 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
13.0 |
3.2 |
(9.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Dang v. Hornby, 2006 CanLII 12973 (ON S.C.) |
570 |
|
$ 570 per month child support reduced from $ 762, 13 K arrears, income imputed from 10 K claimed to 40 K |
|
50.0 |
10.0 |
13.8 |
(3.8) |
0.0 |
4.7 |
(3.8) |
(8.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) |
1152 |
|
$ 700 per month child support and $ 452 per month s.7 expenses, 2.7 K arrears, 2.2 K retroactive s.7 arrears man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 50 K |
|
21 |
10.2 |
4.0 |
8.2 |
0.0 |
5.7 |
8.2 |
2.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 1276 (ON S.C.) |
337 |
|
$ 297 and $ 40 s.7 expenses per month child support retroactive, man claims 10.2 K income and is imputed to 21 K |
|
10.8 |
10.8 |
1.9 |
8.9 |
0.2 |
5.7 |
8.7 |
3.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.) |
158 |
|
$ 158 per month retroactive child support, claim of undue hardship denied, mans income 10.8 K per year |
|
22.0 |
11.0 |
9.2 |
1.8 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
39.4 |
|
c |
s |
Bonair v. Bonair, 2007 CanLII 28322 (ON S.C.) |
770 |
|
$ 770 per month for 2 children, man claims income of 11 K and is imputed to 22 K, wifes income is 39.4 K per year |
|
16.1 |
11.1 |
2.8 |
11.1 |
0.2 |
14.4 |
10.9 |
(3.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Clark v. Clark, 2002 CanLII 2773 (ON S.C.) |
237 |
|
$ 900 per month child support changed to $ 700 changed to $ 237, husband diagnosed with cancer , 14.4 K arrears, man claims 11.1 K and is imputed to 16.1 K per year |
|
25.0 |
12.0 |
5.7 |
6.3 |
0.4 |
43.6 |
6.3 |
(37.3) |
|
|
c |
s |
Courchesne v. Courchesne, 2004 CanLII 5003 (ON S.C.) |
474 |
|
Man must pay former level of $ 600 per month but now child support is $ 474 and remainder goes to arrears, 77.1 K arrears reduced to 43.6 K, income imputed to 25 K from claimed 12 K |
|
50.0 |
12.0 |
13.4 |
(1.4) |
0.4 |
19.0 |
(1.8) |
(20.8) |
64 |
|
c |
s |
Belcastro v. Belcastro, 2004 CanLII 10991 (ON S.C.) |
1116 |
|
$ 917 per month child support and $ 199 per month s.7 expenses, man claims he makes $ 6.25 per hour and has no money, income imputed to 50 K per year, wifes income 64 K per year, 10 K retroactive arrears, total arrears 19 K |
|
47.0 |
12.0 |
8.0 |
4.0 |
0.4 |
24.0 |
3.6 |
(20.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.) |
669 |
|
$ 669 per month child support, arrears 24 K, man on disability imputed to 47 K per year income |
|
69.0 |
12.0 |
14.4 |
(2.4) |
0.4 |
14.0 |
(2.8) |
(16.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Alsafouti v. Alsafouti, 2005 CanLII 34576 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support, 14 K arrears, man loses job and claims income of 12 K but imputed to 69 K former level, no recession, drivers license removed |
|
43.0 |
12.0 |
9.6 |
2.4 |
0.4 |
12.0 |
2.0 |
(10.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lajoie v. Lajoie, 2005 CanLII 23684 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
|
$ 800 per month child support, 12 K arrears, man claims 12 K income but is imputed to 43 K |
|
40.0 |
12.0 |
7.2 |
4.8 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Mollica v. Melchionna, 2006 CanLII 41526 (ON S.C.) |
601 |
|
$ 601 per month child support, man claims 12 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
|
28.0 |
12.0 |
1.2 |
10.8 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
10.4 |
10.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
O'Neill v. O'Neill, 2004 CanLII 8231 (ON S.C.) |
100 |
|
$ 100 per month child support, man claims 12 K and is imputed to 28 K |
|
30 |
12.6 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
8.4 |
20.4 |
12.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 per month child support, arrears 8.4 K, man claims 12.6 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
|
90.0 |
13.0 |
9.7 |
12.3 |
0.6 |
30.0 |
11.6 |
(18.4) |
|
|
c |
o |
Azevedo v. Clements, 2003 CanLII 20711 (ON C.J.)
|
806 |
|
Man must pay $ 806 per month child support and 30 K arrears because he cannot make a 28 K lump sum payment, man claims 13 K income and is imputed to 90 K |
|
27.0 |
13.0 |
6.5 |
13.0 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
12.4 |
12.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Barbaric v. Nielsen, 2007 CanLII 14320 (ON S.C.) |
543 |
|
$ 543 per month child support, income imputed to 27 K, 13 K claimed |
|
43.0 |
14.0 |
8.6 |
5.4 |
0.8 |
5.5 |
4.6 |
(0.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Shaw-McInnis v. Crawford, 2003 CanLII 2241 (ON S.C.) |
714 |
|
$ 714 per month original child support lowered as children reach majority, arrears 5.5 K, mans declared income of 14 K imputed to 43 K and no relief for time on welfare |
|
35.0 |
14.2 |
4.0 |
10.2 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
9.4 |
9.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pochodaj v. Pochodaj, 2006 CanLII 13104 (ON S.C.) |
333 |
|
$333 child support per month based imputed income of 35 K, man declares income of 14.2 K |
|
72.0 |
14.4 |
7.9 |
6.5 |
0.9 |
7.9 |
5.6 |
(2.3) |
|
|
c |
o |
Pinnock v. McDowell (Clarke), 2007 ONCJ 327 (CanLII) |
661 |
|
$ 661 per month child support, 3 years retroactive support, man claims 14.4 K and is imputed to 72 K per year income |
|
15 |
15 |
3.0 |
12.0 |
1.1 |
15.0 |
10.9 |
(4.1) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lantaigne v. Lantaigne, 2005 CanLII 39886 (ON S.C.) |
250 |
|
$ 250 per month child support reduced from $ 500, 40 K arrears rescinded to 15 K, enforcement stayed, man has 15 K income, wife has higher income |
|
100.0 |
15.0 |
21.8 |
(6.8) |
1.1 |
11.0 |
(7.8) |
(18.8) |
96.0 |
|
c |
s |
Perkins v. O'Neill, 2006 CanLII 39035 (ON S.C.) |
1820 |
|
$ 1404 per month child support and 5 K per year s.7 expense, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 100 K, wife makes 96 K per year, mans pleadings struck, 11 K costs |
|
26.0 |
15.0 |
6.0 |
9.0 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
D.B. v. J.B., 2006 CanLII 726 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 26 K |
|
17.5 |
17.5 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Montgomery v. Montgomery, 2007 ONCJ 3 (CanLII) |
431 |
|
$ 431 per month child support for 4 children based on a gross income of 17.5 K, arrears rescinded. |
|
17.8 |
17.8 |
2.4 |
15.4 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
13.8 |
11.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Self v. Reid, 2006 ONCJ 30 (CanLII) |
200 |
|
$ 139 for child support and $ 61 for s.7 expenses and 1.2 K arrears and 1 K costs, mans income 17.8 K |
|
18 |
18 |
3.4 |
14.6 |
1.7 |
15.1 |
12.9 |
(2.2) |
|
|
c |
o |
Vaughan v. Vaughan, 2007 ONCJ 21 (CanLII) |
281 |
|
$ 281 child support 15.1 K arrears, mans income 18 K per year |
|
18 |
18 |
3.2. |
14.8 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
13.1 |
13.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Luedtke v. Vuletic, 2001 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) |
140 |
|
$ 140 per month child support and 50 % of s.7 expenses based on 18 K income, mans answer struck and he can’t participate at trial |
|
35.0 |
18.0 |
8.2 |
9.8 |
1.7 |
36.0 |
8.1 |
(44.1) |
|
|
c |
s |
Mahoney v. Laderoute, 2007 CanLII 37893 (ON S.C.) |
681 |
|
$ 681 per month child support, 36 K retroactive arrears, man claims 18 K income and is imputed to 35 K |
|
35.0 |
18.0 |
6.0 |
12.0 |
1.7 |
30.0 |
10.3 |
(19.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
DiMillo v. DiMillo, 2007 CanLII 1340 (ON S.C.) |
504 |
|
$ 504 K per month child support, 30 K arrears, 18 K income claimed imputed to 35 K, cannot ask for access to child until he pays 15 K |
|
70.0 |
18.5 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
1.8 |
0.0 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
38.0 |
|
c |
o |
Urban v. Warner, 2005 ONCJ 330 (CanLII) |
766 |
|
$ 586 per month child support and 60 % of 300 per month s.7 expense, man claims income of 18.5 K and is imputed to 70 K, wife makes 38 K |
|
18.7 |
18.7 |
1.7 |
17.0 |
1.8 |
24.0 |
15.2 |
(8.8) |
|
|
c |
o |
Hamilton v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 35 (CanLII) |
145 |
|
$ 145 per month child support based on an income of 18.7 K, 24 K arrears |
|
18.7 |
18.7 |
5.6 |
13.1 |
1.8 |
0.0 |
11.3 |
11.3 |
11 |
|
c |
o |
Paszkiewicz v. Paszkiewicz, 2006 ONCJ 476 (CanLII) |
463 |
|
$ 463 per month child support for 2 children, man makes 18.7 K and wife makes 11 K |
|
19 |
19 |
4.5 |
14.5 |
1.9 |
40.5 |
13.6 |
(26.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Woodland v. Woodland, 2005 CanLII 34591 (ON S.C.) |
375 |
|
Child support reduced from $ 541 to $ 375, arrears fixed at 40 K, mans income 19 K |
|
19 |
19 |
6.0 |
13.0 |
1.9 |
17.0 |
11.1 |
(5.9) |
|
|
c |
o |
DuQuesnay v. Scrivens, 2007 ONCJ 257 (CanLII) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month child support, 17 K arrears, man claims 19 K average income, over 10 K owing to social services |
|
19 |
19 |
4.1 |
14.9 |
1.9 |
0.0 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Mlambo v. Mlambo, 2007 ONCJ 240 (CanLII) |
339 |
|
$ 339 per month for 3 children based on income of 19 K |
|
22 |
20 |
2.3 |
17.7 |
2.1 |
5.7 |
15.6 |
9.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
H.F. v. P.F., 2007 ONCJ 170 (CanLII) |
188 |
|
$ 188 per month child support, retoactive arrears 20 K, imputed income to 22 K |
|
|
20 |
6.0 |
14.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Stutz v. Stutz Sorrenson, 2002 CanLII 2815 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 20 K income and is imputed higher |
|
175.0 |
20.0 |
12.1 |
7.9 |
2.1 |
59.0 |
5.8 |
(53.2) |
40.0 |
|
c |
y |
Pirner v. Pirner, 2005 CanLII 44166 (ON C.A.) |
1010 |
|
$ 4400 per month child support changed to $ 2023 then changed to $ 1010, 59 K arrears, man claims 20 K income and is imputed to 175 K, wife has 40 K income |
|
34.0 |
20.0 |
3.6 |
17.3 |
2.1 |
12.0 |
15.2 |
(27.2) |
|
|
c |
o |
Spencer v. Scarlett, 2005 ONCJ 300 (CanLII) |
304 |
|
$ 304 per month child support, 12 K arrears, imprisoned for default 90 days, man claims 20 K average income but must pay on 34 K income |
|
40.0 |
20.0 |
8.8 |
11.2 |
2.1 |
9.6 |
9.1 |
(0.5) |
50.0 |
|
c |
o |
Deane v. Riar-Deane, 2007 ONCJ 427 (CanLII)
|
737 |
|
$ 367 per month child support, $ 365 per month s.7 expense, 7.3 K retroactive arrears, 2.3 K s.7 expense arrears, mans income imputed to 40 K and wifes income 50 K |
|
20.2 |
20.2 |
2.0 |
18.2 |
2.1 |
0.6 |
16.1 |
15.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
G.R.L. v. S.L., 2005 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) |
167 |
|
$ 167 child support per month, $ 611 in retroactive arrears, man pays two other child support claims, mans income 20.2 K per year |
|
20.8 |
20.8 |
3.4 |
17.4 |
2.3 |
11.5 |
15.1 |
3.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Barker-Papos v. Mihaly, 2005 ONCJ 259 (CanLII) |
285 |
|
$ 285 per month child support based on an income of 20.8 K, 11.5 K arrears |
|
20.8 |
20.8 |
1.2 |
19.6 |
2.3 |
0.9 |
17.3 |
16.4 |
4.8 |
|
c |
o |
D.H. v. C.B., 2006 ONCJ 521 (CanLII)
|
100 |
|
$ 100 per month child support as guidelines would be undue hardship, 7 ½ year retroactive claim rejected and $ 900 retroactive order made, mans income 20.8 K and wifes income 4.8 K per year. |
|
21.2 |
21.2 |
3.6 |
17.6 |
2.3 |
46.0 |
15.3 |
(30.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
G.P.M. v. S.J.F., 2005 CanLII 19840 (ON S.C.) |
300 |
|
$ 1804 child support reduced to $ 410 then later $ 300, spousal support terminated, 36 K costs and 10 K for assault and 28 K for equalization, mans income 21.2 K |
|
21.4 |
21.4 |
3.9 |
17.5 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
15.1 |
15.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bell v. Bell, 2006 CanLII 23927 (ON S.C. |
327 |
|
$ 327 per month for natural son and step daughter, man has unemployment income of 21.4 K, man denies being parent of stepdaughter |
|
21.8 |
21.8 |
1.8 |
20.0 |
2.5 |
3.9 |
17.5 |
13.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
C.U. v. D.D., 2007 ONCJ 478 (CanLII) |
148 |
|
$ 148 per month child support, 2 years 2 months retroactive support, mans income 21.8 K |
|
21.8 |
21.8 |
2.1 |
19.7 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
17.2 |
17.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Jackpine v. Gamsby, 2003 CanLII 26235 (ON C.J.) |
178 |
|
$ 350 per month child support changed to $ 178, mans income is 21.8 K |
|
26.0 |
22.0 |
4.5 |
18.5 |
2.5 |
14.1 |
16.0 |
1.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
V.C.E. v. C.E.T., 2004 ONCJ 309 (CanLII) |
379 |
|
$ 379 m per month child support, 3 years 1 month retroactive arrears, man claims 22 K income and is imputed to 26 K |
|
37.0 |
22.0 |
9.8 |
12.2 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
9.7 |
9.7 |
42.0 |
|
c |
s |
Hakim-Kyei v. Kyei, 2005 CanLII 34581 (ON S.C.) |
820 |
|
$ 535 in child support and $ 285 in s.7 expenses, mans income imputed from 22 K claimed to 37 K, wife earns 42 K per year |
|
41.6 |
22.3 |
4.5 |
17.8 |
2.6 |
0.0 |
15.2 |
15.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Parkes v. Zayachkowski, 2005 ONCJ 106 (CanLII)
|
359 |
|
$ 379 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims 22.3 K income and is imputed to 41.6 K per year |
|
53.0 |
23.0 |
8.9 |
14.1 |
2.7 |
22.8 |
11.4 |
(11.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.) |
739 |
|
$ 739 per month child support, 21 K arrears, $ 1750 K lump sum spousal support award, man claims 23 K income and is imputed to 53 K |
|
28.0 |
23.0 |
3.0 |
22.0 |
2.7 |
0.0 |
19.3 |
19.3 |
37.9 |
|
c |
o |
Jaworski v. Jaworski, 2004 CanLII 7695 (ON C.J.) |
250 |
|
$ 250 per month child support and $ 130 per month s.7 expense retroactive, man claims income of 23 K and is imputed to 28 K, wife has income of 37.9 K |
|
23.5 |
23.5 |
5.2 |
18.3 |
2.8 |
5.7 |
15.5 |
9.8 |
35.9 |
|
c |
s |
Zeray v. Khassay, 2007 CanLII 38404 (ON S.C.)
|
435 |
|
$ 335 per month child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man has income of 23.5 K per year and wife earns 35.9 K |
|
30.0 |
24.0 |
6.8 |
17.2 |
2.9 |
0.0 |
14.3 |
14.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Murch v. Bell, 2003 CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.) |
440 |
|
$ 400 per month child support and $ 40 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
|
39.0 |
24.0 |
6.7 |
17.3 |
2.9 |
0.0 |
14.4 |
14.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Priftis v. Priftis, 2005 CanLII 47093 (ON S.C.) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 39 K |
|
24 |
24 |
4.2 |
19.8 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
16.8 |
16.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Perkins v. O'Neill, 2005 CanLII 39892 (ON S.C.) |
350 |
|
$ 350 per month interim child support based on an income of 24 K |
|
24 |
24 |
2.6 |
21.4 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
18.4 |
18.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
R.P.H. v. V.M., 2003 CanLII 2109 (ON S.C.) |
213 |
|
$ 213 per month child support based on imputed income of 24 K |
|
116.0 |
25.0 |
14.6 |
10.4 |
3.2 |
21.1 |
7.2 |
(13.9) |
35.0 |
|
c |
o |
Ciolfe (Caravatta) v. Ciolfe, 2006 ONCJ 118 (CanLII) |
880 |
|
$ 880 per month child support and 86 % of s.7 expenses, 2 years retroactive arrears, man claims 25 K income and is imputed to 116 K, wifes income 35 K, 5 K costs |
|
25.0 |
25.0 |
7.9 |
17.1 |
3.2 |
8.5 |
14.1 |
5.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Woodbridge v. Hayes, 2004 ONCJ 168 (CanLII) |
660 |
|
$ 660 per month child support reduced to $ 360, 8.5 K arrears, mans income 25 K |
|
35.8 |
25.0 |
9.6 |
15.4 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
12.2 |
12.2 |
15 |
|
c |
o |
Terry v. Clarke, 2006 ONCJ 496 (CanLII) |
800 |
|
$ 516 per month child support, $ 283 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 25 K and is imputed to 35.8 K per year income, wife makes 15 K |
|
45.0 |
26.0 |
9.1 |
17.0 |
3.4 |
10.1 |
13.6 |
3.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
Smith v. Addison, 2004 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) |
635 |
|
$ 635 per month child support and s.7 expenses, 10.1 K arrears, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 45 K per year |
|
44.0 |
26.0 |
17.8 |
8.2 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
4.8 |
|
|
c |
o |
Szucs v. Freeman, 2007 ONCJ 96 (CanLII)
|
1484 |
|
$ 1484 per month child support from income imputed at 44 K, man claims income of 26 K |
|
40.0 |
26.0 |
7.0 |
19.0 |
3.4 |
4.8 |
15.6 |
10.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.) |
580 |
|
$ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
|
75 |
26 |
8.2 |
66.8 |
21.4 |
0.0 |
45.4 |
45.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kowalczyk v. Slavner, 2006 CanLII 40996 (ON S.C.) |
680 |
|
$ 680 per month interim child support, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 75 K |
|
26.3 |
26.3 |
2.8 |
23.5 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
20.1 |
20.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Z.(A.) v. W.(J.), 2004 ONCJ 161 (CanLII) |
235 |
|
$ 235 per month child support based on an income of 26.3 K |
|
54.0 |
26.4 |
10.5 |
15.9 |
3.5 |
15.7 |
12.4 |
(3.3) |
|
|
c |
o |
Lee v. Wright, 2007 ONCJ 476 (CanLII)
|
750 |
|
$ 450 per month child support and $ 330 per month s.7 expense, 11.3 K arrears, mans claims 26.4 K income and is imputed to 54 K, 4.4 K costs |
|
27.0 |
27.0 |
5.1 |
21.9 |
3.6 |
13.0 |
18.3 |
5.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kampman v. Kampman, 2006 CanLII 38657 (ON S.C.) |
429 |
|
$ 429 per month child support and 13 K arrears, mans income 27 K. |
|
41.0 |
27.0 |
7.8 |
19.8 |
3.6 |
0.0 |
16.2 |
16.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 585 per month child support and $ 65 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 27 K income and is imputed to 41 K |
|
27.9 |
27.9 |
4.2 |
23.7 |
3.8 |
12.0 |
19.9 |
7.9 |
15 |
|
c |
o |
K.E.A. v. D.M.J.1, 2007 ONCJ 165 (CanLII) |
350 |
|
$ 180 per month child support. Undue hardship due to second family, arrears, mans income 27.9 K and wifes income 15 K |
|
96.0 |
28.0 |
14.4 |
13.6 |
4.2 |
28.0 |
9.4 |
(18.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Di Matteo v. Del Medico, 2005 CanLII 27011 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support, income imputed to 96 K from claimed 28 K, retroactive arrears |
|
28.0 |
28.0 |
9.5 |
18.5 |
3.8 |
3.0 |
14.7 |
11.7 |
30 |
|
c |
s |
Simpson v. Simpson, 2004 CanLII 14116 (ON S.C.) |
789 |
|
$ 525 child support and $ 250 spousal support reduced to $ 689 child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expense. Arrears reduced to 3 K, man earns 28 K wife earns 30 K per year |
|
29.0 |
29.0 |
7.3 |
21.7 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
17.7 |
17.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Fuller v. Da Ponte, 2005 ONCJ 265 (CanLII)
|
607 |
|
$ 285 per month child support and $ 322 per month s.7 expense, mans income 29 K |
|
29.0 |
29.0 |
4.3 |
24.7 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
20.7 |
20.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Alvarez v. Vargas, 2006 ONCJ 474 (CanLII)
|
360 |
|
$ 258 per month child support and $ 102 per month s.7 expense, man makes 29 K per year |
|
88.0 |
30.0 |
14.7 |
15.3 |
4.2 |
40.0 |
11.2 |
(28.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) |
894 |
|
$ 794 per month child support and $ 100 s.7 expense and 54 % of school expenses, man claims 30 K income imputed to 88 K, 40 K arrears |
|
30.0 |
30.0 |
3.1 |
26.9 |
4.2 |
41.0 |
22.7 |
(18.3) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kumar v. McKenna (Kumar), 2003 CanLII 2156 (ON S.C.) |
258 |
|
$ 258 per month child support and 5 K lump sum spousal support award, 80 K arrears reduced to 36 K, man earns 30 K per year and is incapacitated |
|
88.2 |
30.0 |
9.8 |
20.2 |
4.2 |
12.0 |
16.0 |
4.0 |
120.0 |
|
c |
s |
Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) |
694 |
|
$ 694 per month child support and 47 % of s.7 expenses, arrears, wife makes 120 K income.and man claims 30 K imputed to 88.2 K |
|
30.0 |
30.0 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
12.0 |
20.4 |
8.4 |
10 |
|
c |
s |
Tyll v. Dini-Tyll, 2003 CanLII 2262 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 per month child support, arrears, income imputed to 30 K, wife makes 10 K per year |
|
30.0 |
30.0 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
7.7 |
20.2 |
12.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kalla v. Kalla, 2003 CanLII 2322 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 834 child support order changed to $ 557 then changed to $ 446, man on disability earns 2.5 K per month, 7.7 arrears |
|
54.0 |
30.0 |
11.8 |
18.2 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Schiller v. Schiller, 2007 CanLII 1343 (ON S.C.) |
980 |
|
$ 980 per month child support based on imputed income of 54 K, man claims income of 30 K |
|
30.0 |
30.0 |
9.9 |
20.1 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
15.9 |
15.9 |
65 |
|
c |
s |
R.J.R.H. v. A.A.H., 2004 CanLII 34792 (ON S.C.) |
827 |
|
$ 267 per month child support and $ 560 s.7 expense, father says he won’t pay if he doesn’t get to see daughter, fathers income 30 K per year, mothers income 65 K |
|
30.3 |
30.3 |
6.3 |
24.0 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.8 |
19.8 |
|
|
c |
o |
Hazel v. Leslie, 2007 ONCJ 543 (CanLII) |
400 |
|
$ 400 per month child support, s.7 expenses, mans income 30.3 K per year |
|
30.5 |
30.5 |
8.2 |
22.3 |
4.3 |
0.0 |
18.0 |
18.0 |
60.9 |
|
c |
s |
Harmsworth v. Harmsworth, 2003 CanLII 1961 (ON S.C.) |
682 |
|
$ 452 child support per month and $ 130 s.7 expenses, man makes 30.5 K and wife 60.9 K |
|
66.0 |
31.0 |
6.6 |
24.4 |
4.4 |
0.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
57.0 |
|
c |
s |
Rivard v. Trepanier, 2003 CanLII 2345 (ON S.C.) |
550 |
|
$ 550 child support per month, man claims 31 K income and is imputed to 66 K, wifes income 57 K |
|
31.2 |
31.2 |
3.4 |
27.8 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
23.3 |
23.3 |
8.6 |
|
c |
o |
Pollard v. Deale, 2003 CanLII 27021 (ON C.J.).. |
281 |
|
$ 281 per month child support based on an income of 31.2 K, wife makes 8.6 K per year |
|
31.9 |
31.9 |
7.2 |
24.7 |
4.6 |
19.0 |
20.1 |
1.1 |
39.6 |
|
c |
o |
Ramrud v. Lutchman, 2006 ONCJ 501 (CanLII) |
478 |
|
$ 476 per month and 45 % of s.7 expenses based on mans income of 31.9 K, wifes income is 39.6 K, 19 K arrears |
|
32.5 |
32.5 |
3.6 |
28.9 |
4.7 |
1.0 |
24.2 |
23.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ciffolillo v. Nieweglowski, 2007 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) |
298 |
|
$ 298 per month child support, arrears 1 K, fathers income 32.5 K per year |
|
32.5 |
32.5 |
3.8 |
28.7 |
4.7 |
0.0 |
24.0 |
24.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Harvey v. Baker, 2007 ONCJ 574 (CanLII) |
320 |
|
$ 320 per month child support for one child based on income of 32.5 K |
|
33.0 |
33.0 |
7.8 |
25.2 |
4.9 |
55.0 |
20.3 |
(35.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kauric v. Kauric, 2006 CanLII 21594 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 650 per month child support reduced from $ 1500, 41 K US arrears, mans income 33 K |
|
67.0 |
33.0 |
7.2 |
25.8 |
4.9 |
11.0 |
20.9 |
9.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
Rivard v. Hankiewicz, 2007 ONCJ 180 (CanLII) |
603 |
|
$ 555 per month child support and $ 53 per month s.7 expenses, 11 K retroactive arrears, man claims 37 K and is grossed up to 67 K |
|
33.0 |
33.0 |
3.5 |
29.5 |
4.8 |
0.0 |
24.7 |
24.7 |
28 |
|
c |
o |
Duguay v. Duguay, 2005 ONCJ 269 (CanLII) |
294 |
|
$ 294 per month child support based on an income of 33 K, wife makes 28 K |
|
33.3 |
33.3 |
7.3 |
26.0 |
4.9 |
3.0 |
21.1 |
18.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Yackobeck v. Brazeau, 2002 CanLII 46583 (ON C.J.) |
483 |
|
$ 483 per month child support and ½ of s.7 expenses, support based on an income of 33.3 K per year, 3k costs |
|
33.5 |
33.5 |
5.4 |
28.1 |
5.0 |
0.0 |
23.1 |
23.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
S.S. v. M.S. and P.A., 2006 ONCJ 311 (CanLII)
|
327 |
|
$ 327 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man makes 33.5 K income per year |
|
77.0 |
34.0 |
12.0 |
24.0 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
18.9 |
18.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hagner v. Hawkins, 2005 CanLII 43294 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
|
$ 1000 per month child support upheld, intentionally unemployed, 34 K income as teacher imputed to 77 K |
|
46.0 |
34.0 |
5.4 |
28.6 |
5.0 |
4.0 |
23.6 |
19.6 |
23.0 |
|
c |
o |
McClymonth v. Wray, 2001 CanLII 26483 (ON C.J.) |
446 |
|
$ 401 per month child support, man claims income of 34 K and is imputed to 46 K, wife has income of 23 K, 4 K costs |
|
34.0 |
34.0 |
7.8 |
26.2 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
21.1 |
21.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Zoldy v. Zoldy, 2007 ONCJ 24 (CanLII) |
651 |
|
$ 651 per month for 3 children based on an income of 34 K |
|
35.0 |
35.0 |
5.8 |
29.2 |
5.3 |
40.6 |
23.9 |
(16.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.) |
481 |
|
$ 481 per month child support, man must pay on imputed income for 2 ½ years he was in jail, arrears 40.6 K, mans income imputed at 35 K while in jail |
|
35.0 |
35.0 |
6.3 |
28.7 |
5.3 |
20.0 |
23.4 |
3.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dang v. Duong, 2006 CanLII 34339 (ON S.C.) |
521 |
|
$ 521 per month interim child support for 2 children based on 35 K income, wife gets 20 K lump sum support payment |
|
35.0 |
35.0 |
10.7 |
24.3 |
5.3 |
2.5 |
19.0 |
16.5 |
29.1 |
|
c |
s |
McLean v. Rice, 2005 CanLII 3470 (ON S.C.) |
893 |
|
Total child support payments $ 893 per month including $ 275 s.7 expense, 2.5 K retroactive arrears, man makes 36 K wife makes 29.1 K per year |
|
35.0 |
35.0 |
8.1 |
26.9 |
5.3 |
4.3 |
21.6 |
17.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bell v. Lloyd-Bell, 2005 CanLII 39875 (ON S.C.) |
672 |
|
$ 672 per month in child support, arrears of $ 4275, mans income 35 K |
|
80.0 |
35.0 |
9.1 |
25.9 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
20.6 |
20.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
Laufer v. Laufer, 2006 CanLII 32997 (ON S.C.) |
719 |
|
$ 719 per month child support, 83 % s.7 expenses, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 80 K |
|
50.0 |
35.0 |
10.1 |
24.9 |
3.2 |
0.0 |
21.7 |
21.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Tran v. Lee, 2003 CanLII 11863 (ON S.C.) |
x |
|
$ 700 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims income of 35 K but income of 50 K imputed |
|
81.0 |
35.0 |
7.6 |
27.4 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
22.1 |
22.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 2366 (ON S.C.) |
643 |
|
$ 643 per month child support, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 81 K |
|
35.0 |
35.0 |
6.1 |
28.9 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
23.6 |
23.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Kelly v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 242 (CanLII) |
506 |
|
$ 506 per month child support, mans income 35 K |
|
35.0 |
35.0 |
6.0 |
29.0 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
23.7 |
23.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Collis v. Wilson, 2003 CanLII 2413 (ON S.C.) |
375 |
|
$ 375 per month in child support and s.7 expenses based on income of 35 K |
|
36.0 |
36.0 |
5.2 |
30.8 |
5.5 |
11.0 |
25.3 |
14.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
J.J.C. v. K.G.M., 2004 CanLII 10578 (ON S.C.) |
433 |
|
$ 433 per month child support, mother denies all access and remarries, 80 K arrears cut to 11 K, mans current income 36 K |
|
36.0 |
36.0 |
9.7 |
26.3 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fraser v. McKinlay, 2004 CanLII 5857 (ON S.C.) |
682 |
|
$ 682 per month child support based on 36 K income, s.7 expenses |
|
55.0 |
36.0 |
10.7 |
25.3 |
3.4 |
1.0 |
21.9 |
20.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.) |
768 |
|
$ 768 per month child support and 61 % of s.7 expenses and 1 K in past s.7 expenses, man claims 36 K income and is imputed to 55 K |
|
36.0 |
36.0 |
6.5 |
29.5 |
5.5 |
2.4 |
24.0 |
21.6 |
60.0 |
|
c |
s |
L.N. v. D.E.N., 2006 CanLII 42602 (ON S.C.) |
545 |
|
$ 545 per month child support, 2.4 K arrears, mothers income 60 K fathers income 36 K |
|
36.0 |
36.0 |
8.8 |
27.2 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
21.7 |
21.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lamontagne v. Lamontagne, 2006 ONCJ 498 (CanLII) |
730 |
|
$ 705 per month child support for 3 children based on income of 36 K, $ 25 per month s.7 expenses, hardship due to second family |
|
48.0 |
36.0 |
5.4 |
30.6 |
5.5 |
3.2 |
25.1 |
21.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
St. Amant (Peddie) v. Walkingshaw, 2006 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) |
448 |
|
$ 448 per month child support raised frrom $ 89, $ 1750 s.7 lump- sum expense, income imputed fron 36 K claimed to 48 K, 1.4 K retroactive arrears |
|
37.0 |
37.0 |
4.1 |
32.9 |
5.7 |
42.8 |
27.2 |
(15.6) |
|
|
c |
o |
Pisani v. Jackson, 2007 ONCJ 243 (CanLII) |
345 |
|
$ 345 per month child support on income of 37 K, 42.8 K in arrears |
|
37.0 |
37.0 |
8.4 |
28.6 |
5.7 |
12.0 |
22.9 |
10.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Simmons v. Yandt, 2004 CanLII 8101 (ON S.C.) |
698 |
|
$ 698 per month child support, arrears reduced based on actual income, mans income 37 K |
|
38.0 |
38.0 |
9.5 |
28.5 |
5.9 |
0.0 |
22.6 |
22.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lewis v. Crearer, 2007 ONCJ 353 (CanLII) |
792 |
|
$ 502 per month child support and $ 290 per month s.7 expenses, mans income imputed to 38 K |
|
38.0 |
38.0 |
5.0 |
33.0 |
5.9 |
3.2 |
27.1 |
23.9 |
10 |
|
c |
o |
Jepson v. Cresnjovec, 2007 ONCJ 466 (CanLII) |
415 |
|
$ 415 per month child support, 3.2 K retroactive lump sum, mans income 38 K wifes average income 10 K |
|
38.0 |
38.0 |
4.0 |
34.0 |
5.9 |
1.0 |
27.9 |
26.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
T.(P.) v. A.(S.), 2004 ONCJ 295 (CanLII) |
332 |
|
$ 332 per month child support, retroactive arrears of $ 950, mans income 38 K |
|
39.0 |
39.0 |
6.9 |
32.1 |
6.1 |
40.0 |
26.0 |
(14.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
D'Souza v. D'Souza, 2003 CanLII 1933 (ON S.C.) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month interim child support, 40 K arrears based on a 39 K income |
|
39.0 |
39.0 |
8.9 |
30.1 |
6.1 |
5.7 |
24.0 |
18.3 |
30.5 |
|
c |
s |