Federal Support Study Child Support 902k
Legend
1 Payors Court Ordered Income per Year in $ 1000’s
2 Income Claimed by Payors per Year in $ 1000’s
3 Total Support Ordered ( median for payment group for s.7 expense used where $ figures are not stated, . and any other periodic expenses described are included ) per Year in 1000 $’s
4 Payors Claimed Income after Support Payment
5 Tax on Payors Claimed Income ( minus a 10 K personal exemption ) per Year in $ 1000’s
6 Fixed Support Award Expense ( median for payment group and award type used where $ figures are not stated ) per Year in $ 1000’s
7 Payors Claimed Income after Support Payment and Tax per Year in $ 1000’s
8 Payors Disposable Incme after Support Payment, Tax and Fixed Award Expenses per Year in $ 1000’s
9 Support Recipients Income per Year in $ 1000’s
10 Blank
11 Type of Support ( c= Child Support, s = Spousal Support, b = Both Child and Spousal Support )
12 Court ( s = Superior Court, o = Ontario Court of Justice, y = Court of Appeal )
13 Case and Canlii File Number
14 Child Support ( only values where $ figures are stated ) per Month in $’s
15 Spousal Support ( only values where $ figures are stated ) per Month in $’s
16 Description of Outcome
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Case |
14 |
15 |
Outcome |
|
72.5 |
0.0 |
|
|
20.6 |
42.5 |
|
|
|
|
c |
s |
Burisch v. Gosal, 2007 CanLII 2647 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support for 1 child at 72.5 K income per year, 42.5 K arrears, imputed at 72.5 K per year while unemployed |
|
50 |
0.0 |
14.4 |
(14.4) |
0.0 |
40.0 |
(14.4) |
(54.4)) |
|
|
c |
s |
Derek Cross v. Lila Cross, 2004 CanLII 13409 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 700 per month child support and $ 500 per month s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and income imputed to 50 K, 40 K arrears |
|
30.0 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
(4.8) |
0.0 |
13.8 |
(4.8) |
(18.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) |
398 |
|
$ 398 per month child support, contempt penalty 10 K, 15 K security, wife makes false criminal allegations, man claims no income and is imputed to 30 K, 1.75 K retroactive s.7 award, arrears |
|
9.0 |
0.0 |
1.2 |
(1.2) |
0.0 |
40.0 |
(1.2) |
(41.2) |
|
|
c |
y |
Difrancesco v. Couto, 2001 CanLII 8613 (ON C.A.) |
102 |
|
$ 102 per month child support, man claims no income and 9 K per year is imputed, arrears 40 K |
|
27.0 |
0.0 |
4.4 |
(4.4) |
0.0 |
22.0 |
(4.4) |
(26.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lalonde v. Lalonde, 2005 CanLII 16637 (ON S.C.) |
365 |
|
$ 240 per month child support and $ 125 per month s.7 expenses, 22 K arrears, man claims no income and is imputed to 27 K per year |
|
35 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
(5.4) |
5.3 |
17.0 |
(5.4) |
(22.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.) |
448 |
|
$ 448 per month child support, 17 K arrears, variation denied, man quit job and is unemployed and income imputed at 35 K, 3.5 K costs |
|
48.0 |
0.0 |
5.7 |
(5.7) |
0.0 |
14.0 |
(5.7) |
(19.7) |
30.0 |
|
c |
s |
Lauge v. Liepins, 2002 CanLII 2712 (ON S.C.) |
474 |
|
$ 762 per month child support lowered to $ 474, arrears 14 K, 25 K security deposit ordered, man unemployed is imputed to 48 K income, wife earns 30 K per year |
|
54.0 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
(5.4) |
0.0 |
54.0 |
(5.4) |
(19.1) |
65.0 |
|
c |
y |
Roscoe v. Roscoe, 2004 CanLII 1785 (ON C.A.)
|
454 |
|
$ 454 per month child support based on income imputed to 45 K but support set at 54 K, man claims no income, 8 K arrears, 46 K costs |
|
23.6 |
0.0 |
3.8 |
(3.8) |
0.0 |
12.0 |
(3.8) |
(15.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Fournier v. Hynes, 2007 CanLII 2653 (ON S.C.) |
320 |
|
$ 320 per month child support and $ 100 per month repayment of arrears, man claims to be unemployed but income of 23.6 K imputed |
|
50 |
0.0 |
14.7 |
(14.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(14.7) |
(14.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
Azimi v. Mirzaei, 2007 CanLII 16445 (ON S.C.) |
1229 |
|
$ 429 per month child support and $ 800 s.7 expense, man unemployed is imputed to 50 K income, man is denied spousal support |
|
60.6 |
0.0 |
11.5 |
(11.5) |
0.0 |
2.8 |
(11.5) |
(14.3) |
48.8 |
|
c |
s |
Tughan v. Tughan, 2003 CanLII 2355 (ON S.C.) |
830 |
|
$ 830 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, 55 % s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and incomeis imputed to 60.6 K, wifes income is 48.8 K per year |
|
47 |
0.0 |
11.7 |
(11.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(11.7) |
(11.7) |
|
|
c |
o |
Razavi-Brahimi v. Ershadi, 2007 ONCJ 406 (CanLII) |
975 |
|
$ 515 per month child support and $ 460 per month s.7 expense, man is unemployed but imputed to 47 K per year income |
|
81.0 |
0.0 |
8.8 |
(8.8) |
0.0 |
2.8 |
(8.8) |
(11.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Pysznyj v. Pysznyj, 2007 CanLII 4881 (ON S.C.) |
734 |
|
$ 734 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, man on unemployment is imputed to 81 K per year. |
|
57.0 |
0.0 |
5.8 |
(5.8) |
0.0 |
5.7 |
(5.8) |
(11.5) |
|
|
c |
o |
Malleye v. Brereton, 2007 ONCJ 216 (CanLII) |
484 |
|
$ 484 child support not varied or arrears rescinded, man intentionally unemployed and imputed at former 57 K |
|
56 |
0.0 |
9.3 |
(9.3) |
0.0 |
2.0 |
(9.3) |
(11.3) |
|
|
c |
s |
Hirtle v. Earl, 2007 CanLII 20282 (ON S.C.) |
775 |
|
$ 775 per month child support based on 56 K income, man is unemployed and denied variation, 2 K arrears |
|
35 |
0.0 |
5.5 |
(5.5) |
0.0 |
5.7 |
(5.5) |
(11.2) |
|
|
c |
s |
Bhullar v. Bhullar, 2005 CanLII 18718 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support for 1 child based on an imputed income of 35 K and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrearsman claims no income, previous 5 years income tax average 19 K |
|
|
0.0 |
3.6 |
(3.6) |
0.0 |
6.3 |
(3.6) |
(9.9) |
|
|
c |
o |
Pompey v. Pompey, 1992 CanLII 4044 (ON C.J.) |
300 |
|
$ 300 per month child support, 6.3 K arrears, man is unemployed but must contiunue paying at former level |
|
60.0 |
0.0 |
9.6 |
(9.6) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(9.6) |
(9.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Léveillé v. Lemieux, 2002 CanLII 2694 (ON S.C.) |
530 |
|
$ 507 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses and 2 1 K airfares per year, man quits job as a teacher and starts a convenience store, claims a 6 K loss and is imputed to 60 K per year |
|
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
(7.9) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(7.9) |
(7.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.) |
663 |
|
$ 663 per month child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 33 K, mans proceeds from sale of home to be held as security for support |
|
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
(7.9) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(7.9) |
(7.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 13820 (ON S.C.) |
633 |
|
$ 633 child support per month intentionally unemployed for going back to school, no variation, 33 K income imputed |
|
39.0 |
0.0 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
(6.7) |
0.0 |
(6.7) |
(6.7) |
|
|
c |
o |
Zagar v. Zagar, 2006 ONCJ 296 (CanLII) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support, man unemployed and imputed at 39 K |
|
16.0 |
0.0 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
(1.5) |
4.6 |
(1.5) |
(6.1) |
|
|
c |
y |
Drygala v. Pauli, 2002 CanLII 41868 (ON C.A.) |
127 |
|
$ 127 per month retroactive 3 years, man claims 7.3 K loss and is imputed to 16 K per year |
|
30.0 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
(5.4) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(5.4) |
(5.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Abdilla v. Abdilla, 2004 CanLII 35086 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 child support per month, unemployed and income imputed to 30 K |
|
20 |
0.0 |
4.6 |
(4.6) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(4.6) |
(4.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Marchese v. Marchese, 2002 CanLII 40030 (ON S.C.) |
265 |
|
$ 265 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man studying for PHD has 20 K income imputed |
|
22 |
0.0 |
2.4 |
(2.4) |
0.0 |
2.0 |
(2.4) |
(4.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.) |
199 |
|
$ 199 per month child support, 2 K arrears, variation denied, loses job because FRO takes drivers license, income held imputed at former 22 K |
|
20 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
(3.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(3.7) |
(3.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 37233 (ON S.C.) |
308 |
|
$ 308 interim child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 20 K income |
|
35.0 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
(3.7) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(3.7) |
(3.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
Bowman v. Cheluk, 2003 CanLII 1938 (ON S.C.) |
305 |
|
$ 305 child support, $ 2500 spousal support paid by wife terminated, man is unemployed but income is imputed to 35 K |
|
25.0 |
0.0 |
2.7 |
0.0 |
(2.7) |
0.0 |
(2.7) |
(2.7) |
19 |
|
c |
s |
Clewlow v. Clewlow, 2004 CanLII 7355 (ON S.C.) |
222 |
|
$ 222 child support and $ 140 spousal support based on imputed income of 25 K, man laid off and gets some work as a handiman, wife earns 19 K |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.4 |
(1.4) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.4) |
(1.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Bak v. Dobell, 2005 CanLII 36463 (ON S.C.) |
117 |
|
$ 117 per month child support, man supported by father, court finds man has no income |
|
26.0 |
0.0 |
2.6 |
13.0 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Trafford v. Trafford, 2006 ONCJ 389 (CanLII)
|
216 |
|
$ 216 per month for 1 child based on imputed income of 26 K, man declares 13 K income |
|
51 |
0.0 |
8.6 |
(8.6) |
0.0 |
11.5 |
(8.6) |
20.1 |
16.0 |
|
c |
s |
P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.) |
713 |
|
$ 713 per month child support, retroactive arrears of 11.5 K, man claims no income and is imputed to 51 K, wife makes 16 K per year |
|
1624.0 |
0.0 |
121.2 |
1502.8 |
749.1 |
22.0 |
753.7 |
731.7 |
33.7 |
|
c |
s |
De Zen v. De Zen, 2002 CanLII 45410 (ON S.C.) |
10100 |
|
10.1 K per month child support retroactive, 4.9 K per month s.7 expenses, man quits job and court imputes income of 1.9 million to him, wife makes 33.7 K per year |
|
15.0 |
2.0 |
3.5 |
(1.5) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.5) |
(1.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.) |
294 |
|
$ 294 child support per month, man claims 2 K income and is imputed to 15 K |
|
18 |
2.8 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
21.0 |
1.1 |
(22.1) |
|
|
c |
s |
Cherry v. Cherry, 2004 CanLII 1649 (ON S.C.) |
144 |
|
$ 144 per month child support based on an imputed income of 18 K for failing to make efforts to become employed, man on disability with benefits of 2.8 K per year, 32 K arrears rescinded to 21 K |
|
13.0 |
4.0 |
2.4 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
6.0 |
1.6 |
(4.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.) |
200 |
|
$ 200 per month child support, 6 K in s.7 expense arrears, man declares 4 K income and is imputed to 13 K. |
|
17.0 |
5.0 |
1.6 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
9.7 |
3.4 |
(6.3) |
|
|
c |
o |
B.O.v. A.K.O., 2005 ONCJ 328 (CanLII) |
134 |
|
$ 134 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 17 K, 9.7 K arrears |
|
30.0 |
5.0 |
6.8 |
(1.8) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.8) |
(1.8) |
|
|
c |
o |
Ike v. Ike, 2005 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) |
568 |
|
$ 568 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 30 K |