Legend
1 Court Ordered Payors Income per Year in $ 1000s
2 Income Claimed by Payors per Year in $ 1000s
3 Total Support Ordered per Month in $s
4 Support Recipients Income per Year in $ 1000s
5 Type of Support ( c= Child Support, s = Spousal Support, b = Both Child and Spousal Support )
6 Court ( s = Superior Court, o = Ontario Court of Justice, y = Court of Appeal )
7 Child Support per Month in $s
8 Spousal Support per Month in $s
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Case |
7 CS |
8 SS |
Outcome |
|
24.6 |
24.6 |
19.8 |
4.8 |
1.4 |
0.0 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
|
|
b |
s |
Lear v. Lear, 2004 CanLII 14820 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
650 |
$ 1000 child support and $ 650 spousal support from man with 24.6 K per year claimed income |
|
30 |
30 |
5.5 |
24.5 |
3.7 |
0.8 |
20.8 |
20.0 |
|
|
b |
o |
Bouchard v. Ouellet, 2005 ONCJ 335 (CanLII) |
266 |
192 |
$ 266 per month child support and $ 192 spousal support, man does not give financial figures and is imputed to an income of 30 K, 3 months retroactive support |
|
34 |
26 |
9.5 |
24.5 |
5.0 |
11.9 |
19.5 |
7.6 |
|
|
b |
o |
DeFina v. DeFina, 2007 ONCJ 94 (CanLII) |
660 |
129 |
$ 660 per month child support and $ 129 spousal support, 1 year and 3 months retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income imputed to 34 K |
|
35 |
35 |
12.4 |
24.1 |
4.1 |
6.3 |
20.0 |
13.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Elizabeth Ann Zunti v. Ian George McIntosh, 2004 CanLII 19511 (ON S.C.) |
506 |
400 |
$ 506 per month child support and $ 400 per month spousal support, 7 months retroactive, s.7 expenses, mans income 35 K per year |
|
36 |
36 |
8.6 |
27.4 |
6.5 |
0.0 |
20.9 |
20.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Mahood v. Mahood, 2005 CanLII 19841 (ON S.C.) |
518 |
200 |
$ 518 child support to be reduced to $ 313 when child graduates, $ 200 spousal support, mans income 36 K per year |
|
38.8 |
38.8 |
11.8 |
27.0 |
4.7 |
19.0 |
22.3 |
3.3 |
|
|
b |
o |
Gregory v. Brown, 2005 ONCJ 284 (CanLII) |
554 |
433 |
$ 554 child support and 433 spousal support, arrears not rescinded, mans income 38.8 K |
|
42.7 |
0.0 |
13.3 |
29.4 |
5.4 |
12.2 |
24.0 |
11.8 |
|
|
b |
o |
T.R. v. R.T., 2006 ONCJ 173 (CanLII) |
605 |
500 |
$ 605 per month child support and $ 500 per month spousal support, man quits job and claims no income and is imputed at 42.7 K per year, 11 months retroactive arrears |
|
43 |
43 |
10.2 |
32.8 |
6.1 |
42.5 |
26.7 |
(15.8) |
|
|
b |
s |
Connors v. Connors, 2006 CanLII 17597 (ON S.C.) |
651 |
200 |
$ 651 child support per month and $ 200 spousal support, arrears 42.5 K, enforcement action by FRO, man makes 43 K |
|
45 |
45 |
15.9 |
29.1 |
5.6 |
3.5 |
23.5 |
20.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
M.S. v. I.S., 2003 CanLII 2239 (ON S.C.) |
300 |
900 |
$ 300 child support and $ 900 spousal support, s.7 expenses, arrears reduced from 5.4 K to 3.5 K,.mans income 45 K |
|
45.9 |
45.9 |
12.5 |
33.4 |
6.8 |
31.6 |
26.6 |
(5.0) |
|
|
b |
s |
P.R. v. W.M.R., 2006 CanLII 28911 (ON S.C.) |
880 |
160 |
$ 880 per month child support and $ 160 spousal support, arrears partly rescinded, mans income 45.9 K per year, costs 12.6 K |
|
46 |
46 |
16.8 |
31.2 |
4.8 |
1.3 |
26.4 |
25.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
Millward v. Millward, 2003 CanLII 2116 (ON S.C.) |
396 |
1000 |
$ 1000 spousal support and $ 396 per month child support 1.3 K s.7 expense, short marrige, short marriage, mans income 46 K |
|
50 |
50 |
15.4 |
34.6 |
5.9 |
2.5 |
28.7 |
26.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Pollock v. Pollock, 2006 CanLII 3483 (ON S.C.) |
435 |
850 |
$ 850 spousal support and $ 435 child support, 2.5 K in lump sum support, non depletion order, disability and pension imputed to 50 K |
|
50 |
50 |
23.8 |
26.2 |
5.6 |
0.0 |
20.6 |
20.6 |
|
|
b |
s |
Stigter v. Stigter, 2006 CanLII 43638 (ON S.C.) |
986 |
1000 |
$ 986 per month interim child support and $ 1000 per month spousal support based on income of 50 K |
|
51 |
0.0 |
17.1 |
33.9 |
6.5 |
11.9 |
27.4 |
15.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
P.F. v. E.J.J.F., 2003 CanLII 2115 (ON S.C.) |
713 |
713 |
$ 713 spousal support and $ 713 child support and $ 2300 s.7 expense award and 9.6 K retroactive arrears, man claims no income and is imputed to 51 K |
|
52 |
52 |
11.1 |
40.9 |
12.1 |
2.8 |
28.8 |
26.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
Willson v. Willson, 2003 CanLII 2273 (ON S.C.) |
726 |
200 |
$ 726 child support and $ 200 spousal support based on income of 52 K, 3 months of retoractive spousal support |
|
52.3 |
52.3 |
9.0 |
43.3 |
12.1 |
0.0 |
31.2 |
31.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Somerville v. Somerville, 2005 CanLII 8705 (ON S.C.) |
450 |
300 |
$ 450 child support and $ 300 spousal support, mans income 52.3 K |
|
53.8 |
53.8 |
16.5 |
37.3 |
12.2 |
0.0 |
25.1 |
25.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
Van Bilsen v. Van Bilsen, 2003 CanLII 2012 (ON S.C.) |
979 |
400 |
$ 979 child support per month and $ 400 spousal support, mans income 53.8 K, wife remarries a man with a 50 K income |
|
56.7 |
56.7 |
13.8 |
42.9 |
12.6 |
1.2 |
30.3 |
29.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Newton v. Newton, 2007 CanLII 48990 (ON S.C.)
|
623 |
526 |
623 spousal support, 526 child support based on 56.7 K income and 1 child, 1.2 K retroactive arrears |
|
57 |
57 |
26.4 |
30.6 |
6.5 |
71.1 |
24.1 |
(47.0) |
|
|
b |
s |
Wilson-Tick v. Tick, 2006 CanLII 12964 (ON S.C.) |
866 |
1333 |
$ 866 per month child support, and 16 K per year or more spousal support, man has custody, 28.3 K spousal support arrears and 45.8 K child support arrears, mans income 57 K |
|
58 |
58 |
25.8 |
32.2 |
6.6 |
22.0 |
25.6 |
3.6 |
|
|
b |
o |
Johnson v. Johnson, 2005 ONCJ 325 (CanLII) |
752 |
1400 |
$ 1400 per month spousal support and $ 752 per month child support, retroactive arrears, mans income 58 K |
|
59 |
59 |
22.6 |
36.4 |
8.9 |
10.0 |
27.5 |
17.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
Kropf v. Kropf, 2003 CanLII 2155 (ON S.C.) |
881 |
1000 |
$ 1000 spousal support and $ 881 child support, arrears 10 K, man makes 59 K per year |
|
60 |
40 |
7.3 |
52.7 |
15.5 |
16.5 |
37.2 |
20.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Marok v. Marok, 2003 CanLII 9094 (ON S.C.) |
507 |
100 |
$ 507 per month child support and $ 100 per month spousal support, 16.5 K arrears, man claims 40 K and is imputed to 60 K |
|
60 |
0.0 |
20.6 |
39.4 |
12.3 |
4.0 |
27.1 |
23.0 |
|
|
b |
o |
E.K. v. I.K., 2005 CanLII 26319 (ON C.J.) |
883 |
883 |
$ 883 child support and $ 833 spousal support, man claims no income and is imputed to 60 K, retroactive arrears including 4.5 K owed to Social Services |
|
60 |
25 |
15.9 |
44.1 |
14.6 |
0.0 |
29.4 |
29.4 |
|
|
b |
s |
Scholes v. Scholes, 2003 CanLII 2349 (ON S.C.) |
1076 |
250 |
$ 1076 per month child support and $ 250 interim spousal support, man claims 25 K income and is imputed to 60 K |
|
60 |
60 |
54.0 |
6.0 |
3.8 |
53.0 |
2.2 |
(50.8) |
|
|
b |
s |
Maceus-Agyekum v. Agyekum, 2005 CanLII 10539 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
3500 |
3.5 K spousal support per month, child support lowered to 1 K per month and s.7 expenses, 53 K retroactive arrears including 20 K lump sum spousal support, 50 K additional income imputed during previous order, man agrees to 60 K income |
|
60 |
53 |
26.4 |
33.6 |
10.7 |
0.0 |
22.9 |
22.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Humphrey v. Humphrey, 2006 CanLII 42709 (ON S.C.)
|
900 |
1300 |
$ 1300 spousal support per month and $ 900 child support per month, man claims 53 K per year income and is imputed to 60 K |
|
63 |
63 |
20.2 |
42.8 |
15.0 |
0.0 |
27.8 |
27.8 |
|
|
b |
s |
Manning v. Bain, 2007 CanLII 27974 (ON S.C.) |
1287 |
400 |
$ 1287 per month child support for 3 children and $ 400 spousal support based on income of 63 K |
|
63.5 |
63.5 |
21.8 |
41.7 |
13.2 |
32.0 |
28.5 |
(3.5) |
|
|
b |
s |
G.A.F. v. L.E.D., 2005 CanLII 32923 (ON S.C.) |
876 |
939 |
$ 876 per month child support of which 390 per month is s.7 expense and arrears and $ 939 spousal support with 13 K arrears, mans income is 63.5 K per year |
|
65 |
65 |
24.6 |
40.4 |
8.7 |
0.0 |
31.7 |
31.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Clement v. Clement, 2007 CanLII 12686 (ON S.C.) |
600 |
1450 |
$ 1450 spousal support per month and $ 600 per month child support based on an income of 65 K per year |
|
68 |
60 |
24.1 |
43.9 |
14.0 |
0.0 |
29.9 |
29.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Spicer v. Benoit-Spicer, 2004 CanLII 11631 (ON S.C. |
9070 |
1100 |
$ 907 per month child support and $ 1100 per month spousal support, man claims 60 K income but must pay on fomer 68 K per year amount |
|
72 |
72 |
23.5 |
48.5 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
32.9 |
32.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Billings v. Billings, 2004 CanLII 5029 (ON S.C.) |
957 |
1000 |
$ 957 per month interim child support and $ 1000 K spousal support, mans income 72 K |
|
73 |
73 |
31.1 |
41.9 |
18.1 |
3.4 |
23.7 |
20.3 |
|
|
b |
s |
Somerville v. Somerville, 2006 CanLII 9984 (ON S.C.) |
x |
400 |
$ 958 per month child support and $ 400 spousal support, s.7 expenses, 3.4 K arrears, man makes 73 K |
|
73 |
59 |
25.2 |
47.8 |
14.7 |
0.0 |
30.1 |
30.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
R.S.H. v. P.W.H., 2006 CanLII 23958 (ON S.C.) |
1083 |
1317 |
$ 1083 child support per month and $ 1317 spousal support, man claims an income of 59 K and is imputed to 73 K |
|
75 |
75 |
14.0 |
61.0 |
18.4 |
9.7 |
42.6 |
31.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
Janmaat v. Janmaat, 2005 CanLII 25890 (ON S.C.) |
666 |
500 |
$ 666 per month interim child support and $ 500 spousal support, retroactive arrears, mans income 75 K per year |
|
78 |
78 |
17.1 |
60.9 |
18.2 |
0.0 |
42.7 |
42.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Donaldson v. Dιnommιe, 2004 CanLII 53115 (ON S.C.) |
625 |
800 |
$ 625 child support and $ 800 spousal support, man makes 78 K per year |
|
78 |
45 |
43.0 |
35.0 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
19.6 |
19.4 |
|
|
b |
s |
Rueter v. Rueter, 2003 CanLII 2231 (ON S.C.) |
2183 |
1500 |
$ 1017 per month child support and $ 1066 per month s.7 expenses, and $ 1500 per month spousal support, man claims 45 K income imputed to 78 K per year |
|
79 |
79 |
18.4 |
60.6 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
b |
y |
Marson v. Marson, 2001 CanLII 8534 (ON C.A.) |
1200 |
|
2.5 K spousal support per month, 1.2 child support per month and s.7 expenses, man makes 79 K per year |
|
80 |
80 |
14.9 |
65.1 |
19.0 |
0.0 |
46.1 |
46.1 |
|
|
b |
o |
Foster v. Foster, 2004 ONCJ 114 (CanLII) |
639 |
600 |
$ 600 spousal and $ 639 child, mans income 80 K per year |
|
80 |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b |
s |
Hinke v. Lake, 2007 CanLII 39754 (ON S.C.) |
|
500 |
80 K imputed income for child support purposes for 2 children, $ 500 spousal support per month |
|
84.1 |
84.1 |
28.8 |
55.3 |
16.7 |
22.0 |
38.6 |
16.6 |
|
|
b |
s |
Giles v. Giles, 2002 CanLII 2785 (ON S.C.) |
700 |
1700 |
1.7 spousal support per month, 0.7 child support per month, retroactive arrears, man makes 84.1 K income per year |
|
85 |
39 |
43.9 |
41.1 |
16.1 |
0.0 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
Hogan v. Hogan, 2004 CanLII 31372 (ON S.C.) |
1035 |
1950 |
$ 1950 per month spousal support, $ 1035 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims 39 K income and is imputed to 85 K |
|
86 |
86 |
26.4 |
59.6 |
21.1 |
22.0 |
38.5 |
16.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
Stancheff v. Stancheff, 2005 CanLII 2059 (ON S.C.) |
1100 |
1000 |
1 K per month spousal support retroactive, 1.1 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, man makes 86 K per year |
|
96 |
96 |
24.6 |
71.4 |
23.2 |
4.5 |
48.2 |
43.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Evans v. Evans, 2003 CanLII 2021 (ON S.C.) |
752 |
1300 |
$ 1300 per month spousal support and $ 752 child support, 4.5 K retroactive arrears, mans income 96 K per year |
|
98 |
98 |
24.1 |
73.9 |
25.9 |
0.0 |
48.0 |
48.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
Cianciotta v. Cianciotta, 2007 CanLII 24076 (ON S.C.) |
779 |
1232 |
$ 779 child support and $ 1232 per month spousal support, mans income 98 K |
|
100 |
0.0 |
45.6 |
54.4 |
21.0 |
36.0 |
33.4 |
(2.6) |
|
|
b |
y |
Higgins v. Higgins, 2006 CanLII 33303 (ON C.A.) |
1600 |
2200 |
3.8 K combined support plus 1 K per month arrears, spousal support 2.2 K per month, s.7 expenses and retroactive lump sums, man is assignee in bankruptcy, mans income imputed to 100 K |
|
100 |
100 |
32.4 |
67.6 |
25.5 |
0.0 |
42.1 |
42.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
Logiacco v. Papadopoulos, 2005 CanLII 5473 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
1500 |
1.5 K spousal support per month, 1.2 K child support per month, man makes 100 K per year |
|
102 |
55 |
47.5 |
54.5 |
29.2 |
0.0 |
25.3 |
25.3 |
|
|
b |
s |
Guy v. Tulloch, 2004 CanLII 11695 (ON S.C.) |
2460 |
1500 |
$ 1960 per month child support and $ 500 per month s.7 expense and $ 1500 per month spousal support, man claims 55 K income and is imputed to 102 K |
|
105 |
105 |
32.4 |
72.6 |
35.0 |
(22.5) |
37.6 |
60.1 |
|
|
b |
y |
Raaymakers v. Green, 2006 CanLII 719 (ON C.A.) |
1500 |
1200 |
1.2 K spousal support per month, 1.5 K childs support, trial costs against wife reduced to 11.5 K from 57 K and 10 K costs of appeal, man makes 105 K per year |
|
120 |
120 |
28.2 |
91.8 |
39.9 |
5.7 |
51.9 |
46.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Minty v. Minty, 2003 CanLII 2185 (ON S.C.) |
724 |
1500 |
$ 1500 per month spousal support and $ 724 per month child support and s.7 expenses, retroactive s.7 expenses |
|
132 |
55 |
67.2 |
64.8 |
35.3 |
0.0 |
29.5 |
29.5 |
|
|
b |
y |
Riel v. Holland, 2003 CanLII 3433 (ON C.A.) |
2200 |
3400 |
3.4 spousal support per month, 2.2 child support per month, man claims 55 K and is imputed to 132 K per year |
|
132 |
132 |
48.0 |
84.0 |
45.1 |
32.0 |
38.9 |
6.9 |
|
|
b |
s |
S.L. v. A.L., 2003 CanLII 2161 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
1500 |
2.5 K per month spousal support, 1.5 K per month child support, 132 K imputed income, 32 K arrears |
|
150 |
150 |
69.6 |
80.4 |
47.2 |
15.5 |
33.2 |
17.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Elieff v. Elieff, 2007 CanLII 15787 (ON S.C.) |
3000 |
2600 |
3 K per month child support and 2.6 K per month spousal support and $ 200 per month s.7 expenses based on an income of 150 K, 40 K interim disbursement, 15.5 K costs |
|
171 |
171 |
69.6 |
101.4 |
46.5 |
0.0 |
59.4 |
59.4 |
|
|
b |
s |
Antonopoulos v. Antonopoulos, 2006 CanLII 3289 (ON S.C.) |
1300 |
4500 |
4.5 K spousal support per month, 1.3 K child support per month for 1 child, man earns 171 K per year |
|
175 |
175 |
57.6 |
117.4 |
67.1 |
0.0 |
50.3 |
50.3 |
|
|
b |
s |
Hackett v. Leung, 2005 CanLII 27603 (ON S.C.) |
3100 |
1700 |
1.7 K spousal support per month, 3.1 K child support |
|
179 |
179 |
51.6 |
127.4 |
61.7 |
22.0 |
65.7 |
43.7 |
|
|
b |
s |
Schmidt v. Haley, 2004 CanLII 34344 (ON S.C.) |
1300 |
3000 |
3 K per month spousal support and 1.3 K child support, retroactive arrears, man makes 179 K per year |
|
180 |
180 |
95.7 |
84.3 |
52.0 |
0.0 |
32.3 |
32.3 |
|
|
b |
s |
Lewi v. Lewi, 2005 CanLII 4441 (ON S.C.) |
2750 |
4188 |
50 K per year spousal support, 33 K per year child support, s.7 expenses, 2 children in university, mans income is 180 K per year |
|
190 |
190 |
76.0 |
114.0 |
58.5 |
0.0 |
55.5 |
55.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
Da Silva v. Da Silva, 2004 CanLII 8940 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
4500 |
Interim spousal support of 4.5 K per month, child support 1.5 K, 71.5 % of s.7 expenses, man makes 190 K per year |
|
200 |
28 |
93.3 |
106.7 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
b |
s |
Mashadi (Bankruptcy), Re, 2004 CanLII 15923 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
$ 7771 per month child and spousal support, man claims income of 28 K and is imputed to 200 K per year, judge says he runs a cash business |
|
204 |
165 |
54.0 |
150.0 |
78.9 |
0.0 |
71.0 |
71.0 |
|
|
b |
s |
Tymoszewicz (Re), 2007 CanLII 39765 (ON S.C.) |
2000 |
2000 |
2 K per month interim child support and 2 K per month temporary spousal support based on an imputed income of 204 K, man claims income of 165 K |
|
219 |
219 |
138.0 |
81.0 |
66.8 |
0.0 |
14.2 |
14.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Watson v. Watson, 2004 CanLII 19612 (ON S.C.) |
6100 |
5400 |
5.4 K spousal support per month, 6.1 K child support per month including s.7 expenses of $ 3832 per month, man makes 219 K per year |
|
227 |
140 |
79.2 |
147.8 |
72.9 |
90.0 |
74.9 |
(15.1) |
|
|
b |
s |
Jordan v. Stewart, 2002 CanLII 2678 (ON S.C.) |
1600 |
5000 |
5 K spousal support per month retroactive for 18 months, 1.6 K child support per month, mans declared income of 140 K imputed to 227 K |
|
250 |
52 |
99.6 |
150.4 |
75.2 |
20.0 |
75.2 |
55.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Sheikh v. Sheikh, 2005 CanLII 14151 (ON S.C.) |
1800 |
6500 |
20 K lump sum and 6.5 K per month spousal support, 1.8 K per month child support, man claims 52 K income and is imputed to 250 K per year |
|
376 |
376 |
57.6 |
318.4 |
154.3 |
42.0 |
164.1 |
122.1 |
|
|
b |
y |
Walsh v. Walsh, 2004 CanLII 36110 (ON C.A.) |
2000 |
2800 |
2.8 K spousal support per month, 2 K child support, 42 K arrears, man makes 376 K income per year |
|
400 |
243 |
165.3 |
234.7 |
139.2 |
0.0 |
95.5 |
95.5 |
|
|
b |
s |
Wells v. Wells, 2003 CanLII 2270 (ON S.C.) |
6275 |
7500 |
7.5 K spousal support per month, 5.6 K child support per month and maximum 675 per month s.7 expense, man claims 243 K income and wife asks he be imputed to 600 K but court imputes to 400 K |
|
530 |
150 |
195.6 |
334.4 |
191.2 |
113.0 |
143.2 |
30.2 |
|
|
b |
s |
Ojo v. Ojo, 2005 CanLII 1498 (ON S.C.) |
7300 |
9000 |
9 K per month spousal support., 7.3 K per month child support, man claims income of 150 K and is imputed to 530 K, 113 K arrears |
|
561 |
561 |
108.0 |
453.0 |
227.9 |
7.0 |
225.1 |
218.1 |
|
|
b |
s |
Loy v. Loy, 2005 CanLII 27606 (ON S.C.) |
2000 |
5000 |
7 K per month spousal support, 2 K per month child support, 1 year retroactive |
|
890 |
890 |
134.1 |
755.9 |
349.9 |
57.0 |
405.1 |
348.1 |
|
|
b |
y |
Marinangeli v. Marinangeli, 2003 CanLII 27673 (ON C.A.) |
5800 |
10500 |
10.5 K per month spousal support, 5.8 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, man makes 890 K per year, 35 K costs |
|
|
0.0 |
3.6 |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
c |
o |
Pompey v. Pompey, 1992 CanLII 4044 (ON C.J.) |
300 |
|
$ 300 per month child support, 6.3 K arrears, man is unemployed but must contiunue paying at former level |
|
|
20 |
6.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
c |
s |
Stutz v. Stutz Sorrenson, 2002 CanLII 2815 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 20 K income and is imputed higher |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.4 |
(1.4) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
(1.4) |
(1.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Bak v. Dobell, 2005 CanLII 36463 (ON S.C.) |
117 |
|
$ 117 per month child support, man supported by father, court finds man has no income |
|
9 |
0.0 |
1.2 |
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
c |
y |
Difrancesco v. Couto, 2001 CanLII 8613 (ON C.A.) |
102 |
|
$ 102 per month child support, man claims no income and 9 K per year is imputed, arrears 40 K |
|
10 |
10 |
7.8 |
2.2 |
0.0 |
45 |
(5.8) |
(50.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Maurice v. Maurice, 2003 CanLII 2418 (ON S.C.) |
653 |
|
$ 653 per month child support, 45 K arrears, set off against 40 K of his value in home, mans income 10 K |
|
10.8 |
10.8 |
1.9 |
8.9 |
0.2 |
5.7 |
8.7 |
3.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fulford v. Fulford, 2003 CanLII 2313 (ON S.C.) |
158 |
|
$ 158 per month retroactive child support, claim of undue hardship denied, mans income 10.8 K per year |
|
13 |
4 |
2.4 |
11.6 |
0.6 |
6.0 |
11.0 |
5.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pearson v. McAteer, 2005 CanLII 32002 (ON S.C.) |
200 |
|
$ 200 per month child support, 6 K in s.7 expense arrears, man declares 4 K income and is imputed to 13 K. |
|
15 |
2 |
3.5 |
11.5 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
10.4 |
10.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Brown v. Brown, 2004 CanLII 12750 (ON S.C.) |
294 |
|
$ 294 child support per month, man claims 2 K income and is imputed to 15 K |
|
15 |
15 |
3.0 |
12.0 |
1.1 |
15.0 |
10.9 |
(4.1) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lantaigne v. Lantaigne, 2005 CanLII 39886 (ON S.C.) |
250 |
|
$ 250 per month child support reduced from $ 500, 40 K arrears rescinded to 15 K, enforcement stayed, man has 15 K income, wife has higher income |
|
16 |
0.0 |
1.5 |
14.5 |
1.3 |
4.6 |
13.2 |
8.6 |
|
|
c |
y |
Drygala v. Pauli, 2002 CanLII 41868 (ON C.A.) |
127 |
|
$ 127 per month retroactive 3 years, man claims 7.3 K loss and is imputed to 16 K per year |
|
16.1 |
11.1 |
2.8 |
13.3 |
1.3 |
14.4 |
12.0 |
(2.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Clark v. Clark, 2002 CanLII 2773 (ON S.C.) |
237 |
|
$ 900 per month child support changed to $ 700 changed to $ 237, husband diagnosed with cancer , 14.4 K arrears, man claims 11.1 K and is imputed to 16.1 K per year |
|
17 |
5 |
1.6 |
15.4 |
1.5 |
9.7 |
13.9 |
4.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
B.O.v. A.K.O., 2005 ONCJ 328 (CanLII) |
134 |
|
$ 134 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 17 K, 9.7 K arrears |
|
17.5 |
17.5 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
1.6 |
0.0 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Montgomery v. Montgomery, 2007 ONCJ 3 (CanLII) |
431 |
|
$ 431 per month child support for 4 children based on a gross income of 17.5 K, arrears rescinded. |
|
17.8 |
17.8 |
2.4 |
15.4 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
13.8 |
11.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Self v. Reid, 2006 ONCJ 30 (CanLII) |
200 |
|
$ 139 for child support and $ 61 for s.7 expenses and 1.2 K arrears and 1 K costs, mans income 17.8 K |
|
18 |
2.8 |
1.7 |
16.3 |
1.7 |
21.0 |
14.6 |
(6.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
Cherry v. Cherry, 2004 CanLII 1649 (ON S.C.) |
144 |
|
$ 144 per month child support based on an imputed income of 18 K for failing to make efforts to become employed, man on disability with benefits of 2.8 K per year, 32 K arrears rescinded to 21 K |
|
18 |
18 |
3.4 |
14.6 |
1.7 |
15.1 |
12.9 |
(2.2) |
|
|
c |
o |
Vaughan v. Vaughan, 2007 ONCJ 21 (CanLII) |
281 |
|
$ 281 child support 15.1 K arrears, mans income 18 K per year |
|
18 |
18 |
3.2. |
14.8 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
13.1 |
13.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Luedtke v. Vuletic, 2001 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) |
140 |
|
$ 140 per month child support and 50 % of s.7 expenses based on 18 K income, mans answer struck and he cant participate at trial |
|
18.7 |
18.7 |
1.7 |
17.0 |
1.8 |
24.0 |
15.2 |
(8.8) |
|
|
c |
o |
Hamilton v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 35 (CanLII) |
145 |
|
$ 145 per month child support based on an income of 18.7 K, 24 K arrears |
|
19 |
19 |
6.0 |
13.0 |
1.9 |
17.0 |
11.1 |
(5.9) |
|
|
c |
o |
DuQuesnay v. Scrivens, 2007 ONCJ 257 (CanLII) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month child support, 17 K arrears, man claims 19 K average income, over 10 K owing to social services |
|
19 |
19 |
4.1 |
14.9 |
1.9 |
0.0 |
13.0 |
13.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Mlambo v. Mlambo, 2007 ONCJ 240 (CanLII) |
339 |
|
$ 339 per month for 3 children based on income of 19 K |
|
19 |
19 |
4.5 |
14.5 |
1.9 |
40.5 |
13.6 |
(26.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Woodland v. Woodland, 2005 CanLII 34591 (ON S.C.) |
375 |
|
Child support reduced from $ 541 to $ 375, arrears fixed at 40 K, mans income 19 K |
|
20 |
0.0 |
4.6 |
15.4 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
13.3 |
13.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Marchese v. Marchese, 2002 CanLII 40030 (ON S.C.) |
265 |
|
$ 265 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man studying for PHD has 20 K income imputed |
|
20 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
16.3 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
14.2 |
14.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Smith v. Smith, 2007 CanLII 37233 (ON S.C.) |
308 |
|
$ 308 interim child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 20 K income |
|
20.2 |
20.2 |
2.0 |
18.2 |
2.1 |
0.6 |
16.1 |
15.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
G.R.L. v. S.L., 2005 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) |
167 |
|
$ 167 child support per month, $ 611 in retroactive arrears, man pays two other child support claims, mans income 20.2 K per year |
|
20.8 |
20.8 |
3.4 |
17.4 |
2.3 |
11.5 |
15.1 |
3.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Barker-Papos v. Mihaly, 2005 ONCJ 259 (CanLII) |
285 |
|
$ 285 per month child support based on an income of 20.8 K, 11.5 K arrears |
|
21 |
10.2 |
4.0 |
17.0 |
2.3 |
5.7 |
14.7 |
9.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Davis v. Davis, 2004 CanLII 1276 (ON S.C.) |
337 |
|
$ 297 and $ 40 s.7 expenses per month child support retroactive, man claims 10.2 K income and is imputed to 21 K |
|
21.2 |
21.2 |
3.6 |
17.6 |
2.3 |
46.0 |
15.3 |
(30.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
G.P.M. v. S.J.F., 2005 CanLII 19840 (ON S.C.) |
300 |
|
$ 1804 child support reduced to $ 410 then later $ 300, spousal support terminated, 36 K costs and 10 K for assault and 28 K for equalization, mans income 21.2 K |
|
21.4 |
21.4 |
3.9 |
17.5 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
15.1 |
15.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bell v. Bell, 2006 CanLII 23927 (ON S.C. |
327 |
|
$ 327 per month for natural son and step daughter, man has unemployment income of 21.4 K, man denies being parent of stepdaughter |
|
21.8 |
21.8 |
1.8 |
20.0 |
2.5 |
3.9 |
17.5 |
13.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
C.U. v. D.D., 2007 ONCJ 478 (CanLII) |
148 |
|
$ 148 per month child support, 2 years 2 months retroactive support, mans income 21.8 K |
|
21.8 |
21.8 |
2.1 |
19.7 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
17.2 |
17.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Jackpine v. Gamsby, 2003 CanLII 26235 (ON C.J.) |
178 |
|
$ 350 per month child support changed to $ 178, mans income is 21.8 K |
|
22 |
0.0 |
2.4 |
19.6 |
2.5 |
2.0 |
17.1 |
15.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Mercer v. Cruise, 2005 CanLII 44837 (ON S.C.) |
199 |
|
$ 199 per month child support, 2 K arrears, variation denied, loses job because FRO takes drivers license, income held imputed at former 22 K |
|
22 |
20 |
2.3 |
19.7 |
2.5 |
5.7 |
17.2 |
11.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
H.F. v. P.F., 2007 ONCJ 170 (CanLII) |
188 |
|
$ 188 per month child support, retoactive arrears 20 K, imputed income to 22 K |
|
23.6 |
0.0 |
3.8 |
19.2 |
2.9 |
12.0 |
16.3 |
4.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fournier v. Hynes, 2007 CanLII 2653 (ON S.C.) |
320 |
|
$ 320 per month child support and $ 100 per month repayment of arrears, man claims to be unemployed but income of 23.6 K imputed |
|
24 |
24 |
4.2 |
19.8 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
16.8 |
16.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Perkins v. O'Neill, 2005 CanLII 39892 (ON S.C.) |
350 |
|
$ 350 per month interim child support based on an income of 24 K |
|
24 |
24 |
2.6 |
21.4 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
18.4 |
18.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
R.P.H. v. V.M., 2003 CanLII 2109 (ON S.C.) |
213 |
|
$ 213 per month child support based on imputed income of 24 K |
|
25 |
12 |
5.7 |
19.3 |
3.2 |
43.6 |
16.1 |
(26.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Courchesne v. Courchesne, 2004 CanLII 5003 (ON S.C.) |
474 |
|
Man must pay former level of $ 600 per month but now child support is $ 474 and remainder goes to arrears, 77.1 K arrears reduced to 43.6 K, income imputed to 25 K from claimed 12 K |
|
25 |
25 |
7.9 |
17.1 |
3.2 |
8.5 |
14.1 |
5.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Woodbridge v. Hayes, 2004 ONCJ 168 (CanLII) |
660 |
|
$ 660 per month child support reduced to $ 360, 8.5 K arrears, mans income 25 K |
|
26 |
13 |
2.6 |
23.4 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Trafford v. Trafford, 2006 ONCJ 389 (CanLII)
|
216 |
|
$ 216 per month for 1 child based on imputed income of 26 K, man declares 13 K income |
|
26 |
15 |
6.0 |
20.0 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
16.6 |
16.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
D.B. v. J.B., 2006 CanLII 726 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support, man claims 15 K income and is imputed to 26 K |
|
26 |
22 |
4.5 |
21.5 |
3.4 |
14.1 |
18.1 |
4.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
V.C.E. v. C.E.T., 2004 ONCJ 309 (CanLII) |
379 |
|
$ 379 m per month child support, 3 years 1 month retroactive arrears, man claims 22 K income and is imputed to 26 K |
|
26.3 |
26.3 |
2.8 |
23.5 |
3.4 |
0.0 |
20.1 |
20.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Z.(A.) v. W.(J.), 2004 ONCJ 161 (CanLII) |
235 |
|
$ 235 per month child support based on an income of 26.3 K |
|
27 |
0.0 |
4.4 |
22.6 |
3.6 |
22.0 |
19.0 |
(3.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Lalonde v. Lalonde, 2005 CanLII 16637 (ON S.C.) |
365 |
|
$ 240 per month child support and $ 125 per month s.7 expenses, 22 K arrears, man claims no income and is imputed to 27 K per year |
|
27 |
13 |
6.5 |
20.5 |
3.6 |
0.0 |
16.9 |
16.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Barbaric v. Nielsen, 2007 CanLII 14320 (ON S.C.) |
543 |
|
$ 543 per month child support, income imputed to 27 K, 13 K claimed |
|
27 |
27 |
5.1 |
21.9 |
3.6 |
13.0 |
18.3 |
5.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kampman v. Kampman, 2006 CanLII 38657 (ON S.C.) |
429 |
|
$ 429 per month child support and 13 K arrears, mans income 27 K. |
|
28 |
12 |
1.2 |
26.8 |
3.8 |
0.0 |
23.0 |
23.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
O'Neill v. O'Neill, 2004 CanLII 8231 (ON S.C.) |
100 |
|
$ 100 per month child support, man claims 12 K and is imputed to 28 K |
|
29 |
29 |
4.3 |
24.7 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
20.7 |
20.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Alvarez v. Vargas, 2006 ONCJ 474 (CanLII)
|
360 |
|
$ 258 per month child support and $ 102 per month s.7 expense, man makes 29 K per year |
|
29 |
29 |
7.3 |
21.7 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
17.7 |
17.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Fuller v. Da Ponte, 2005 ONCJ 265 (CanLII)
|
607 |
|
$ 285 per month child support and $ 322 per month s.7 expense, mans income 29 K |
|
30.0 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
20.4 |
20.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Abdilla v. Abdilla, 2004 CanLII 35086 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 child support per month, unemployed and income imputed to 30 K |
|
30 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
25.2 |
4.2 |
13.8 |
21.0 |
7.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Jhuman v. Moakhan, 2005 CanLII 36266 (ON S.C.) |
398 |
|
$ 398 per month child support, contempt penalty 10 K, 15 K security, wife makes false criminal allegations, man claims no income and is imputed to 30 K, 1.75 K retroactive s.7 award, arrears |
|
30 |
12.6 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
8.4 |
20.4 |
12.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 per month child support, arrears 8.4 K, man claims 12.6 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
|
30 |
24 |
6.8 |
23.2 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Murch v. Bell, 2003 CanLII 2031 (ON S.C.) |
440 |
|
$ 400 per month child support and $ 40 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
|
30 |
30 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
7.7 |
20.2 |
12.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kalla v. Kalla, 2003 CanLII 2322 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 834 child support order changed to $ 557 then changed to $ 446, man on disability earns 2.5 K per month, 7.7 arrears |
|
30 |
30 |
3.1 |
26.9 |
4.2 |
41.0 |
22.7 |
(18.3) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kumar v. McKenna (Kumar), 2003 CanLII 2156 (ON S.C.) |
258 |
|
$ 258 per month child support and 5 K lump sum spousal support award, 80 K arrears reduced to 36 K, man earns 30 K per year and is incapacitated |
|
30 |
5.0 |
6.8 |
23.2 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ike v. Ike, 2005 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) |
568 |
|
$ 568 per month child support, man claims 5 K income and is imputed to 30 K |
|
30.3 |
30.3 |
6.3 |
24.0 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
19.8 |
19.8 |
|
|
c |
o |
Hazel v. Leslie, 2007 ONCJ 543 (CanLII) |
400 |
|
$ 400 per month child support, s.7 expenses, mans income 30.3 K per year |
|
32.5 |
32.5 |
3.6 |
28.9 |
4.7 |
1.0 |
24.2 |
23.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ciffolillo v. Nieweglowski, 2007 ONCJ 469 (CanLII) |
298 |
|
$ 298 per month child support, arrears 1 K, fathers income 32.5 K per year |
|
32.5 |
32.5 |
3.8 |
28.7 |
4.7 |
0.0 |
24.0 |
24.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Harvey v. Baker, 2007 ONCJ 574 (CanLII) |
320 |
|
$ 320 per month child support for one child based on income of 32.5 K |
|
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
25.1 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
20.2 |
20.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Chamanlall v. Chamanlall, 2006 CanLII 1916 (ON S.C.) |
663 |
|
$ 663 per month child support, man claims no income and is imputed to 33 K, mans proceeds from sale of home to be held as security for support |
|
33 |
0.0 |
7.9 |
25.1 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
20.2 |
20.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Stoate v. Stoate, 2005 CanLII 13820 (ON S.C.) |
633 |
|
$ 633 child support per month intentionally unemployed for going back to school, no variation, 33 K income imputed |
|
33 |
33 |
7.8 |
25.2 |
4.9 |
55.0 |
20.3 |
(35.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kauric v. Kauric, 2006 CanLII 21594 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 650 per month child support reduced from $ 1500, 41 K US arrears, mans income 33 K |
|
33.3 |
33.3 |
7.3 |
26.0 |
4.9 |
3.0 |
21.1 |
18.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Yackobeck v. Brazeau, 2002 CanLII 46583 (ON C.J.) |
483 |
|
$ 483 per month child support and ½ of s.7 expenses, support based on an income of 33.3 K per year, 3k costs |
|
33.5 |
33.5 |
5.4 |
28.1 |
5.0 |
0.0 |
23.1 |
23.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
S.S. v. M.S. and P.A., 2006 ONCJ 311 (CanLII)
|
327 |
|
$ 327 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man makes 33.5 K income per year |
|
34 |
20 |
3.6 |
30.4 |
5.1 |
12.0 |
25.3 |
13.3 |
|
|
c |
o |
Spencer v. Scarlett, 2005 ONCJ 300 (CanLII) |
304 |
|
$ 304 per month child support, 12 K arrears, imprisoned for default 90 days, man claims 20 K average income but must pay on 34 K income |
|
34 |
34 |
7.8 |
26.2 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
21.1 |
21.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Zoldy v. Zoldy, 2007 ONCJ 24 (CanLII) |
651 |
|
$ 651 per month for 3 children based on an income of 34 K |
|
35 |
0.0 |
5.5 |
29.5 |
5.3 |
5.7 |
24.2 |
18.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bhullar v. Bhullar, 2005 CanLII 18718 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support for 1 child based on an imputed income of 35 K and s.7 expenses, retroactive arrearsman claims no income, previous 5 years income tax average 19 K |
|
35 |
0.0 |
3.7 |
31.3 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
26.0 |
26.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bowman v. Cheluk, 2003 CanLII 1938 (ON S.C.) |
305 |
|
$ 305 child support, $ 2500 spousal support paid by wife terminated, man is unemployed but income is imputed to 35 K |
|
35 |
0.0 |
5.4 |
29.6 |
5.3 |
17.0 |
24.3 |
8.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.) |
448 |
|
$ 448 per month child support, 17 K arrears, variation denied, man quit job and is unemployed and income imputed at 35 K, 3.5 K costs |
|
35 |
14.2 |
4.0 |
31.0 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
25.7 |
25.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pochodaj v. Pochodaj, 2006 CanLII 13104 (ON S.C.) |
333 |
|
$333 child support per month based imputed income of 35 K, man declares income of 14.2 K |
|
35 |
18 |
6.0 |
29.0 |
5.3 |
30.0 |
23.7 |
(6.4) |
|
|
c |
s |
DiMillo v. DiMillo, 2007 CanLII 1340 (ON S.C.) |
504 |
|
$ 504 K per month child support, 30 K arrears, 18 K income claimed imputed to 35 K, cannot ask for access to child until he pays 15 K |
|
35 |
18 |
8.2 |
26.8 |
5.3 |
36.0 |
21.5 |
(14.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Mahoney v. Laderoute, 2007 CanLII 37893 (ON S.C.) |
681 |
|
$ 681 per month child support, 36 K retroactive arrears, man claims 18 K income and is imputed to 35 K |
|
35 |
35 |
6.1 |
28.9 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
23.6 |
23.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Kelly v. Kelly, 2004 ONCJ 242 (CanLII) |
506 |
|
$ 506 per month child support, mans income 35 K |
|
35 |
35 |
8.1 |
26.9 |
5.3 |
4.3 |
21.6 |
17.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bell v. Lloyd-Bell, 2005 CanLII 39875 (ON S.C.) |
672 |
|
$ 672 per month in child support, arrears of $ 4275, mans income 35 K |
|
35 |
35 |
6.0 |
29.0 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
23.7 |
23.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Collis v. Wilson, 2003 CanLII 2413 (ON S.C.) |
375 |
|
$ 375 per month in child support and s.7 expenses based on income of 35 K |
|
35 |
35 |
6.3 |
28.7 |
5.3 |
20.0 |
23.4 |
3.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dang v. Duong, 2006 CanLII 34339 (ON S.C.) |
521 |
|
$ 521 per month interim child support for 2 children based on 35 K income, wife gets 20 K lump sum support payment |
|
35 |
35 |
5.8 |
29.2 |
5.3 |
40.6 |
23.9 |
(16.7) |
|
|
c |
s |
K.K. v. G.B., 2007 CanLII 9758 (ON S.C.) |
481 |
|
$ 481 per month child support, man must pay on imputed income for 2 ½ years he was in jail, arrears 40.6 K, mans income imputed at 35 K while in jail |
|
36 |
36 |
8.8 |
27.2 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
21.7 |
21.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lamontagne v. Lamontagne, 2006 ONCJ 498 (CanLII) |
730 |
|
$ 705 per month child support for 3 children based on income of 36 K, $ 25 per month s.7 expenses, hardship due to second family |
|
36 |
36 |
9.7 |
26.3 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fraser v. McKinlay, 2004 CanLII 5857 (ON S.C.) |
682 |
|
$ 682 per month child support based on 36 K income, s.7 expenses |
|
36 |
36 |
5.2 |
30.8 |
5.5 |
11.0 |
25.3 |
14.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
J.J.C. v. K.G.M., 2004 CanLII 10578 (ON S.C.) |
433 |
|
$ 433 per month child support, mother denies all access and remarries, 80 K arrears cut to 11 K, mans current income 36 K |
|
37 |
37 |
4.1 |
32.9 |
5.7 |
42.8 |
27.2 |
(15.6) |
|
|
c |
o |
Pisani v. Jackson, 2007 ONCJ 243 (CanLII) |
345 |
|
$ 345 per month child support on income of 37 K, 42.8 K in arrears |
|
37 |
37 |
8.4 |
28.6 |
5.7 |
12.0 |
22.9 |
10.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Simmons v. Yandt, 2004 CanLII 8101 (ON S.C.) |
698 |
|
$ 698 per month child support, arrears reduced based on actual income, mans income 37 K |
|
38 |
38 |
9.5 |
28.5 |
5.9 |
0.0 |
22.6 |
22.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lewis v. Crearer, 2007 ONCJ 353 (CanLII) |
792 |
|
$ 502 per month child support and $ 290 per month s.7 expenses, mans income imputed to 38 K |
|
38 |
38 |
4.0 |
34.0 |
5.9 |
1.0 |
27.9 |
26.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
T.(P.) v. A.(S.), 2004 ONCJ 295 (CanLII) |
332 |
|
$ 332 per month child support, retroactive arrears of $ 950, mans income 38 K |
|
39 |
0.0 |
6.7 |
32.3 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
26.2 |
26.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Zagar v. Zagar, 2006 ONCJ 296 (CanLII) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support, man unemployed and imputed at 39 K |
|
39 |
24 |
6.7 |
32.3 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
26.2 |
26.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Priftis v. Priftis, 2005 CanLII 47093 (ON S.C.) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support, man claims 24 K income and is imputed to 39 K |
|
39 |
39 |
6.9 |
32.1 |
6.1 |
40.0 |
26.0 |
(14.0) |
|
|
c |
s |
D'Souza v. D'Souza, 2003 CanLII 1933 (ON S.C.) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month interim child support, 40 K arrears based on a 39 K income |
|
39 |
39 |
7.1 |
31.9 |
6.1 |
6.0 |
25.8 |
19.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Olaveson v. Olaveson, 2007 CanLII 23168 (ON S.C.) |
591 |
|
$ 591 per month child support based on income of 39 K, 6 K retroactive arrears |
|
40 |
10 |
6.8 |
33.2 |
6.3 |
13.0 |
26.9 |
13.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dang v. Hornby, 2006 CanLII 12973 (ON S.C.) |
570 |
|
$ 570 per month child support reduced from $ 762, 13 K arrears, income imputed from 10 K claimed to 40 K |
|
40 |
12 |
7.2 |
32.8 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
26.5 |
26.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Mollica v. Melchionna, 2006 CanLII 41526 (ON S.C.) |
601 |
|
$ 601 per month child support, man claims 12 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
|
40 |
26 |
7.0 |
33.0 |
6.3 |
4.8 |
27.0 |
22.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
McCormick v. Vey, 2007 CanLII 35 (ON S.C.) |
580 |
|
$ 570 per month child support and $ 10 per month s.7 expenses, 4.8 K retroactive arrears, man claims 26 K income and is imputed to 40 K |
|
40 |
40 |
4.1 |
35.9 |
6.3 |
12.0 |
29.6 |
17.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Baxter v. Beharry, 2006 ONCJ 1 (CanLII) |
345 |
|
$ 345 per month on 2 child support orders, man is wrongfully imputed to 1 million income, most arrears rescinded as income retroactively varied to closer to 100 K and finally to 40 K per year on both orders. welfare is opposing party |
|
40 |
40 |
12.3 |
27.7 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
21.4 |
21.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bielak-Montemurro v. Montemurro, 2007 CanLII 2800 (ON S.C.) |
1021 |
|
$ 771 per month child support and $ 250 per month s.7 expenses based on an income of 40 K |
|
40 |
40 |
10.2 |
29.8 |
6.3 |
0.0 |
23.5 |
23.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Viertelhausen v. Burbridge, 2006 CanLII 5311 (ON S.C.) |
855 |
|
$ 855 per month child support, man seeks termination and wife seeks retroactive, mans income 40 K |
|
41 |
27 |
7.8 |
33.2 |
6.5 |
0.0 |
27.6 |
27.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
V.S.J. v. L.J.G., 2004 CanLII 17126 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 585 per month child support and $ 65 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 27 K income and is imputed to 41 K |
|
41 |
41 |
7.0 |
34.0 |
6.5 |
0.0 |
27.5 |
27.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kocsis v. Kocsis, 2002 CanLII 2716 (ON S.C.) |
583 |
|
$ 583 per month child support from biological father who earns 41 K per year |
|
41.6 |
22.3 |
4.5 |
37.1 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
30.4 |
30.4 |
|
|
c |
o |
Parkes v. Zayachkowski, 2005 ONCJ 106 (CanLII)
|
359 |
|
$ 379 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims 22.3 K income and is imputed to 41.6 K per year |
|
43 |
|
6.0 |
33.0 |
6.9 |
12.0 |
26.1 |
14.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Gingo v. Ginglo, 2004 CanLII 1546 (ON S.C.) |
371 |
|
$ 600 spousal and $ 750 child changed to $ 1500 child and $ 600 spousal, changed to $ 371 child only, s.7 expenses, Over 80 K arrears rescinded to 12 K, 17.8 K arrears on costs and 12.8 K interest on arrears on costs, interest on costs rescinded, mans income 43 K |
|
43 |
12 |
9.6 |
33.4 |
6.9 |
12.0 |
26.5 |
14.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Lajoie v. Lajoie, 2005 CanLII 23684 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
|
$ 800 per month child support, 12 K arrears, man claims 12 K income but is imputed to 43 K |
|
43 |
14 |
8.6 |
34.4 |
6.9 |
5.5 |
27.5 |
22.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Shaw-McInnis v. Crawford, 2003 CanLII 2241 (ON S.C.) |
714 |
|
$ 714 per month original child support lowered as children reach majority, arrears 5.5 K, mans declared income of 14 K imputed to 43 K and no relief for time on welfare |
|
43 |
43 |
7.8 |
35.2 |
6.9 |
14.5 |
28.3 |
13.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Man v. Phamisith, 2007 CanLII 46698 (ON S.C.) |
650 |
|
$ 651 per month child support, $ 1400 lump sum spousal support, 9.1 K retroactive arrears, 4 K costs, mans income 43 K |
|
43.8 |
43.8 |
4 |
29.5 |
7.1 |
2.2 |
22.4 |
20.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Difede v. Difede, 2007 CanLII 4574 (ON S.C.) |
855 |
|
$ 855 per month child support, based on an income of 43.8 K per year, s.7 expense and 2.2 retroactive s.7 expense arrears |
|
44 |
44 |
5.1 |
38.9 |
7.2 |
8.5 |
31.7 |
23.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hines v. Hines, 2006 CanLII 28737 (ON S.C.) |
423 |
|
$ 423 per month child support based on 44 K income, 8.5 K lump sum spousal award |
|
44 |
26 |
17.8 |
26.2 |
7.2 |
0.0 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Szucs v. Freeman, 2007 ONCJ 96 (CanLII)
|
1484 |
|
$ 1484 per month child support from income imputed at 44 K, man claims income of 26 K |
|
45 |
26 |
9.1 |
37.4 |
7.4 |
10.1 |
30.0 |
19.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
Smith v. Addison, 2004 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) |
635 |
|
$ 635 per month child support and s.7 expenses, 10.1 K arrears, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 45 K per year |
|
45 |
45 |
4.8 |
40.2 |
7.4 |
0.0 |
32.8 |
32.8 |
|
|
c |
o |
Malcolm v. Vassell, 2005 ONCJ 77 (CanLII) |
387 |
|
$ 387 per month child support, no access to child, mans income 45 K |
|
47 |
12 |
8.0 |
39.0 |
8.9 |
24.0 |
30.1 |
6.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Armstrong v. Armstrong, 2004 CanLII 12100 (ON S.C.) |
669 |
|
$ 669 per month child support, arrears 24 K, man on disability imputed to 47 K per year income |
|
47 |
47 |
8.5 |
38.5 |
8.9 |
32.0 |
29.6 |
(2.4) |
|
|
c |
o |
Ricafort v. Ricafort, 2006 ONCJ 520 (CanLII) |
710 |
|
$ 710 per month for 2 children based on 47 K imputed income, 32 K arrears, 60 days in jail for not producing financial documents |
|
47 |
0.0 |
11.7 |
35.3 |
8.9 |
0.0 |
26.4 |
26.4 |
|
|
c |
o |
Razavi-Brahimi v. Ershadi, 2007 ONCJ 406 (CanLII) |
975 |
|
$ 515 per month child support and $ 460 per month s.7 expense, man is unemployed but imputed to 47 K per year income |
|
47 |
47 |
10.4 |
36.6 |
8.9 |
0.0 |
27.7 |
27.7 |
|
|
c |
s |
Weening v. Weening, 2004 CanLII 9706 (ON S.C.) |
866 |
|
$ 866 per month in child support, man makes 47 K per year |
|
47.1 |
47.1 |
8.0 |
39.1 |
8.9 |
0.0 |
30.2 |
30.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Nowakowski v. Nowakowski, 2003 CanLII 2191 (ON S.C.) |
663 |
|
$ 663 interim child support, wife gets exclusive possession of home, mans income 47.1 K |
|
48 |
36 |
5.4 |
42.6 |
11.8 |
3.2 |
30.8 |
27.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
St. Amant (Peddie) v. Walkingshaw, 2006 ONCJ 191 (CanLII) |
448 |
|
$ 448 per month child support raised frrom $ 89, $ 1750 s.7 lump- sum expense, income imputed fron 36 K claimed to 48 K, 1.4 K retroactive arrears |
|
49 |
49 |
12.9 |
35.1 |
12.1 |
19.0 |
23.0 |
4.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Caterini v. Zaccaria, 2002 CanLII 2772 (ON S.C.) |
1074 |
|
$ 1074 child support per month, 16 K rescinded from arrears, mans income 49 K |
|
49.1 |
49.1 |
10.8 |
38.3 |
12.2 |
0.0 |
26.1 |
26.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
McKenzie v. McKenzie, 2004 CanLII 9465 (ON S.C.) |
901 |
|
$ 901 per month child support for 3 children, mans income 49.1 K |
|
50 |
10 |
9.0 |
41.0 |
12.5 |
35.0 |
28.5 |
(6.5) |
|
|
c |
s |
Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.) |
750 |
|
$ 750 per month child support, spousal support satisfied by 35 K lump sum, man claims income of 10 K and is imputed to 50 K |
|
50 |
35 |
10.1 |
39.9 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
27.4 |
27.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Tran v. Lee, 2003 CanLII 11863 (ON S.C.) |
x |
|
$ 700 per month child support and s.7 expenses, man claims income of 35 K but income of 50 K imputed |
|
50 |
50 |
5.7 |
44.3 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
31.8 |
31.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Reid v. Mulder, 2005 CanLII 38108 (ON S.C.) |
475 |
|
$ 475 per month child support, support to end when mother moves to Fiji, mans income 50 K and wife is a student who will make 50 K on return to Fiji |
|
50 |
0.0 |
14.7 |
35.3 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
22.8 |
22.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Azimi v. Mirzaei, 2007 CanLII 16445 (ON S.C.) |
1229 |
|
$ 429 per month child support and $ 800 s.7 expense, man unemployed is imputed to 50 K income, man is denied spousal support |
|
50 |
0.0 |
14.4 |
35.6 |
12.5 |
40.0 |
23.1 |
(16.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Derek Cross v. Lila Cross, 2004 CanLII 13409 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 700 per month child support and $ 500 per month s.7 expenses, man is unemployed and income imputed to 50 K, 40 K arrears |
|
50 |
10 |
13.8 |
36.2 |
12.5 |
4.7 |
23.7 |
19.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Millard v. Cargoe, 2004 CanLII 15955 (ON S.C.) |
1152 |
|
$ 700 per month child support and $ 452 per month s.7 expenses, 2.7 K arrears, 2.2 K retroactive s.7 arrears man claims 10 K income and is imputed to 50 K |
|
51 |
51 |
8.2 |
42.8 |
12.8 |
12.0 |
30.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Gabriel v. Robinson, 2005 ONCJ 327 (CanLII |
560 |
|
$ 250 per month child support raised to $ 455, and $ 105 per month s.7 expenses, 12 K retroactive arrears, man earns 51 K per year |
|
52 |
52 |
5.2 |
46.8 |
13.1 |
12.0 |
33.7 |
21.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Anderson v. Hamilton, 2006 ONCJ 110 (CanLII) |
430 |
|
$ 430 per month child support, arrears, man makes 52 K income per year |
|
52 |
52 |
10.9 |
41.1 |
13.1 |
6.3 |
28.5 |
22.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Prince v. Prince, 2006 CanLII 27873 (ON S.C.) |
783 |
|
$ 783 per month child support and s.7 expenses, arrears 6.3 K, mans income 52 K per year |
|
52.5 |
52.5 |
5.7 |
46.8 |
13.2 |
27.2 |
33.6 |
6.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Ross (Gedcke) v. Gedcke, 2005 CanLII 50881 (ON S.C.) |
477 |
|
$ 477 child support per month, 27.2 K retroactive arrears, mans income 52.5 K |
|
53 |
23 |
8.9 |
44.1 |
13.4 |
22.8 |
30.7 |
7.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Meade v. Meade, 2002 CanLII 2806 (ON S.C.) |
739 |
|
$ 739 per month child support, 21 K arrears, $ 1750 K lump sum spousal support award, man claims 23 K income and is imputed to 53 K |
|
53 |
53 |
5.4 |
47.6 |
13.4 |
5.7 |
34.2 |
28.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
Heimbecker-Wood v. Campbell, 2004 ONCJ 252 (CanLII) |
450 |
|
$ 450 per month child support, retroactive arrears of almost 2 years at over twice previously ordered income , man makes 53 K per year |
|
53 |
53 |
6.0 |
47.0 |
13.4 |
0.0 |
33.6 |
33.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hughes v. Hughes, 2005 CanLII 44395 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
|
$ 500 per month interim child support based on income of 53 K |
|
54 |
26.4 |
10.5 |
43.5 |
13.7 |
15.7 |
29.8 |
14.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lee v. Wright, 2007 ONCJ 476 (CanLII)
|
750 |
|
$ 450 per month child support and $ 330 per month s.7 expense, 11.3 K arrears, mans claims 26.4 K income and is imputed to 54 K, 4.4 K costs |
|
54 |
30 |
11.8 |
42.2 |
13.7 |
0.0 |
28.5 |
28.5 |
|
|
c |
s |
Schiller v. Schiller, 2007 CanLII 1343 (ON S.C.) |
980 |
|
$ 980 per month child support based on imputed income of 54 K, man claims income of 30 K |
|
54 |
54 |
11.7 |
42.3 |
13.7 |
0.0 |
28.6 |
28.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lee v. Wright, 2007 ONCJ 454 (CanLII)
|
852 |
|
$ 504 per month child support and $ 348 per month s.7 expense based on an income of 54 K |
|
55 |
36 |
10.7 |
43.3 |
14.0 |
1.0 |
29.3 |
28.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Blaschuk v. Bridgewater, 2005 CanLII 28787 (ON S.C.) |
768 |
|
$ 768 per month child support and 61 % of s.7 expenses and 1 K in past s.7 expenses, man claims 36 K income and is imputed to 55 K |
|
55 |
55 |
5.9 |
49.1 |
14.0 |
19.0 |
35.1 |
16.1 |
|
|
c |
o |
Stiebel v. Stiebel, 2004 ONCJ 425 (CanLII) |
495 |
|
$ 800 per month child support reduced to $ 495, 19 K arrears to be paid on imputed income, mans income 55 K per year |
|
56 |
0.0 |
9.3 |
46.7 |
14.4 |
2.0 |
32.3 |
30.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hirtle v. Earl, 2007 CanLII 20282 (ON S.C.) |
775 |
|
$ 775 per month child support based on 56 K income, man is unemployed and denied variation, 2 K arrears |
|
56 |
56 |
9.4 |
46.6 |
14.4 |
27.0 |
32.2 |
5.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Garcia-Talavera (Fernandes) v. Fernandes, 2006 ONCJ 27 (CanLII)
|
780 |
|
$ 780 per month for 2 children based on 56 K income, separation agreement overturned and 27 K retroactive award |
|
56 |
56 |
17.6 |
38.4 |
14.4 |
6.0 |
24.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Facchin v. Taylor, 2004 CanLII 33118 (ON S.C.) |
1463 |
|
$ 648 child support is raised to guidelines cause less than income and unexplained, $ 815 S.7 expense, retroactive award, mans income 56 K, 2 K costs |
|
57 |
0.0 |
5.8 |
51.2 |
14.6 |
5.7 |
36.6 |
30.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
Malleye v. Brereton, 2007 ONCJ 216 (CanLII) |
484 |
|
$ 484 child support not varied or arrears rescinded, man intentionally unemployed and imputed at former 57 K |
|
58 |
9 |
4.8 |
53.2 |
15.0 |
48.0 |
38.2 |
(9.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Pantchevski v. Pantchevska, 2005 CanLII 7672 (ON S.C.) |
400 |
|
$ 400 per month child support, 48 K in arrears, man claims 9 K income but is denied variation and must pay at income of 58 K , wife is on social assistance |
|
58 |
58 |
2.4 |
55.6 |
15.0 |
0.0 |
40.6 |
40.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
Dent v. Flynn, 2005 CanLII 14317 (ON S.C.) |
200 |
|
$ 200 per month child support, father has new family with 3 special needs children, man earns 58 K per year |
|
58 |
58 |
20.3 |
37.7 |
15.0 |
9.0 |
23.7 |
14.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Brown v. Rowe, 2007 ONCJ 545 (CanLII) |
1358 |
|
$ 1358 per month child support based on income of 58 K, s.7 expenses, 9 K arrears |
|
59 |
59 |
10.3 |
48.7 |
15.3 |
0.0 |
33.4 |
33.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Malka v. Seliktar, 2004 CanLII 34933 (ON S.C.) |
858 |
|
Guideline support for one child from an income of 59 K, add on payments of $ 379 per month for daycare |
|
59.4 |
59.4 |
11.2 |
48.2 |
15.5 |
5.1 |
32.7 |
27.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Ferril v. Chen, 2006 ONCJ 301 (CanLII) |
935 |
|
$ 557 per month child support and $ 378 per month s.7 expense, 5.1 K arrears, mans income 59.4 K per year |
|
60 |
0.0 |
9.6 |
50.4 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
34.8 |
34.8 |
|
|
c |
s |
Lιveillι v. Lemieux, 2002 CanLII 2694 (ON S.C.) |
530 |
|
$ 507 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses and 2 1 K airfares per year, man quits job as a teacher and starts a convenience store, claims a 6 K loss and is imputed to 60 K per year |
|
60 |
60 |
6.1 |
53.9 |
15.6 |
24.3 |
38.3 |
14.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Norman v. Chernev, 2004 ONCJ 385 (CanLII)
|
507 |
|
$ 507 per month child support, man has made no payment and is 4 years in arrears, mans income 60 K per year |
|
60 |
60 |
6.7 |
53.3 |
15.6 |
0.0 |
39.7 |
39.7 |
|
|
c |
o |
Perry v. Perry, 2006 ONCJ 387 (CanLII) |
557 |
|
$ 557 per month child support based on an income of 60 K |
|
60 |
60 |
7.6 |
52.4 |
15.6 |
45.7 |
36.8 |
(8.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Plotz v. Boehmer Plotz, 2004 CanLII 5072 (ON S.C.) |
507 |
|
$ 1700 spousal support and $300 child support varied to $ 507 child support and $ 1 spousal support, arrears fixed at 40 K, retroactive s.7 expenses, mans income 60 K, wife remarries man with 85 K income |
|
60 |
60 |
6.1 |
53.9 |
15.6 |
2.1 |
38.3 |
36.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Scott v. Jolicoeur, 2005 CanLII 2058 (ON S.C.) |
507 |
|
$ 507 per month in child support and 2.1 K arrears, guilty of contempt given suspended sentence, mans income 60 K per year |
|
60.8 |
60.8 |
6.2 |
54.6 |
15.8 |
20.8 |
38.8 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Balo v. Motlagh (Madsen), 2004 ONCJ 166 (CanLII) |
514 |
|
$ 514 per month child support, retroactive arrears of 20.8 K, fathers income 60.8 K |
|
61 |
61 |
10.4 |
50.6 |
15.9 |
4.5 |
34.7 |
30.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Roote v. Thompson, 2005 CanLII 47790 (ON S.C.) |
863 |
|
$ 863 per month child support based on income of 61 K, 4.5 K retroactive arrears |
|
62.9 |
62.9 |
16.0 |
44.9 |
16.5 |
1.4 |
28.4 |
27.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Shaw v. Friesen, 2007 CanLII 19796 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
|
1 K per month child support, s.7 expenses, 1.4 K arrears, mans income 69.2 K |
|
63 |
63 |
17.4 |
45.6 |
16.5 |
71.0 |
29.1 |
(41.9) |
|
|
c |
s |
Huber v. Huber, 2003 CanLII 2134 (ON S.C.) |
1120 |
|
$1120 per month child support and half s.7 expenses, 71 K retroactive arrears, man makes 63 K per year |
|
63.2 |
63.2 |
6.4 |
57.0 |
16.6 |
0.0 |
40.4 |
40.4 |
|
|
c |
o |
Nikita v. Nikita, 2002 CanLII 46584 (ON C.J.) |
531 |
|
$ 531 per month child support and $ 295 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 63.2 K |
|
65 |
46 |
5.6 |
59.4 |
17.1 |
10.0 |
42.3 |
32.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Vangroenigen v. Vangroenigen, 2005 CanLII 38896 (ON S.C.) |
466 |
|
$ 466 per month child support, $ 500 per month spousal support terminated for 10 K lump sum payment, man declares 46 K income but is imputed to 65 K for overtime |
|
66 |
66 |
8.4 |
57.6 |
17.4 |
0.0 |
40.2 |
40.2 |
|
|
c |
o |
Whitlock v. Whitlock, 2005 ONCJ 266 (CanLII) |
696 |
|
$ 696 per month child support, mans income 66 K per year |
|
66 |
66 |
14.9 |
51.1 |
17.4 |
20.2 |
33.7 |
13.5 |
|
|
c |
o |
Kent v. Schellenberg, 2005 ONCJ 260 (CanLII) |
908 |
|
$ 550 per month child support and 4.3 K university expenses, 35 months at $ 500 per month retroactive arrears and 2.7 K for past years s.7 expenses, man earns 66 K per year |
|
67 |
33 |
7.2 |
59.8 |
17.8 |
11.0 |
42.0 |
31.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Rivard v. Hankiewicz, 2007 ONCJ 180 (CanLII) |
603 |
|
$ 555 per month child support and $ 53 per month s.7 expenses, 11 K retroactive arrears, man claims 37 K and is grossed up to 67 K |
|
67 |
67 |
12.6 |
54.4 |
17.8 |
7.9 |
36.6 |
28.7 |
|
|
c |
y |
Shea v. Fraser, 2007 ONCA 224 (CanLII) |
1048 |
|
$ 600 per month child support and $ 448 per month s.7 expenses, 7.9 K arrears, man declares bankruptcy, mans income 67 K |
|
67.3 |
67.3 |
16.0 |
51.3 |
17.9 |
0.0 |
33.4 |
33.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pepin v. Jung, 2003 CanLII 2048 (ON S.C.) |
1330 |
|
$ 900 per month child support, $ 430 in s.7 expenses per month, mans income 67.3 K per year |
|
68. |
68 |
13.5 |
54.5 |
18.1 |
0.0 |
36.4 |
36.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Byrne v. Byrne, 2003 CanLII 2073 (ON S.C.) |
1123 |
|
$ 1123 child support per month, spousal support terminated, mans income 68.4 K per year |
|
69 |
12 |
14.4 |
54.6 |
18.4 |
14.0 |
36.2 |
22.2 |
|
|
c |
s |
Alsafouti v. Alsafouti, 2005 CanLII 34576 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support, 14 K arrears, man loses job and claims income of 12 K but imputed to 69 K former level, no recession, drivers license removed |
|
71.3 |
71.3 |
7.9 |
63.4 |
19.1 |
0.0 |
44.3 |
44.3 |
|
|
c |
o |
Cocirla v. Barbu and Marques, 2006 ONCJ 278 (CanLII) |
656 |
|
$ 656 per month child support, man has income of 71.3 K |
|
72 |
14.4 |
7.9 |
64.1 |
19.3 |
7.9 |
44.8 |
36.9 |
|
|
c |
o |
Pinnock v. McDowell (Clarke), 2007 ONCJ 327 (CanLII) |
661 |
|
$ 661 per month child support, 3 years retroactive support, man claims 14.4 K and is imputed to 72 K per year income |
|
72.5 |
0.0 |
|
|
20.6 |
42.5 |
|
|
|
|
c |
s |
Burisch v. Gosal, 2007 CanLII 2647 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support for 1 child at 72.5 K income per year, 42.5 K arrears, imputed at 72.5 K per year while unemployed |
|
73 |
41 |
7.2 |
65.8 |
20.8 |
0.0 |
45.0 |
45.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Chute v. Chute, 2006 CanLII 1915 (ON S.C.) |
596 |
|
$ 596 per month in child support, variation denied, spousal support claim pending, man claims 41 K income after bankruptcy and is imputed to 73 K |
|
75 |
26 |
8.2 |
66.8 |
21.4 |
0.0 |
45.4 |
45.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kowalczyk v. Slavner, 2006 CanLII 40996 (ON S.C.) |
680 |
|
$ 680 per month interim child support, man claims income of 26 K and is imputed to 75 K |
|
75 |
75 |
9.3 |
65.7 |
21.4 |
2.7 |
44.3 |
41.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Lee v. Dunphy, 2006 ONCJ 499 (CanLII)
|
778 |
|
$ 688 per month child support and $ 90 s.7 expenses per month based on an income of 75 K, 2.7 K costs |
|
75 |
75 |
7.3 |
67.7 |
21.4 |
0.0 |
46.3 |
46.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Nebel v. Robertson, 2003 CanLII 4374 (ON S.C.) |
606 |
|
$ 606 per month child support changed to guidelines from separation agreement amount of $ 300, mans income 75 K per year |
|
77 |
34 |
12.0 |
65.0 |
22.1 |
0.0 |
42.9 |
42.9 |
|
|
c |
s |
Hagner v. Hawkins, 2005 CanLII 43294 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
|
$ 1000 per month child support upheld, intentionally unemployed, 34 K income as teacher imputed to 77 K |
|
77 |
77 |
12.0 |
65.0 |
22.1 |
66.9 |
42.9 |
(24.0) |
|
|
c |
o |
Sodoski v. Dudgeon, 2004 ONCJ 424 (CanLII) |
1000 |
|
$ 1000 per month child support, 26.9 K arrears, 40 K retroactive s.7 expenses, man makes 77 K |
|
80 |
35 |
9.1 |
69.9 |
23.1 |
0.0 |
46.6 |
46.6 |
|
|
c |
s |
Laufer v. Laufer, 2006 CanLII 32997 (ON S.C.) |
719 |
|
$ 719 per month child support, 83 % s.7 expenses, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 80 K |
|
80.1 |
76.4 |
12.5 |
67.6 |
23.2 |
0.0 |
44.4 |
44.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Fantin v. Gillingham-Corkun Fantin, 2003 CanLII 2114 (ON S.C.) |
1043 |
|
$ 639 per month child support and $ 404 s.7 expenses, man claims 76.4 K and is imputed to 80.1 K |
|
81 |
0.0 |
8.8 |
72.2 |
23.4 |
2.8 |
48.8 |
46.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pysznyj v. Pysznyj, 2007 CanLII 4881 (ON S.C.) |
734 |
|
$ 734 per month child support, 2.8 K retroactive arrears, man on unemployment is imputed to 81 K per year. |
|
81 |
35 |
7.6 |
73.4 |
23.4 |
0.0 |
50.0 |
50.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
O'Brien v. O'Brien, 2003 CanLII 2366 (ON S.C.) |
643 |
|
$ 643 per month child support, man claims 35 K income and is imputed to 81 K |
|
81.7 |
81.7 |
16.3 |
65.4 |
25.4 |
22.0 |
40.0 |
18.0 |
|
|
c |
o |
Sharpley v. Sharpley, 2005 ONCJ 483 (CanLII) |
1360 |
|
$ 1360 per month child support raised from $ 858 that was based on false income, mans income 81.7 K, 15 K retroactive arrears, 6 K contempt award and 1 K costs |
|
83 |
83 |
16.7 |
66.3 |
25.8 |
8.2 |
40.2 |
32.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pollen v. Pollen, 2004 CanLII 5073 (ON S.C.) |
1392 |
|
$1200 and $ 192 retroactive child support for child who is now no longer dependant, 8 K lump sum support, man makes 83 K per year |
|
83.3 |
83.3 |
15.1 |
68.2 |
25.9 |
0.0 |
42.3 |
42.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Lane v. Lane, 2002 CanLII 2794 (ON S.C.) |
1261 |
|
$ 918 per month child support and $ 343 per month s.7 expenses, mans income 83.3 K |
|
85 |
85 |
26.0 |
59.0 |
32.6 |
0.0 |
26.4 |
26.4 |
|
|
c |
s |
Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 2003 CanLII 2227 (ON S.C.) |
691 |
|
$ 691 per month child support for one child and 50 % of the university expenses for the other child, mans income is 85 K |
|
88 |
30 |
14.7 |
73.3 |
33.9 |
40.0 |
39.4 |
(0.6) |
|
|
c |
s |
Kimla v. Golds, 2005 CanLII 6928 (ON S.C.) |
894 |
|
$ 794 per month child support and $ 100 s.7 expense and 54 % of school expenses, man claims 30 K income imputed to 88 K, 40 K arrears |
|
90 |
13 |
9.7 |
80.3 |
34.7 |
30.0 |
45.6 |
15.6 |
|
|
c |
o |
Azevedo v. Clements, 2003 CanLII 20711 (ON C.J.)
|
806 |
|
Man must pay $ 806 per month child support and 30 K arrears because he cannot make a 28 K lump sum payment, man claims 13 K income and is imputed to 90 K |
|
90 |
90 |
18.5 |
71.5 |
34.7 |
9.7 |
36.8 |
27.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Bromley v. Brown, 2005 CanLII 19798 (ON S.C.) |
1209 |
|
$ 1209 per month child support, s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears, mans income 90 K |
|
96 |
28 |
14.4 |
81.6 |
37.3 |
28.0 |
44.3 |
16.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Di Matteo v. Del Medico, 2005 CanLII 27011 (ON S.C.) |
1200 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support, income imputed to 96 K from claimed 28 K, retroactive arrears |
|
99 |
58 |
11.1 |
87.9 |
38.6 |
0.0 |
49.3 |
49.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Chrysler v. Chrysler, 2006 CanLII 9596 (ON S.C.) |
927 |
|
$927 per month child support, mans income imputed from 58 K to 99 K |
|
100 |
60 |
10.6 |
89.4 |
39.1 |
0.0 |
50.3 |
50.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Clifford v. Heinzl, 2007 CanLII 23335 (ON S.C.) |
877 |
|
$ 877 per month child support, man claims 60 K income and is imputed to 100 K |
|
101 |
101 |
10.7 |
90.3 |
39.5 |
9.7 |
58.5 |
49.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Kourany v. Salem, 2006 CanLII 15908 (ON S.C.) |
889 |
|
$ 889 per month child support, retroactive arrears, mans income 101.6 K per year |
|
110 |
110 |
18.1 |
91.4 |
44.1 |
0.0 |
47.3 |
47.3 |
|
|
c |
s |
Sprason v. Murray, 2007 CanLII 26613 (ON S.C.) |
1506 |
|
$ 959 child support per month and $ 6572 per year s.7 expense, mans income 110 K per year |
|
132 |
132 |
21.4 |
110.8 |
56.6 |
70.0 |
54.2 |
(15.8) |
|
|
c |
s |
Wilson v. Sinden, 2007 CanLII 47161 (ON S.C.) |
1783 |
|
$ 1783 per month child support, 70 K in arrears,mans income 132 K per year |
|
139 |
61 |
25.2 |
113.8 |
59.7 |
0.0 |
54.1 |
54.1 |
|
|
c |
s |
Vanderzalm v. Vanderzalm, 2003 CanLII 2356 (ON S.C.) |
2100 |
|
$1500 spousal support and $ 2100 child support changed to $ 2100 child support, man claims income of 61 K but must pay on an income of 139 K per year |
|
250 |
250 |
12.0 |
238.0 |
111.4 |
0.0 |
126.6 |
126.6 |
|
|
c |
y |
Tierney-Hynes v. Hynes, 2005 CanLII 35770 (ON C.A.) |
1000 |
|
Originally $ 1500 child support and $ 300 spousal support, varied in Manitoba to 1 K child support, appeal of dismissal of spousal support allowed, man makes 250 K per year |
|
2000 |
2000 |
181.2 |
1818.8 |
928.0 |
0.0 |
890.0 |
890.0 |
|
|
c |
s |
Pakka v. Nygard, 2004 CanLII 5071 (ON S.C.) |
15100 |
|
15.1 K per month child support, mans income 2000 K per year |
|
|
60 |
48.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Fair v. Fair, 2004 CanLII 16762 (ON S.C.) |
2000 |
2000 |
2 K per month spousal support, 2 K per month child support, man claims income of 60 K and is imputed higher, wife is unemployed |
|
21.6 |
21.6 |
7.0 |
14.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
14.6 |
14.6 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Pickard v. Pickard, 2005 CanLII 23688 (ON S.C.) |
287 |
300 |
$ 187 child support and $ 100 per month s.7 expenses and $ 300 per month spousal support, lump sum of 5 K child support already paid, mans income 21.6 K, wife is unemployed |
|
45 |
45 |
39.2 |
5.8 |
4.1 |
13.0 |
1.7 |
(11.3) |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Mondino v. Mondino, 2004 CanLII 21293 (ON S.C.) |
1968 |
1300 |
1.3 K per month spousal support and $ 635 per month child support and 16 K per year s.7 expense, 10 months retroactive arrears of spousal support, man makes reduced 45 K and wife is unemployed and will be imputed to imputed to 20 K in 3 months and spousal support cut to 1 K per month |
|
56 |
30 |
10.7 |
45.3 |
13.4 |
0.0 |
31.9 |
31.9 |
0.0 |
|
b |
o |
Dacres v. Dacres, 2007 ONCJ 622 (CanLII)
|
769 |
250 |
$ 250 spousal support per month and $ 519 in child support and 65 % of s.7 expenses, man claims 30 K income and is imputed to 56 K, wife is unemployed |
|
64 |
57 |
18.9 |
45.1 |
14.2 |
0.0 |
30.9 |
30.9 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Patkau v. Patkau, 2005 CanLII 49673 (ON S.C.) |
868 |
700 |
$ 868 per month child support and $ 700 spousal support, man claims an income of 57 K and is held to payments at 64 K, wife is unemployed |
|
65 |
65 |
18.5 |
46.5 |
13.4 |
0.0 |
33.1 |
33.1 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Milunovic v. Milunovic, 2004 CanLII 19101 (ON S.C.) |
543 |
1000 |
$ 1000 spousal support and $ 543 child support, man earns 65 K per year and wife is a student |
|
66 |
46 |
30.6 |
35.4 |
12.6 |
0.0 |
22.8 |
22.8 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Korevaar v. Allard, 2003 CanLII 2151 (ON S.C.) |
1320 |
1230 |
1.23 K spousal support per month, 1.32 K child support per month including daycare, man claims 46 K income and is imputed to 66 K per year |
|
67 |
67 |
30.0 |
37.0 |
6.9 |
0.0 |
30.1 |
30.1 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Shantz v. Shantz, 2003 CanLII 2416 (ON S.C.) |
500 |
2000 |
2 K per month interim spousal support, 0.5 K per month child support, man makes 67 K per year and wife has no income |
|
75 |
75 |
30.0 |
45.0 |
16.5 |
0.0 |
28.5 |
28.5 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Kreklewich v. Kreklewich, 2003 CanLII 1963 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
1000 |
1 K spousal support per month, 1.5 K child support per month for 4 children, variation denied, man earns 75 K per year |
|
77 |
0.0 |
30.0 |
47.0 |
15.3 |
3.5 |
31.7 |
28.2 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Dhanna v. Dhanna, 2004 CanLII 46660 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
1500 |
1.5 K spousal support per month, 1 K child support per month, 3.5 K retroactive arrears, man is unemployed, variation denied, income imputed to 77 K per year, wife is student. |
|
77 |
28 |
46.8 |
30.2 |
6.8 |
0.0 |
23.4 |
23.4 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Ayoub v. Osman, 2006 CanLII 9309 (ON S.C.) |
1000 |
2900 |
$ 2900 per month spousal support, 1 K per year child support, man claims 28 K and income imputed to 77 K, variation denied |
|
77.5 |
77.5 |
22.8 |
54.7 |
17.6 |
35.0 |
37.1 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
|
b |
o |
Schisler v. Schisler, 2004 ONCJ 324 (CanLII) |
1000 |
900 |
1K per month child support and $ 900 per month spousal support, retroactive child support going back almost 3 years but no retroactive spousal support, man makes 77.5 K and wife claims no income |
|
81 |
28 |
24.1 |
56.9 |
15.9 |
90.0 |
41.0 |
(49.0) |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Skramrud v. Skramrud, 2007 CanLII 51173 (ON S.C.) |
400 |
2500 |
2.5 K spousal per month, $ 400 child support, lump sum of 90 K, man is imputed to former 81 K pay from actual 28 K for taking voluntary retirement, wife has no income |
|
83 |
70 |
34.6 |
48.4 |
17.7 |
0.0 |
30.7 |
30.7 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Stoyshin v. Stoyshin, 2007 CanLII 15478 (ON S.C.) |
1530 |
1350 |
$ 1350 per month spouasal support and $ 1250 per month child support and $ 280 per month s.7 expenses, man claims 70 K income and is imputed to 83 K, wife is a student |
|
84 |
20 |
21.9 |
62.1 |
21.4 |
0.0 |
40.7 |
40.7 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Ul Haq v. Ul Haq, 2003 CanLII 2263 (ON S.C.)
|
1078 |
750 |
$ 1078 total child support per month and $ 750 spousal support, man claims 20 K income imputed to 84 K per year, wife has no income |
|
88 |
83 |
26.3 |
56.7 |
19.8 |
12.0 |
36.9 |
24.9 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Nanan v. Nanan, 2006 CanLII 12718 (ON S.C.) |
691 |
1500 |
$ 691 per month child support and $ 1500 per month spousal support, man pays 2 K per month mortgage for home wife occupies, income imputed from claimed 83 K to 88 K, wife has no income |
|
97 |
97 |
39.6 |
57.4 |
25.8 |
0.0 |
31.6 |
31.6 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Gentle v. Gentle, 2007 CanLII 17028 (ON S.C.) |
2131 |
1171 |
$ 2131 per month child support for 4 children based on an income of 97 K, $ 1171 per month spousal support |
|
250 |
72 |
72.3 |
178.0 |
|
20.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Giacco v. Papadopoulos, 2006 CanLII 40790 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Combined $ 6021 per month child support and spousal support, husband claims 72 K income and is imputed to 250 K, wife get interim disbursement of 25 K, 20 K costs |
|
100 |
100 |
44.4 |
55.6 |
17.2 |
33.0 |
38.4 |
5.4 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Romanenko v. Stolarsky, 2005 CanLII 9677 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
2900 |
2.9 K per month indefinite spousal support, 0.8 K per month child support, retroactive arrears, man does not submit financial documents and is imputed to 100 K per year income, 11K costs |
|
110 |
46 |
42.0 |
68.0 |
33.0 |
22.0 |
35.0 |
13.0 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Rae v. Rae, 2006 CanLII 33674 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
2000 |
2 K per month interim spousal support, 1.5 K per month child support, retroactive arrears, man claims 46 K income and is imputed to 110 K per year, wife is unemployed |
|
110 |
75 |
54.0 |
56.0 |
25.3 |
0.0 |
30.7 |
30.7 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Teodoro v. Quintaneiro, 2006 CanLII 820 (ON S.C.) |
1300 |
3200 |
3.2 K spousal support per month, 1.3 K child support per month, man claims 75 K income and is imputed to 110, wife is unemployed |
|
125 |
125 |
48.0 |
77.0 |
36.9 |
0.0 |
40.1 |
40.1 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Chrobok v. Chrobok, 2006 CanLII 27308 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
2500 |
1.5 K per month child support and 2.5 K per month spousal support, mans income 125 K per year and wife is unemployed |
|
129 |
129 |
36.5 |
92.5 |
43.8 |
0.0 |
48.7 |
48.7 |
0.0 |
|
b |
o |
K.J.B. v. S.M., 2006 ONCJ 87 (CanLII) |
1544 |
1500 |
$ 1544 per month child support and $ 1500 per month spousal support, man has 129 K income and wife is unemployed |
|
144 |
144 |
61.2 |
82.8 |
41.6 |
22.0 |
41.2 |
19.2 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Sciuk v. Sciuk, 2005 CanLII 16642 (ON S.C.) |
2250 |
2850 |
5.1 K combined interim child and spousal support, retroactive arrears, mans income at least 144 K and wife is unemployed |
|
194 |
194 |
88.0 |
106.0 |
51.8 |
0.0 |
54.2 |
54.2 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Church v. Church, 2003 CanLII 1942 (ON S.C.) |
1700 |
5300 |
5.3 K per month spousal support and 1.7 child support per month and s.7 expenses, fathers gross income 194 K and salary 125 K per year |
|
200 |
100 |
120.0 |
80.0 |
|
40.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Graham v. Graham, 2005 CanLII 23682 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
10 K per month combined child and spousal support, man claims 100 K and is imputed to 200 K, wife is unemployed, 40 K costs |
|
221 |
221 |
67.2 |
153.8 |
92.4 |
0.0 |
61.0 |
61.0 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Celotti v. Celotti, 2007 CanLII 23909 (ON S.C.) |
4600 |
1000 |
$ 3.6 K per month child support, and 1 K per month s.7 expenses and 2 K per month spousal support, man makes 221 K per year and wife is unemployed |
|
300 |
300 |
87.6 |
212.4 |
61.7 |
0.0 |
210.7 |
210.7 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Liao v. Liao, 2003 CanLII 2167 (ON S.C.) |
800 |
6500 |
6.5 K per month spousal support, 0.8 K per month child support, mans income is 300 K wife is unemployed |
|
355 |
62 |
69.6 |
285.4 |
149.0 |
140.0 |
136.4 |
(4.0) |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Jackson v. Jackson, 2005 CanLII 6371 (ON S.C.) |
3800 |
2000 |
2 K per month spousal support, 3.8 K per month child support, 140 K arrears, mans income changes from 355 to 62 K per year but he must continue paying at 355 income level, only 1000 per month to be enforced until trial but he must pay arrears to participate at trial. |
|
388 |
388 |
138.0 |
250.0 |
139.2 |
0.0 |
110.8 |
110.8 |
0.0 |
|
b |
y |
Adams v. Adams, 2001 CanLII 8527 (ON C.A.)
|
5000 |
6500 |
5 K per month spousal support, 6.5 K child support per month, man earns average 388 K per year |
|
500 |
500 |
180.0 |
320.0 |
182.9 |
0.0 |
137.1 |
137.1 |
0.0 |
|
b |
s |
Sharf v. Sharf, 2004 CanLII 5765 (ON S.C.) |
7000 |
8000 |
8 K spousal support, 7 K child support per month, man imputed to 500 K per year income wife has no income |
|
700 |
700 |
282.0 |
418.0 |
231.1 |
559.0 |
186.9 |
(372.1) |
0.0 |
|
b |
y |
Wildman v. Wildman, 2006 CanLII 33540 (ON C.A.) |
7500 |
16000 |
16 K per month spousal support and 7.5 K per month child support, 524 K arrears, 350 security deposit, appeal dismissed, 35 K costs, man makes around 700 K and wife is unemployed |
|
76 |
76 |
24.5 |
51.5 |
21.8 |
0.0 |
29.7 |
29.7 |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
Tustian v. Dancey, 2004 CanLII 48179 (ON S.C.) |
1922 |
|
$ 1922 per month child support including $ 300 s.7 expenses, must pay $ 111 per month for insurance covering children too, support obligations for a second divorce and 2 kids with present partner, man earns 76 K, wife is remarried and new husband earns 160 K and supports her |
|
114 |
114 |
39.6 |
74.4 |
45.1 |
79.0 |
29.3 |
(49.7) |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
Shamess v. Berry, 2006 CanLII 41003 (ON S.C.) |
3300 |
|
1.8 K per month indexed child support, 1.5 K per month s.7 expenses, 79 K arrears, variation denied, man makes 114 K per year and wife is unemployed |
|
250 |
64 |
48.9 |
201.1 |
111.4 |
22.0 |
89.7 |
67.7 |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
Bruzas v. Bruzas, 2005 CanLII 36267 (ON S.C.) |
3400 |
|
3.4 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, reteroactive arrears, man claims 64 K income and is imputed to 250 K |
|
502 |
502 |
180.0 |
322.0 |
228.3 |
12.0 |
93.7 |
81.7 |
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
V.A.W. v. R.C.L., 2004 CanLII 7043 (ON S.C.) |
15000 |
|
15 K per month ongoing child support, 12 K retroactive arrears, man makes over 500 K and wife is unemployed |
|
811 |
766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
c |
s |
K.C. v. S.B., 2007 CanLII 17035 (ON S.C.) |
|
|
Support set on 811 K income for 1 child and at least $ 1.3 K per month s.7 expenses, 51 K s.7 expenses arrears, retoractive support and arrears, income imputed 45 K above declared |
|
281 |
281 |
92.4 |
188.6 |
97.9 |
23.0 |
90.7 |
67.7 |
0.5 |
|
b |
s |
Le Bel v. Chartrand, 2007 CanLII 50876 (ON S.C.) |
2700 |
5000 |
5 K per month interim spousal support, 2.7 K per month child support, man also pays 23 K university expenses for older child not included in order, man earns 281 K and wife made $ 500 as an artist |
|
95 |
95 |
45.3 |
49.7 |
25.8 |
0.0 |
23.9 |
23.9 |
1.0 |
|
b |
s |
Kerr v. Kerr, 2005 CanLII 16613 (ON S.C.) |
2100 |
1000 |
1 K per month spousal support, 2.1 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, man makes 95 K and wife makes 1 K per year |
|
54 |
54 |
11.8 |
42.2 |
13.7 |
4.0 |
28.5 |
24.5 |
2.7 |
|
c |
s |
MacLeod v. MacLeod, 2003 CanLII 2328 (ON S.C.) |
982 |
|
$ 982 per month child support, spousal support of $ 1500 per month set aside, wife may make a new application for spousal support, mans income 54 K, wife claims 2.7 K income per year, retroactive arrears |
|
41.9 |
41.9 |
15.5 |
25.4 |
6.7 |
0.0 |
18.7 |
18.7 |
3.3 |
|
c |
s |
Kingsley v. Kingsley, 2006 CanLII 19038 (ON S.C.) |
960 |
|
$ 1200 per month child support varied to $ 960, s.7 expenses, mans income 41.9 K and wifes income 3.3 K per year |
|
20.8 |
20.8 |
1.2 |
19.6 |
2.3 |
0.9 |
17.3 |
16.4 |
4.8 |
|
c |
o |
D.H. v. C.B., 2006 ONCJ 521 (CanLII)
|
100 |
|
$ 100 per month child support as guidelines would be undue hardship, 7 ½ year retroactive claim rejected and $ 900 retroactive order made, mans income 20.8 K and wifes income 4.8 K per year. |
|
44 |
44 |
19.2 |
24.8 |
2.3 |
22.9 |
22.5 |
(0.4) |
6.5 |
|
b |
s |
Sh. Ι. C. v. G. P., 2003 CanLII 2028 (ON S.C.) |
499 |
1100 |
$ 1100 per month spousal support with 12 K retroactive lump, $ 374 per month child support and 125 per month s.7 expense, 10.9 K retroactive arrears, proceeds from sale of home to be held as security, hasnt seen child in 1 ½ years, permanent restraining order, man makes 44 K and wife on social assistance |
|
49 |
49 |
23.7 |
25.3 |
4.7 |
1.6 |
19.6 |
18.0 |
6.5 |
|
b |
s |
V. W. v. Wa. T., 2005 CanLII 2752 (ON S.C.)
|
575 |
1400 |
$ 1400 spousal support per month and $ 420 child support and $ 155 s.7 expenses, arrears 1.6 K, man makes 49 K and wife is on social assistance |
|
110 |
60 |
58.2 |
51.8 |
16.2 |
0.0 |
35.6 |
35.6 |
6.5 |
|
b |
o |
Downer v. Alexander, 2005 ONCJ 245 (CanLII) |
850 |
4000 |
4 K spousal support per month, 0.8 K child support per month, man claims income of 60 K and is imputed to 110 K per year, wife is on social assistance |
|
50 |
10 |
22.8 |
27.2 |
5.5 |
59.0 |
21.7 |
37.3 |
7 |
|
b |
s |
Ostap v. Ostap, 2003 CanLII 2193 (ON S.C.) |
750 |
1150 |
$ 750 child support and $ 1150 spousal support with 59 K arrears, arrears and spousal support rescinded to lump sum spousal support of 35 K if he can pay it, man claims 10 K income but must pay at former 50 K imuted level, wife earns 7 K per year |
|
84 |
84 |
35.0 |
49.0 |
19.3 |
17.0 |
29.7 |
12.7 |
7 |
|
b |
s |
Marsbergen v. Marsbergen, 2006 CanLII 3969 (ON S.C.) |
1916 |
1000 |
1 K per month spousal support, 1.4 K per month child support and maximum 6.2 K annual s.7 expense not including dental work , retroactive, arrears 17 K, man earns 64 K and wife eans 7 K per year |
|
84 |
75 |
12.5 |
71.5 |
29.2 |
0.0 |
42.3 |
42.3 |
7.3 |
|
c |
s |
Boissy v. Boissy, 2004 CanLII 7047 (ON S.C.) |
1043 |
|
$ 1043 per month interim child support, man claims average income of 75 K and is imputed to 84 K due to non taxable non cash benefits, wifes income before support 7.3 K, husband declares bankruptcy |
|
20 |
20 |
15.6 |
4.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
7.5 |
|
b |
y |
Arvai v. Arvai, 2001 CanLII 24142 (ON C.A.) |
296 |
1000 |
1 K per month spousal support and $ 296 per month child support, upheld on appeal, man makes 20 K and wife makes 7.5 K per year |
|
56 |
56 |
14.9 |
41.1 |
11.6 |
2.5 |
29.5 |
27.0 |
7.5 |
|
b |
s |
Martin v. Blanchard, 2007 CanLII 26612 (ON S.C.) |
519 |
723 |
$ 519 child support per month and 2.5 K retroactive arrears and $ 723 per month spousal support, mans income 56 K and wifes income 7.5 K per year |
|
65 |
65 |
29.2 |
35.8 |
13.4 |
9.7 |
22.4 |
12.7 |
7.5 |
|
b |
s |
Lee v. Lee, 2004 CanLII 5056 (ON S.C.) |
1100 |
1000 |
1 K per month spousal support retroactive, 1.1 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, previous lump sum payment, mans income variable set at 65 K and wifes income 7.5 K per year |
|
27.9 |
27.9 |
5.4 |
22.5 |
3.3 |
5.8 |
19.2 |
13.4 |
8 |
|
b |
s |
Hart v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 2129 (ON S.C.) |
248 |
200 |
$ 248 child support and $ 200 spousal support per month, 5.8 K arrears, mans income imputed to 27.9 K and wife claims 8 K |
|
120 |
31 |
30.4 |
89.6 |
43.5 |
225.0 |
46.1 |
(178.9) |
8 |
|
b |
s |
Trick v. Trick, 2003 CanLII 2260 (ON S.C.) |
1400 |
800 |
Average $ 800 spousal support and 1.4 K child support, 75 % s.7 expenses, retroactive arrears of 225 K, man claims 31 K income and is imputed to 120 K per year, wife makes 8 K |
|
31.2 |
31.2 |
3.4 |
27.8 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
23.3 |
23.3 |
8.6 |
|
c |
o |
Pollard v. Deale, 2003 CanLII 27021 (ON C.J.).. |
281 |
|
$ 281 per month child support based on an income of 31.2 K, wife makes 8.6 K per year |
|
82.4 |
82.4 |
21.4 |
61.0 |
17.3 |
18.5 |
43.7 |
25.2 |
8.9 |
|
b |
s |
Laprise v. Laprise, 2004 CanLII 23638 (ON S.C.) |
380 |
1400 |
$380 child support and $ 1200 spousal support increased to $ 1400, 18.5 K retroactive arrears, mans income 82.4 K and wifes income 8.9 K per year |
|
225 |
170 |
72.0 |
153.0 |
92.3 |
22.0 |
60.7 |
38.7 |
8.9 |
|
b |
s |
Salzmann v. Salzmann, 2004 CanLII 5009 (ON S.C.) |
2400 |
3600 |
3.6 K spousal support per month, 2 K child support per month and $ 400 per month s.7 expense, retroactive arrears, man claims 170 K per year income and is imputed to 225 K, wife has 8.9 K interest income |
|
100 |
100 |
32.5 |
71.5 |
25.5 |
9.7 |
46.0 |
36.3 |
9.6 |
|
b |
s |
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc, 2006 CanLII 24337 (ON S.C.) |
878 |
1500 |
$ 1500 per month spousal suport and $ 878 per month child support increased from $ 700 retroactively, man makes 100 K per year and wife makes 9.6 K before support |
|
40 |
40 |
8.9 |
31.1 |
5.3 |
0.0 |
25.8 |
25.8 |
10 |
|
b |
s |
Jarzebinski v. Jarzebinski, 2004 CanLII 36075 (ON S.C.) |
345 |
400 |
$ 400 spousal support and $ 345 child support per month, man earns 40 K per year wife earns 10 K |
|
45 |
8 |
16.6 |
28.4 |
4.8 |
30.0 |
23.6 |
(6.4) |
10 |
|
b |
s |
Hitchens v. Hitchens, 2004 CanLII 12899 (ON S.C.) |
387 |
1000 |
$ 1000 per month spousal support and $ 387 child support, 30 K spousal support lump sum payment too, 10 K equalization, man claims 8 K income and is imputed to 45 K, wife has income of 10 K per year |
|
66 |
66 |
17.4 |
48.6 |
14.1 |
0.0 |
34.5 |
34.5 |
10 |
|
b |
s |
Erb v. Erb, 2003 CanLII 2112 (ON S.C.) |
548 |
900 |
$ 548 child support and $ 900 spousal support, mans income 66 K and wifes income 10 K per year |
|
75 |
75 |
19.4 |
55.6 |
17.8 |
0.0 |
37.8 |
37.8 |
10 |
|
b |
s |
C.J.A. v. L.R.G., 2004 CanLII 18593 (ON S.C.) |
979 |
640 |
$ 979 child support and $ 640 spousal support, spousal support limited to one final year and gradually reduced, mans income 75 K and wifes income 10 K per year |
|
151 |
151 |
72.0 |
79.0 |
37.8 |
15.0 |
41.2 |
26.2 |
10 |
|
b |
s |
Rothenburg v. Rothenburg, 2003 CanLII 2229 (ON S.C.) |
1500 |
4500 |
4.5 K per month spousal support, 1.5 K child support per month, 15 K retroactive arrears, man makes 151 K per year wife makes 10 K |
|
177 |
177 |
68.8 |
108.2 |
42.5 |
23.0 |
65.7 |
42.7 |
10 |
|
b |
s |
Cade v. Rotstein, 2002 CanLII 2811 (ON S.C.) |
1800 |
3600 |
3.6 spousal support per month, 1.8 K per month child support and s.7 expenses, 23 K retroactive arrears, 177 K imputed to husband and 10 K imputed to wife |
|
332 |
208 |
108.0 |
224.0 |
118.8 |
0.0 |
105.2 |
105.2 |
10 |
|
b |
s |
Biddle v. Biddle, 2004 CanLII 52809 (ON S.C.) |
3500 |
5500 |
5.5 K spousal support, 3.5 K child support per month, mans declared income of 208 K imputed to 332 K, wifes income 10 K |
|
30 |
30 |
5.4 |
24.6 |
4.2 |
12.0 |
20.4 |
8.4 |
10 |
|
c |
s |
Tyll v. Dini-Tyll, 2003 CanLII 2262 (ON S.C.) |
446 |
|
$ 446 per month child support, arrears, income imputed to 30 K, wife makes 10 K per year |
|
38 |
38 |
5.0 |
33.0 |
5.9 |
3.2 |
27.1 |
23.9 |
10 |
|
c |
o |
Jepson v. Cresnjovec, 2007 ONCJ 466 (CanLII) |
415 |
|
$ 415 per month child support, 3.2 K retroactive lump sum, mans income 38 K wifes average income 10 K |
|
60 |
60 |