Legend
1 Court Ordered Payors Income per Year in $ 1000s
2 Income Claimed by Payors per Year in $ 1000s
3 Total Support Ordered per Month in $s
4 Support Recipients Income per Year in $ 1000s
5 Type of Support ( c= Child Support, s = Spousal Support, b = Both Child and Spousal Support )
6 Court ( s = Superior Court, o = Ontario Court of Justice, y = Court of Appeal )
7 Child Support per Month in $s
8 Spousal Support per Month in $s
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Case |
7 CS |
8 SS |
Outcome |
|
24.6 |
24.6 |
19.8 |
4.8 |
1.4 |
0.0 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
|
|
b |
s |
Lear v. Lear, 2004 CanLII 14820 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
650 |
$ 1000 child support and $ 650 spousal support from man with 24.6 K per year claimed income |
|
30 |
30 |
5.5 |
24.5 |
3.7 |
0.8 |
20.8 |
20.0 |
|
|
b |
o |
Bouchard v. Ouellet, 2005 ONCJ 335 (CanLII) |
266 |
192 |
$ 266 per month child support and $ 192 spousal support, man does not give financial figures and is imputed to an income of 30 K, 3 months retroactive support |
|
34 |
26 |
9.5 |
24.5 |
5.0 |
11.9 |
19.5 |
7.6 |
|
|
b |
o |
DeFina v. DeFina, 2007 ONCJ 94 (CanLII) |
660 |
129 |
$ 660 per month child support and $ 129 spousal support, 1 year and 3 months retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income imputed to 34 K |
|
35 |
35 |
12.4 |
24.1 |
4.1 |
6.3 |
20.0 |
13.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Elizabeth Ann Zunti v. Ian George McIntosh, 2004 CanLII 19511 (ON S.C.) |
506 |
400 |
$ 506 per month child support and $ 400 per month spousal support, 7 months retroactive, s.7 expenses, mans income 35 K per year |
|
36 |
36 |
8.6 |
27.4 |
6.5 |
0.0 |
20.9 |
20.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Mahood v. Mahood, 2005 CanLII 19841 (ON S.C.) |
518 |
200 |
$ 518 child support to be reduced to $ 313 when child graduates, $ 200 spousal support, mans income 36 K per year |
|
38.8 |
38.8 |
11.8 |
27.0 |
4.7 |
19.0 |
22.3 |
3.3 |
|
|
b |
o |
Gregory v. Brown, 2005 ONCJ 284 (CanLII) |
554 |
433 |
$ 554 child support and 433 spousal support, arrears not rescinded, mans income 38.8 K |
|
42.7 |
0.0 |
13.3 |
29.4 |
5.4 |
12.2 |
24.0 |
11.8 |
|
|
b |
o |
T.R. v. R.T., 2006 ONCJ 173 (CanLII) |
605 |
500 |
$ 605 per month child support and $ 500 per month spousal support, man quits job and claims no income and is imputed at 42.7 K per year, 11 months retroactive arrears |
|
43 |
43 |
10.2 |
32.8 |
6.1 |
42.5 |
26.7 |
(15.8) |
|
|
b |
s |
Connors v. Connors, 2006 CanLII 17597 (ON S.C.) |
651 |
200 |
$ 651 child support per month and $ 200 spousal support, arrears 42.5 K, enforcement action by FRO, man makes 43 K |
|
45 |
45 |
15.9 |
29.1 |
5.6 |
3.5 |
23.5 |
20.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
M.S. v. I.S., 2003 CanLII 2239 (ON S.C.) |
300 |
900 |
$ 300 child support and $ 900 spousal support, s.7 expenses, arrears reduced from 5.4 K to 3.5 K,.mans income 45 K |
|
45.9 |
45.9 |
12.5 |
33.4 |
6.8 |
31.6 |
26.6 |
(5.0) |
|
|
b |
s |
P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.) |
880 |
160 |
$ 880 per month child support and $ 160 spousal support, arrears partly rescinded, mans income 45.9 K per year, costs 12.6 K |
|
46 |
46 |
16.8 |
31.2 |
4.8 |
1.3 |
26.4 |
25.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
Millward v. Millward, 2003 CanLII 2116 (ON S.C.) |
396 |
1000 |
$ 1000 spousal support and $ 396 per month child support 1.3 K s.7 expense, short marrige, short marriage, mans income 46 K |
|
50 |
50 |
15.4 |
34.6 |
5.9 |
2.5 |
28.7 |
26.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Pollock v. Pollock, 2006 CanLII 3483 (ON S.C.) |
435 |
850 |
$ 850 spousal support and $ 435 child support, 2.5 K in lump sum support, non depletion order, disability and pension imputed to 50 K |
|
50 |
50 |
23.8 |
26.2 |
5.6 |
0.0 |
20.6 |
20.6 |
|
|
b |
s |
Stigter v. Stigter, 2006 CanLII 43638 (ON S.C.) |
986 |
1000 |
$ 986 per month interim child support and $ 1000 per month spousal support based on income of 50 K |
|
51 |
0.0 |
17.1 |
33.9 |
6.5 |
11.9 |
27.4 |
15.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.) |
713 |
713 |
$ 713 spousal support and $ 713 child support and $ 2300 s.7 expense award and 9.6 K retroactive arrears, man claims no income and is imputed to 51 K |
|
52 |
52 |
11.1 |
40.9 |
12.1 |
2.8 |
28.8 |
26.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
Willson v. Willson, 2003 CanLII 2273 (ON S.C.) |
726 |
200 |
$ 726 child support and $ 200 spousal support based on income of 52 K, 3 months of retoractive spousal support |
|
52.3 |
52.3 |
9.0 |
43.3 |
12.1 |
0.0 |
31.2 |
31.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Somerville v. Somerville, 2005 CanLII 8705 (ON S.C.) |
450 |
300 |
$ 450 child support and $ 300 spousal support, mans income 52.3 K |
|
53.8 |
53.8 |
16.5 |
37.3 |
12.2 |
0.0 |
25.1 |
25.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
Van Bilsen v. Van Bilsen, 2003 CanLII 2012 (ON S.C.) |
979 |
400 |
$ 979 child support per month and $ 400 spousal support, mans income 53.8 K, wife remarries a man with a 50 K income |
|
56.7 |
56.7 |
13.8 |
42.9 |
12.6 |
1.2 |
30.3 |
29.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Newton v. Newton, 2007 CanLII 48990 (ON S.C.)
|
623 |
526 |
623 spousal support, 526 child support based on 56.7 K income and 1 child, 1.2 K retroactive arrears |
|
57 |
57 |
26.4 |
30.6 |
6.5 |
71.1 |
24.1 |
(47.0) |
|
|
b |
s |
Wilson-Tick v. Tick, 2006 CanLII 12964 (ON S.C.) |
866 |
1333 |
$ 866 per month child support, and 16 K per year or more spousal support, man has custody, 28.3 K spousal support arrears and 45.8 K child support arrears, mans income 57 K |
|
58 |
58 |
25.8 |
32.2 |
6.6 |
22.0 |
25.6 |
3.6 |
|
|
b |
o |
Johnson v. Johnson, 2005 ONCJ 325 (CanLII) |
752 |
1400 |
$ 1400 per month spousal support and $ 752 per month child support, retroactive arrears, mans income 58 K |
|
59 |
59 |
22.6 |
36.4 |
8.9 |
10.0 |
27.5 |
17.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
Kropf v. Kropf, 2003 CanLII 2155 (ON S.C.) |
881 |
1000 |
$ 1000 spousal support and $ 881 child support, arrears 10 K, man makes 59 K per year |
|
60 |
40 |
7.3 |
52.7 |
15.5 |
16.5 |
37.2 |
20.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Marok v. Marok, 2003 CanLII 9094 (ON S.C.) |
507 |
100 |
$ 507 per month child support and $ 100 per month spousal support, 16.5 K arrears, man claims 40 K and is imputed to 60 K |
|
60 |
0.0 |
20.6 |
39.4 |
12.3 |
4.0 |
27.1 |
23.0 |
|
|
b |
o |
E.K. v. I.K., 2005 CanLII 26319 (ON C.J.) |
883 |
883 |
$ 883 child support and $ 833 spousal support, man claims no income and is imputed to 60 K, retroactive arrears including 4.5 K owed to Social Services |
|
60 |
25 |
15.9 |
44.1 |
14.6 |
0.0 |
29.4 |
29.4 |
|
|
b |
s |
Scholes v. Scholes, 2003 CanLII 2349 (ON S.C.) |
1076 |
250 |
$ 1076 per month child support and $ 250 interim spousal support, man claims 25 K income and is imputed to 60 K |
|
60 |
60 |
54.0 |
6.0 |
3.8 |
53.0 |
2.2 |
(50.8) |
|
|
b |
s |
Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
3500 |
3.5 K spousal support per month, child support lowered to 1 K per month and s.7 expenses, 53 K retroactive arrears including 20 K lump sum spousal support, 50 K additional income imputed during previous order, man agrees to 60 K income |
|
60 |
53 |
26.4 |
33.6 |
10.7 |
0.0 |
22.9 |
22.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Humphrey v. Humphrey, 2006 CanLII 42709 (ON S.C.)
|
900 |
1300 |
$ 1300 spousal support per month and $ 900 child support per month, man claims 53 K per year income and is imputed to 60 K |
|
63 |
63 |
20.2 |
42.8 |
15.0 |
0.0 |
27.8 |
27.8 |
|
|
b |
s |
Manning v. Bain, 2007 CanLII 27974 (ON S.C.) |
1287 |
400 |
$ 1287 per month child support for 3 children and $ 400 spousal support based on income of 63 K |
|
63.5 |
63.5 |
21.8 |
41.7 |
13.2 |
32.0 |
28.5 |
(3.5) |
|
|
b |
s |
G.A.F. v. L.E.D., 2005 CanLII 32923 (ON S.C.) |
876 |
939 |
$ 876 per month child support of which 390 per month is s.7 expense and arrears and $ 939 spousal support with 13 K arrears, mans income is 63.5 K per year |
|
65 |
65 |
24.6 |
40.4 |
8.7 |
0.0 |
31.7 |
31.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Clement v. Clement, 2007 CanLII 12686 (ON S.C.) |
600 |
1450 |
$ 1450 spousal support per month and $ 600 per month child support based on an income of 65 K per year |
|
68 |
60 |
24.1 |
43.9 |
14.0 |
0.0 |
29.9 |
29.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Spicer v. Benoit-Spicer, 2004 CanLII 11631 (ON S.C. |
9070 |
1100 |
$ 907 per month child support and $ 1100 per month spousal support, man claims 60 K income but must pay on fomer 68 K per year amount |
|
72 |
72 |
23.5 |
48.5 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
32.9 |
32.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Billings v. Billings, 2004 CanLII 5029 (ON S.C.) |
957 |
1000 |
$ 957 per month interim child support and $ 1000 K spousal support, mans income 72 K |
|
73 |
73 |
31.1 |
41.9 |
18.1 |
3.4 |
23.7 |
20.3 |
|
|
b |
s |
Somerville v. Somerville, 2006 CanLII 9984 (ON S.C.) |
x |
400 |
$ 958 per month child support and $ 400 spousal support, s.7 expenses, 3.4 K arrears, man makes 73 K |
|
73 |
59 |
25.2 |
47.8 |
14.7 |
0.0 |
30.1 |
30.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
R.S.H. v. P.W.H., 2006 CanLII 23958 (ON S.C.) |
1083 |
1317 |
$ 1083 child support per month and $ 1317 spousal support, man claims an income of 59 K and is imputed to 73 K |
|
75 |
75 |
14.0 |
61.0 |
18.4 |
9.7 |
42.6 |
31.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25890 (ON S.C.) |
666 |
500 |
$ 666 per month interim child support and $ 500 spousal support, retroactive arrears, mans income 75 K per year |
|
78 |
78 |
17.1 |
60.9 |
18.2 |
0.0 |
42.7 |
42.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Donaldson v. Dιnommιe, 2004 CanLII 53115 (ON S.C.) |
625 |
800 |
$ 625 child support and $ 800 spousal support, man makes 78 K per year |
|
78 |
45 |
43.0 |
35.0 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
19.6 |
19.4 |
|
|
b |
s |
Rueter v. Rueter, 2003 CanLII 2231 (ON S.C.) |
2183 |
1500 |
$ 1017 per month child support and $ 1066 per month s.7 expenses, and $ 1500 per month spousal support, man claims 45 K income imputed to 78 K per year |
|
79 |
79 |
18.4 |
60.6 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
b |
y |
Marson v. Marson, 2001 CanLII 8534 (ON C.A.) |
1200 |
|
2.5 K spousal support per month, 1.2 child support per month and s.7 expenses, man makes 79 K per year |
|
80 |
80 |
14.9 |
65.1 |
19.0 |
0.0 |
46.1 |
46.1 |
|
|
b |
o |
Foster v. Foster, 2004 ONCJ 114 (CanLII) |
639 |
600 |
$ 600 spousal and $ 639 child, mans income 80 K per year |
|
80 |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b |
s |
Hinke v. Lake, 2007 CanLII 39754 (ON S.C.) |
|
500 |
80 K imputed income for child support purposes for 2 children, $ 500 spousal support per month |
|
84.1 |
84.1 |
28.8 |
55.3 |
16.7 |
22.0 |
38.6 |
16.6 |
|
|
b |
s |
Giles v. Giles, 2002 CanLII 2785 (ON S.C.) |
700 |
1700 |
1.7 spousal support per month, 0.7 child support per month, retroactive arrears, man makes 84.1 K income per year |
|
85 |
39 |
43.9 |
41.1 |
16.1 |
0.0 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
Hogan v. Hogan, 2004 CanLII 31372 (ON S.C.) |
1035 |
1950 |
$ 1950 per month spousal support, $ 1035 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims 39 K income and is imputed to 85 K |
|
86 |
86 |
26.4 |
59.6 |
21.1 |
22.0 |
38.5 |
16.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
Stancheff v. Stancheff, 2005 CanLII 2059 (ON S.C.) |
1100 |
1000 |
1 K per month spousal support retroactive, 1.1 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, man makes 86 K per year |
|
96 |
96 |
24.6 |
71.4 |
23.2 |
4.5 |
48.2 |
43.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Evans v. Evans, 2003 CanLII 2021 (ON S.C.) |
752 |
1300 |
$ 1300 per month spousal support and $ 752 child support, 4.5 K retroactive arrears, mans income 96 K per year |
|
98 |
98 |
24.1 |
73.9 |
25.9 |
0.0 |
48.0 |
48.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
Cianciotta v. Cianciotta, 2007 CanLII 24076 (ON S.C.) |
779 |
1232 |
$ 779 child support and $ 1232 per month spousal support, mans income 98 K |
|
100 |
0.0 |
45.6 |
54.4 |
21.0 |
36.0 |
33.4 |
(2.6) |
|
|
b |
y |
Higgins v. Higgins, 2006 CanLII 33303 (ON C.A.) |
1600 |
2200 |
3.8 K combined support plus 1 K per month arrears, spousal support 2.2 K per month, s.7 expenses and retroactive lump sums, man is assignee in bankruptcy, mans income imputed to 100 K |
|
100 |
100 |
32.4 |
67.6 |
25.5 |
0.0 |
42.1 |
42.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
Logiacco v. Papadopoulos, 2005 CanLII 5473 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
1500 |
1.5 K spousal support per month, 1.2 K child support per month, man makes 100 K per year |
|
102 |
55 |
47.5 |
54.5 |
29.2 |
0.0 |
25.3 |
25.3 |
|
|
b |
s |
Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 11695 (ON S.C.) |
2460 |
1500 |
$ 1960 per month child support and $ 500 per month s.7 expense and $ 1500 per month spousal support, man claims 55 K income and is imputed to 102 K |
|
105 |
105 |
32.4 |
72.6 |
35.0 |
(22.5) |
37.6 |
60.1 |
|
|
b |
y |
Raaymakers v. Green, 2006 CanLII 719 (ON C.A.) |
1500 |
1200 |
1.2 K spousal support per month, 1.5 K childs support, trial costs against wife reduced to 11.5 K from 57 K and 10 K costs of appeal, man makes 105 K per year |
|
120 |
120 |
28.2 |
91.8 |
39.9 |
5.7 |
51.9 |
46.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Minty v. Minty, 2003 CanLII 2185 (ON S.C.) |
724 |
1500 |
$ 1500 per month spousal support and $ 724 per month child support and s.7 expenses, retroactive s.7 expenses |
|
132 |
55 |
67.2 |
64.8 |
35.3 |
0.0 |
29.5 |
29.5 |
|
|
b |
y |
Riel v. Holland, 2003 CanLII 3433 (ON C.A.) |
2200 |
3400 |
3.4 spousal support per month, 2.2 child support per month, man claims 55 K and is imputed to 132 K per year |
|
132 |
132 |
48.0 |
84.0 |
45.1 |
32.0 |
38.9 |
6.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
S.L. v. A.L., 2003 CanLII 2161 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
1500 |
2.5 K per month spousal support, 1.5 K per month child support, 132 K imputed income, 32 K arrears |
|
150 |
150 |
69.6 |
80.4 |
47.2 |
15.5 |
33.2 |
17.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Elieff v. Elieff, 2007 CanLII 15787 (ON S.C.) |
3000 |
2600 |
3 K per month child support and 2.6 K per month spousal support and $ 200 per month s.7 expenses based on an income of 150 K, 40 K interim disbursement, 15.5 K costs |
|
171 |
171 |
69.6 |
101.4 |
46.5 |
0.0 |
59.4 |
59.4 |
|
|
b |
s |
Antonopoulos v. Antonopoulos, 2006 CanLII 3289 (ON S.C.) |
1300 |
4500 |
4.5 K spousal support per month, 1.3 K child support per month for 1 child, man earns 171 K per year |
|
175 |
175 |
57.6 |
117.4 |
67.1 |
0.0 |
50.3 |
50.3 |
|
|
b |
s |
Hackett v. Leung, 2005 CanLII 27603 (ON S.C.) |
3100 |
1700 |
1.7 K spousal support per month, 3.1 K child support |
|
179 |
179 |
51.6 |
127.4 |
61.7 |
22.0 |
65.7 |
43.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Schmidt v. Haley, 2004 CanLII 34344 (ON S.C.) |
1300 |
3000 |
3 K per month spousal support and 1.3 K child support, retroactive arrears, man makes 179 K per year |
|
180 |
180 |
95.7 |
84.3 |
52.0 |
0.0 |
32.3 |
32.3 |
|
|
b |
s |
Lewi v. Lewi, 2005 CanLII 4441 (ON S.C.) |
2750 |
4188 |
50 K per year spousal support, 33 K per year child support, s.7 expenses, 2 children in university, mans income is 180 K per year |
|
190 |
190 |
76.0 |
114.0 |
58.5 |
0.0 |
55.5 |
55.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
Da Silva v. Da Silva, 2004 CanLII 8940 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
4500 |
Interim spousal support of 4.5 K per month, child support 1.5 K, 71.5 % of s.7 expenses, man makes 190 K per year |
|
200 |
28 |
93.3 |
106.7 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
b |
s |
Mashadi (Bankruptcy), Re, 2004 CanLII 15923 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
$ 7771 per month child and spousal support, man claims income of 28 K and is imputed to 200 K per year, judge says he runs a cash business |
|
204 |
165 |
54.0 |
150.0 |
78.9 |
0.0 |
71.0 |
71.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
Tymoszewicz (Re), 2007 CanLII 39765 (ON S.C.) |
2000 |
2000 |
2 K per month interim child support and 2 K per month temporary spousal support based on an imputed income of 204 K, man claims income of 165 K |
|
219 |
219 |
138.0 |
81.0 |
66.8 |
0.0 |
14.2 |
14.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Watson v. Watson, 2004 CanLII 19612 (ON S.C.) |
6100 |
5400 |
5.4 K spousal support per month, 6.1 K child support per month including s.7 expenses of $ 3832 per month, man makes 219 K per year |
|
227 |
140 |
79.2 |
147.8 |
72.9 |
90.0 |
74.9 |
(15.1) |
|
|
b |
s |
Jordan v. Stewart, 2002 CanLII 2678 (ON S.C.) |
1600 |
5000 |
5 K spousal support per month retroactive for 18 months, 1.6 K child support per month, mans declared income of 140 K imputed to 227 K |
|
250 |
52 |
99.6 |
150.4 |
75.2 |
20.0 |
75.2 |
55.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Sheikh v. Sheikh, 2005 CanLII 14151 (ON S.C.) |
1800 |
6500 |
20 K lump sum and 6.5 K per month spousal support, 1.8 K per month child support, man claims 52 K income and is imputed to 250 K per year |
|
376 |
376 |
57.6 |
318.4 |
154.3 |
42.0 |
164.1 |
122.1 |
|
|
b |
y |
Walsh v. Walsh, 2004 CanLII 36110 (ON C.A.) |
2000 |
2800 |
2.8 K spousal support per month, 2 K child support, 42 K arrears, man makes 376 K income per year |
|
400 |
243 |
165.3 |
234.7 |
139.2 |
0.0 |
95.5 |
95.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
Wells v. Wells, 2003 CanLII 2270 (ON S.C.) |
6275 |
7500 |
7.5 K spousal support per month, 5.6 K child support per month and maximum 675 per month s.7 expense, man claims 243 K income and wife asks he be imputed to 600 K but court imputes to 400 K |
|
530 |
150 |
195.6 |
334.4 |
191.2 |
113.0 |
143.2 |
30.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.) |
7300 |
9000 |
9 K per month spousal support., 7.3 K per month child support, man claims income of 150 K and is imputed to 530 K, 113 K arrears |
|
561 |
561 |
108.0 |
453.0 |
227.9 |
7.0 |
225.1 |
218.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
Loy v. Loy, 2005 CanLII 27606 (ON S.C.) |
2000 |
5000 |
7 K per month spousal support, 2 K per month child support, 1 year retroactive |
|
890 |
890 |
134.1 |
755.9 |
349.9 |
57.0 |
405.1 |
348.1 |
|
|
b |
y |
Marinangeli v. Marinangeli, 2003 CanLII 27673 (ON C.A.) |
5800 |
10500 |
10.5 K per month spousal support, 5.8 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man makes 890 K per year, 35 K costs |
|
|
0.0 |
3.6 |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
c |
o |
Pompey v. Pompey, 1992 CanLII 4044 (ON C.J.) |
300 |
|
$ 300 per month child support, 6.3 K arrears, man is unemployed but must contiunue paying at former level |
|
|
20 |
6.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
c |
s |
Stutz v. Stutz Sorrenson, 2002 CanLII 2815 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 20 K income and is imputed higher |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.4 |
(1.4) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.4) |
(1.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Bak v. Dobell, 2005 CanLII 36463 (ON S.C.) |
117 |
|
$ 117 per month child support, man supported by father, court finds man has no income |
|
9 |
0.0 |
1.2 |
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
c |
y |
Difrancesco v. Couto, 2001 CanLII 8613 (ON C.A.) |
102 |
|
$ 102 per month child support, man claims no income and 9 K per year is imputed, arrears 40 K |
|
10 |
10 |
7.8 |
2.2 |
0.0 |
45 |
(5.8) |
(50.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Maurice v. Maurice, 2003 CanLII 2418 (ON S.C.) |
653 |
|
$ 653 per month child support, 45 K arrears, set off against 40 K of his value in home, mans income 10 K |
|
10.8 |
10.8 |
1.9 |
8.9 |
0.2 |
5.7 |
8.7 |
3.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.) |
158 |
|
$ 158 per month retroactive child support, claim of undue hardship denied, mans income 10.8 K per year |
|
13 |
4 |
2.4 |
11.6 |
0.6 |
6.0 |
11.0 |
5.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.) |
200 |
|
$ 200 per month child support, 6 K in s.7 expense arrears, man declares 4 K income and is imputed to 13 K. |
|
15 |
2 |
3.5 |
11.5 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
10.4 |
10.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.) |
294 |
|
$ 294 child support per month, man claims 2 K income and is imputed to 15 K |
|
15 |
15 |
3.0 |
12.0 |
1.1 |
15.0 |
10.9 |
(4.1) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lantaigne v. Lantaigne, 2005 CanLII 39886 (ON S.C.) |
250 |
|
$ 250 per month child support reduced from $ 500, 40 K arrears rescinded to 15 K, enforcement stayed, man has 15 K income, wife has higher income |
|
16 |
0.0 |
1.5 |
14.5 |
1.3 |
4.6 |
13.2 |
8.6 |
|
|
c |
y |
Drygala v. Pauli, 2002 CanLII 41868 (ON C.A.) |
127 |
|
$ 127 per month retroactive 3 years, man claims 7.3 K loss and is imputed to 16 K per year |
|
16.1 |
11.1 |
2.8 |
13.3 |
1.3 |
14.4 |
12.0 |
(2.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Clark v. Clark, 2002 CanLII 2773 (ON S.C.) |
237 |
|
$ 900 per month child support changed to $ 700 changed to $ 237, husband diagnosed with cancer , 14.4 K arrears, man claims 11.1 K and is imputed to 16.1 K per year |
|
17 |
5 |
1.6 |
15.4 |
1.5 |
9.7 |
13.9 |
4.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
B.O.v. A.K.O., 2005 ONCJ 328 (CanLII) |
134 |
|
$ 134 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 17 K, 9.7 K arrears |
|
17.5 |
17.5 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Montgomery v. Montgomery, 2007 ONCJ 3 (CanLII) |
431 |
|
$ 431 per month child support for 4 children based on a gross income of 17.5 K, arrears rescinded. |
|
17.8 |
17.8 |
2.4 |
15.4 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
13.8 |
11.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Self v. Reid, 2006 ONCJ 30 (CanLII) |
200 |
|
$ 139 for child support and $ 61 for s.7 expenses and 1.2 K arrears and 1 K costs, mans income 17.8 K |
|
18 |
2.8 |
1.7 |
16.3 |
1.7 |
21.0 |
14.6 |
(6.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Cherry v. Cherry, 2004 CanLII 1649 (ON S.C.) |
144 |
|
$ 144 per month child support based on an imputed income of 18 K for failing to make efforts to become employed, man on disability with benefits of 2.8 K per year, 32 K arrears rescinded to 21 K |
|
18 |
18 |
3.4 |
14.6 |
1.7 |
15.1 |
12.9 |
(2.2) |
|
|
c |
o |
Vaughan v. Vaughan, 2007 ONCJ 21 (CanLII) |
281 |
|
$ 281 child support 15.1 K arrears, mans income 18 K per year |
|
18 |
18 |
3.2. |
14.8 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
13.1 |
13.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Luedtke v. Vuletic, 2001 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) |
140 |
|
$ 140 per month child support and 50 % of s.7 expenses based on 18 K income, mans answer struck and he cant participate at trial |
|
18.7 |
18.7 |
1.7 |
17.0 |
1.8 |
24.0 |
15.2 |
(8.8) |
|
|
c |
o |
Hamilton v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 35 (CanLII) |
145 |
|
$ 145 per month child support based on an income of 18.7 K, 24 K arrears |
|
19 |
19 |
6.0 |
13.0 |
1.9 |
17.0 |
11.1 |
(5.9) |
|
|
c |
o |
DuQuesnay v. Scrivens, 2007 ONCJ 257 (CanLII) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month child support, 17 K arrears, man claims 19 K average income, over 10 K owing to social services |
|
19 |
19 |
4.1 |
14.9 |
1.9 |
0.0 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Mlambo v. Mlambo, 2007 ONCJ 240 (CanLII) |
339 |
|
$ 339 per month for 3 children based on income of 19 K |
|
19 |
19 |
4.5 |
14.5 |
1.9 |
40.5 |
13.6 |
(26.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Woodland v. Woodland, 2005 CanLII 34591 (ON S.C.) |
375 |
|
Child support reduced from $ 541 to $ 375, arrears fixed at 40 K, mans income 19 K |
|
20 |
0.0 |
4.6 |
15.4 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
13.3 |
13.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Marchese v. Marchese, 2002 CanLII 40030 (ON S.C.) |
265 |
|
$ 265 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man studying for PHD has 20 K income imputed |
|
20 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
16.3 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
14.2 |
14.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 37233 (ON S.C.) |
308 |
|
$ 308 interim child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 20 K income |
|
20.2 |
20.2 |
2.0 |
18.2 |
2.1 |
0.6 |
16.1 |
15.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
G.R.L. v. S.L., 2005 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) |
167 |
|
$ 167 child support per month, $ 611 in retroactive arrears, man pays two other child support claims, mans income 20.2 K per year |
|
20.8 |
20.8 |
3.4 |
17.4 |
2.3 |
11.5 |
15.1 |
3.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Barker-Papos v. Mihaly, 2005 ONCJ 259 (CanLII) |
285 |
|
$ 285 per month child support based on an income of 20.8 K, 11.5 K arrears |
|
21 |
10.2 |
4.0 |
17.0 |
2.3 |
5.7 |
14.7 |
9.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 1276 (ON S.C.) |
337 |
|
$ 297 and $ 40 s.7 expenses per month child support retroactive, man claims 10.2 K income and is imputed to 21 K |
|
21.2 |
21.2 |
3.6 |
17.6 |
2.3 |
46.0 |
15.3 |
(30.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
G.P.M. v. S.J.F., 2005 CanLII 19840 (ON S.C.) |
300 |
|
$ 1804 child support reduced to $ 410 then later $ 300, spousal support terminated, 36 K costs and 10 K for assault and 28 K for equalization, mans income 21.2 K |
|
21.4 |
21.4 |
3.9 |
17.5 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
15.1 |
15.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bell v. Bell, 2006 CanLII 23927 (ON S.C. |
327 |
|
$ 327 per month for natural son and step daughter, man has unemployment income of 21.4 K, man denies being parent of stepdaughter |
|
21.8 |
21.8 |
1.8 |
20.0 |
2.5 |
3.9 |
17.5 |
13.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
C.U. v. D.D., 2007 ONCJ 478 (CanLII) |
148 |
|
$ 148 per month child support, 2 years 2 months retroactive support, mans income 21.8 K |
|
21.8 |
21.8 |
2.1 |
19.7 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
17.2 |
17.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Jackpine v. Gamsby, 2003 CanLII 26235 (ON C.J.) |
178 |
|
$ 350 per month child support changed to $ 178, mans income is 21.8 K |
|
22 |
0.0 |
2.4 |
19.6 |
2.5 |
2.0 |
17.1 |
15.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.) |
199 |
|
$ 199 per month child support, 2 K arrears, variation denied, loses job because FRO takes drivers license, income held imputed at former 22 K |
|
22 |
20 |
2.3 |
19.7 |
2.5 |
5.7 |
17.2 |
11.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
H.F. v. P.F., 2007 ONCJ 170 (CanLII) |
188 |
|
$ 188 per month child support, retoactive arrears 20 K, imputed income to 22 K |
|
23.6 |
0.0 |
3.8 |
19.2 |
2.9 |
12.0 |
16.3 |
4.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fournier v. Hynes, 2007 CanLII 2653 (ON S.C.) |
320 |
|
$ 320 per month child support and $ 100 per month repayment of arrears, man claims to be unemployed but income of 23.6 K imputed |
|
24 |
24 |
4.2 |
19.8 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
16.8 |
16.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Perkins v. O'Neill, 2005 CanLII 39892 (ON S.C.) |
350 |
|
$ 350 per month interim child support based on an income of 24 K |
|
24 |
24 |
2.6 |
21.4 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
18.4 |
18.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
R.P.H. v. V.M., 2003 CanLII 2109 (ON S.C.) |
213 |
|
$ 213 per month child support based on imputed income of 24 K |
|
25 |
12 |
5.7 |
19.3 |
3.2 |
43.6 |
16.1 |
(26.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Courchesne v. Courchesne, 2004 CanLII 5003 (ON S.C.) |
474 |
|
Man must pay former level of $ 600 per month but now child support is $ 474 and remainder goes to arrears, 77.1 K arrears reduced to 43.6 K, income imputed to 25 K from claimed 12 K |
|
25 |
25 |
7.9 |
17.1 |
3.2 |
8.5 |
14.1 |
5.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Woodbridge v. Hayes, 2004 ONCJ 168 (CanLII) |
660 |
|
$ 660 per month child support reduced to $ 360, 8.5 K arrears, mans income 25 K |
|
26 |
13 |
2.6 |
23.4 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Trafford v. Trafford, 2006 ONCJ 389 (CanLII)
|
216 |
|
$ 216 per month for 1 child based on imputed income of 26 K, man declares 13 K income |
|
26 |
15 |
6.0 |
20.0 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
16.6 |
16.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
D.B. v. J.B., 2006 CanLII 726 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 26 K |
|
26 |
22 |
4.5 |
21.5 |
3.4 |
14.1 |
18.1 |
4.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
V.C.E. v. C.E.T., 2004 ONCJ 309 (CanLII) |
379 |
|
$ 379 m per month child support, 3 years 1 month retroactive arrears, man claims 22 K income and is imputed to 26 K |
|
26.3 |
26.3 |
2.8 |
23.5 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
20.1 |
20.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Z.(A.) v. W.(J.), 2004 ONCJ 161 (CanLII) |
235 |
|
$ 235 per month child support based on an income of 26.3 K |
|
27 |
0.0 |
4.4 |
22.6 |
3.6 |
22.0 |
19.0 |
(3.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lalonde v. Lalonde, 2005 CanLII 16637 (ON S.C.) |
365 |
|
$ 240 per month child support and $ 125 per month s.7 expenses, 22 K arrears, man claims no income and is imputed to 27 K per year |
|
27 |
13 |
6.5 |
20.5 |
3.6 |
0.0 |
16.9 |
16.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Barbaric v. Nielsen, 2007 CanLII 14320 (ON S.C.) |
543 |
|
$ 543 per month child support, income imputed to 27 K, 13 K claimed |
|
27 |
27 |
5.1 |
21.9 |
3.6 |
13.0 |
18.3 |
5.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kampman v. Kampman, 2006 CanLII 38657 (ON S.C.) |
429 |
|
$ 429 per month child support and 13 K arrears, mans income 27 K. |
|
28 |
12 |
1.2 |
26.8 |
3.8 |
0.0 |
23.0 |
23.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
O'Neill v. O'Neill, 2004 CanLII 8231 (ON S.C.) |
100 |
|
$ 100 per month child support, man claims 12 K and is imputed to 28 K |
|
29 |
29 |
4.3 |
24.7 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
20.7 |
20.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Alvarez v. Vargas, 2006 ONCJ 474 (CanLII)
|
360 |
|
$ 258 per month child support and $ 102 per month s.7 expense, man makes 29 K per year |
|
29 |
29 |
7.3 |
21.7 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
17.7 |
17.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Fuller v. Da Ponte, 2005 ONCJ 265 (CanLII)
|
607 |
|
$ 285 per month child support and $ 322 per month s.7 expense, mans income 29 K |
|
30.0 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
20.4 |
20.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Abdilla v. Abdilla, 2004 CanLII 35086 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 child support per month, unemployed and income imputed to 30 K |
|
30 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
25.2 |
4.2 |
13.8 |
21.0 |
7.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) |
398 |
|
$ 398 per month child support, contempt penalty 10 K, 15 K security, wife makes false criminal allegations, man claims no income and is imputed to 30 K, 1.75 K retroactive s.7 award, arrears |
|
30 |
12.6 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
8.4 |
20.4 |
12.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 per month child support, arrears 8.4 K, man claims 12.6 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
|
30 |
24 |
6.8 |
23.2 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Murch v. Bell, 2003 CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.) |
440 |
|
$ 400 per month child support and $ 40 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
|
30 |
30 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
7.7 |
20.2 |
12.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kalla v. Kalla, 2003 CanLII 2322 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 834 child support order changed to $ 557 then changed to $ 446, man on disability earns 2.5 K per month, 7.7 arrears |
|
30 |
30 |
3.1 |
26.9 |
4.2 |
41.0 |
22.7 |
(18.3) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kumar v. McKenna (Kumar), 2003 CanLII 2156 (ON S.C.) |
258 |
|
$ 258 per month child support and 5 K lump sum spousal support award, 80 K arrears reduced to 36 K, man earns 30 K per year and is incapacitated |
|
30 |
5.0 |
6.8 |
23.2 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ike v. Ike, 2005 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) |
568 |
|
$ 568 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
|
30.3 |
30.3 |
6.3 |
24.0 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.8 |
19.8 |
|
|
c |
o |
Hazel v. Leslie, 2007 ONCJ 543 (CanLII) |
400 |
|
$ 400 per month child support, s.7 expenses, mans income 30.3 K per year |
|
32.5 |
32.5 |
3.6 |
28.9 |
4.7 |
1.0 |
24.2 |
23.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ciffolillo v. Nieweglowski, 2007 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) |
298 |
|
$ 298 per month child support, arrears 1 K, fathers income 32.5 K per year |
|
32.5 |
32.5 |
3.8 |
28.7 |
4.7 |
0.0 |
24.0 |
24.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Harvey v. Baker, 2007 ONCJ 574 (CanLII) |
320 |
|
$ 320 per month child support for one child based on income of 32.5 K |
|
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
25.1 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
20.2 |
20.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.) |
663 |
|
$ 663 per month child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 33 K, mans proceeds from sale of home to be held as security for support |
|
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
25.1 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
20.2 |
20.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 13820 (ON S.C.) |
633 |
|
$ 633 child support per month intentionally unemployed for going back to school, no variation, 33 K income imputed |
|
33 |
33 |
7.8 |
25.2 |
4.9 |
55.0 |
20.3 |
(35.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kauric v. Kauric, 2006 CanLII 21594 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 650 per month child support reduced from $ 1500, 41 K US arrears, mans income 33 K |
|
33.3 |
33.3 |
7.3 |
26.0 |
4.9 |
3.0 |
21.1 |
18.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Yackobeck v. Brazeau, 2002 CanLII 46583 (ON C.J.) |
483 |
|
$ 483 per month child support and ½ of s.7 expenses, support based on an income of 33.3 K per year, 3k costs |
|
33.5 |
33.5 |
5.4 |
28.1 |
5.0 |
0.0 |
23.1 |
23.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
S.S. v. M.S. and P.A., 2006 ONCJ 311 (CanLII)
|
327 |
|
$ 327 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man makes 33.5 K income per year |
|
34 |
20 |
3.6 |
30.4 |
5.1 |
12.0 |
25.3 |
13.3 |
|
|
c |
o |
Spencer v. Scarlett, 2005 ONCJ 300 (CanLII) |
304 |
|
$ 304 per month child support, 12 K arrears, imprisoned for default 90 days, man claims 20 K average income but must pay on 34 K income |
|
34 |
34 |
7.8 |
26.2 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
21.1 |
21.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Zoldy v. Zoldy, 2007 ONCJ 24 (CanLII) |
651 |
|
$ 651 per month for 3 children based on an income of 34 K |
|
35 |
0.0 |
5.5 |
29.5 |
5.3 |
5.7 |
24.2 |
18.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bhullar v. Bhullar, 2005 CanLII 18718 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support for 1 child based on an imputed income of 35 K and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrearsman claims no income, previous 5 years income tax average 19 K |
|
35 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
31.3 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
26.0 |
26.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bowman v. Cheluk, 2003 CanLII 1938 (ON S.C.) |
305 |
|
$ 305 child support, $ 2500 spousal support paid by wife terminated, man is unemployed but income is imputed to 35 K |
|
35 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
29.6 |
5.3 |
17.0 |
24.3 |
8.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.) |
448 |
|
$ 448 per month child support, 17 K arrears, variation denied, man quit job and is unemployed and income imputed at 35 K, 3.5 K costs |
|
35 |
14.2 |
4.0 |
31.0 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
25.7 |
25.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pochodaj v. Pochodaj, 2006 CanLII 13104 (ON S.C.) |
333 |
|
$333 child support per month based imputed income of 35 K, man declares income of 14.2 K |
|
35 |
18 |
6.0 |
29.0 |
5.3 |
30.0 |
23.7 |
(6.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
DiMillo v. DiMillo, 2007 CanLII 1340 (ON S.C.) |
504 |
|
$ 504 K per month child support, 30 K arrears, 18 K income claimed imputed to 35 K, cannot ask for access to child until he pays 15 K |
|
35 |
18 |
8.2 |
26.8 |
5.3 |
36.0 |
21.5 |
(14.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Mahoney v. Laderoute, 2007 CanLII 37893 (ON S.C.) |
681 |
|
$ 681 per month child support, 36 K retroactive arrears, man claims 18 K income and is imputed to 35 K |
|
35 |
35 |
6.1 |
28.9 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
23.6 |
23.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Kelly v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 242 (CanLII) |
506 |
|
$ 506 per month child support, mans income 35 K |
|
35 |
35 |
8.1 |
26.9 |
5.3 |
4.3 |
21.6 |
17.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bell v. Lloyd-Bell, 2005 CanLII 39875 (ON S.C.) |
672 |
|
$ 672 per month in child support, arrears of $ 4275, mans income 35 K |
|
35 |
35 |
6.0 |
29.0 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
23.7 |
23.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Collis v. Wilson, 2003 CanLII 2413 (ON S.C.) |
375 |
|
$ 375 per month in child support and s.7 expenses based on income of 35 K |
|
35 |
35 |
6.3 |
28.7 |
5.3 |
20.0 |
23.4 |
3.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dang v. Duong, 2006 CanLII 34339 (ON S.C.) |
521 |
|
$ 521 per month interim child support for 2 children based on 35 K income, wife gets 20 K lump sum support payment |
|
35 |
35 |
5.8 |
29.2 |
5.3 |
40.6 |
23.9 |
(16.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.) |
481 |
|
$ 481 per month child support, man must pay on imputed income for 2 ½ years he was in jail, arrears 40.6 K, mans income imputed at 35 K while in jail |
|
36 |
36 |
8.8 |
27.2 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
21.7 |
21.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lamontagne v. Lamontagne, 2006 ONCJ 498 (CanLII) |
730 |
|
$ 705 per month child support for 3 children based on income of 36 K, $ 25 per month s.7 expenses, hardship due to second family |
|
36 |
36 |
9.7 |
26.3 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fraser v. McKinlay, 2004 CanLII 5857 (ON S.C.) |
682 |
|
$ 682 per month child support based on 36 K income, s.7 expenses |
|
36 |
36 |
5.2 |
30.8 |
5.5 |
11.0 |
25.3 |
14.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
J.J.C. v. K.G.M., 2004 CanLII 10578 (ON S.C.) |
433 |
|
$ 433 per month child support, mother denies all access and remarries, 80 K arrears cut to 11 K, mans current income 36 K |
|
37 |
37 |
4.1 |
32.9 |
5.7 |
42.8 |
27.2 |
(15.6) |
|
|
c |
o |
Pisani v. Jackson, 2007 ONCJ 243 (CanLII) |
345 |
|
$ 345 per month child support on income of 37 K, 42.8 K in arrears |
|
37 |
37 |
8.4 |
28.6 |
5.7 |
12.0 |
22.9 |
10.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Simmons v. Yandt, 2004 CanLII 8101 (ON S.C.) |
698 |
|
$ 698 per month child support, arrears reduced based on actual income, mans income 37 K |
|
38 |
38 |
9.5 |
28.5 |
5.9 |
0.0 |
22.6 |
22.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lewis v. Crearer, 2007 ONCJ 353 (CanLII) |
792 |
|
$ 502 per month child support and $ 290 per month s.7 expenses, mans income imputed to 38 K |
|
38 |
38 |
4.0 |
34.0 |
5.9 |
1.0 |
27.9 |
26.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
T.(P.) v. A.(S.), 2004 ONCJ 295 (CanLII) |
332 |
|
$ 332 per month child support, retroactive arrears of $ 950, mans income 38 K |
|
39 |
0.0 |
6.7 |
32.3 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
26.2 |
26.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Zagar v. Zagar, 2006 ONCJ 296 (CanLII) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support, man unemployed and imputed at 39 K |
|
39 |
24 |
6.7 |
32.3 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
26.2 |
26.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Priftis v. Priftis, 2005 CanLII 47093 (ON S.C.) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 39 K |
|
39 |
39 |
6.9 |
32.1 |
6.1 |
40.0 |
26.0 |
(14.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
D'Souza v. D'Souza, 2003 CanLII 1933 (ON S.C.) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month interim child support, 40 K arrears based on a 39 K income |
|
39 |
39 |
7.1 |
31.9 |
6.1 |
6.0 |
25.8 |
19.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Olaveson v. Olaveson, 2007 CanLII 23168 (ON S.C.) |
591 |
|
$ 591 per month child support based on income of 39 K, 6 K retroactive arrears |
|
40 |
10 |
6.8 |
33.2 |
6.3 |
13.0 |
26.9 |
13.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dang v. Hornby, 2006 CanLII 12973 (ON S.C.) |
570 |
|
$ 570 per month child support reduced from $ 762, 13 K arrears, income imputed from 10 K claimed to 40 K |
|
40 |
12 |
7.2 |
32.8 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
26.5 |
26.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Mollica v. Melchionna, 2006 CanLII 41526 (ON S.C.) |
601 |
|
$ 601 per month child support, man claims 12 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
|
40 |
26 |
7.0 |
33.0 |
6.3 |
4.8 |
27.0 |
22.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.) |
580 |
|
$ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
|
40 |
40 |
4.1 |
35.9 |
6.3 |
12.0 |
29.6 |
17.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Baxter v. Beharry, 2006 ONCJ 1 (CanLII) |
345 |
|
$ 345 per month on 2 child support orders, man is wrongfully imputed to 1 million income, most arrears rescinded as income retroactively varied to closer to 100 K and finally to 40 K per year on both orders. welfare is opposing party |
|
40 |
40 |
12.3 |
27.7 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
21.4 |
21.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bielak-Montemurro v. Montemurro, 2007 CanLII 2800 (ON S.C.) |
1021 |
|
$ 771 per month child support and $ 250 per month s.7 expenses based on an income of 40 K |
|
40 |
40 |
10.2 |
29.8 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
23.5 |
23.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Viertelhausen v. Burbridge, 2006 CanLII 5311 (ON S.C.) |
855 |
|
$ 855 per month child support, man seeks termination and wife seeks retroactive, mans income 40 K |
|
41 |
27 |
7.8 |
33.2 |